logo
Harvard's fallout shows: Where international students may go if the US shuts them out

Harvard's fallout shows: Where international students may go if the US shuts them out

Time of India28-05-2025

As Harvard faces challenges, international students explore new countries for education. (AI Image)
For decades, the US has been the world's most popular destination for international students. According to US State Department data, the country currently hosts over 1.12 million international students, generating more than $50 billion annually.
Harvard University, along with other top US schools, has long been a key draw. However, with the US government tightening immigration policies, including a recent move to end Harvard's ability to enroll international students, the global higher education landscape is experiencing seismic shifts.
This policy change, initiated by the Trump administration, marks a turning point for international education. Harvard has already seen a drop in its international student intake due to rising tuition fees, lost research funding, and mounting visa uncertainties.
As US universities lose their allure, students are increasingly considering alternative destinations to pursue their academic dreams. Countries like the UK, Canada, and Australia have long been popular options, but even these traditional study destinations are introducing tighter restrictions, prompting students to explore newer, less traditional alternatives.
The rise of non-traditional study hubs
As the US, UK, and Canada face mounting immigration challenges, a new wave of countries is vying to attract international students.
Among them are nations in Asia and Europe, which are actively pursuing global talent to fill their universities and close workforce gaps. Harvard's policies and the broader US trend have highlighted the vulnerability of long-established education hubs, pushing students to look elsewhere for stability.
Japan, for example, has set an ambitious goal to attract 400,000 international students by 2033, as reported by ICEF Monitor.
The country is responding to a demographic crisis, with its aging population and declining birth rates leading to fewer high school graduates. As part of their strategy, Japanese universities are increasing the number of English-taught programs, making it easier for international students to study without needing to learn Japanese.
Tuition fees in Japan are also relatively low, with yearly costs averaging around $4,000, making it an attractive option for cost-conscious students, especially when compared to the US, where tuition can exceed $100,000 per year at private universities.
South Korea, another rising player, aims to host 300,000 international students by 2027. As reported by ICEF Monitor, the country is focusing on enhancing its research opportunities and making post-study work pathways more accessible. This makes South Korea a prime destination for students interested in high-quality education and employment opportunities.
European nations stepping up
Europe is also witnessing a surge in interest from international students.
Germany, Spain, and the Netherlands have all reported record-high numbers of foreign students in recent years. Germany, in particular, offers high-quality education with minimal tuition fees—many public universities charge no tuition for international students, aside from administrative fees. In Spain, the low cost of living and increasingly diverse academic programs in English have made it a competitive option for students seeking value without compromising on quality.
According to Forbes, India has also made significant strides in attracting international students. The country plans to enroll 500,000 international students by 2047, focusing on increasing the availability of English-language programs and improving research facilities.
The future of global education
The growing number of alternative study destinations offers a glimpse into the future of global higher education.
As more countries step up to welcome international students, US universities face an uncertain future. Harvard, once the crown jewel of US higher education, now finds itself in the crosshairs of shifting US immigration policies.
Despite these challenges, the influx of international students into countries like Japan, South Korea, and Germany signals that students are more than willing to seek out new opportunities.
As reported by Forbes, international students are now prioritizing not just the prestige of their institution but also stability, affordability, and post-graduation opportunities.
Ultimately, Harvard's fallout could be the beginning of a broader trend in which global education becomes less dominated by traditional powerhouses and more diverse, with a wider range of countries offering valuable academic experiences. With US immigration policies tightening and international students seeking new pathways, the global education landscape is poised for significant change.
Ready to empower your child for the AI era? Join our program now! Hurry, only a few seats left.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump travel ban: Will Iran travel for 2026 FIFA World Cup?
Trump travel ban: Will Iran travel for 2026 FIFA World Cup?

Hindustan Times

time5 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Trump travel ban: Will Iran travel for 2026 FIFA World Cup?

USA, Canada, and Mexico are all set to host the 2026 FIFA World Cup together. However, President Donald Trump's latest travel ban has posed questions about whether certain qualified countries will now be allowed to travel to the US and take part. Starting Monday (June 9), citizens of 12 countries will no longer be allowed to get a US visa, according to a recent decision by Trump. Citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen have been banned by Trump and tighter restrictions have been applied to seven other nations (Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela). Trump explained his move by stating in a video, 'The recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, has underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country, by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come here as temporary visitors and overstay their visas. We don't want them.' As of now, Iran is the only country from the list to have already qualified to compete in the FIFA World Cup next year. Cuba, Sudan, and Haiti are currently in contention to contest. Venezuela is five points off the threshold for automatic qualification but a playoff might just cut the deal. Sierra Leone can still be involved through multiple playoff games while Burundi, Equatorial Guinea, and Libya have very slim chances. Under the current policy, sports teams of qualifying countries should still be able to contest since such a provision have been provided for 'any athlete or member of an athletic team, including coaches, persons performing a necessary support role, and immediate relatives, traveling for the World Cup, Olympics, or other major sporting event as determined by the secretary of state.' However, this exception will only continue as long as there is no change to the current ban policy adopted by the US. Iranian fans hoping to catch their national team in the spotlight won't be so lucky however since the policy provides no such exceptions for fans of sporting teams. Getting an American visa had already been tough for Iranians even before the ban was implemented due to tougher vetting procedures. However, considering how those indulging in international travel for sporting events are usually from a higher wealth bracket, such individuals could still try to circumvent the process by using different passport options. The move has stirred a debate about the intersection of politics with global sport. Back in 2017, FIFA President Gianni Infantino had said, "Any team, including the supporters and officials of that team, who qualify for a World Cup need to have access to the country, otherwise there is no World Cup." Infantino has since developed close ties with Trump and has re-emphasized that sporting teams of all countries will face no barriers in coming to the US for participation next year. The event is expected to raise a majority of the soccer body's revenue in the 2023-2026 period. Questions have also been raised about the US' legitimacy to hold the upcoming 2028 Olympic Games with such strict travel policies against certain participating countries.

Tech analyst and Tesla bull warns investors on Elon Musk-Donald Trump 'fight': 'I don't think...'
Tech analyst and Tesla bull warns investors on Elon Musk-Donald Trump 'fight': 'I don't think...'

Time of India

time11 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Tech analyst and Tesla bull warns investors on Elon Musk-Donald Trump 'fight': 'I don't think...'

A day after Elon Musk and US President Donald Trump engaged in a 'fight' online, Wedbush Securities tech analyst and Tesla bull, Dan Ives, has advised investors to brace for further developments in the ongoing public dispute between the Tesla CEO and Trump, a conflict many experts had anticipated, a report has said. "Get the popcorn out," Ives told CNBC, suggesting the dispute is far from over. 'I don't think we're done here,' he added. Ives says the online feud between Musk and Trump is 'bad news' for market Ives expressed concern that Musk's strong reactions to Trump could jeopardise prospects for favourable regulatory outcomes for Tesla. In a research note on Thursday, Ives said the spat will be "jaw-dropping and a shock to the market." 'The quickly deteriorating friendship and now 'major beef' between Musk and Trump is jaw-dropping and a shock to the market,' Ives warned in a research note on Thursday, adding it is 'putting major fear for Tesla investors on what is ahead,' he said. However, Ives later moderated his stance following reports from Politico indicating that White House aides had contacted Musk in an attempt to de-escalate the situation. On Friday (June 6), Ives adjusted his assessment, writing that "Musk needs Trump and Trump needs Musk for many reasons, and these two becoming friends again will be a huge relief for Tesla shares," subsequently labeling the stock as oversold. How Musk-Trump spat started The feud started soon after the introduction of the Trump administration's " One Big, Beautiful Bill ", which Musk publicly branded a "disgusting abomination." Trump later fired back saying he did not need Musk to win in Pennsylvania. Musk replied by saying that if he would have not been involved, Trump would have lost the elections.

Ange Postecoglou Sacked: Tottenham Hotspur make surprise move, remove manager despite first major trophy in 17 years
Ange Postecoglou Sacked: Tottenham Hotspur make surprise move, remove manager despite first major trophy in 17 years

Time of India

time14 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Ange Postecoglou Sacked: Tottenham Hotspur make surprise move, remove manager despite first major trophy in 17 years

Ange Postecoglou (AP Photo) NEW DELHI: Premier League club Tottenham Hotspur on Friday announced the dismissal of their manager Ange Postecoglou, shortly after the Australian guided the side to their first trophy in 17 years through the Europa League triumph. The victory over Manchester United with a 1-0 scoreline in Bilbao marked Tottenham's first European success in 41 years, additionally securing them a Champions League spot for the upcoming season. However, the club's dismal domestic performance, their worst since the 1976-77 relegation season, resulted in Postecoglou's departure. Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW! "Following a review of performances and after significant reflection, the Club can announce that Ange Postecoglou has been relieved of his duties," according to a statement posted on Tottenham's official X account. The Australian's tenure ended precisely two years after his appointment from Celtic, with chairman Daniel Levy making the final decision. The club's Premier League campaign concluded with 22 defeats from 38 matches, placing them 17th, just above Leicester, Ipswich and Southampton, who faced relegation. "The Board has unanimously concluded that it is in the best interests of the club for a change to take place," the statement continued. "Whilst winning the Europa League this season ranks as one of the club's greatest moments, we cannot base our decision on emotions aligned to this triumph."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store