German coalition approved for Merz to become chancellor
Germany's centre-left Social Democrats have approved a deal to join a new coalition government, paving the way for parliament to elect conservative leader Friedrich Merz as the new chancellor.
The conservative-SPD coalition was the only path to a majority government after both major parties suffered steep losses in the February general election.
They have both ruled out governing with the far-right Alternative for Germany which scored a historic second place. Over the last two weeks, SPD members have voted on the coalition treaty drawn up by leaders of both parties. Their approval, which had been expected, would enable Merz to become chancellor on May 6.
In the vote, which ended on Tuesday just before midnight, 84 per cent of the members who took part were in favour of the deal, the party said, adding that 56 per cent of the around 360,000 members took part in the vote.
"In these very difficult times in global politics, we bear responsibility for our security, for economic growth, secure jobs and equal opportunities," party General Secretary Matthias Miersch said in a statement.
Reviving Europe's largest economy is a top priority for Germany's next government, amid fears a trade war sparked by US President Donald Trump's tariff announcements could further hurt its export-driven economy.
Despite the SPD's historic low of just 16.4 per cent of the vote, political experts say it secured key gains in the coalition deal, leveraging the conservatives' lack of alternative paths to the chancellery for the next four years.
The next coalition aims for example to invest heavily in Germany's infrastructure, raise the minimum wage to 15 euros ($A26.60) per hour, keep pensions level at 48 per cent of the current average wage and extend a cap on rents, according to the coalition contract.
The SPD also secured the coveted finance ministry, along with six other cabinet posts.
The SPD's concessions on tighter migration rules and cuts to unemployment benefits as well as its failure to secure tax hikes for the wealthy have, however, drawn sharp criticism from the party's influential Jusos youth wing, whose leaders had urged members to reject the deal.
with AP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
3 days ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
J.D. Vance chastised Europeans on free speech. He wasn't wrong
There is a counterfactual fantasy, not much indulged but not dismissed entirely, in which Prime Minister Anthony Albanese went to his second election in the brief 'vibe shift' between Donald Trump's triumphant return to the US presidency in 2024 and his clumsy tariff whammy in 2025. Perhaps, if the Australian election had taken place before 'Liberation Day' the outcome would have been different for Peter Dutton. More likely, it would not. In any case, such imaginings are of no use to the Coalition. It's as helpful to them as the reverse counterfactual is to the Social Democrats I spoke to in Germany this week. Germany held its election in February. The incumbent government was led by a chancellor from the Social Democratic Party (SPD), the German analogue of the Labor Party. Perhaps if the election had come after Trump's global tariff day, the SPD might also have retained power. But as the German election was set for February, only 20 per cent of German voters chose the SPD. The Social Democrats now have a lower primary vote than the Alternative for Germany (AfD), an economically conservative-turned-far-right party that has made immigration control its primary platform. If the Albanese government cared to take the German experience as a cautionary tale – a possible but avoidable future – it could reflect that what occurred there is just part of a pattern rolling through the Western world. These trends come to Australia late and slowly. But they do seem to come eventually. US Vice President J.D. Vance described what was about to happen to Germany at the Munich Security Conference in February. He warned that European governments must listen to and respect their citizens, even when the message is not agreeable to the official and intellectual classes. And in this context he urged the conference to bear in mind that 'when political leaders represent an important constituency, it is incumbent upon us to at least participate in dialogue with them'. The problem is one of free speech. The precise amount of it which should be permissible, the dose which inoculates against social strife and what constitutes an overdose which would poison the social waters. Germany has taken the homeopathic approach to free speech, hoping that a minuscule amount, heavily diluted, will cure what ails the nation. Vance's words generated indignation among European leaders and officials. But it spoke from the soul of many voters. Days later, the German public delivered a historic high primary vote for the AfD. The gulf between what is said and what is thought was dramatically exposed by democracy.
The Age
3 days ago
- The Age
J.D. Vance chastised Europeans on free speech. He wasn't wrong
There is a counterfactual fantasy, not much indulged but not dismissed entirely, in which Prime Minister Anthony Albanese went to his second election in the brief 'vibe shift' between Donald Trump's triumphant return to the US presidency in 2024 and his clumsy tariff whammy in 2025. Perhaps, if the Australian election had taken place before 'Liberation Day' the outcome would have been different for Peter Dutton. More likely, it would not. In any case, such imaginings are of no use to the Coalition. It's as helpful to them as the reverse counterfactual is to the Social Democrats I spoke to in Germany this week. Germany held its election in February. The incumbent government was led by a chancellor from the Social Democratic Party (SPD), the German analogue of the Labor Party. Perhaps if the election had come after Trump's global tariff day, the SPD might also have retained power. But as the German election was set for February, only 20 per cent of German voters chose the SPD. The Social Democrats now have a lower primary vote than the Alternative for Germany (AfD), an economically conservative-turned-far-right party that has made immigration control its primary platform. If the Albanese government cared to take the German experience as a cautionary tale – a possible but avoidable future – it could reflect that what occurred there is just part of a pattern rolling through the Western world. These trends come to Australia late and slowly. But they do seem to come eventually. US Vice President J.D. Vance described what was about to happen to Germany at the Munich Security Conference in February. He warned that European governments must listen to and respect their citizens, even when the message is not agreeable to the official and intellectual classes. And in this context he urged the conference to bear in mind that 'when political leaders represent an important constituency, it is incumbent upon us to at least participate in dialogue with them'. The problem is one of free speech. The precise amount of it which should be permissible, the dose which inoculates against social strife and what constitutes an overdose which would poison the social waters. Germany has taken the homeopathic approach to free speech, hoping that a minuscule amount, heavily diluted, will cure what ails the nation. Vance's words generated indignation among European leaders and officials. But it spoke from the soul of many voters. Days later, the German public delivered a historic high primary vote for the AfD. The gulf between what is said and what is thought was dramatically exposed by democracy.
Sky News AU
5 days ago
- Sky News AU
‘Not a great day for you': Trump ruthlessly trolls German Chancellor over WW2's D-Day
US President Donald Trump raised eyebrows by joking D-Day was 'not a great day' for Germany during a meeting with Chancellor Friedrich Merz ahead of the WWII anniversary. President Trump met with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz at the White House on Thursday to discuss the Russia-Ukraine war. Trump called the war a 'bloodbath' and compared it to 'two children fighting,' suggesting sometimes it's better to let it play out before intervening. He claimed 5,000–6,000 soldiers are dying weekly and said Putin told him Moscow had 'no choice but to attack' after recent Ukrainian strikes deep inside Russia. Merz urged US leadership to help end the war, citing the D-Day anniversary and America's historic role in liberating Europe. "May I remind you that we are having June 6 tomorrow. This is D-Day anniversary when the Americans once ended a war in Europe," Merz said. 'That was not a pleasant day for you," Trump quipped. 'No, that was not a pleasant ... Well, in the long run, Mr President, this was the liberation of my country from the Nazi dictatorship," the Chancellor replied. "That's true," Trump said.
