logo
Swinney: Reasonable for ex-Dundee University principal to return £150,000 payout

Swinney: Reasonable for ex-Dundee University principal to return £150,000 payout

Independent4 hours ago

First Minister John Swinney has said it would be 'reasonable' for a former principal of the cash-strapped University of Dundee to return a £150,000 payment he received when he stepped down.
Professor Iain Gillespie told MSPs on Thursday it was not in his 'thought process' to hand back the cash, although he accepted the 'buck stops with me' for the university's difficulties.
He stepped down from his post at the university – which is looking to cut hundreds of posts as it tries to deal with a £35 million deficit – in December.
He told Holyrood's Education Committee, which is examining the difficulties faced by the institution, that the university had a 'contractual obligation' to pay him the cash.
Prof Gillespie insisted it was 'not in my thought process to repay a contractual obligation to me for my work at the university' – although he added later he would 'reflect' on the matter.
Mr Swinney however later insisted: 'I think that would be the right thing to do because the University of Dundee is facing an acute challenge.'
A report into the situation at Dundee by former Glasgow Caledonian University principal Professor Pamela Gillies last week heavily criticised Prof Gillespie.
Asked if Prof Gillespie should give back the money, the First Minister said: 'Given the awfulness of the Gillies review of the handling of the finances of the University of Dundee, I think that would be a reasonable thing to do.'
His comments came after Education Committee convener Douglas Ross branded Prof Gillespie a 'coward' and accused him of having 'created this mess and walked away into the sunset'.
Pressing the former principal over his time in charge, Mr Ross asked him if he was 'incompetent or corrupt' – with him replying he was 'certainly not corrupt' so he would 'have to choose incompetent'.
Prof Gillespie began his evidence to the committee with a 'heartfelt apology' to staff and students at Dundee – which is to receive an additional £40 million from the Scottish Government to help its financial situation.
'Let me start off with an apology to the staff and students,' he told MSPs.
'I think staff and students deserve better than they have had with the management and the governance of the University of Dundee over quite some time, but particularly over the period of 2024.
'It's a heartfelt apology for a university that I love, and a city that I hugely respect.
'I accept the buck stops with me. That is why at the end of last year I left.'
Mr Ross said the Gillies report showed Prof Gillespie had 'dangerous over self-confidence and complacency', and an 'overbearing leadership style'.
Prof Gillespie said that description was 'not something I recognise' – although he later told how a complaint had been made against him in a previous job at the Natural Environment Research Council about his 'overbearing behaviour'.
Prof Gillespie stepped down as principal at the University of Dundee in December, recalling this happened after others at the institution told him they had 'no confidence' in his leadership.
He told MSPs it was 'possible' he had then resigned by text – though he said he may instead have sent an email confirming his decision.
Mr Ross told him: 'The only thing I thought about you was you are a coward.
'You couldn't go back to the university and face the staff who were losing their jobs, face the students whose studies were so badly disrupted.
'You just created this mess and walked away into the sunset.'
Challenging him on the payout, Mr Ross told Prof Gillespie he had been given 'over £150,000 to walk away from a university you almost destroyed'.
He asked the former principal: 'At any point have you considered paying that money back?'
Prof Gillespie said the university had a 'contractual obligation' to pay him the money.
While he said he took 'overall management responsibility for what happened at the University of Dundee', he told Mr Ross he would 'push back' against the claim that he 'almost destroyed it'.
Liberal Democrat MSP Willie Rennie also pressed for Prof Gillespie to give back the money.
He told the former principal: 'To hold on to that just seems astonishing with the pain other people are feeling.
'I just genuinely want you to think about that, because I think it would send an important message.
'It wouldn't repair the damage but it would send an important message.'
Conservative MSP Miles Briggs said giving back the money could be a way for Prof Gillespie to 'send a message to students, to the staff who are left at Dundee, that you understand your role in this saga'.
The former principal told him: 'You are one of several members of the committee who have suggested that and I will reflect on that.'
Prof Gillespie also hit back at claims from former Holyrood minister Wendy Alexander, who was vice-principal international at the university for almost a decade.
In a submission to the committee, Baroness Alexander had said she was 'frozen out' and then 'asked to leave' her post after raising concerns about university finances.
Prof Gillespie insisted he did 'not want to get into a slagging match about people's characters', he told MSPs: 'Wendy's performance in terms of delivering student numbers wasn't what we needed it to be.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Under-threat bioethanol plant says talks with Government a ‘positive signal'
Under-threat bioethanol plant says talks with Government a ‘positive signal'

The Herald Scotland

time20 minutes ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Under-threat bioethanol plant says talks with Government a ‘positive signal'

But the firm, which is owned by Associated British Foods (ABF), said it is simultaneously beginning consultation with staff to wind down the plant, which employs more than 160 people, due to the uncertain situation – a process which could see production stop before September 13, if support is not provided. An ABF spokesperson said: 'We are extremely pleased to be entering the next phase of formal negotiations with Government over the future of Vivergo. 'We believe it is a very positive signal that Government recognises the strategic importance of a domestic bioethanol industry, and is serious about working with the sector to find a sustainable long-term future. 'We look forward to engaging intensively and constructively with ministers over the coming weeks.' The statement added: 'ABF cannot continue to absorb losses at the plant. That is why a timely solution is vital. 'Our clear preference is to find that solution through this process and to get back to running a business that can thrive in the long term.' The firm said that 'in parallel' it has entered into a consultation process with staff, which it said was a necessary step as there is no guarantee that the negotiations with Government will be successful. It said: 'Our employees are our most important consideration, and we will engage with them properly and transparently about the future. The Vivergo Fuels site in Hull is the UK's largest producer of bioethanol (Vivergo Fuels/PA) 'Consultation is not a fixed outcome, and closure is not a certainty. 'The outcome depends on the progress we are able to make through negotiations with the Government.' Last month, Vivergo wrote to the wheat farmers who supply it, telling them it will have to close unless there is quick Government intervention. It said the removal of a 19% tariff on US ethanol imports, which formed part of the recent UK-US trade deal, was the 'final blow'. The bioethanol industry says the deal has made it impossible to compete with heavily subsidised American products. Vivergo said the Hull plant can produce up to 420 million litres of bioethanol from wheat sourced from thousands of UK farms. It described bioethanol production as 'a key national strategic asset' which helps reduce emissions from petrol and is expected to be a key component in sustainable aircraft fuel in the future. The firm said it has just signed a £1.25 billion memorandum of understanding with Meld Energy to anchor a 'world-class' Sustainable Aviation Fuel facility at the site. It said the 'potential ahead is enormous', adding that 'there is a real opportunity for Hull to be home to one of Britain's most exciting clean fuel clusters'. The plant is also the UK's largest single production site for animal feed and the company says it indirectly supports about 4,000 jobs in the Humber and Lincolnshire region. Following ABF's announcement of a potential shutdown by mid-September, a Government spokesperson said on Thursday: 'We recognise this is a concerning time for workers and their families and it is disappointing to see this announcement after we entered into negotiations with the company on financial support yesterday. 'We will continue to take proactive steps to address the long-standing challenges the company faces and remain committed to working closely with them throughout this period to present a plan for a way forward that protects supply chains, jobs and livelihoods.' The Government said the bioethanol industry has been facing significant challenges for some time and officials and ministers have met with Ensus and Vivergo consistently over the last few months to address the challenges. It said both the business and transport secretaries met representatives from the industry on June 10 and engagement with the companies 'will continue at pace' to assess potential solutions, with the help of external consultants.

Church of England preparing for war 'that involves the UK' amid fears over global conflicts
Church of England preparing for war 'that involves the UK' amid fears over global conflicts

Daily Mail​

time22 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Church of England preparing for war 'that involves the UK' amid fears over global conflicts

The Church of England is preparing for Britain to be drawn into a war due to the growing threat of global conflict, it revealed today. For what is thought to be the first time, a serving member of the Armed Forces - who fought in Iraq and Afghanistan - will brief the Church's ruling body on the threats facing Britain when it meets next month. While not yet on a 'war footing' and still 'praying for peace', the Bishop to the Armed Forces said the Church is now readying itself to play an important spiritual role during 'conflict that involves the UK'. As part of preparations for this, the CofE's top brass is looking back to the leadership shown by senior religious figures during the Second World War for inspiration. Reverend Hugh Nelson, Bishop to the Armed Forces, said the Church wants to 'take seriously' the potential challenges ahead and avoid being caught out like the nation was by the pandemic. Revd Nelson said he had been hearing from military personnel for the past two years 'rising concern about the threat of very, very serious conflict, including conflict that involves the UK'. During a briefing ahead of next month's General Synod, he referenced the Government's national security strategy, published earlier this week, which warned the UK must actively prepare for a 'wartime scenario' on British soil 'for the first time in many years'. The upcoming meeting of the Church's ruling body will receive an address by Brigadier Jaish Mahan, Deputy Commander (Reserves) 1st UK Division, in what is thought to be the first time a serving member of the Armed Forces who is not a CofE chaplain or Royal has spoken at Synod. Brigadier Jaish - a practising Christian who joined the army in 1994 and served in Kosovo, Sierra Leone, Iraq and Afghanistan - will brief Synod on the 'global context and the challenges faced by the UK'. A Synod agenda paper states: 'While a conflict directly involving the UK is not an immediate risk, given the very serious impact such a conflict would have on every person in the country, we must be prepared. 'The pandemic showed us the risks of being unprepared for a national crisis, and we must learn the lessons.' Revd Nelson said today: 'As a Church, we want to take seriously those challenges, both to do everything that we can to pray for and work for and advocate for peace, because the kingdom of God is a kingdom of justice and peace, and to face the reality and to put in place, or at least to begin to have conversations towards plans about how the Church might need to respond and to be if there were to be a serious conflict. 'We do not want to be in the situation that we were all in - Church and wider society - pre-pandemic, when those that knew things said there will one day be a pandemic, and none of us had done anything in preparation for that. So we want to take that seriously.' While he declined to go so far as to say the work was putting the Church on a 'war footing', he noted that consideration is being given to how religious leaders acted in previous wartime scenarios. He said: 'We have looked back at some of the ways in which senior Church leadership - archbishops and bishops - led, the things that they said, particularly in the Second World War.'

Bring on the BNPL regulation, but let's get it right!: By Willem Wellinghoff
Bring on the BNPL regulation, but let's get it right!: By Willem Wellinghoff

Finextra

time25 minutes ago

  • Finextra

Bring on the BNPL regulation, but let's get it right!: By Willem Wellinghoff

The rapid expansion of Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) services has undeniably reshaped the consumer credit landscape, offering a flexible and accessible payment method that caters to diverse lifestyles. However, this growth has simultaneously brought into sharp focus the imperative for suitable regulation. While further regulation is welcome in the wake of the Consumer Credit Act review, it must strike a delicate balance to safeguard consumers without stifling innovation and the UK's competitiveness. We mustn't forget that BNPL serves as an inclusive payment method, empowering individuals to manage their finances by spreading payments in a way that suits their needs. This aspect of inclusivity, allowing consumers a wider choice in how they pay for goods and services, remains a vital requirement. The emotional connection consumers feel to BNPL, stemming from its ability to provide informed choice and accountability, is also a key factor in its enduring appeal. However, the inherent lending essence of BNPL, despite its "payment method" perception, necessitates a strong focus on consumer protection. Government initiatives including introducing affordability checks and granting consumers the right to complain to the Financial Ombudsman from 2026, are significant steps towards improving perceptions of this newer form of borrowing. The new regulations will ensure a consistent standard across the industry, fostering greater consumer confidence and fairer access to refunds. Regulation sweet spot The challenge lies in ensuring regulation is proportionate. An overly stringent approach risks phasing out an important product in the market, hindering the very inclusivity that BNPL provides. In particular this could be an issue in the payments ecosystem where offering BNPL through orchestration might even potentially be considered as a form of credit broking which would require payment service providers and orchestrators to potentially enhance their regulatory permissions to include consumer credit activities, and be subject to additional onerous rules. The UK's National Payments Vision emphasises continued growth and innovation, and any regulatory framework must align with this. The balance required between managing innovation, suitability tailored to individual needs, and robust regulation is a complex tightrope walk. Companies like Ecommpay are already operating with a strong compliance and regulatory lens in our product design, recognising the need for emotionally empowering choices for consumers. The maturing BNPL market now offers a diverse array of solutions, and for e-commerce merchants, the key is to collaborate with payment providers who can offer a comprehensive range of credit options. Solutions like Visa Instalments, which leverage existing card infrastructure and eliminate the need for additional credit checks, can significantly improve checkout performance, especially in high-value sectors such as travel and luxury goods. These instalment solutions, whether interest-free or low-cost, provide greater financial flexibility for customers. Empowering payments and protecting customers Ultimately, however, the future of BNPL lies in a nuanced approach to regulation. While the core emphasis must be on affordability, transparent reporting to credit reference bureaus, and recognising vulnerability in consumers who might overextend themselves, this must not come at the expense of choice and innovation or restricting merchants' ability to offer payment methods that customers have come to use and trust. The goal is to cultivate an environment where BNPL continues to be an inclusive and empowering payment method, while simultaneously ensuring robust consumer protection and maintaining the UK's competitive edge in the global payments ecosystem. Payment providers, by staying abreast of the evolving regulatory landscape and offering diverse, compliant solutions, will be instrumental in achieving this delicate balance.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store