
Erotic Roman mosaic stolen by Nazis during Second World War returns to Pompeii
The mosaic panel, on travertine slabs, depicting an erotic theme from the Roman era, was returned to the archaeological park of Pompeii after being stolen by a Nazi German captain.
The artwork was repatriated from Germany through diplomatic channels.
It was arranged by the Italian Consulate in Stuttgart having been returned from the heirs of the last owner, a deceased German citizen.
The owner had received the mosaic as a gift from a Wehrmacht captain, assigned to the military supply chain in Italy during the war.
The mosaic — dating between mid- to last century B.C. and the first century — is considered a work of 'extraordinary cultural interest,' experts said.
'It is the moment when the theme of domestic love becomes an artistic subject,' said Gabriel Zuchtriegel, director of the Archaeological Park of Pompeii and co-author of an essay dedicated to the returned work. 'While the Hellenistic period, from the fourth to the first century B.C., exulted the passion of mythological and heroic figures, now we see a new theme."
The heirs of the mosaic's last owner in Germany contacted the Carabinieri unit in Rome that's dedicated to protecting cultural heritage, which was in charge of the investigation, asking for information on how to return the mosaic to the Italian state. Authorities carried out the necessary checks to establish its authenticity and provenance, and then worked to repatriate the mosaic in September 2023.
The collaboration with the Archaeological Park of Pompeii was also key, as it made it possible to trace it to near the Mount Vesuvius volcano, despite the scarcity of data on the original context of its discovery, the Carabinieri said.
The panel was then assigned to the Archaeological Park of Pompeii where, suitably catalogued, it will be protected and available for educational and research purposes.
'Today's return is like healing an open wound,' Zuchtriegel said, adding that the mosaic allows to reconstruct the story of that period, the first century A.D., before Pompeii was destroyed by the Vesuvius eruption in A.D. 79.
The park's director also highlighted how the return by the heirs of its owner signals an important change in 'mentality,' as 'the sense of possession (of stolen art) becomes a heavy burden.'
'We see that often in the many letters we receive from people who may have stolen just a stone, to bring home a piece of Pompeii,' Zuchtriegel said.
He recalled the so-called 'Pompeii curse,' which according to a popular superstition hits whoever steals artifacts in Pompeii.
The world-known legend suggests that those who steal finds from the ancient city of Pompeii will experience bad luck or misfortune. That has been fueled over the years by several tourists who return stolen items, claiming they brought them bad luck and caused tragic events.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Ofqual admits massively exaggerating number of students getting exam assistance
The exam regulator for England has admitted to massively exaggerating how many students are granted extra time and other assistance while taking A-levels and GCSEs, a subject that has sparked controversy in recent years. Ofqual announced on Thursday that it was withdrawing its official statistics for assistance in exams going back to 2014, saying that 'the published figures significantly overstated the number of students receiving access arrangements'. Ofqual had claimed that 30% of students taking A-level, AS-level and GCSE exams were approved for extra time to answer questions last year. It now thinks the actual rate may be far lower. An Ofqual official said its analysis 'has not revealed any evidence of misuse or systemic failure. This has been a technical issue with reporting rather than how the system has been used.' Access arrangements are adjustments to exams for students with special needs, disabilities or injuries, with 25% extra time being the most common. In 2012-13, 107,000 students in England were granted extra time. But in 2024 Ofqual said it was nearly 420,000 students, an increase of nearly 300%. The discredited figures had highlighted private schools as particularly to blame for the increase, where nearly 42% of students received adjustments. But that could be more than halved when Ofqual issues revised figures this year. Julie Robinson, the chief executive of the Independent Schools Council, said Ofqual should apologise. She added: 'Ofqual is supposed to be the trusted source for exam statistics and as a result of these significant errors, independent schools have wrongly seen their results undermined and their integrity questioned.' Tom Bramley, Ofqual's executive director of research, said: 'We are correcting the record as soon as possible. The access arrangements process has not changed, and students who received support did so appropriately. 'This issue is limited to our access arrangements dataset and our other statistics are not affected.' Bramley said the problems were with 'how the data was recorded and reported', including errors and double-counting. But the huge differences raise questions about Ofqual's malfunctions dating back to the Covid pandemic, when its attempt to award grades by algorithm collapsed in chaos. Ofqual's initial analysis suggested the true proportion of students receiving extra exam time was 'much more closely aligned' with the number of students with special educational needs. The DfE's figures show that 16.5% of secondary school students had SEN support and education, health and care plans last year. Ofqual said it would work with the Office for Statistics Regulation and examination boards to improve data quality. A Department for Education spokesperson said: 'We welcome Ofqual's commitment to improving data quality and transparency, and we will continue to work closely with them to ensure high standards across the system.'


Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Exam watchdog admits a decade of data on extra time was wrong
The exams regulator has admitted that a decade of data on the number of pupils receiving extra time was wrong. Ofqual said on Thursday it was pulling 10 years of data from 2014 onwards after revealing it had accidentally doubled the number of GCSE and A-level students receiving special arrangements, such as extra time or a laptop. Nearly a third of all pupils in England, or around 420,000, were recorded as getting extra time last year, with the figure quadrupling over the past decade. Private schools have also been accused of gaming the system in recent years after official data showed an eye-watering four in 10 pupils received extra time in 2024. But the watchdog has now admitted those statistics were 'significantly overstated' and that the true figure is almost half of that, including for private schools. The Independent Schools Council (ISC) said private schools were owed 'an apology' for the botched data which it said had seen their 'integrity questioned' for years. Pupils are usually only eligible for extra support in exams if they have special educational needs and disabilities (Send) or a temporary injury such as a broken arm. Ofqual said on Thursday that the real level of students receiving extra time in exams was broadly equivalent to the proportion of Send pupils across the school population. This would mean around 19.5 per cent of pupils across all schools in England actually received extra time in their exams last year, not the 30 per cent recorded on official statistics. It also slashes the proportion of private school pupils thought to have received extra time by around half. In total, 41.8 per cent of fee-paying pupils were recorded as getting extra time in last summer's formal exams, but Department for Education (DfE) shows just 22.4 per cent currently receive Send support. Critics had jumped on the disparity between private school pupils receiving extra time and those in the state sector, with 26 per cent of children in non-selective state schools granted it last summer. Julie Robinson, the chief executive of the ISC, said: 'Ofqual is supposed to be the trusted source for exam statistics and as a result of these significant errors, independent schools have wrongly seen their results undermined and their integrity questioned. 'We are pleased that the investigation instigated by the DfE [Department for Education] will lead to a correction of the record and we hope an apology will be forthcoming.' Ofqual blamed the data blunder on duplicate applications for the same student that were accidentally included in official statistics. It also said the inflated data wrongly counted pupils who obtained special access arrangements but did not go on to sit their exams. The watchdog said in a statement: 'Ofqual's detailed analysis of underlying data from the boards has established that the published figures significantly overstated the number of students receiving access arrangements.' Tom Bramley, executive director of research and analysis at Ofqual, said: 'We are correcting the record as soon as possible. 'The access arrangements process has not changed, and students who received support did so appropriately. 'This issue is limited to our access arrangements dataset and our other statistics are not affected.' It will raise serious questions over the regulator's official data collection, as pupils await their GCSE and A-level results next month. The exams watchdog said it will publish revised statistics later this year covering special exam arrangements for 2021 onwards, but warned they 'won't be perfect'. It will leave a seven-year black hole in official data in England, since Ofqual will not replace the figures between 2014 and 2021. Bridget Phillipson, the Education Secretary, voiced concerns with Ofqual last year about the significant jump in pupils receiving extra time and urged them to examine 'the range of reasons that might be driving this and whether any policy response is required'. She told the Financial Times in November that it was 'a real concern to me there is such a big divide between the state and private system'. Torsten Bell, the Labour MP for Swansea West, also said on X last November: 'A far greater proportion of private than state school pupils get extra time in exams… which is even odder when you consider the wider context this is happening within: we know special educational needs are more prevalent in poorer areas.' Unions had also jumped at the rise in extra time figures to claim that exams are too stressful for pupils and called for a rethink of high-stakes assessments. Paul Whiteman, general secretary at school leaders' union NAHT, said: 'While it is regrettable that problems have been identified with these statistics, Ofqual has done the right thing in withdrawing them and working to correct and republish them. 'School leaders have certainly seen more requests for access arrangements in recent years in the aftermath of Covid, increased reports of anxiety and mental ill-health, and significant rises in numbers of children with additional needs.'


Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
My controlling 42-year-old brother keeps taking money from my struggling mother. How can I stop him taking advantage of her? CAROLINE WEST-MEADS has the answer
Q My mother, who is widowed and in her late 70s, keeps bailing out my younger brother financially. This is despite not being well-off herself and my brother being 42 and perfectly able to get a job. He and his wife live near my mother whereas my husband and I are 100 miles away. He has never really worked or been responsible for himself, even though he has a wife and children. They are on benefits and don't seem to have ever wanted to work.