China's military says it 'drove away' U.S. destroyer near Scarborough Shoal
The first known U.S. military operation in at least six years within the shoal's waters came a day after the Philippines accused Chinese vessels of "dangerous maneuvres and unlawful interference" during a supply mission around the atoll.
In a statement, the Chinese military's Southern Theatre Command said the USS Higgins had entered the waters "without approval of the Chinese government" on Wednesday.
"The U.S. move seriously violated China's sovereignty and security, severely undermined peace and stability in the South China Sea," it added, vowing to keep a "high alert at all times."
The U.S. Indo-Pacific Command and the U.S. embassy in Beijing did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
China claims almost the entire South China Sea, despite overlapping claims by Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan and Vietnam.
The United States regularly carries out "freedom of navigation" operations in the South China Sea, challenging what it says are curbs on passage imposed by China and other claimants.
The Scarborough Shoal has been a major source of tension in the South China Sea, a conduit for more than $3 trillion of annual ship-borne commerce.
The actions of Chinese vessels in the shoal this week also resulted in a collision of two of them, Manila said, the first such known in the area.
China's coast guard said it had taken "necessary measures" to expel Philippine vessels from the waters.
In 2016, an international arbitral tribunal ruled there was no basis in international law for Beijing's claims, based on its historic maps. China does not recognize that decision, however.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yomiuri Shimbun
an hour ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
SDF Held Training Near Senkakus while Chinese Carriers were Deployed in Pacific; Exercise was Intended to Demonstrate Japan Could Counter China's Navy
The Self-Defense Forces conducted attack training against aircraft carriers in June in the waters near the Senkaku Islands in Okinawa Prefecture, at around the same time as two Chinese Navy carriers were deployed to the Pacific Ocean, it has been learned. The exercises were meant to demonstrate that Japan is prepared to counter the Chinese Navy, which is exerting increasing military pressure in the waters near Japan and Taiwan, according to several government sources. The June training was conducted in the waters north of the Senkakus and included the participation of multiple F-2 fighter jets from the Air Self-Defense Force. The area had been passed through by the Chinese aircraft carrier Liaoning in late May, and the sources report that the ship's path took it through Japan's exclusive economic zone (EEZ). These waters are apparently not a standard location for SDF training. During the exercises, the SDF checked procedures for attacking aircraft carriers using air-to-ship missiles mounted on the F-2s, the sources said. While F-2s possess high anti-ship attack capabilities, they have limited capacity for stealth. Deploying these jets instead of the most cutting-edge models shows that the exercises were apparently meant to be visible to China. 'Given when and where it was conducted and what it involved, this training was clearly intended to make sure China gets the message that it was conducted as a countermeasure [against them],' a government source said. The Liaoning traveled southward through the waters near the Senkakus in late May to reach the Pacific Ocean. In early June, it reached Japan's EEZ off Minami-Torishima Island. Around that time, the other carrier, the Shandong, traveled eastward in waters south of Taiwan to reach the Pacific, sailing within the Japanese EEZ off Okinotorishima Island. Japanese government analysis concluded that the two Chinese aircraft carriers were conducting exercises in which one of them played the role of a U.S. counterpart. It is believed that these exercises were intended to enhance the Chinese military's ability to intercept any U.S. carrier that might be deployed to intervene in the event of a contingency around Taiwan or a military invasion of the Senkakus by China. The Chinese military is trying to establish a so-called anti-access/area denial strategy, which would be aimed at obstructing U.S. forces launched from their bases in Hawaii and Guam from approaching Taiwan in a bid to help the island. It was the first time two Chinese Navy aircraft carriers have been deployed in the Pacific Ocean at the same time. During the approximately one-month period beginning in late May when the Liaoning and Shandong were deployed in the area, fighter jets and helicopters based on the two vessels conducted a total of about 1,120 takeoffs and landings. China has been escalating its military provocations, such as on June 7 and 8 when a Chinese fighter jet flew dangerously close to an MSDF P-3C patrol aircraft after taking off from the Shandong while sailing in the Pacific Ocean, according to the Defense Ministry.
Japan Times
an hour ago
- Japan Times
Approval for Ishiba Cabinet has risen to 27.3% in August, poll shows
The public approval rate for Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's Cabinet has increased 6.5 percentage points month on month in August, to 27.3%, a Jiji Press opinion poll showed Thursday. The disapproval rate fell 5.4 points to 49.6%. When asked whether Ishiba, also president of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party, should resign to take responsibility for its major setback in last month's House of Councilors election, 39.9% of the respondents said they do not think so, slightly outpacing the 36.9% who said they do. Among supporters of the LDP, 65.9% said they think Ishiba should not step down, against 24.6% who think he should quit. Some in the LDP called for Ishiba to resign after the party took a drubbing in the July 20 Upper House election. Regarding reasons for supporting the Ishiba Cabinet, with multiple answers allowed, 13.6% of those backing it said there is no one other than Ishiba suitable to be prime minister, followed by 8.3% who said Ishiba is trustworthy and 4.3% who said it does not matter who is prime minister. On the other hand, 26.9% of those not supporting the Cabinet said they have no hopes for it, 18.9% said they cannot trust Ishiba and 18.1% said that they have a bad impression of him. Support for the LDP fell 0.7 point to 15.7%. Sanseito, which surged in the Upper House election, led opposition parties in support for the first time, at 7.6%. The Democratic Party for the People and the main opposition Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan followed, with 6.8% and 5.5% respectively. Komeito, the LDP's coalition partner, came fifth, with 3.7%, followed by Nippon Ishin no Kai, with 2.4%, the Japanese Communist Party, with 1.8%, the Conservative Party of Japan, with 1.6%, Reiwa Shinsengumi, with 1.5%, Team Mirai, with 0.6% and the Social Democratic Party, with 0.5%. The share of respondents who support no particular party came to 50.0%. The interview survey, conducted over four days through Monday, covered 2,000 people age 18 or over in Japan. Valid responses were received from 56.9%.
Japan Times
an hour ago
- Japan Times
Trump's 50% tariff threatens India's manufacturing ambitions
India's largest shoemaker Farida Group had already staked out the land — a 150-acre plot in southern Tamil Nadu — for a sprawling new export facility. Then came the blow from Washington: President Donald Trump announced he was doubling tariffs on Indian exports to 50%. For Farida, which supplies brands like Cole Haan and Clarks and depends on the U.S. for about 60% of its business, the impact was immediate. New orders stopped. The 10 billion rupee ($114 million) project froze. "With 25% tariffs, you can still work, you can give some discount, negotiate with the buyer and make some adjustments in your profits,' Rafeeque Ahmed, the company's chairman, said in an interview. "At 50%, you don't have anything.' Farida is hardly alone. Trump's move would give India the highest tariff rate in Asia, threatening a manufacturing sector that Prime Minister Narendra Modi has spent a decade trying to build to take on the likes of China. The "Make in India' campaign was supposed to lift manufacturing to 25% of the economy. Last year, it stood at just 13% — lower than the 16% in 2015, according to World Bank data. The last few years did offer glimmers of the future Modi had envisioned. Apple Inc. scaled up iPhone assembly in India, making the country the second-largest smartphone producer after China. Pharmaceuticals and green tech have also gained ground. The U.S. — whose policies and actions accelerated companies' adoption of a "China Plus One' strategy to diversify supply chains — is now India's biggest export market and one of its top sources of foreign investment. That progress is suddenly vulnerable. While the tariff hike spares smartphones and pharmaceuticals for now, it puts the rest of India's $87 billion in U.S.-bound exports on the line. "Forget China Plus One right now. Companies are thinking India Plus One,' Ahmed said. "They are making plans to move out of India.' U.S. President Donald Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi shake hands as they attend a joint press conference at the White House in Washington on February 13. | REUTERS India's Ministry of Commerce and Industry didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump says the tariff hike is punishment for India's purchase of discounted oil from Russia, which he argues helps fund President Vladimir Putin's war on Ukraine. But India was the only major economy to be hit with such "secondary tariffs,' even though China is the largest overall buyer of Moscow's crude. If the 50% rate holds, Bloomberg Economics estimates U.S.-bound exports from India could fall by 60% and put nearly 1% of gross domestic product at risk. Without exemptions for pharmaceuticals and electronics, the decline could reach 80%. Even the earlier 25% rate — already higher than in Vietnam, Malaysia or Bangladesh, was enough to threaten a 30% drop in exports. For comparison, Chinese goods face about a 30% U.S. tariff. "In addition to the economic challenge, politically it's difficult for Prime Minister Modi that India now pays a higher blanket rate than China,' said Alexander Slater, head of the India practice at consulting firm Capstone. China is pressing on other fronts as well. Beijing wants to limit tech transfers and equipment exports to India and Southeast Asia, aiming to deter companies from relocating production, Bloomberg previously reported. China's rare earth curbs also hit Indian automakers earlier this year. At the same time, Trump's tariffs have opened the door for closer India-China ties. Direct flights may resume as soon as next month, and Beijing has eased restrictions on urea exports to India. The two sides are discussing resuming border trade of locally made goods after more than five years, Bloomberg reported on Thursday. An employee applies lacquer on a wedding ring for rhodium plating at the manufacturing unit of Creations Gems & Jewellery in Mumbai on April 9. | AFP-JIJI On the factory floor, anxiety over the U.S. tariff is palpable. Ajay Sahai, chief executive officer of the Federation of Indian Export Organizations, said exporters could see demand fall 20% in the short term. The timing couldn't be worse: summer 2026 orders are being placed right now, but with tariffs sitting at 50%, buyers are balking. "I've been getting 80 to 90 calls every day concerning these issues from exporters seeking solutions and ways out,' he said. "It's difficult to do business in such a tariff environment.' Some factories are slashing prices to hold on to customers. The only way to retain buyers is by giving huge discounts, said Sudhir Sekhri, managing director at apparel maker Trend Setters Group. Spring and summer orders account for roughly 65% of his firm's revenue. In Mumbai, Sharad Kumar Saraf, managing director of Technocraft Group, which produces scaffolding, textiles and other goods, is running the numbers to reduce costs for buyers. About a third of its sales are headed for the U.S.. "Additional tariffs is unwarranted and uncalled for and will impact our trade severely,' he said. There's still the possibility for a reprieve. U.S. and Indian officials are continuing trade talks, with the hopes of landing the first tranche of a bilateral trade deal this fall that could dial back tariffs. Trump will also meet Putin in Alaska this week to discuss Ukraine — any breakthrough there could strengthen the case for dropping America's oil-related levies. But time is not on India's side. The longer the uncertainty drags on, the more companies will start looking elsewhere. India's share in many of these product categories is small and U.S. brands can shift their supply chains quickly if they decide to, said P Senthilkumar, partner at Vector Consulting Group. The tariff threat feels personal for Farida Group, whose shoe plants employ about 23,000 people, with over half producing for the U.S.. Every paused shipment or canceled order brings painful choices — whether to halt or slow production, or let go of staff who have spent years honing their craft. "You can't take business decisions in such uncertainty,' said Ahmed. "What will happen to workers? Shall I send them back? They have been with me for years, they are skilled workers, I can't just send them back.' "Workers would be one of the biggest sufferers,' he added.
