New Orleans pushes to legalize police use of ‘facial surveillance'
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
In an emailed statement, a police spokesperson said the department 'does not surveil the public,' and that surveillance is 'not the goal of this ordinance revision.' But the word 'surveillance' appears in the proposed ordinance dozens of times, including explicitly giving police authority to use 'facial surveillance.'
Advertisement
Many police departments use AI to help them identify suspects from still images taken at or near the scene of a crime, but New Orleans police have already taken the technology a step further. Over the past two years, the department relied on a privately owned network of cameras equipped with facial recognition software to constantly monitor the streets for wanted people and automatically ping an app on officers' mobile phones to convey the names and locations of possible matches, The Post reported last month.
Advertisement
In April, after The Post requested public records about this system, New Orleans Police Superintendent Anne Kirkpatrick paused the automated alerts and ordered a review into how officers used the technology and whether the practice violated local restrictions on facial recognition.
David Barnes, a New Orleans police sergeant overseeing legal research and planning, who wrote the proposed ordinance, said he hopes to complete the review and share his findings before the City Council vote. The facial recognition alerts are still paused, he said Wednesday.
There are no federal regulations around the use of AI by local law enforcement. New Orleans was one of many cities to ban the technology during the policing overhauls passed in the wake of the Black Lives Matter protests of 2020, with the City Council saying it had 'significant concerns about the role of facial recognition technologies and surveillance databases in exacerbating racial and other bias.' Federal studies have shown the technology to be less reliable when scanning people of color, women, and older people.
New Orleans partly rolled back the restrictions in 2022, letting police use facial recognition for searches of specific suspects of violent crimes, but not for general tracking of people in public places. Each time police want to scan a face, they must send a still image to trained examiners at a state facility and later provide details about these scans to the city council — guardrails meant to protect the public's privacy and prevent software errors from leading to wrongful arrests.
Advertisement
Now, city leaders want to give police broad access to the technology with fewer limitations, arguing that automated surveillance tools are necessary for fighting crime. Violent crime rates in New Orleans, like much of the country, are at historic lows, according to Jeff Asher, a consultant who tracks crime statistics in the region. But facial recognition-equipped cameras have proven useful in a few recent high-profile incidents, including the May 16 escape of 10 inmates from a local jail and the New Year's Day attack on Bourbon Street that left 14 dead.
'Violent crime is at an all-time low but mass murders and shootings are at an all-time high,' Oliver Thomas, one of two council members sponsoring the ordinance, said in an interview this week. 'This is a tool to deal with some of this mass violence and mass murders and attacks.'
After The Post informed Thomas there were 310 fatal and nonfatal shootings in New Orleans last year — by far the lowest number in the 14 years the city council has published these statistics on its online crime data dashboard — he acknowledged that shootings are down and partly attributed the decline to his work with young people and ex-offenders.
Nora Ahmed, the legal director for the ACLU of Louisiana, said council members are using public concern over recent news to justify the widespread adoption of facial recognition technology, or FRT — a powerful technology with the potential to strip people of their rights.
'In the name of making FRT available for a once-in-a-decade jail break, this bill opens up FRT to being used by federal and state entities, and enterprising local police departments,' Ahmed said in a text message. 'This type of surveillance should not exist in the United States period.'
Advertisement
The new ordinance would give police the ability to use 'facial surveillance' and 'characteristic tracking' systems to actively monitor the streets looking for people with warrants or people under investigation. It would require them to continue sharing data about facial searches to the City Council and begin reporting details about the software they use and its accuracy.
While the ordinance says police cannot use facial surveillance tools to target abortion seekers or undocumented immigrants, Ahmed says those protections are 'paper thin' and worries officers would find ways around them.
It's not clear whether New Orleans plans to keep working with Project NOLA, a privately funded nonprofit group that has provided automated facial recognition alerts to officers despite having no contract with the city. Barnes, the police sergeant, said Project NOLA would need to come into a formal data-sharing agreement with the city if it wanted to continue sending automated alerts to officers who have logged into a Project NOLA system to receive them. Under the new ordinance, Project NOLA could also be required to publish information about all of its searches to the city council.
Such data reporting could be complicated with a live facial recognition system, in which cameras are constantly scanning every face in their vicinity. With hundreds of cameras potentially scanning thousands of faces a day, Project NOLA, or the city, could theoretically need to report information about millions of facial recognition scans in each of its quarterly data reports the department is required to provide to the City Council.
Bryan Lagarde, Project NOLA's founder, declined to comment this week, saying he was on vacation.
Advertisement
New Orleans's embrace of the term 'surveillance' — which appears 40 times in the text of the proposed ordinance — appears at odds with statements made by Kirkpatrick, the city's top police official. In an interview last month, Kirkpatrick said she believes governments should be prevented from surveilling their citizens, especially when they are in public exercising their constitutional rights.
'I do not believe in surveilling the citizenry and residents of our country,' Kirkpatrick said at the time. 'Surveilling is an invasion of our privacy.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
a few seconds ago
- Newsweek
Melania Trump's Message to Putin Sparks AI Claims
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Melania Trump's letter to Russian President Vladimir Putin has sparked speculation over whether the first lady used AI to pen a missive to the Kremlin chief. In a message posted to the first lady's social media, Melania Trump appealed to Putin to "singlehandedly restore" the "melodic laughter" of children caught up in the nearly three and a half years of full-scale war in Ukraine. Why It Matters President Donald Trump met with Putin in Alaska on Friday with relations soured by Russia's refusal to ink a ceasefire deal brokered by the U.S. to stop fighting in Ukraine. Although no deal was reached in Anchorage, Trump described the summit as "useful" and pivoted his position on a ceasefire, saying he would move straight to a permanent peace deal. Ukrainian President, Volodymyr Zelensky, who will visit Washington on Monday, said on Saturday that Russia's refusal to sign a ceasefire "complicates the situation." First lady Melania Trump listens as President Donald Trump delivers remarks during an Independence Day military family picnic on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, D.C., on July 4, 2025. First lady Melania Trump listens as President Donald Trump delivers remarks during an Independence Day military family picnic on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, D.C., on July 4, To Know The message sent by the first lady, dubbed a "peace letter" on her official Instagram account, quickly prompted online commentators to question whether the letter had been generated using AI. Democrat strategist, Keith Edwards, said in a post to X the letter "says a whole lot of nothing," and "may have been written by AI." Chris Jackson, a long-time supporter of former president Joe Biden and Democrat activist, said in his own social media post that he had run the letter through AI, which had deemed the message to the Kremlin AI-generated. Grok, a tool developed by Elon Musk's company xAI, said the letter "shows strong signs of AI generation" with "minor human edits for tone." There is no concrete evidence that the letter published on the first lady's accounts was generated using artificial intelligence. Newsweek has reached out to Melania Trump's office for comment. As tools improve, it becomes harder to work out when AI is responsible for published writing. When Newsweek asked AI's opinion on the letter, it said it had "qualities that resemble AI writing," including a lofty, idealistic style. "Words like purity, innocence, humanity, love, possibility, dignity are stacked densely without much concrete policy or detail. AI models tend to default to these universal values when asked to 'sound inspirational,'" according to one AI response. But AI also said the letter did not feature the types of tonal shifts or awkward phasing often associated with content generated using artificial intelligence. Zelensky Thanks The First Lady for 'Sincere Attention' President Trump hand-delivered a letter from his wife to Putin during the summit, which focused on the fate of Ukrainian and Russian children, Reuters reported, citing two unnamed White House officials. Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine Andrii Sybiha said in a post to social media that Zelensky had "conveyed his gratitude" to Trump during a conversation on Saturday for the first lady's "sincere attention and efforts to bring forcibly deported Ukrainian kids back." The version of the letter published by the first lady on her social media does not directly mention Ukrainian children taken to Russia. Ukraine has consistently said Russia has abducted thousands of Ukrainian children throughout its full-scale invasion of the country and relocated them to Russia or Russian-controlled areas. Kyiv has called this a war crime. The International Criminal Court in March 2023 issued arrest warrants for Putin and Maria Lvova-Belova, Russia's children's rights commissioner, for being "allegedly responsible for the war crime of unlawful deportation of population (children) and that of unlawful transfer of population (children) from occupied areas of Ukraine to the Russian Federation." Moscow has said children were moved away from conflict areas to protect them. UN Human Rights Chief Volker Türk said earlier this year that children had been subject to "summary executions, arbitrary detention, conflict-related sexual violence, torture and ill-treatment" in the four regions of Ukraine Russia claimed to have annexed in fall 2022. The Kremlin declared Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia were part of Russia after referendums widely condemned as a sham. Russia had seized Crimea, to the south of the mainland, from Ukraine in 2014. The first lady has released an audiobook touted as "created entirely with artificial intelligence audio technology." The seven-hour-long audiobook is narrated by Melania Trump's "official AI voice." Melania Trump faced accusations in 2016 that she had plagiarized a previous address given by Michelle Obama during a section of her own speech to the Republican National Convention. Trump's team at the time said Melania Trump had used "common words" and not copied Michelle Obama's speech. The First Lady's Letter in Full "Dear President Putin, Every child shares the same quiet dreams in their heart, whether born randomly into a nation's rustic countryside or a magnificent city-center. They dream of love, possibility, and safety from danger. As parents, it is our duty to nurture the next generation's hope. As leaders, the responsibility to sustain our children extends beyond the comfort of a few. Undeniably, we must strive to paint a dignity-filled world for all – so that every soul may wake to peace, and so that the future itself is perfectly guarded. A simple yet profound concept, Mr. Putin, as I am sure you agree, is that each generation's descendants begin their lives with a purity – an innocence which stands above geography, government, and ideology. Yet in today's world, some children are forced to carry a quiet laughter, untouched by the darkness around them – a silent defiance against the forces that can potentially claim their future. Mr. Putin, you can singlehandedly restore their melodic laughter. In protecting the innocence of these children, you will do more than serve Russia alone – you serve humanity itself. Such a bold idea transcends all human division, and you, Mr. Putin, are fit to implement this vision with a stroke of the pen today. It is time."
Forbes
30 minutes ago
- Forbes
Cherokee Nation Shows How AI Governance Can Be Sovereign
When most enterprises and governments evaluate artificial intelligence, their primary lens is return on investment such as how many processes can be automated, how many jobs restructured, and how much efficiency squeezed from the system. At the Ai4 2025 conference in Las Vegas, Paula Starr, Chief Information Officer of the Cherokee Nation, offers a very different perspective. For sovereign tribal governments like the Cherokee, ROI isn't purely financial. It is cultural, legal, and existential. 'AI must serve the collective good and uphold Cherokee values,' Starr told the audience. 'If a tool compromises that, it doesn't belong in our Nation's systems.' This perspective positions the Cherokee Nation at the forefront of a movement redefining what artificial intelligence governance means. While big tech and large governments experiment with guardrails, the Cherokee Nation is constructing a model rooted in centuries of tradition and sovereignty. From Enterprise ROI To Sovereign ROI The Cherokee Nation, with nearly 480,000 citizens and a land base of 7,000 square miles in northeastern Oklahoma, has ambitions and obligations that extend far beyond typical government IT departments. The question of AI adoption is not simply 'how much faster can a form be processed' or 'what percentage of staff hours can be reduced.' It is about protecting Cherokee data sovereignty, ensuring cultural preservation, and reinforcing treaty rights in the digital era. That shift in framing, away from efficiency and toward sovereignty, has profound implications for how AI is selected, tested, and deployed. In most enterprises, procurement is measured in business outcomes. For the Cherokee Nation, the baseline metric is trust. Citizen data must be treated with the same protection as physical sovereignty, and outcomes must strengthen rather than erode the community's lifeways. The concept of ROI here stretches to include aspects of citizen trust, cultural preservation, and legal autonomy. The key questions to address with AI include are citizens more confident engaging with tribal services, does AI strengthen traditions, language, or practices, and does technology reinforce tribal governance authority? AI in Action: Use Cases Built on Values Starr's presentation outlined several initiatives now underway that showcase how AI can be deployed under this framework. The Gadugi Portal, named after the Cherokee value of working together, is built on Salesforce and augmented with AI to provide authenticated access to tribal services. Rather than reducing headcount, the platform allows more citizens to be served without expanding staffing, improving efficiency while broadening reach across geography. A Legal Agent developed in Microsoft Copilot Studio with assistance from MIT interns, consolidates treaty law, tribal codes, executive orders, and court rulings into a single AI-driven research system. For a sovereign government often required to defend its rights in state and federal courts, this capability accelerates legal decision-making and strengthens sovereignty. The AI Agent, as part of a website refresh launching this year, includes an AI assistant that helps citizens navigate services and applications. The expected result is higher completion rates, 24/7 accessibility, and a reduction in friction for rural citizens. In a unique blending of cultural continuity and conservation, the Nation is using AI-driven scanning to replicate turtle shells traditionally used in ceremonies, without harming wildlife by using 3D printed shells. These examples underscore a central point. AI is not replacing people, it is extending tradition and sovereignty into the digital domain. Governance: Policy Before Code Many enterprises are only now realizing the importance of governance after experimentation with generative AI has already run ahead of regulation. The Cherokee Nation has taken the opposite approach. In October 2024, Principal Chief Chuck Hoskin Jr. issued an Executive Order on Data Sovereignty and Self-Governance, creating the AI, Data Sovereignty, and Cybersecurity Task Force. Starr, as CIO, chaired this group, which produced a comprehensive roadmap earlier this year. The report's key recommendations included adoption of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework to provide a baseline for ethics, transparency, and accountability. Also recommended is the creation of dedicated AI and Data Governance Committees with clear roles for policy development, legal review, and risk mitigation. Other recommendations include institution of an AI Questionnaire for evaluating any generative AI tools under consideration, covering oversight, data privacy, bias mitigation, and risk scenarios. The document also aims for standardization of the Cherokee Citizen ID across all data systems, strengthening both sovereignty and service delivery, expansion of data literacy programs for the workforce, ensuring adoption doesn't outpace understanding, and establishment of a Tribal Innovation Summit to generate citizen-driven use cases. Community Values as a Governance Lens The framework is not just technical. It is cultural. Starr shared how Cherokee Community Values are core to the implementation and usage of AI. Principles such as 'detsadasinasdi itsehesdi', translated as live skillfully and resourcefully aims to engage with new technologies to augment talents and skills. 'Detsadageyusesdi' which is to protect each other as a mother with child aims to protect the data of our citizens as we would protect their existence and 'detsadanvwidisgesdi', encourage and instruct one another in a gentle and thoughtful way is focused on meeting the challenges of the future and staying forever resilient. When surveyed, while only 74% of Cherokee citizens said they had limited AI understanding, 70% were open to AI adoption if it was aligned with cultural and ethical standards. That conditional openness is the key, AI is welcome if it is accountable to values. By embedding these cultural guardrails, the Nation ensures that AI outcomes are not only efficient but also consistent with the community's identity. In effect, the Cherokee are demonstrating that governance frameworks grounded in culture may be more effective than those grounded solely in regulation. Broader Context: A Global Movement The Cherokee Nation is not alone in rethinking digital sovereignty. Around the world, Indigenous communities are building frameworks to ensure emerging technologies serve their people rather than exploit them. In Canada, the Indigenous Digital Sovereignty Initiative seeks to give First Nations control over data infrastructure and governance. In New Zealand, the Māori Data Sovereignty Network asserts that data about Māori people should be subject to Māori governance. The Cherokee approach, integrating AI into service delivery while grounding deployments in cultural values, adds a North American model to this growing international movement. For governments worldwide struggling with questions of digital ethics, this experiment in sovereignty-driven AI governance may provide a reference point. Where corporations often prioritize shareholder returns, sovereign nations must prioritize the well-being of citizens and future generations. As Starr put it plainly, 'AI is a tool. But it's our people, our values, and our policy that give it direction.' That framing may turn out to be the most sustainable way to harness AI, because it ties innovation not just to speed and scale but to the long-term continuity of a people.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The US May Have Already Lost the AI Race to China Due to a Key Weakness
You might have heard of an "AI race" heating up between the US and China, a bitter rivalry between two global adversaries that could shape the direction of world history. At least, that's how some in the US feel. While China has repeatedly tried to establish a geopolitical friendship with the richest nation in the world, officials and pundits in the US have doubled down, reframing artificial intelligence as the 21st century's nuclear bomb. In the meantime, China may have gotten a massive lead — by actively investing in its power grid, while the United States' is quickly running out of capacity to power immensely power-hungry AI models. As Fortune reports, Americans who've had a look at China's technological development firsthand found that the two country's aren't even in the same league, given China's next-level power grid. "Energy is considered a solved problem," wrote Rui Ma, editor of the US publication Tech Buzz China. "Everywhere we went, people treated energy availability as a given," she continued. "This is a stark contrast to the US, where AI growth is increasingly tied to debates over data center power consumption and grid limitations." AI is a notoriously energy-intensive technology. The data centers powering large language models like ChatGPT are immense labyrinths of computer chips, which suck down resources like power and water in order to keep up with demand. As Fortune notes, this effectively makes electricity the key bottleneck for expanding AI infrastructure. That's caused some critical shortages in the US. Short on energy and hopped up on fantasies of an arms race, American companies are resorting to all kinds of bizarre strategies to get their juice. Elon Musk's xAI, for example, is running 35 portable methane gas generators in the parking lot of one of its main datacenters in Memphis, encircling nearby communities in a cloud of noxious smog. China has no such problems. In 2024, China was responsible for nearly 65 percent of the world's renewable energy construction, installing so many solar panels and wind turbines that it caused the country's CO2 emissions to drop for the first time — despite record-high demands for energy. Whether or not the US can catch up remains to be seen. President Donald Trump previously made an off-the-cuff remark about attaching coal power plants to data centers directly. It's an unfortunate conundrum in an age when energy demand in the US has never been higher. In the meantime, China keeps chugging along, seemingly unperturbed by any energy bottlenecks — and the Trump administration's posturing. More on AI: AI Datacenters Are Raising Nearby Residents' Electric Bills Solve the daily Crossword
