We should guard ourselves against false narratives created by vested interests, says Minister
'We should guard ourselves from the evil designs of vested interests who are trying to divide society using false narratives from history,' Minister Satish Jarkiholi said in Belagavi on Sunday.
'Some forces are trying to paint a picture of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj as an anti-Muslim leader. This is not true. He had both Hindus and Muslims in his army. They lived like brothers and the King never discriminated against between them. His close confidantes, advisors and army generals were Muslims. If he fought the Mughals and other Kings, it was because of political reasons and not communal ones. There should be no attempt to distort facts for political benefit or other selfish reasons. It is detrimental to society,' he said.
He was speaking after releasing a book, Chhatrapati Shivaji, The Great Maratha, by Sarjoo Katkar.
He urged writers to take up intensive research and publication of books about great personalities, including Kings and saints.
'There needs to be done a lot of work that answer several questions about great personalities like Basavanna, B.R. Ambedkar and Shivaji Maharaj. They should be supported by well documented facts and not myths. It is well documented that some priests refused to officiate his coronation only because he was a Shudra. For centuries, some forces kept hidden the information about Shivaji's grave. They wanted to prevent him from becoming a great leader of the depressed classes. We should be indebted to Jyotiba Phule who identified Shivaji's resting place and cleaned it up,' the Minister said.
He said that Shivaji Maharaj should be referred to as the Great Indian and not the Great Maratha. 'We should realise that historic personalities belong to the world and not to any particular community or group. We should also reflect on the fact as to why those who were opposed to him then, are his great supporters now,' he said.
'There is a growing trend of people blindly believing and thoughtlessly forwarding messages on social media. We should not fall prey to this,' he said.
'Shivaji Maharaj means several things to different people. But I would like to think of him as a social leader who tried to introduce equality in society. There are instances where he mandated that those considered untouchable be allowed inside temples. He continues to guide in such matters. His guerilla war strategies are well documented. In fact, some leaders of Vietnam have said that Shivaji's guerilla strategies helped them defeat the U.S.,' the Minister said.
'The medieval era King shall be known for his patriotism, strategic struggles with enemies for the protection of the country, his military strategy, good governance for the prosperity of all people and his efforts to establish social harmony and a society without discrimination,' Mr. Jarkiholi said.
Author Sarjoo Katkar spoke about the effort of two years in researching for the book.
'I have travelled across several States and read over 200 books and research papers in preparing material for the book,' he said. He said that he was astonished by several things that he found during the research.
'Director of the Dr. Ambedkar Study Centre Sambhaji Rao Birje gave me copies of a letter by Shahu Maharaj to Dr. Ambedkar, where he says that Shivaji's Guru was Kshatra Jagadguru from Patgaon and not Samarth Ramdas. In fact, there is no documentary evidence to show that Shivaji and Samarth Ramdas ever met,' he said.
He clarified that he had used the sobriquet The Great Maratha as it was the term used by Queen Victoria to describe the Maratha King in one of her letters.
Dr. Katkar said that he had translated the books of researcher R.C. Dhere into Kannada. 'As per some of his research work, Shivaji's family originated from Sortur in Gadag district. Baliappa from the Hoysala clan moved from Sortur to Maharashtra to avoid drought conditions. His descendants became the governors of Bengaluru and later the Kings of the Maratha empire,' he said.
The former president of the Kannada Sahitya Parishat Manu Baligar described the book as a reference work for future researchers on Shivaji Maharaj. 'There are thousands of books on Shivaji. But this stands out as it is based on researched facts and not myths and legends. It traces the history of India for over 10,000 years. It also sheds new light about the achievements of Shivaji like establishing his navy,' Dr Baligar said.
Writers Gurudevi Huleppanavaramath and Y.R. Patil introduced the work. Ramakrishna Marathe, Basavaraja Kuppasagoudar, Suma Katkar and others spoke.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
30 minutes ago
- India.com
India to become world's largest Muslim country in..., population will cross..., Hindus will be...
India to become world's largest Muslim country in…, population will cross…, Hindus will be… Hindu-Muslim Population of India: According to a study that was published in 2015 by the United States-based Pew Research Center, the Muslim population in India is expected to increase to such an extent that it will become the country with the largest Muslim population in the world. Currently, Indonesia has the largest population of Muslims. However, India's rapidly growing population, combined with a high growth rate of the Muslim community, may change the scenario soon. According to the report, by 2050 the total population of India will be 166 crores, in which the population of Hindus is expected to be 130 crores. The population of Muslims will be 31 crores by then. In 2050, the country's share in the total world's Muslim population will be 11 percent. This change will majorly impact demographics and consequently, social, cultural, and political discussions. How Many Hindus-Muslims Between 1951 And 2011? From 1951 to 2011, in India, the trend of population growth has witnessed a drastic change on the basis of religion. As per Pew Research's data, the fastest growth has been recorded in the Muslims of the country. In 1951, the population of Muslims in India was 3 crore 54 lakh, which has increased to 17.20 crore in 2011. A jump of 386 percent was recorded in the population of Muslims during this period. Between 1951 and 2011, the Hindu population grew from 300 million to 960 million, a 218% increase. This growth rate was significantly lower than that of the Muslim population. However, the Muslim population's rapid growth is tempered by a concurrently declining fertility rate. Over the same period, the Sikh and Christian populations increased by 235% and 232%, respectively. Decline In Fertility Rates The Pew Research Report also revealed that there has been a clear decline in the fertility rate in both Muslim and Hindu communities, a positive sign towards population stabilisation. If we look at the fertility rate among Muslims, the fertility rate of women was 4.4 percent in 1992-93, which recorded 2.3 in 2022. Meanwhile, a decline of 47 percent was recorded. The fertility rate of Hindu women was 3.3 in 1992-93, which became 1.9 in 2022, with a decline of 42 percent. Is Population Growth A Matter Of Social Concern? Analysis of religious population data reveals that the growth of the Muslim population in India is attributable to socioeconomic factors like access to education and wealth, rather than being a cause for political or social alarm. A consistent decline in fertility rates is observed across all religious groups. Consequently, India's population is projected to be multi-religious but increasingly socially homogenous by 2050.


Mint
40 minutes ago
- Mint
Harvard's China ties become new front in battle with Trump
In his war with Harvard, President Trump has sought to withhold billions of dollars in federal funding from the school and strip its tax exemptions, measures the White House initially tied to perceived antisemitism at the school amid Israel's war in Gaza. In recent weeks, long-simmering Republican anger over Harvard's links to China has increasingly gained traction. In escalating calls to punish the school, a training event two years ago in the Chinese city of Kunming has emerged as Exhibit A. The training, on the bland topic of healthcare financing, was co-hosted by a Harvard professor and involved a few dozen provincial-level bureaucrats. Among them was at least one representative from Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, a large Chinese Communist Party paramilitary organization in the country's far west that also handles civilian government services, including managing hospitals. U.S. authorities in 2020 imposed sanctions against the Xinjiang corps, accusing it of ethnic and religious abuses against Uyghurs and other mostly Muslim minorities and forbidding U.S. persons from providing it 'funds, goods, or services." On Wednesday, as Trump moved to bar Harvard from enrolling foreign students, his order cited the event, charging that in exchange for Chinese funding the school 'has, among other things, 'repeatedly hosted and trained members of a Chinese Communist Party paramilitary organization.' " Harvard, which didn't respond to questions, hasn't publicly addressed the allegations involving the Xinjiang corps. The school is fighting Trump in court, calling some of the administration's measures illegal. To its detractors, Harvard epitomizes American elite universities' dependence on Beijing as a profit center—and how that helps the country's rulers, the Chinese Communist Party, challenge the U.S. The conservative Heritage Foundation took aim at higher education in its Project 2025 recommendations, saying, 'Universities taking money from the CCP should lose their accreditation, charters, and eligibility for federal funds." Chinese citizens represent some 23% of Harvard's international students, and Education Department data show that in recent decades individuals and companies from China and Hong Kong together have been the university's No. 2 source of large foreign gifts and contracts, behind only England. In 2023 and 2024 combined, the data show, Harvard reported $55.6 million in gifts of $250,000 or more from China, including Hong Kong, plus $13.7 million in contracts, some 13% and 8.2% respectively among all large-scale funding from non-U.S. partners. The Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps booth during a 2021 trade fair in Beijing. In previous responses to questions about its China exposure, such as acceptance of financial gifts, the school has cited its broad global alumni network across over 200 nations. With some 90 million members, the Chinese Communist Party has a deep reach into Chinese society. But while some tuition payments and funding might ultimately be traced to decisions by Chinese Communist Party officials, neither China's government nor the party would be likely to directly underwrite activities involving universities abroad, and there is no indication of such payments to Harvard. The Xinjiang corps, colloquially known as Bingtuan, is central to the Chinese Communist Party's ironclad rule over Xinjiang. Widespread evidence shows its paramilitary operations have played a leading role in Beijing's suppression of Uyghurs, including the detention of more than a million people. In imposing sanctions on the corps and its leaders in 2020, the Treasury Department cited 'their connection to serious human-rights abuse." The organization also has a massive administrative role in providing social services to ordinary citizens, such as managing hospitals and healthcare systems, the topic of the 2023 Harvard training, co-hosted by Winnie Yip, a professor at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. Analysts say the Xinjiang corps's participation in the training—organized by a Chinese health-insurance regulator, the National Healthcare Security Administration—was hardly the kind of nefarious activity American sanctions are designed to halt. Still, U.S. sanctions laws don't differentiate between types of interaction, said Julian Ku, a law professor at New York's Hofstra University. 'Providing services to a blocked entity is prohibited, so Harvard does indeed face some possible liability here," he said. Trump indicated that his concern about the Xinjiang corps was based on findings of a House Select Committee on China. Its chairman, Rep. John Moolenaar (R., Mich.), late last month wrote to Harvard President Alan Garber, demanding explanations about university activities that 'create risks to U.S. national security and further the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP's) genocide in Xinjiang." Harvard President Alan Garber A China committee statement about Moolenaar's letter charged that Harvard researchers did transplant studies with 'PRC-based collaborators, amid mounting evidence of the CCP's forced organ harvesting practices." Allegations that Beijing is engaged in institutionalized theft from prisoners and others of body parts for organ transplants have recently gained traction among Republican China critics. While few human-rights groups make that claim today, the anti-Beijing spiritual group Falun Gong has forcefully promoted the issue. The Moolenaar letter described a number of Harvard studies as problematic, including one on cardiac transplants involving mice, detailed in a March 2024 scientific paper that indicated one of the 20 researchers had an affiliation with a hospital in northern China. A spokeswoman for Harvard Medical School's Brigham and Women's Hospital told The Wall Street Journal that the study was done at that institution and had no association with China. By the time the paper was published, she said, one researcher had joined the Chinese hospital. Harvard hasn't responded to Moolenaar's May 19 letter, which was also signed by Reps. Tim Walberg (R., Mich.) and Elise Stefanik (R., N.Y.), but by no Democrats on the China committee. Winnie Yip, a professor at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health In a response to questions, Moolenaar called the Xinjiang corps 'a sanctioned, paramilitary organization complicit in genocide" and said, 'I stand by the letter, and I will continue demanding answers from those enabling or ignoring the CCP's abuses." Criticism over the Xinjiang organization's participation in the 2023 healthcare event originated in a late April report by Strategy Risks, a research firm run by Isaac Stone Fish, a New York-based journalist, which concluded that Harvard's behavior raised doubts about its effectiveness in 'limiting [Chinese Communist Party] and authoritarian influences." The Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, a New York public-policy organization, funded the report but hasn't independently published the findings. Last month the report found an audience with Sen. Tom Cotton (R., Ark.), who cited Strategy Risks in an open letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent that urged an investigation into Harvard's potentially 'prohibited behavior" with the Xinjiang organization. Rep. John Moolenaar Four days later, Moolenaar and his fellow House members sent their letter to Harvard's Garber, noting the Xinjiang organization's role in mass detentions and describing healthcare efforts in Xinjiang as a 'fig leaf" to whitewash crimes. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem then called out the training as she moved to strip Harvard of its right to educate foreign students. Harvard's public materials on the meetings don't say how the corps came to participate in the training, an iteration of a series on healthcare finance basics known as the Flagship Program developed by the World Bank and Harvard in the 1990s. It has been offered to bureaucrats in dozens of low- and middle-income nations; the 2023 version in China had a special focus on eldercare insurance. A Chinese-language website published by Harvard said the Xinjiang group joined the annual training in 2019, but an internet archive tool showed that reference to its participation was later deleted. Yip, far left, at healthcare-finance training event in China in 2023. The congressional letter also took issue with a photo Harvard published from the 2023 event that blurred out name plates in front of four speakers, which the politicians charged 'raises questions about why Harvard wanted to keep their identities hidden." It couldn't be determined who had obscured the nametags; the photo had previously been widely published that way in China. Key participants are nonetheless easily identified, including the Harvard professor, Yip. Write to James T. Areddy at


News18
an hour ago
- News18
Canada Has Invited PM Modi For G7 Summit, But India Must Remain Cautiously Optimistic
Last Updated: Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney's invitation for PM Narendra Modi shows that even Canada realises that India can't be ignored Canada's invitation to Prime Minister Narendra Modi for the G7 Summit next week has stunned not only the Congress, but also the Khalistani groups who have been running rampant in Canada. The former has been humbled after questioning PM Modi's potential absence, while the latter have begun protests. PM Modi will be in Canada after a decade. His last visit was in 2015 as part of a three-nation tour. Since 2024, besides Pakistan, India's diplomatic ties hit rock bottom with only one other country — Canada. Accusatory barbs were exchanged and diplomats were withdrawn. In such a scenario, Modi's visit to Canada seemed improbable. This is why the invite from new Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney assumes significance. It shows that even Canada realises, albeit under a new administration, that India can't be ignored. judge Canada based on its actions. Certainly, the tempers have cooled and the winds are shifting since the departure of former PM Justin Trudeau. Both sides are ready to discuss 'security cooperation". But India would be wise to avoid a full reset. Not until Canada ensures decisive action – arrests, clampdowns, and real-time intelligence cooperation — against the anti-India Khalistani groups operating from Canadian soil. Carney has so far made encouraging remarks, prompting hopes of a bilateral meeting between him and Modi on the sidelines of the G7 Summit. Carney has avoided mentioning Khalistani terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar, only referencing 'earlier strains in the relationship" and suggesting 'they can be addressed with mutual respect". When asked how he would justify the decision to invite Modi while some in Canada question it in light of the ongoing legal proceedings, Carney was clear: 'We are a country of the rule of law, and the rule of law is proceeding as it should…and I am not going to disrupt that process of law." Glad to receive a call from Prime Minister @MarkJCarney of Canada. Congratulated him on his recent election victory and thanked him for the invitation to the G7 Summit in Kananaskis later this month. As vibrant democracies bound by deep people-to-people ties, India and Canada…— Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) June 6, 2025 MONEY MATTERS Carney has publicly stated that India's emergence among the five biggest economies in the world, with a key role in the supply chains, is why the 'invite to PM Modi makes sense". Canada's Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre went on to add: ' India has been at the last six G7 conferences. It is one of the biggest and fastest growing economies. We need to sell our natural gas and civilian nuclear power technology to India. We need to work with India on trade and security. The invite is necessary." Canada realises that ignoring India any further could be catastrophic for its economy in the future. For India, the key is a dialogue between their law enforcement agencies, given the turbulence in India-Canada ties over the past year. Under Trudeau, Canada went so far as to directly accuse Indian agents and top Indian leaders of masterminding Nijjar's killing without providing any proof. This created an atmosphere of zero trust, leading to India's expulsion of Canadian diplomats and suspension of visa services. India also recalled its ambassador. With Trudeau's departure, India hopes Carney is pragmatic and realises that maintaining good relations and harbouring anti-India groups cannot go hand in hand. INDIA'S CONCERNS Indian diplomats in Canada remain under serious threat from Khalistani groups, against whom Canada does not act, citing 'their freedom of speech". Khalistani extremists openly brandish swords and daggers on Canadian streets and threaten India's top leaders. Their chief sympathiser political party, the NDP and its leader Jagmeet Singh, suffered a crushing defeat in the recent Canadian elections, winning only seven of the 343 seats, with Singh losing his seat. This was apparently a significant blow to the Khalistani factor in Canada. But now, the Carney government needs to walk the talk. Carney's approach to India is a clear departure from Trudeau's. He said the Canada-India relationship was 'incredibly important". But he needs to act against these anti-India groups and their finances, to earn India's trust. India must not forget the events of the past year, and judge Carney not just by his words, but his actions. Modi's G7 engagements since 2019 demonstrate India's deepening global footprint and the trust placed in the PM's global leadership. India must leverage this to ensure Canada falls in line and is no longer a haven for anti-India extremists. The G7 Summit will be Carney's first test on this count. About the Author Aman Sharma Aman Sharma, Executive Editor - National Affairs at CNN-News18, and Bureau Chief at News18 in Delhi, has over two decades of experience in covering the wide spectrum of politics and the Prime Minister's More Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : Homework Column india canada Narendra Modi news18 specials Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: June 09, 2025, 07:00 IST News india Canada Has Invited PM Modi For G7 Summit, But India Must Remain Cautiously Optimistic | Homework