Richest 1% of Minnesota families own nearly one third of the wealth

Yahoo

28-01-2025

Getty Images
The wealthiest communities in the Twin Cities are roughly 10 times richer than the poorest ones, according to a new database of household wealth.
Median households in parts of the west metro — including Lake Minnetonka, Plymouth and Maple Grove — have a net worth well over $400,000. Those in parts of south Minneapolis and the western part of St. Paul have closer to $40,000.
Meanwhile, Minnesota wealth has also become more concentrated in fewer hands.
Net worth, or wealth, is a measure of a household's assets, like cash accounts, retirement accounts, and home equity, minus its debts. For most people in the middle class, home equity is the chief component of household wealth. Many families have a negative net worth, which means their debts are greater than their assets.
In the richest areas of the country, like Palo Alto or the New York City suburbs, the typical family is worth well over $1 million. In the poorest communities, which are in New York, Houston and Milwaukee, the typical family has only $18,000 in assets.
'People who grow up in wealthier places can reap benefits that span generations,' Tom Kemeny, one of the database's compilers, explained in a recent commentary. 'As a result of property taxes and philanthropy, wealthier communities have greater resources for schools, health care, transportation and other infrastructure.'
As the map above shows, the richest and poorest Minnesota communities are all concentrated in the Twin Cities metro. The map is divided into Public Use Microdata Areas, which are census divisions containing at least 100,000 people. Researchers often analyze data at this geographic level because it allows them to see variation within densely populated counties.
The estimates in the database are based the federal Survey of Consumer Finances, which asks respondents about their assets and debts, as well as the Census' American Community Survey, which measures demographics, income and home ownership.
The dataset also shows how Minnesota household wealth — mirroring national trends — has become more concentrated over the past six decades. In 1960, for instance, the bottom 50% of families owned about 10% of the state's total wealth, while the richest 1% had about 17%.
But by 2010, the share of wealth owned by the bottom 50% fell by roughly half, while the wealth of the richest 1% more than doubled. Those shares changed little from 2010 to 2020.
The rise in wealth inequality is driven by many factors, including the loss of high-paying blue collar jobs; the growing concentration of white-collar jobs in coastal metropolitan areas and big advanced economies like the Twin Cities; and changes to the tax code favoring the already-wealthy.
Wealth inequality in the United States is greater than in most other democracies. Racial wealth disparities, driven in part by decades of discriminatory policymaking, are often staggering.
Minnesota's racial disparities are among the worst in the nation, partly due to the state's long history of redlining, or denying mortgages and other financial services to non-white people. Those century-old policies reverberate in maps of neighborhood inequality made today.