logo
Revealed: The age group most affected by pension changes – and how much they could lose

Revealed: The age group most affected by pension changes – and how much they could lose

Independent30-07-2025
The age bracket which stands to lose out the most from potential changes to the state pension age has been revealed after Labour's recently announced review into the current age of retirement.
Millions of workers could lose more than £17,000 if an increase to the age at which the state pension can be claimed is moved forward, analysis by a wealth management firm has found.
This is one of the more commonly speculated possibilities that could come from the government's state pension review, announced by work and pensions minister Liz Kendall last week.
Governments are legally required to carry out a review of the state pension age every six years. The last one concluded in 2023, while this one is due to finish in 2029. It must give at least 10 years' notice for any state pension age change.
Currently set at 66, and rising to 67 by 2028, the state pension age is the point at which a person is able to retire from work and receive the government-funded state pension.
The figure is set to rise to 68 by 2046, but there is a strong possibility this is pushed forward by ministers in a bid to rein in massive spending on the state pension.
Such a move was actually proposed by the previous pensions review, suggesting the rise to 68 be completed by 2039, but was never acted on by the government.
New analysis by wealth management firm Rathbones has now found that if the deadline was pushed back even to 2039-41, workers aged 51 to 53 now would stand to lose out the most.
This is because they would lose a full year of state pension payments that they would otherwise be receiving.
Because of the triple-lock guarantee, which sees the state pension rise by at least 2.5 per cent every year, workers currently aged 51 would lose out on £17,774 from the change, Rathbones calculated.
For those aged 52, it would be £16,918, and for those aged 51, it would be £17,340.
Rebecca Williams, divisional lead of financial planning at Rathbones, said: 'With longevity increasing and population pressures mounting, future generations appear set to face a less generous state pension regime than that enjoyed by many of today's retirees. The situation appears particularly precarious for those in their early 50s who face real prospect of missing out.
'The state pension alone is not enough for a comfortable retirement. Individuals need a broad foundation built on workplace pensions, private savings, and the ongoing support of pension tax relief. Cracks are beginning to show in the system, and they must be addressed urgently if we are to maintain faith in the UK's pension framework and ensure people are equipped not just to survive, but to thrive in later life.'
In her statement last week, Ms Kendall had noted that by the 2070s, the number of pensioners is expected to have increased by over 50 per cent, whereas the working age population will have only grown by over 10 per cent.
She said that this makes 'it even more imperative to help future pensioners put into a savings pot they can rely on in the future'.
Ms Kendall warned: 'My big worry is, so many young people have not even got a hope in hell of getting on the housing ladder, they're being absolutely killed by their rent, and if you are paying off your mortgage in retirement, or still renting in retirement, that is what is driving this sort of tsunami of pensioner poverty that is coming our way.'
The minister told reporters: 'Put simply, unless we act, tomorrow's pensioners will be poorer than today's, because people who are saving aren't saving enough for their retirement.
'And crucially, because almost half of the working age population isn't saving anything for their retirement at all.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bank of England's Pill sees risks that could slow pace of rate cuts
Bank of England's Pill sees risks that could slow pace of rate cuts

Reuters

time18 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Bank of England's Pill sees risks that could slow pace of rate cuts

LONDON, Aug 8 (Reuters) - Bank of England Chief Economist Huw Pill said on Friday that inflation pressures were likely to continue weakening, but there was a risk that future rate cuts could be delayed by shifts in longer-term price- and wage-setting behaviour in the economy. "If that's more the driver of this increase in the upside risk to inflation, that might lead us to ... have to question whether the pace at which we're reducing Bank Rate over the last year, a pace of one quarter-point cut every quarter, is that sustainable?," Pill said in an online briefing to businesses. "I think that's kind of where more of the dissenting members focus, the members of the committee who were voting ultimately to hold rates at 4.25% yesterday," he said. The BoE cut its benchmark Bank Rate to 4.0% from 4.25% on Thursday but Pill and three other Monetary Policy Committee members favoured keeping rates on hold due to inflation pressures, resulting in an unexpectedly tight 5-4 vote. The outcome raised the prospect of the BoE slowing its run of rate cuts. Investors are not fully pricing in a next quarter-point reduction before February.

Citroen blasted for stop-drive safety recall
Citroen blasted for stop-drive safety recall

Daily Mail​

time18 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Citroen blasted for stop-drive safety recall

Citroen and its parent company Stellantis faces mounting pressure and criticism from a consumer group for failing owners of cars embroiled in a nationwide 'stop-drive' safety recall. Some 96,000 UK owners of Citroen C3 and DS3 models produced between 2009 and 2019 were informed at the end of June that their vehicles are unsafe due to faulty airbags that recently caused the death of a driver in France. On 20 June, Stellantis UK issued an urgent stop-drive order for these models, telling owners to park them up until the lethal parts could be replaced - and to seek alternative transport in the meantime. However, having already been without their cars for seven weeks, thousands of motorists are still in the dark about when their vehicles will be fixed and back on the road. With the company only providing courtesy cars to those with the 'most urgent needs', customers being refused or offered limited compensation towards alternative travel costs, and many given false information about the recall process - including having to personally arrange delivery of their cars to dealers for repair - Which? has said it's now time for the Government to get involved to resolve Stellantis' 'chaotic handling' of the situation. It comes just weeks after the we revealed the extraordinary lengths some drivers have gone to so that they can continue to get to work and carry out day-to-day tasks while their cars are deemed unroadworthy. Some have forked out for a cheap second vehicle to run until their Citroen is fixed, while others have resorted to reducing their working hours and even staying with friends who live closer to their jobs. Which? said the 'emotional and financial burden of the recall has fallen squarely on those least able to absorb it' and it's time for the government to 'step in and hold Stellantis to account'. The watchdog has blasted Stellantis' process so far for replacing faulty Takata airbags in cars and offering motorists appropriate compensation. It accused it of providing a 'seemingly deliberate lack of public clarity' over available recompense for customers who are paying through the nose for alternative transport options, including taxis, hire cars, train fares, bus tickets and begging lifts from friends, family and colleagues simply to get to work and back. The manufacturer last month told affected drivers to immediately stop driving their cars due to the risk of airbags rupturing in a collision and potentially firing mental shards and shrapnel into the bodies of drivers and passengers and has causes several deaths worldwide. Owners were urged to contact their dealer - or Stellantis' recall helpline - to arrange a free airbag replacement. However, customer support lines have been clogged-up by the near-100,000 motorists affected by the stop-drive notice, and the Daily Mail has seen evidence of dealers giving misinformation to owners about getting their motors repaired. Which?, like the Daily Mail, has heard from many distressed drivers over recent weeks. It has been contacted by the mum of a premature baby who needs regular hospital visits and a woman caring for her terminally ill husband who needs to get to life-extending hospital appointments but have faced weeks - and possibly months - without transport. Both are incurring significant expenses for hire cars, taxis, or insurance fees. 'These car owners have been given no clear timeline on when – or how – their original cars will be made safe,' Which? said. Owners given dangerous mis-information about recalls When the Daily Mail raised various cases of owners facing significant hardship without access to their cars last month, Stellantis apologised for the inconvenience caused and assured us that all recalled models would be repaired by the end of September at the very latest. However, we have been contacted by owners this week who have told us their cars are not booked in with dealers until October. Most worrying of all is that some customers have told Which? they have continued driving their cars despite the safety risks - and the fact it is illegal to do so. According to information given to the Daily Mail by the Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA), ignoring a stop-drive order or any safety recall could result in legal repercussions. If involved in an accident, drivers could also face prosecution, fine, penalty points or a driving ban. Insurers could also refuse claims on the grounds that drivers are responsible for roadworthiness of their vehicles. Yet several customers have told Which? that they have told by garages to drive their cars to their location to be fixed, despite clear instruction from Stellantis not to do so. Martin Bradley from East Yorkshire told us weeks ago that he had originally been quoted a recall date of January 2026 by Evan Halshaw Citroen in Hull, though this was fast-tracked to 4 August, granted he would need to drive his DS3 to the dealer, they told him. He told us that he had planned to drop the car off at the dealership on 1 August before departing on holiday for a fortnight, but received a call that morning telling him the repair could not be completed because the dealer 'had no parts'. He was also told he could not leave his car there as they had no space. Calling it a 'shambles', he told the Daily Mail: 'I'm going to have to drive the car when I get home from holiday because I have no other means to get to and from work.' Dealers have also instructed some customers to arrange transport of their cars to their garages for repair. Julian Anderson, 70, from Kinross, Scotland, emailed us this week to say that an Arnold Clark dealership has refused to arrange collection of his Citroen C3. Instead, it told the pensioner to source, book, and pay for a vehicle transport agency himself, then reclaim a base fee of £50 plus £1 per mile from Citroen UK. Stellantis vehemently told us that this should not be the case and that all impacted Citroen models should be collected on the back of transporters or truck arranged by dealerships, or that mechanics visit owners' homes to carry out airbag replacements. It also informed the Daily Mail that Peugeot garages are now repairing recalled Citroens to accelerate the process, while the RAC - its official breakdown partner - is providing at-home airbag replacements, too. Stellantis' 'vague promises' - and no compensation With tens of thousands of drivers forced to seek alternative transport arrangements, Which? blasted Stellantis for owners being given 'vague promises or modest travel reimbursements'. Some owners who have been told they are not eligible for any compensation whatsoever, while others have been informed that they can receive remuneration of a maximum £22.50 per day - a figure far below the cost of car hire in most regions. Which? has also condemned the DVSA - which is responsible for overseeing safety recalls in Britain - for failing to provide clear guidance to help impacted drivers. That's despite its own code of conduct stating among other things that it will 'continually aim to raise the profile of and improve information available to consumers to ensure that it provides clear information in the best ways'. While it accepted that a 'stop-drive' recall of this scale is unprecedented, it said the DVSA - as the national regulator - should be doing more to ensure customers are not being left high and dry. Which? is warning that this lack of clarity is 'endangering people', forcing them to either feel they have no option but to drive a potentially dangerous car or going into debt to ensure they can afford to get around. Sue Davies, head of consumer protection policy at the watchdog, said: 'From people left stranded with no means of transport, to those paying out a fortune to hire cars and taxis, the emotional and financial burden of this recall has fallen squarely on those least able to absorb it. 'Stellantis must urgently confirm it will pay compensation for alternative transport as well as offer practical solutions such as offering at-home repairs or towing affected cars to garages. 'If not, many people will see no alternative but to continue driving cars that are potentially very dangerous. 'The government needs to step in and hold them to account to ensure UK consumers have much greater clarity of what they need to do and what they are entitled to - and are never left in this position again.' The consumer group has called on Stellantis to immediately address its helpline issues, confirm a formal compensation scheme and provide practical solutions including courtesy cars, at-home repairs, or collection options, so that unsafe cars can be fixed without the risk of being driven. It has also written to the DVSA and the Department for Transport (DFT) to outline its concerns and request they step in to provide greater oversight of Stellantis' handling of the situation. A Stellantis spokesperson said: 'The company's focus remains on completing the replacement of airbags in affected vehicles as swiftly as possible. 'Our Citroen network is fully engaged in maximising the number of cars that can be completed every day and, to increase our repair capacity even further and minimise as much as possible the impact on customers, our Peugeot network is now authorised to replace airbags on these cars in addition to at home options. 'For each and every customer, we discuss options to support mobility, recognising that every driver has specific requirements. These options include replacement airbags at a dealership or at home, courtesy car, support for other mobility options and recovery. We give priority to those with the most urgent needs.' A DVSA spokesperson also commented: 'We are working with Citroen to make sure that everyone with these vehicles knows that they can't use this model of car until the necessary repair work has been carried out.' A Department for Transport spokesperson added: 'We understand how frustrating these recalls are for those affected. 'The safety of those drivers and their families remains the Transport Secretary's top priority. She and the Future of Roads Minister are actively engaging with manufacturers and industry leaders to ensure any disruption is kept to an absolute minimum.'

Romania proposes pension reforms as it moves to join OECD
Romania proposes pension reforms as it moves to join OECD

Reuters

time18 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Romania proposes pension reforms as it moves to join OECD

BUCHAREST, Aug 8 (Reuters) - Romanians will be limited to withdrawing a quarter of their private pension funds upon retirement and will receive the rest in monthly payments under a draft reform of the system unveiled on Friday that aims to boost the country's OECD candidacy. The EU member state overhauled its communist-era pension system in 2008, making it compulsory for working Romanians under 35 to contribute to a so-called "second pillar" of private pension schemes in addition to their state pension. Under the scheme, more than 8 million Romanians contribute to seven private pension funds, which have become the largest institutional investors on the Bucharest Stock Exchange. Those funds held assets worth 166.2 billion lei ($38 billion) at the end of May, up 19% on the year, data from Romania's financial supervision authority ASF showed. Romanians are currently allowed to withdraw the entirety of their private pension assets as a lump sum when they reach the retirement age of 65. ASF president Alexandru Petrescu said the draft payments bill released by the government would ensure the stability of the system, giving fund managers more predictability. The payment bill is also a requirement under Romania's accession path to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Romania became an OECD accession country in 2022 and hopes to join the club of wealthy nations in early 2026. The OECD will assess Romania's private pension system next month. The draft bill will allow Romanians to choose scheduled withdrawals for up to 10 years or lifelong monthly installments. It will now be submitted for public consultations before approval by the government and a final vote in parliament on its implementation. Romanians will increasingly rely on private pensions, particularly after 2030 when just under 2 million people - a 10th of the population - born under a communist-era abortion ban will reach retirement age, increasing the burden on the pay-as-you-go state pension system. The seven pension funds have so far made payments worth 3.8 billion lei to some 238,000 people but will begin to face larger withdrawals from 2030. ($1 = 4.3554 lei)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store