Cargojet Announces Second Quarter Financial Results
For the second quarter ended June 30, 2025:
Total revenues, driven by a 14% increase in Domestic revenues and 22% growth in Charter revenues, came in at $238.2 million, an increase of $7.4 million or 3.2% compared to the same period of previous year.
Adjusted EBITDA (1) (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) was $80.2 million, an increase of $1.1 million or 1.4% compared to the same quarter of previous year.
Net loss was $3.2 million, a decrease of $21.8 million or 87.2% compared to a net loss of $25.0 million for the second quarter of 2024.
Achieved another record On-time Arrival Performance of 99.5% within fifteen minutes of scheduled arrival time during the quarter.
"Cargojet posted strong overall revenues despite ongoing uncertainty and a weakening economic outlook, underscoring the strength of our network. Softness in the ACMI segment from weaker European traffic was more than offset by robust domestic and charter revenue growth, and with the EU–US trade deal now in place, we expect the EU–US corridor to reopen and generate new ACMI and charter opportunities in the coming quarters, said Jamie Porteous, Co–Chief Executive Officer.
"Ensuring that we can deliver shareholder value in any economic cycle remains a clear priority. Our company wide cost management and productivity initiatives produced a year-on-year improvement in adjusted EBITDA and sequential improvement of 140 basis-point increase in adjusted EBITDA margins, despite a 10% drop in block hours flown during Q2 versus the prior year,." said Pauline Dhillon, Co-Chief Executive Officer.
Second Quarter 2025 Financial Results:
SECOND QUARTER RESULTS
Financial highlights
Three Month Periods Ended
Six Month Periods Ended
June 30,
June 30,
(Canadian dollars in millions, except where
indicated)
2025
2024
Change
%
2025
2024
Change
%
Domestic network, ACMI and charter revenues
$204.6
$191.3
$13.3
7.0 %
$414.8
$372.3
$42.5
11.4 %
Total revenues
$238.2
$230.8
$7.4
3.2 %
$488.1
$462.0
$26.1
5.6 %
Net (loss) earnings
($3.2)
($25.0)
$21.8
87.2 %
$44.8
$7.5
$37.3
497.3 %
Adjusted net earnings (1)
$15.7
$7.0
$8.7
124.3 %
$41.0
$35.4
$5.6
15.8 %
EPS Diluted
($0.21)
($1.53)
$1.32
86.3 %
$2.80
$0.46
$2.34
508.7 %
Adjusted EPS (1)
$1.02
$0.43
$0.59
137.2 %
$2.64
$2.16
$0.48
22.2 %
Adjusted EBITDA (1)
$80.2
$79.1
$1.1
1.4 %
$161.0
$157.5
$3.5
2.2 %
Adjusted EBITDA margin (1) - (%)
33.7 %
34.3 %
(0.6 %)
33.0 %
34.1 %
(1.1 %)
Net cash from operating activities
$28.0
$48.5
($20.5)
(42.3 %)
$92.8
$128.8
($36.0)
(28.0 %)
Free cash flow (1)
($72.5)
$0.5
($73.0)
(14,600.0 %)
($118.4)
$169.2
($287.6)
(170.0 %)
(1) Non-GAAP measures. See "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" section.
(1) Non-GAAP Measures
Below is a description of certain non-GAAP financial measures and non-GAAP financial ratios used by the Corporation to provide readers with additional information on its financial and operating performance. Non-GAAP financial ratios are ratios or percentages that are calculated using a non-GAAP financial measure. Such measures are not recognized measures for financial statement presentation under GAAP, do not have standardized meanings, may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other entities and should not be considered a substitute for or superior to GAAP results.
"Adjusted EBITDA" is used by the Corporation to assess earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, gain or loss on disposal of capital assets, share-based compensation, gain or loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment and assets held for sale, fair value write-down of assets held for sale and property, plant and equipment, fair value increase or decrease on stock warrant, amortization of stock warrant contract assets, gain or loss on fair value or settlement of swap derivatives, unrealized foreign exchange gains or losses, gains or losses on settlement of debts, share of gain or loss in associate, and provision for employee pension, as these costs can vary significantly among airlines due to differences in the way airlines finance their aircraft and other assets. The most directly comparable financial measure disclosed in the Corporation's financial statements is net earnings.
"Adjusted EBITDA margin" is defined as Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of revenue. Adjusted EBITDA margin is commonly used in the airline industry and is used by the Corporation as a means to measure the operating margin excluding certain items as described above.
"Free Cash Flow" is used by the Corporation to evaluate its financial strength and performance of its business, indicating the amount of cash the Corporation can generate from operations after capital expenditures. Free Cash Flow is defined as cash flows from operating activities less purchases of property, plant and equipment plus proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment and assets held for sale, and insurance proceeds related to these assets.
"Adjusted net earnings" and "Adjusted net earnings per share" ("Adjusted EPS") are used to assess the overall financial performance of its business. Prior to the third quarter of 2024, adjusted net earnings and adjusted EPS are defined as net earnings and net earnings per basic share excluding impairment and gain on insurance claim, fair value increase or decrease on stock warrant, amortization of stock warrant contract assets, gain or loss on swap derivatives, and unrealized foreign exchange gain or loss.
These items are excluded as they may distort the analysis of certain business trends and render comparative analysis to other airlines less meaningful. In the third quarter of 2024, the company updated the definition to further exclude the tax impact of the adjustments where applicable as the net earnings and net earnings per share are also after-tax. Wherever presented, prior periods adjusted net earnings and Adjusted EPS are updated accordingly.
Reconciliations of non-GAAP measures are provided below and in the "Non-GAAP Measures" section of the Corporation's Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("MD&A") for the three month period ended June 30, 2025 and is available on SEDAR+ at wwww.sedarplus.ca.
Three Month Periods
Ended
Six Month Periods
Ended
(Unaudited - Canadian dollars in millions)
June 30,
June 30,
2025
2024
2025
2024
Calculation of Free Cash Flow
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Net cash from operating activities
28.0
48.5
92.8
128.8
Purchase of property, plant and equipment (1)
(100.5)
(48.0)
(212.4)
(60.9)
Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment and assets
held for sale
-
-
1.2
101.3
Free cash flow
(72.5)
0.5
(118.4)
169.2
Three Month periods
ended
Six Month periods
ended
(Unaudited - Canadian dollars in millions, except where indicated)
June 30,
June 30,
2025
2024
2025
2024
Calculation of Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted EPS
$
$
$
$
Net (loss) earnings
(3.2)
(25.0)
44.8
7.5
Add:
Fair value write-down of assets held for sale and property, plant and
equipment
7.0
-
7.0
1.1
Fair value adjustment on stock warrant and amortization of stock warrant
contract assets
21.5
53.9
(12.5)
42.2
(Gain) loss on swap derivative
(7.0)
(30.4)
7.3
(22.6)
Unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss
(3.6)
0.7
(2.5)
2.0
Tax impact on items listed above
1.0
7.9
(3.1)
5.2
Adjusted net earnings
15.7
7.0
41.0
35.4
Weighted average number of shares - basic (in millions of shares)
15.4
16.4
15.5
16.4
Adjusted EPS
1.02
0.43
2.64
2.16
Notice on Forward Looking Statements:
Certain statements contained herein constitute "forward-looking statements", including with respect to the Corporation's intention to continue rationalizing costs and capital expenditures to generate cash, strengthen strategic customer relationships, and drive shareholder value. Forward-looking statements look into the future and provide an opinion as to the effect of certain events and trends on the business. Forward-looking statements may include words such as "plans," "intends," "anticipates," "should," "estimates," "expects," "believes," "indicates," "targeting," "suggests" and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and entail various risks and uncertainties. Reference should be made to the Corporation's most recent Annual Information Form ("AIF") filed with the Canadian securities regulators, and its most recent Annual Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto and related MD&A, for a summary of major risks. Actual results may materially differ from expectations, if known and unknown risks or uncertainties affect our business, or if our estimates or assumptions prove inaccurate. The Corporation cautions that the list of risk factors and uncertainties described in the AIF and MD&A is not exhaustive and other factors could also adversely affect its results. Readers are urged to carefully consider the risks, uncertainties and assumptions in evaluating the forward-looking information and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such information. The forward-looking information contained herein represents our expectations as of the date hereof (or as the date they are otherwise stated to be made), and are subject to change after such date. However, we disclaim any intention or obligation or undertaking to update or revise any forward-looking information whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required under applicable securities laws. In the event that we update any forward-looking statement, no inference should be made that we will make additional updates with respect to that statement, related matters, or any other forward-looking statement.
All references to "$" in this press release are to Canadian dollars.
About Cargojet
Cargojet is Canada's leading provider of time sensitive premium air cargo services to all major cities across North America, providing Dedicated, ACMI and International Charter services and carries over 25,000,000 pounds of cargo weekly. Cargojet operates a fleet of all Boeing aircraft.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND OPERATING STATISTICS HIGHLIGHTS
(Unaudited - Canadian dollars in millions, except where indicated)
Three Month Periods Ended
Six Month Periods Ended
June 30,
June 30,
2025
2024
Change
%
2025
2024
Change
%
Domestic network, ACMI and charter revenues
$204.6
$191.3
$13.3
7.0 %
$414.8
$372.3
$42.5
11.4 %
Fuel surcharge and other revenues
$38.3
$44.9
($6.6)
(14.7 %)
$83.5
$100.4
($16.9)
(16.8 %)
Total revenues excluding warrant amortization
$242.9
$236.2
$6.7
2.8 %
$498.3
$472.7
$25.6
5.4 %
Amortization of stock warrant contract assets
($4.7)
($5.4)
$0.7
(13.0 %)
($10.2)
($10.7)
$0.5
(4.7 %)
Total revenues
$238.2
$230.8
$7.4
3.2 %
$488.1
$462.0
$26.1
5.6 %
Direct expenses
$188.7
$185.7
$3.0
1.6 %
$385.8
$372.2
$13.6
3.7 %
Gross margin
$49.5
$45.1
$4.4
9.8 %
$102.3
$89.8
$12.5
13.9 %
Gross margin - (%)
20.8 %
19.5 %
1.2 %
21.0 %
19.4 %
1.5 %
Selling, general and administrative expenses
$23.6
$23.6
-
-
$39.9
$41.0
($1.1)
(2.7 %)
Net finance costs and other gains and losses
$25.0
$35.2
($10.2)
(29.0 %)
$11.9
$25.2
($13.3)
(52.8 %)
Share of gain in associate
($1.2)
($0.3)
(0.90)
(300.0 %)
($1.5)
($0.6)
($0.9)
(150.0 %)
Earnings (loss) before income taxes
$2.1
($13.4)
$15.5
115.7 %
$52.0
$24.2
$27.8
114.9 %
Income taxes
5.3
$11.6
($6.3)
(54.2 %)
$7.2
$16.7
($9.5)
(56.8 %)
Net (loss) earnings
($3.2)
($25.0)
$21.8
87.2 %
$44.8
$7.5
$37.3
497.3 %
Adjusted net earnings (1)
$15.7
$7.0
$8.7
124.3 %
$41.0
$35.4
$5.6
15.8 %
(Loss) earnings per share
Basic
($0.21)
($1.53)
$1.32
86.3 %
$2.89
$0.46
$2.43
528.3 %
Diluted
($0.21)
($1.53)
$1.32
86.3 %
$2.80
$0.46
$2.34
508.7 %
Adjusted (1)
$1.02
$0.43
$0.59
137.2 %
$2.64
$2.16
$0.48
22.2 %
Adjusted EBITDA (1)
$80.2
$79.1
$1.1
1.4 %
$161.0
$157.5
$3.5
2.2 %
Adjusted EBITDA margin (1) - (%)
33.7 %
34.3 %
(0.6 %)
33.0 %
34.1 %
(1.1 %)
Net cash from operating activities
$28.0
$48.5
($20.5)
(42.3 %)
$92.8
$128.8
($36.0)
(28.0 %)
Free cash flow (1)
($72.5)
$0.5
($73.0)
(14,600.0 %)
($118.4)
$169.2
($287.6)
(170.0 %)
Operating statistics (2)
Operating days (3)
50
51
(1)
(2.0 %)
99
100
(1)
(1.0 %)
Average domestic network revenue per
operating day (4)
2.05
1.75
0.30
17.1 %
2.09
1.79
0.30
16.8 %
Block hours (5)
15,840
17,623
(1,783)
(10.1 %)
33,185
34,938
(1,753)
(5.0 %)
B757-200
17
17
-
17
17
-
B767-200
3
3
-
3
3
-
B767-300
23
21
2.0
23
21
2.0
Cargo operating fleet
43
41
2.0
4.9 %
43
41
2.0
4.9 %
Head count
1,817
1,874
(57)
(3.0 %)
1,817
1,874
(57)
(3.0 %)
1.
Non-GAAP measures. See "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" section.
2.
The definitions for the Operating statistics included in this table are provided in the notes below.
3.
Operating days refer to the days on which the full domestic network air cargo network is in operation. The Corporation's domestic network air cargo network operates primarily from Monday to Thursday with a reduced network operating on Friday, weekends and on certain weekdays that are adjacent to certain statutory holidays.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Toronto Sun
4 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
LILLEY: Softwood lumber tariffs soar as Mark Carney's plan fails to deliver
The Prime minister claimed to be the man with the plan, but that plan is clearly not working Get the latest from Brian Lilley straight to your inbox Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney speaks during a press conference after a Cabinet meeting to discuss both trade negotiations with the US and the situation in the Middle East, at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada on July 30, 2025. Photo by DAVE CHAN / AFP via Getty Images No deal is better than a bad deal – that's the message Prime Minister Mark Carney and his team keep selling to Canadians as their efforts to find a deal with Donald Trump falter. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account That message became harder to sell Friday night as duties on softwood lumber skyrocketed to 35%. It's a major blow to Canada's industry, which a year ago saw duties rise from 8.05% to 14.54% under the Biden administration. The Trump administration had recently bumped those tariffs up further to 20.56% and now, as of Friday night, the total cumulative tariff is 35.19%. B.C.'s Forestry Minister Ravi Parmar called the move 'absurd and reckless,' but in the early hours after the change was made public there was no comment from the Carney government. Since Carney won the election, tariffs on steel and aluminum have gone from 25% to 50%, copper has had a 50% tariff added to it, anything related to automotive deemed not compliant with CUSMA has a 50% tariff, general exports not covered by CUSMA have a 35% tariff and now so too does softwood lumber. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Read More This wasn't what Mark Carney was promising as he campaigned to lead the country. 'I know the President, I've dealt with the President in the past in my previous roles when he was in his first term, and I know how to negotiate,' Carney said during the Liberal leadership race that led to him becoming PM. We've gone from Carney saying he knows Trump and how to negotiate to saying no deal is better than a bad one while the Americans don't return his calls and tariffs continue to rise. Carney has completely changed his tune on the impact of tariffs and Trump's impact on the Canadian economy. During the election campaign he portrayed Trump's tariffs as a existential threat to Canada, that the U.S. President was trying to break us – now, it's no big deal. 'We're in a situation right now where 85% of our trade with the United States is tariff free,' Carney said Friday when asked about the situation. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. That's true to a degree now, but it was also true when Carney was whipping up fear in the population, talking about elbows up and driving a huge anti-American sentiment for political gain. He's only shifted to this latest message when it became clear Canada wasn't getting a deal by the Aug. 1 deadline set by Trump. As I noted in a recent column, we went from the Trump administration – senior officials like Howard Lutnick and Jamieson Greer – calling Canada a top priority for a trade deal in March to where we are today. The Americans have lost interest in talking to Carney's team, and they have described the tactic as not really negotiating, just making demands. Again, that's not what Carney promised. It takes two to tango in any scenario, but when every other G7 country is now covered by a deal and when Mexico has an extension and exemption from further tariffs, maybe it's time to ask if we are the problem and change tactics. Whatever Carney and his team have been doing clearly has not been working. RECOMMENDED VIDEO Carney hasn't spoken to Trump since June 26; that was the day our PM told the Americans we were going ahead with the Digital Services Tax. The next day, Trump broke off all talks with Canada and two days later Carney announced he was cancelling the DST. Since then, we've had several tariff increases and a jobs report showing 51,000 full-time jobs lost last month. One of the slogans Carney liked to use during the election was that a plan beats no plan. I'd love to hear what he says about what to do when a plan clearly isn't working. blilley@ Toronto Blue Jays Sunshine Girls Sunshine Girls Editorials Tennis


Calgary Herald
5 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
Carney, Trump and Rocket Richard: Best defence is a good offence
Article content Canadian hockey fans raised in the Connor McDavid era, and even those like me who fondly recall the Wayne Gretzky era, may not know much about Maurice (the Rocket) Richard, but he was a 'fiery force on ice' during his 18 NHL seasons. Article content He was the first player to score 50 goals in a season, the first to reach 500 career goals and was a leader on eight Stanley Cup-winning teams. His suspension for striking an official during a fight in March 1945, by then-NHL commissioner Clarence Campbell, sparked a riot in Montreal, which was the closest Quebec ever got to replicating the French Revolution — with Campbell barely escaping the guillotine. Article content Article content Article content Richard was once asked, 'When you cross the blueline on a breakaway, do you have a plan as to how to beat the goalie?' He replied, 'When I cross the blueline on a breakaway, I don't have the faintest idea what I'm going to do. So how can the goalie know or plan for what I'm going to do?' Article content Article content Fast forward to the North American trade arena and the unwelcome contest between Prime Minister Mark Carney and U.S. President Donald Trump over tariffs. Trump, all bluster and bluff, demonstrates utter unpredictability as he approaches the Canada-U.S. border line — initially proposing to impose a blanket 25 per cent tariff on steel and aluminum, and everything else if Canada didn't tighten its borders against drug and migrant smuggling. Then a month later, a 10 per cent tariff on energy exports and a further increase on steel and aluminum. Then last month, an apoplectic fit over a proposed Canadian tax (since abandoned) on digital services, then pivoting to a 35 per cent overall tariff this month after just settling for 15 per cent tariffs in reciprocity agreements with Japan and the EU. Article content Article content In goal for Canada, to defend Canada's interests, is a former high-level bureaucrat, someone accustomed to working in the polite, predictable and orderly environment of central bankers. Someone who may quite possibly be discomfited and discombobulated by unpredictability as when Trump threatens at the blueline. Article content What to do if you were Canada's coach? What's possible, with Carney in net, to better withstand Trump attacks and even to go on the offensive? Article content Bolster the defence and team around Carney — not with Justin Trudeau-tainted ministers like Dominic LeBlanc, Chrystia Freeland or David Lametti, but with negotiators and spokespeople who have had no association at all with the Trudeau regime. Not fellow public sector bureaucrats such as Marc-Andre Blanchard and Michael Sabia (although they, particularly Sabia, may play a useful support role). Article content Bring in strong executives and union leaders with experience in the areas most susceptible to attack, but also those who can shout, bluff and tweet just as vigorously as Trump from sectors such as the oilpatch, which he needs to attain his goal of continental economic security. Article content Most importantly, do not showcase an unorganized gaggle of provincial premiers posing for photo ops, but mobilizing those like Danielle Smith and Scott Moe to move Trump by getting to his populist base. Article content And coming back to goalie Carney, if, as some commentators have suggested, we are actually heading into a 'tariff war,' maybe he could also draw inspiration and wisdom from William Lyon Mackenzie King, Canada's Liberal prime minister throughout the Second World War. Article content My father, who was Alberta premier from 1943 to 1968, dealt with four prime ministers — John Diefenbaker, Lester B. Pearson, Louis St-Laurent and Mackenzie King — and their administrations. He maintained that Mackenzie King's war cabinet and administration were by far the strongest of the four, and that perhaps his greatest strength was the ability to see his own weaknesses and deficiencies, and to recruit others to compensate for them. Article content Article content It remains to be seen whether Carney can do the same. To do so would require a substantial degree of humility, which Carney professes to value most highly and to which he devoted the last pages of his voluminous book. Article content The end result might then be 'a real Team Canada' — with skill and experience at every position as well as on the bench. A team yet to be built — not yet even in the locker-room, let alone on the ice — but a team most urgently needed if Canada is to prevail in its struggles with the Trump administration.
Montreal Gazette
6 hours ago
- Montreal Gazette
Libman: Maybe it's time to hit pause on our dizzying dance with Trump
I remember as a kid frenetically chasing after a rubber Superball as it bounced around, careening off everything, not knowing where it would bounce next, constantly out of reach. That's what it must feel like to deal with Donald Trump and try to figure out a way to pin down a complicated trade agreement, of all things. International trade, commerce and business need economic stability and predictability. In Canada's history, we've never had to face such a wild card U.S. presidency and been forced to navigate as volatile a relationship with our largest trading partner. Every day seems to bring a different turn. The goalposts seem to move whenever a new idea or insult pops into Trump's head — which he broadcasts on social media — surprising our politicians. There's often no common-sense rationale with Trump. It's dizzying, infuriating and in many ways surreal. One day his chiding of Canada could be related to fentanyl, the next illegal immigrants or imaginary trade imbalances. Perhaps disdain due to slights by our former prime minister still lingers, or maybe current PM Mark Carey hasn't been flattering enough. Who knows? Many Canadians boldly want to see an 'elbows up' approach of defiance. But let's face it — economically we're at the mercy of our much bigger U.S. neighbour. Particularly with this president, as with most bullies or egomaniacs, any attempt at fighting back is likely to backfire. When Ontario Premier Doug Ford threatened to impose a 25-per-cent surcharge on electricity exports to three U.S. states, Trump roared, threatening a 50-per-cent retaliatory tariff the next day, causing Ford to meekly scurry backwards. Trump's flunky, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, said '(Trump) needed to break some guy in Ontario who said he was going to tax American energy.' Lutnick himself often looks foolish, talking in a vacuum without any idea what his boss might decide the next day. Our politicians don't seem to have any game plan or know how to handle this, as they have no idea what to expect next. Federal ministers Dominic LeBlanc, François-Philippe Champagne, Anita Anand and Mélanie Joly seem to be running like hamsters on a wheel. You also get the sense Carney is constantly biting his tongue to avoid criticizing the president, knowing it could boomerang. Last week, not having reached a deal by the Aug. 1 deadline, Trump raised the tariff rate from 25 to 35 per cent on Canadian goods not covered under the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement, again evoking Canada's failure to control the 'ongoing flood of fentanyl and other illicit drugs.' Fentanyl seizures from Canada are less than 0.1 per cent of total U.S. seizures of the drug, but facts are irrelevant in this alternate reality. Perhaps it's time our federal government just went back to governing and stopped this dance. The more we dance, the more Trump will make us dance. If a deal is struck, fine — but patience may be a more sensible approach than scrambling for a deal, any deal. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington is soon expected to rule on whether Trump's tariffs are even legal under the Constitution, which grants Congress powers over trade. Trump has circumvented this by claiming he can use presidential emergency powers under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, something the judges hearing the case have skeptically questioned. Also, the cost impact of tariffs — the higher wages to American workers to produce goods and materials in the U.S., rather than importing at a lower price — presumably will soon start hitting Americans in their wallets. Only if Americans wake up and start questioning Trump's policies will he likely blink. Maybe it's time to stop chasing the ball for now and let the courts and other economic indicators shape the narrative. Robert Libman is an architect and planning consultant who has served as Equality Party leader and MNA, mayor of Côte-St-Luc and a member of the Montreal executive committee. He was a Conservative candidate in the 2015 federal election.