Epstein's ex, Ghislaine Maxwell, doesn't want grand jury transcripts released
By JENNIFER PELTZ
Jeffrey Epstein 's former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, wants to keep grand jury records secret in the sex trafficking case that sent her to prison, her lawyers said Tuesday as prosecutors continued urging a court to release some of those records in the criminal case-turned-political fireball.
Maxwell hasn't seen the material herself, her attorneys said — the grand jury process is conducted behind closed doors. But she opposes unsealing what her lawyers described as potentially 'hearsay-laden' transcripts of grand jury testimony, which was given in secret and without her lawyers there to challenge it.
'Whatever interest the public may have in Epstein, that interest cannot justify a broad intrusion into grand jury secrecy in a case where the defendant is alive, her legal options are viable and her due process rights remain,' attorneys David O. Markus and Melissa Madrigal wrote.
Prosecutors declined to comment.
Government attorneys have been trying to quell a clamor for transparency by seeking the transcripts' release — though the government also says the public already knows much of what's in the documents.
Most of the information 'was made publicly available at trial or has otherwise been publicly reported through the public statements of victims and witnesses,' prosecutors wrote in court papers Monday. They noted that the disclosures excluded some victims' and witnesses' names.
Prosecutors had also said last week that some of what the grand jurors heard eventually came out at Maxwell's 2021 trial and in various victims' lawsuits. There were only two grand jury witnesses, both of them law enforcement officials, prosecutors said.
Prosecutors made clear Monday that they're seeking to unseal only the transcripts of grand jury witnesses' testimony, not the exhibits that accompanied it. But they are also working to parse how much of the exhibits also became public record over the years.
While prosecutors have sought to temper expectations about any new revelations from the grand jury proceedings, they aren't proposing to release a cache of other information the government collected while looking into Epstein.
The transcript faceoff comes six years after authorities said Epstein killed himself while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges and four years after Maxwell was convicted of grooming underage girls to participate in sex acts with him. The British socialite denied the allegations and has appealed her conviction, so far unsuccessfully.
Some of President Donald Trump's allies spent years suggesting there was more to the Epstein saga than met the eye and calling for more disclosures. A few got powerful positions in Trump's Justice Department — and then faced backlash after it abruptly announced that nothing more would be released and that a long-rumored Epstein 'client list' doesn't exist.
After trying unsuccessfully to change the subject and denigrating his own supporters for not moving on, the Republican president told Attorney General Pam Bondi to ask courts to unseal the grand jury transcripts in the case.
A top Justice Department official interviewed Maxwell late last month, at the government's request. Last week, she was moved from a federal prison in Florida to a prison camp in Texas to continue serving her 20-year sentence. Officials didn't explain why.
The Epstein uproar also has reached Congress, where the House Oversight Committee subpoenaed the Justice Department on Tuesday for files in the case. The committee also issued subpoenas to conduct sworn questioning of former President Bill Clinton, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and eight former top law enforcement officials.
Bill Clinton, a Democrat, was among a number of Epstein's famous former friends; so was Trump, a Republican. Both men have said they knew nothing of Epstein's crimes until he was charged, and Epstein's accusers have not alleged any wrongdoing by Trump or Clinton.
© Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Diplomat
5 hours ago
- The Diplomat
How Prabowo is Rewriting Indonesia's Diplomatic Playbook
With 26 overseas visits in nine months, the president is betting big on face-to-face diplomacy. His approach has won visibility, but critics warn of unintended regional consequences. Under President Prabowo Subianto, Indonesian diplomacy has taken a distinctive turn. Rather than relying solely on his foreign ministry, Prabowo has been personally performing diplomatic roles on the international stage. In the nine months since his inauguration on October 21, 2024, he has visited 26 countries for bilateral and multilateral meetings. This practice of diplomacy at the highest level is known as summit diplomacy. It involves heads of state or government engaging directly with their counterparts to negotiate, build trust or assert national interests. Summit diplomacy is not new or uncommon in international relations. Many political leaders have, from time to time, taken direct control over aspects of foreign policy. Historically, summit diplomacy reflected the urgency or gravity of the issues at hand — topics such as war and peace, nuclear disarmament or the founding of new global institutions. These were seen as matters too consequential to be delegated entirely to professional diplomats. Examples include the meetings between British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain and German Chancellor Adolf Hitler before World War II; the wartime conferences between Prime Minister Winston Churchill representing the U.K., President Franklin D. Roosevelt representing the United States, and Soviet leader Josef Stalin in 1945; U.S. President John F. Kennedy's 1961 summit with the USSR's Nikita Khrushchev; and U.S. President Ronald Reagan's meeting with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev in 1985. In more recent decades, however, summit diplomacy has broadened in scope. It is no longer confined to issues of high politics. Instead, it is increasingly used to advance economic, technological and regional agendas. Prabowo's approach fits within this trend, though his intensity and frequency of engagement mark a significant shift in Indonesia's diplomatic posture His preference for summit diplomacy may also reflect a key pledge, made during his presidential campaign, to raise Indonesia's global stature and expand its influence. Summit diplomacy supports this goal not only by enhancing visibility but also by signaling Indonesia's readiness to take on a more active role in global affairs. A president's personal involvement often attracts media attention and international recognition. More importantly, direct dialogue can build stronger bilateral ties and demonstrate Indonesia's commitment to multilateral frameworks. Mixed Results Prabowo, who was earlier defense minister, began his engagement with foreign affairs even before his inauguration as president by visiting 15 countries. At the 2023 Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, he sparked controversy with his proposal to end the war between Russia and Ukraine. Prabowo floated the idea of a demilitarized zone between Russia and Ukraine and a United Nations referendum in what he called disputed territory without consulting or informing his colleagues at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs or the president. His summit diplomacy as president has drawn praise from some quarters. His state visits to Saudi Arabia, Brazil, and various European countries have been described as highly productive. Indonesia's recent accession to the BRICS grouping of countries and his attendance at the 2025 BRICS Summit in Rio de Janeiro signalled Indonesia's deeper alignment with emerging global powers. A tangible outcome of Prabowo's summit diplomacy was the political agreement with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, which advanced the stalled Indonesia–European Union Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement. The agreement has since moved into its final negotiation stage. Similarly, Prabowo's direct phone diplomacy with U.S. President Donald Trump led to a breakthrough trade deal: the reduction of U.S. import tariffs on Indonesian goods from 32 percent to 19 percent. As a result, Indonesia now enjoys the lowest tariff rate of any Southeast Asian country trading with the United States. But summit diplomacy is not without its detractors. While it can help build partnerships or resolve crises, there are also instances where it has produced limited or even counterproductive outcomes. One such example is the 2018 meeting between Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un in Singapore. Hailed initially as a diplomatic breakthrough, the summit ended without a formal agreement and failed to halt North Korea's weapons program. Within months, tensions between the two countries had returned. The appeal of summit diplomacy lies in personal contact. When leaders meet face to face, they can cut through bureaucratic inertia and establish rapport that formal channels may struggle to achieve. However, the highly personalized nature of summit diplomacy also brings risk. Diplomacy conducted without sufficient institutional backing or consultation can lead to missteps. In Prabowo's case, his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping in November 2024 has generated controversy. The joint development agreement signed between the two leaders in disputed maritime areas was criticized for overlooking the sensitivities of Indonesia's ASEAN neighbors. Analysts warned that the move could heighten tensions in the already volatile South China Sea. Prabowo was also seen as making another blunder with his plan to evacuate 1,000 Palestinians from Gaza. To support his plan, Prabowo travelled to the five key countries on the Palestinian issue: the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Turkey, Egypt, Qatar, and Jordan. However, the plan did not resonate positively at home. At the same time, the major Arab countries have made it very clear that they reject any relocation plans for Palestinians out of their territories in Gaza and the occupied West Bank. Role of Institutions These two policies illustrate a broader concern: summit diplomacy, while useful for signaling intent and building momentum, often lacks the institutional depth needed for durable policy outcomes. Many high-profile summits conclude with joint declarations but no clear mechanisms for follow-up implementation. To be effective, summit diplomacy needs to be integrated into a broader institutional framework. Institutionalization helps ensure that agreements are not only negotiated but also monitored, executed and evaluated. This is especially true in multilateral settings, where complex coordination is required. Indonesia's hosting of the G20 Summit in 2022 offers a model of institutionalized summit diplomacy. Despite deep global divisions at the time over the war in Ukraine, rising inflation and economic instability, the G20 produced a joint communiqué. Much of the credit went to the preparatory work done by sherpas, the senior government officials who engaged in months of negotiations to craft language acceptable to all sides. Without this groundwork, the summit might have ended in deadlock. As Indonesia under Prabowo pursues a more assertive foreign policy, summit diplomacy will likely remain a key instrument. However, to avoid the pitfalls of over-personalization, it must be supported by sustained institutional engagement, regional coordination and clear implementation strategies. Originally published under Creative Commons by 360info™.
Yomiuri Shimbun
13 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
DOJ Escalates Probe into Claims Obama Officials Conspired in 2016 Election
The Justice Department moved forward with its investigation into whether the Obama administration broke federal laws while investigating Russia's involvement in the 2016 presidential election, demanding archived intelligence assessments from the nearly decade-old race, according to a letter obtained by The Washington Post. Attorney General Pam Bondi also separately ordered a grand jury to potentially hear evidence in the case, according to a person familiar with the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the ongoing probe. Together, the developments mark an escalation of the investigation into one of President Donald Trump's long-standing grievances – that President Barack Obama and his top officials tried to connect Trump with Russian efforts to influence his first run for the White House. They also suggest that the Justice Department plans to at least attempt to move the investigation from a nascent probe to one that has sufficient evidence to present to the courts. The Justice Department declined to comment on the investigation, and it remained unclear whether prosecutors had settled on specific targets or crimes they believe occurred. The letter to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) – which preserves government records – asks for three different intelligence community assessments about Russian activity in U.S. elections and cyberthreats to the 2016 presidential election. The letter is probably one of many sent to various parties across the federal government as the Justice Department seeks as much documentation as possible to build a case to present to a grand jury. 'I anticipate further requests for information will follow this request,' reads the letter from the Justice Department to NARA's general counsel. 'We would appreciate a timely and expedient response to our request and appreciate your cooperation with our investigation.' The Justice Department did not say where the grand jury would be impaneled, and the letter to NARA obtained by The Post had the name of the federal prosecutor who sent the request redacted. For years, Trump has sought to portray investigations into Russia's involvement in the 2016 campaign as a 'witch hunt' and a Democratic plot to undermine his first presidency. However, intelligence officials and multiple investigations, including the inquiry led by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III, have repeatedly concluded that Russia sought to interfere with the election to benefit Trump over his rival Hillary Clinton, the Democratic presidential nominee. Mueller's probe led to the convictions of several Trump allies, though it found no concrete proof of collusion between members of his campaign and Moscow. The grand jury investigation, which was first reported Monday by Fox News, will allow prosecutors to subpoena documents, solicit testimony and secretly present evidence to a panel that will determine whether to return an indictment. Though the evidentiary standard for such proceedings is lower than that for a criminal trial, grand jurors have the option of rejecting cases presented by prosecutors for lack of probable cause. The previous investigations hung over much of Trump's first presidency. And as he returned to the White House in January, he pledged to revisit the issue, which he has repeatedly cited as an example of Democratic 'weaponization' of the Justice Department. Under Bondi, the department has already taken the unusual step of publicly acknowledging criminal probes into two key figures from those 2016 election inquiries – former FBI director James B. Comey, whom Trump fired in 2017, and former CIA director John Brennan. The Justice Department has declined to discuss details of those investigations. Last month, National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard ramped up the administration's conspiracy claims by releasing a batch of previously classified investigative documents that she portrayed as evidence of Obama administration officials manufacturing information to undermine Trump and plotting a 'years-long coup.' She and CIA Director John Ratcliffe have referred material to the Justice Department and the FBI for criminal investigations of former officials, including former president Barack Obama. National security officials and Democratic lawmakers have accused Gabbard of misrepresenting the documents she released. A spokesperson for Obama dismissed her claims as 'bizarre,' 'ridiculous' and a 'weak attempt at a distraction.' Bondi responded by forming a 'strike force' to investigate Gabbard's claims. 'We will investigate these troubling disclosures fully and leave no stone unturned to deliver justice,' she said in a statement at the time. Amid that renewed effort, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, released last week a recently declassified appendix to a report issued in 2023 by special counsel John Durham. Durham was appointed during the first Trump administration to examine allegations of government misconduct during the earlier Russia investigations. Though he found flaws in the original probe, he uncovered no significant evidence undermining the basic conclusion that Moscow had sought to interfere in the 2016 election in favor of Trump. Included in the appendix Grassley released were 2016 emails among Clinton campaign aides indicating that her team saw Trump's ties to Russia as potential campaign fodder. Republicans have seized upon those messages as proof that Clinton approved of a plan to link Trump to Russia and use the FBI to damage his electoral chances. While the Durham appendix showed that the FBI investigated intelligence reports that suggested as much, it contained no proof that Clinton or Obama administration officials concocted false information on ties between Trump and Russia. Still, Trump and his allies have continued to claim otherwise. In a post to social media last week, FBI Director Kash Patel wrote that the appendix proved the 'Clinton campaign plotted to frame President Trump.' 'The American people deserve the full, unfiltered truth about the Russia collusion hoax and the political abuse of our justice system it exposed,' he said in a statement.
Japan Today
13 hours ago
- Japan Today
Wife of South Korea's ousted ex-President Yoon appears for questioning over corruption allegations
Kim Keon Hee, the wife of South Korea's ousted former President Yoon Suk Yeol, arrives at the special prosecutor's office in Seoul, South Korea, Wednesday, Aug. 6, 2025. (AP Photo/Ahn Young-joon) By KIM TONG-HYUNG The wife of South Korea's ousted former President Yoon Suk Yeol appeared for questioning by a special prosecutor Wednesday, as investigators expanded a probe into suspicions of stock manipulation, bribery, and interference in party nominations. The investigation into Kim Keon Hee is one of three separate special prosecutor probes launched under Seoul's new liberal government targeting the presidency of Yoon, who was removed from office in April and rearrested last month over his brief imposition of martial law in December. The conservative's abrupt and poorly planned power grab on Dec. 3 came during a seemingly routine standoff with the liberals, whom he described as 'anti-state' forces abusing their legislative majority to obstruct his agenda. Some political opponents have questioned whether Yoon's actions were at least partly motivated by growing allegations against his wife, which hurt his approval ratings and gave political ammunition to his rivals. 'I apologize for causing concern to the people, even though I am someone insignificant,' Kim told reporters as she arrived for questioning. She added that she would sincerely cooperate with the investigation, before walking away without responding to specific questions about the allegations. Through a heavy police presence, dozens of Yoon's supporters gathered outside the special prosecutor's office in downtown Seoul, waving South Korean and U.S. flags and banners in light rain. Yoon, who was sent back to prison last month and faces a high-stakes trial on rebellion and other charges, resisted an attempt by investigators last week to compel him for questioning over his wife. Investigators said he took off his prison uniform and laid down on the floor of his cell in his underwear before they gave up executing the warrant to detain him. They plan to negotiate with Yoon's lawyers to arrange a possible questioning. Yoon and Kim have faced suspicions of exerting undue influence over the conservative People Power Party to nominate a specific candidate for a 2022 parliamentary by-election, allegedly at the request of Myung Tae-kyun, an election broker and founder of a polling agency who conducted free opinion surveys for Yoon before he became president. Kim is separately linked to multiple corruption allegations, including claims that she received a necklace and other gifts through a fortuneteller acting as an intermediary for a Unification Church official seeking business favors, as well as possible involvement in a stock price manipulation scheme. While in office, Yoon repeatedly dismissed calls to investigate his wife, denouncing them as baseless political attacks. Yoon's martial law decree lasted only hours, after a quorum of lawmakers managed to break through a blockade of heavily armed soldiers and voted to revoke the measure. He was impeached by lawmakers on Dec. 14 and was formally removed from office by the Constitutional Court in April. Shortly after winning the early presidential election in June, new liberal President Lee Jae Myung approved legislation to launch sweeping special investigations into Yoon's martial law debacle, the allegations against his wife, and the 2023 drowning death of a marine during a flood rescue operation, an incident Lee's Democratic Party claims Yoon's government tried to cover up. Yoon had been released from prison in March after the Seoul Central District Court overturned his January arrest, but the same court approved his new arrest in July, accepting a special prosecutor's claim that he poses a risk of destroying evidence. © Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
