Which credit card rewards are better: Cash back or points?
Cash-back credit cards tend to be easier to use due to straightforward rewards programs with simple earning and redemption rates. However, you might prefer a travel rewards card for its redemption options, such as flights and hotel stays. Many travel credit cards also have increased perks and benefits, including travel insurance or airport lounge access.
The best credit card rewards aren't a matter of cash-back vs. points — what you earn largely comes down to your spending habits, lifestyle, and personal preference.
Cash-back credit cards are rewards cards that earn cash back on eligible purchases. For example, a cash-back card with a 2% rewards rate will earn 2% back on your purchases. That might seem small, but it can add up over time.
The average American household spent over $20,000 on food and transportation in 2022, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. If you spent $20,000 in a year on a 2% cash-back card, you would earn $400 in cash-back rewards.
It depends on the card and credit card company, but standard cash-back redemption options include:
Statement credits
Deposits into bank accounts
Covering past purchases
Mailed checks
Gift cards
Some cards, such as the Chase Freedom Unlimited®, include travel bookings as a redemption option. That means you can use cash-back rewards for travel-related redemptions, like flights and hotel stays.
Cash rewards: You can earn valuable cash back for making eligible purchases with your cash-back card. In addition, cash-back rewards programs are often easier to use and understand than travel rewards programs.
Welcome bonuses: It's common for cash-back cards to provide a welcome offer or sign-up bonus to new cardholders. You typically have to meet a spending requirement to earn the bonus.
Low annual fees: Many cash-back cards have low (under $100) or no annual fees, keeping your yearly card membership costs down.
0% intro APR offers: Cash-back cards have some of the best 0% intro APR offers on purchases and balance transfers.
Foreign transaction fees: Most cash-back cards charge foreign transaction fees, making them poor choices for international travel.
Limited redemptions: Travel redemption options are more uncommon on cash-back cards.
Fewer perks and benefits: You typically won't find as robust travel benefits on cash-back cards, including travel insurance, airport lounge access, and annual travel credits.
We recommend cash-back credit cards if you prefer earning cash rewards on your purchases, want a low annual fee, and want to take advantage of a 0% intro APR offer.
These cards aren't great for frequent travelers because of foreign transaction fees and limited travel redemption options.
This embedded content is not available in your region.
Why we like it: The Capital One Savor is an excellent card for earning cash back in many everyday categories, including grocery stores, dining, and entertainment. If your typical spending habits align with these categories, this could be the perfect addition to your wallet.
Read our full Capital One Savor Cash Rewards review
Why we like it: If you want a simple cash-back card, look no further than the Citi Double Cash. This card has a straightforward rewards rate that works on all eligible purchases. It could be all you need if you don't want to juggle multiple cards.
Read our full Citi Double Cash review
Why we like it: The Amex Blue Cash Everyday makes sense if you want a simple cash-back card for everyday shopping. We especially like that online shoppers can earn elevated rewards on Amazon.com, Walmart.com, and other online retailers.
Read our full Amex Blue Cash Everyday review
Points and miles credit cards earn travel rewards on eligible purchases. These cards often provide various redemption options, but their rewards are designed for travel bookings, such as flights and hotel stays.
Travel rewards vary by card and credit card issuer, which can be confusing for travel card beginners. For example, 10,000 points on one card might offer a different value than 10,000 points on another.
However, it's easy to determine the value of your rewards if you have a specific redemption in mind. Suppose you want to book a flight that costs $150 or 10,000 miles. If you divide $150 by 10,000, you get 0.015.
That means your miles are worth 1.5 cents per mile for that specific redemption. Anything above one cent per mile could be considered decent value, though some rewards' standard value might already be higher than that.
Standard credit card points and miles redemption options include:
Travel bookings
Transfers to travel partners
Covering past travel purchases
Statement credits
Mailed checks
Gift cards
Note that the redemption value for available redemptions varies by credit card. However, a general rule of thumb is that you'll get the most value when redeeming points to book travel or transfer rewards to travel partners.
Travel rewards: If you're a frequent traveler, nothing beats earning valuable points or miles on your existing purchases. Turning gas station and grocery purchases into flights and hotel stays on your next trip is incredibly rewarding.
Welcome bonuses: Welcome offers on the best travel credit cards tend to be more significant than cash-back card bonuses.
Increased perks and benefits: The best rewards credit cards provide a wide range of benefits, including travel credits, airport lounge access, travel insurance, and more. It's also common for travel cards to waive foreign transaction fees.
More redemption variety: It's common for travel cards to have many of the same redemption options as cash-back cards, such as statement credits and gift cards. In addition, you can also have multiple travel-related redemptions.
No 0% intro APR offers: Most travel cards don't provide intro APR offers on purchases or balance transfers.
Potential for high annual fees: Premium and luxury travel cards have high annual fees, often exceeding $300 or more annually. You must determine if it's worth paying an annual fee to use a card's benefits and rewards.
More complicated rewards: Points and miles values vary depending on the rewards program and how you plan to use them. Learning can be confusing at first, but it can pay off with big savings on travel expenses.
We recommend points and miles credit cards if you want to earn travel rewards to help offset significant travel expenses, such as flights and hotels. You can use these cards to make everyday purchases and the rewards you earn can help fuel your next vacation.
In addition, travel credit cards are essential for international travel since most don't charge foreign transaction fees. They also provide travel insurance and luxury travel perks, such as airport lounge access.
Why we like it: The Wells Fargo Autograph provides an exceptionally high rewards rate for a card with a $0 annual fee. Even better, its spending categories align with many everyday expenses, including dining, gas, and transit. If you want a low-stress but rewarding travel card, the Wells Fargo Autograph could be the right choice for you.
Why we like it: The Capital One Venture Rewards makes a strong case for anyone who values simplicity. It doesn't have confusing bonus categories and earns an elevated rate on all eligible purchases. In addition, you get added perks like access to transfer partners and receiving up to a $120 credit for TSA PreCheck or Global Entry applications.
Read our full Capital One Venture Rewards review
Why we like it: The Chase Sapphire Preferred has been one of the most popular travel credit cards for years because of its low annual fee and top-notch travel benefits. That includes getting 25% more value when your points are redeemed for travel through the Chase Travel℠ portal. You can also transfer points to various travel partner loyalty programs, including Southwest Airlines Rapid Rewards, World of Hyatt, and Virgin Atlantic Flying Club.
Read our full Chase Sapphire Preferred review
With cash-back cards, you typically get exactly what the earning rate says. If a card earns 2% cash back on everything, that's what you'll get for making purchases. With points and miles, your rewards value might vary by redemption. For example, 10,000 points could equal $125 toward travel or $100 cash back.
Booking travel through Chase Travel℠ is one of the best ways to use your Chase Ultimate Rewards points with certain Chase cards. For example, 60,000 points on the Chase Sapphire Preferred are worth $750 toward travel redeemed through Chase Travel, whereas those points would only be worth $600 if redeemed for cash back.
Depending on the redemption, some credit card rewards are worth over $0.01 per point, offering more value than most cash-back cards. That's often the case when transferring points to travel partners with valuable rewards programs. For example, you can typically get more than $0.01 per point on redemptions you make with Air Canada, Southwest Airlines, and Virgin Atlantic.
This article was edited by Rebecca McCracken
Editorial Disclosure: The information in this article has not been reviewed or approved by any advertiser. All opinions belong solely to Yahoo Finance and are not those of any other entity. The details on financial products, including card rates and fees, are accurate as of the publish date. All products or services are presented without warranty. Check the bank's website for the most current information. This site doesn't include all currently available offers. Credit score alone does not guarantee or imply approval for any financial product.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
11 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Walmart sees sales ‘momentum' despite tariffs
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up BRANDING Advertisement Critics deride Cracker Barrel's new logo as 'sterile,' 'soulless' and 'woke' The new Cracker Barrel logo is seen on a menu inside the restaurant in Pembroke Pines, Fla., on Aug. 21. Joe Raedle/Getty Cracker Barrel's stock tumbled Thursday as the restaurant chain faced backlash over a new logo that critics derided as 'woke.' What's 'wrong with @CrackerBarrel??!' Donald Trump Jr. wrote on the social media site, X, on Wednesday evening, quoting another account that accused the company of scrapping a 'beloved American aesthetic and replaced it with sterile, soulless branding.' When the national restaurant chain unveiled the logo on Tuesday, it said the new and more streamlined look was 'rooted even more closely to the iconic barrel shape and word mark that started it all.' Notably, missing was the image of a man in overalls leaning against a wooden barrel that had been part of the company's motif since 1977. But within 48 hours, the redesign backlash was raging online, with commenters on both sides using it as a cudgel. Company CEO Julie Felss Masino has since gone on the offensive, telling ABC's 'Good Morning America' that the 'feedback has been overwhelmingly positive.' She added that 'Cracker Barrel needs to feel like the Cracker Barrel for today and for tomorrow.' In a statement, the company said that its 'values haven't changed, and the heart and soul of Cracker Barrel haven't changed.' It added that the new logo is the fifth iteration since 1969. — WASHINGTON POST Advertisement ENTERTAINMENT Apple boosts price of TV+ subscription by 30 percent to $13 a month Crew member Jose Montes polishes a backdrop with the Apple TV+ logo before the premiere of the web television series "See," at the Regency Village Theatre in Los Angeles in 2019. Chris Pizzello/Invision/AP/file Apple Inc. raised the monthly subscription price of its TV+ streaming platform by 30 percent to $13, part of a push to generate more revenue from services. The rate takes effect in the United States and certain international markets for new subscribers on Thursday, Apple said in an emailed statement. Apple TV+ previously cost $10 per month. The TV+ annual plan will remain $99, and the company isn't changing its price for the Apple One bundle of services. Apple has followed streaming peers in steadily increasing prices. But unlike Netflix, Disney+, and HBO Max, the TV+ service is just offered in a single plan — rather than a range of tiers that include ad-supported versions. Apple TV+ has lagged behind those services in subscriber count since launching in 2019, but its original programming continues to earn accolades. Last month, the company garnered 81 Emmy nominations, with Severance picking up 27 for its second season. — BLOOMBERG NEWS Advertisement AUTOMOTIVE Tesla is slow in reporting crashes and the feds have launched an investigation to find out why A Tesla dealership is seen on July 25 in Austin, Texas. Brandon Bell/Getty Federal auto safety regulators are investigating why Tesla has repeatedly broken rules requiring it to quickly tell them about crashes involving its self-driving technology, a potentially significant development given the company's plans to put hundreds of thousands of driverless cars on US roads over the next year. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said in a filing on Thursday that Tesla's reports on 'numerous' incidents involving its driver assistance and self-driving features were submitted far too late — several months after the crashes instead of within five days as required. The probe comes two months after the electric vehicle maker run by Elon Musk started a self-driving taxi service in Austin, Texas, with hopes of soon offering it nationwide. The company also hopes to send over-the-air software updates to millions of Teslas already on the road that will allow them to drive themselves. Investors enthusiastic about such plans have kept Tesla stock aloft despite plunging sales and profits due to boycotts over Musk's support for President Trump and far-right politicians in Europe. The safety agency said the probe will focus on why Tesla took so long to report the crashes, whether the reports included all the necessary data and details, and if there are crashes that the agency still doesn't know about. Tesla did not respond to a request for comment, but the agency noted that the company has told it the delays were 'due to an issue with Tesla's data collection,' which Tesla says has now been fixed. — ASSOCIATED PRESS Advertisement ECONOMY Federal Reserve official says she won't be 'bullied' by Trump into resigning Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook. Al Drago/Bloomberg Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook late Wednesday said she wouldn't leave her post after Trump on social media called on her to resign over an accusation from one his officials that she committed mortgage fraud. 'I have no intention of being bullied to step down from my position because of some questions raised in a tweet,' Cook said in a statement issued by the Fed. Bill Pulte, the head of the agency that regulates mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and a Trump appointee, alleged on the X social media platform early Wednesday that Cook had claimed two primary residences — in Ann Arbor, Mich., and Atlanta — in 2021 to get better mortgage terms. Mortgage rates are often higher on second homes or those purchased to rent. Trump followed up Pulte's accusation by calling on Cook to resign, in the latest effort by the administration to exert greater control over one of the few remaining independent agencies in Washington. Trump has repeatedly attacked the Fed's chair, Jerome Powell, for not cutting its short-term interest rate, and even threatened to fire him. Cook also said, 'I do intend to take any questions about my financial history seriously as a member of the Federal Reserve and so I am gathering the accurate information to answer any legitimate questions and provide the facts.' — ASSOCIATED PRESS LEGAL Their window seats lacked windows, So Delta and United passengers sued A Delta Air Lines plane takes off from the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport on April 9. Joe Raedle/Getty Two lawsuits filed Tuesday accuse Delta Air Lines and United Airlines of knowingly charging passengers extra for window seats that were not next to a window. The class action suits were filed against Delta in federal court in New York and against United in federal court in San Francisco, and accuse each carrier of selling more than 1 million window seats that were, in fact, windowless. 'We're seeking to hold United and Delta accountable for charging customers premiums for products that they didn't deliver, and misrepresenting the nature of the products that they did deliver,' Carter Greenbaum, an attorney whose law firm, Greenbaum Olbrantz LLP, filed the suits, said in an interview. 'They sold customers window seats and ended up seating them next to a wall.' Delta declined to comment. United did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The suits claim that some of the airlines' Boeing 737, Boeing 757 and Airbus A321 aircraft were built with at least one 'window seat' that is adjacent to a wall, not a window, generally because of the placement of air conditioning ducts or electrical components. Other carriers, such as American Airlines and Alaska Airlines, operate similar aircraft types but disclose during the seat selection process if a seat does not include a window. — NEW YORK TIMES Advertisement
The Hill
42 minutes ago
- The Hill
US flight attendants are fed up like their Air Canada peers. Here's why they are unlikely to strike
At the end of work trips, Nathan Miller goes home to a makeshift bedroom in his parents' house in Virginia. The 29-year-old flight attendant is part of a PSA Airlines crew based in Philadelphia, but he can't afford to live there. Miller says he makes about $24,000 a year staffing multiple flights a day as a full-time attendant for the American Airlines subsidiary. To get to work, he commutes by plane between Virginia Beach and Philadelphia International Airport, a distance of about 215 miles. 'I've considered finding a whole new job. It's not something that I want to do,' Miller, who joined PSA two years ago, said. 'But it's not sustainable.' His situation isn't unique. Frustrations among flight attendants at both regional and legacy airlines have been building for years over paychecks that many of them say don't match the weight of what their jobs demand. Compounding the discontent over hourly wages is a long-standing airline practice of not paying attendants for the work they perform on the ground, like getting passengers on and off planes. Air Canada's flight attendants put a public spotlight on these simmering issues when about 10,000 of them walked off the job last weekend, leading the airline to cancel more than 3,100 flights. The strike ended Tuesday with a tentative deal that includes wage increases and, for the first time, pay for boarding passengers. In the United States, however, the nearly century-old Railway Labor Act makes it far more difficult for union flight attendants like Miller, a member of the Association of Flight Attendants, to strike than most other American workers. Unlike the Boeing factory workers and Hollywood writers and actors who collectively stopped work in recent years, U.S. airline workers can only strike if federal mediators declare an impasse — and even then, the president or Congress can intervene. For that reason, airline strikes are exceedingly rare. The last major one in the U.S. was over a decade ago by Spirit Airlines pilots, and most attempts since then have failed. American Airlines flight attendants tried in 2023 but were blocked by mediators. Without the ultimate bargaining chip, airline labor unions have seen their power eroded in contract talks that now stretch far beyond historical norms, according to Sara Nelson, the international president of the AFA. Negotiations that once took between a year and 18 months now drag on for three years, sometimes more. 'The right to strike is fundamental to collective bargaining, but it has been chipped away,' Nelson said. Her union represents 50,000 attendants, including the ones at United Airlines, Alaska Airlines and PSA Airlines. On Monday, she joined PSA flight attendants in protest outside Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, near where an airliner operated by PSA crashed into the Potomac River in January after colliding with an Army helicopter. All 67 people on the two aircraft were killed, including the plane's pilot, co-pilot and two flight attendants. The airline's flight attendants also demonstrated outside airports in Philadelphia, Dallas, Charlotte and Dayton, Ohio. In a statement, PSA called the demonstrations 'one of the important ways flight attendants express their desire to get a deal done — and we share the same goal.' Flight attendants say their jobs have become more demanding in recent years. Planes are fuller, and faster turnaround times between flights are expected. Customers may see them mostly as uniforms that serve food and beverages, but the many hats attendants juggle include handling in-flight emergencies, deescalating conflicts and managing unruly passengers. 'We have to know how to put out a lithium battery fire while at 30,000 feet, or perform CPR on a passenger who's had a heart attack. We're trained to evacuate a plane in 90 seconds, and we're always the last ones off,' said Becky Black, a PSA flight attendant in Dayton, Ohio, who is part of the union's negotiating team. And yet, Black says, their pay hasn't kept pace. PSA flight attendants have been bargaining for over two years for better wages and boarding pay. Alaska flight attendants spent just as long in talks before reaching a deal in February. At American, flight attendants began negotiations on a new contract in 2020 but didn't get one until 2024. Southwest Airlines attendants pushed even longer — over five years — before securing a new deal last year that delivered an immediate 22% wage hike and annual 3% increases through 2027. 'It was a great relief,' Alison Head, a longtime Southwest flight attendant based in Atlanta, said. 'Coming out of COVID, where you saw prices were high and individuals struggling, it really meant something.' The contract didn't include boarding pay but secured the industry's first paid maternity and parental leave, a historic win for the largely female workforce. A mother of two, Head said she returned to work 'fairly quickly' after having her first child because she couldn't afford to stay home. 'Now, new parents don't have to make that same hard decision,' she said. Many of her peers at other airlines are still waiting for their new contracts. At United, attendants rejected a tentative agreement last month, with 71% voting no. The union is now surveying its members to understand why and plans to return to the bargaining table in December. One major sticking point: boarding pay. While Delta became the first U.S. airline to offer it in 2022 — followed by American and Alaska — many flight attendants still aren't compensated during what they call the busiest part of their shift. Back in Virginia Beach, Miller is still trying to make it work. To report for duty at the Philadelphia airport on time, Miller says he wakes up at around 4 a.m. Once his commuter flight lands, it could be hours still before he is officially on the clock and getting paid. His work day sometimes ends at 2 a.m. the next morning. Depending what time it is when Miller returns to Philadelphia, he might spend the night at what's known as a 'crash pad,' a shared housing unit for flight crew members who commute to their base. Miller says his crash pad is a two-bedroom apartment with 10 beds in it. On family vacations during his childhood, Miller said he was fascinated by flight attendants and their ability to make passengers feel comfortable and safe. Now he's got his dream job, but he isn't sure he can afford to keep doing it.
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Immigrant population in US drops for the first time in decades
Advertisement But experts predict looming negative economic and demographic consequences for the United States if the trend persists. Immigrants are a crucial workforce in many sectors, and the country's reliance on them is growing as more baby boomers retire. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up After campaigning on a promise of mass deportations, Trump has introduced sweeping measures to reduce immigration. His administration has restricted access to asylum at the southern border, tightened visa requirements for students and tech workers, and deployed thousands of federal agents to detain and deport immigrants without lawful status. The crackdown has led immigrants to leave the country voluntarily and has discouraged others from coming. Lillian Divina Leite, 46, chose to use the government's new self-deportation program to return to Brazil. A housekeeper in Charlotte, N.C., Leite said that she had begun to panic when she saw immigrants being 'hunted down like hardened criminals.' Advertisement 'I got really scared,' said Leite, who had fallen out of legal status after overstaying a six-month tourist visa. 'I thought, I haven't done anything wrong in my life,' she said, 'and suddenly I could be imprisoned.' Despite the study's findings, Kevin Lynn, executive director of the Institute for Sound Public Policy, which advocates for less immigration, said that foreign workers who enter lawfully continue to pour into the United States and undermine Americans. 'There has been no letup,' he said. 'People coming here legally, whether on green cards or employment visas, are impacting American workers at all strata, whether low-skilled or high-skilled.' Net migration — the difference between the number of immigrants arriving and departing — has turned negative, a shift that the chief Pew demographer, Jeffrey Passel, called a 'demographic certainty' so far in 2025. His team's analysis did not calculate a separate number for immigrants without lawful status who seem likely to represent the largest number of departures, because heightened enforcement probably diminished immigrants' participation in the census survey that was used to make estimates, he said. They may have been undercounted, which would suggest the drop is not as severe, or their low participation could mask an even more striking decline. The United States experienced negative net immigration in the 1930s, during the Great Depression, when between 400,000 and 1 million Mexicans and Mexican Americans left, many under coercive repatriation programs. In July, the conservative-leaning American Enterprise Institute projected net migration in 2025 would be flat or would even drop and predicted that the Trump administration's policies would continue to squeeze out low- and high-skilled foreign workers at least through 2026. Advertisement 'A rapid decline in immigration is going to cause economic harm,' said Tara Watson, an economist at the Brookings Institution and one of the authors of the report. Political pushback and legal challenges could lead the Trump administration to ease its crackdown and, thus, soften the impact, she said. But legislation recently passed by the Republican-controlled Congress has significantly increased funding for immigration enforcement, suggesting that the restrictive approach could extend throughout Trump's term. If so, 'we could go into a spiral of continued decline,' said Watson, which could undermine US competitiveness for global talent. 'If things are really bad, we no longer are the place where people go to do science or tech, and that could have generational repercussions,' she said. In addition to targeting migrants without lawful status, the administration has introduced measures that have undermined legal immigration. It has paused the refugee program, which offered green cards and a path to citizenship to people fleeing persecution. It has increased screening and vetting of visa applicants, which experts expect will reduce the numbers of foreign workers and students. The Trump administration has ended several Biden-era programs that had allowed people from troubled countries to live and work temporarily in the United States. Thousands of immigrants are set to lose their protected status in coming months. Migration across the southern border, which had begun to slow under asylum restrictions imposed late in the term of President Joe Biden, has declined further since Trump returned to office. Employment opportunities have long been the primary draw for immigrants, with migration typically slowing during economic downturns. During the Great Recession, more Mexicans without authorized status left the United States than arrived. Advertisement But the current decline is unfolding in response to stringent policies and at a time when the United States needs immigration to offset a falling birthrate and an aging population. 'We have more and more people over 65 and not in the workforce,' said Dowell Myers, a demography professor at the University of Southern California. 'A new baby won't help us for 20 years, but a young immigrant helps us immediately.' 'If you take a sledgehammer to the labor force by cutting immigrant flows,' he said, 'we are all going to be seeing the consequences in our everyday lives.' Restaurants, farms, and assisted-living facilities are already grappling with labor shortages that could become more pronounced, he said. Many of those roles are filled by unauthorized immigrants, whose population reached 14 million in 2023, according to Pew, and who accounted for 4 percent of the total US population and about a quarter of the foreign-born population. California had the most unauthorized residents in 2023, at 2.3 million, followed closely by Texas, with 2.1 million. Florida had the largest increase, adding 700,000 for a total of 1.6 million. Through mid-2024, the unauthorized population continued to grow at a fast clip, before starting to contract following policy changes in 2025, according to a preliminary Pew analysis. About half of the 14 million unauthorized immigrants in 2023 had been in the United States for more than a decade, and 4.6 million US-born children have parents who are in the country without lawful status. Pew's estimates are based on an analysis of Census Bureau data, including the American Community Survey and the Current Population Survey. Advertisement The Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency is holding a record 60,000 immigrants in detention, and that number is expected to soar as planned facilities open. Confined immigrants often agree to be swiftly deported rather than languish in custody while awaiting court rulings on whether they can remain in the United States. This article originally appeared in
