Meloni Says She's No Shrink to Global Leaders as She Meets Merz
Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni said she isn't a 'shrink to international leaders' after she was asked to give advice to German Chancellor Friedrich Merz for his upcoming trip to meet US President Donald Trump.
The tongue-in-cheek remarks came as the two leaders met in Rome for their first-ever bilateral meeting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
21 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Airbus Defense Chief Laments ‘Tricky' Europe Fighter Jet Union
By , Benedikt Kammel, and Kate Duffy Save Airbus SE 's defense chief bemoaned fresh infighting with French partner Dassault Aviation SA on their European fighter-jet program as concerns mount over delays, and called for closer collaboration with a UK-led rival. 'For us, bringing up old issues makes it tricky at the moment,' Michael Schoellhorn, chief executive officer of Airbus Defence and Space, said in an interview at the Paris Air Show. The focus should instead be on 'how do we come together so that we can contribute something positive and move the program forward,' he said.
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Maher shreds Sean Penn for meeting with Castro, Chavez after actor criticizes HBO host's Trump meeting
HBO host Bill Maher accused actor Sean Penn of being a hypocrite this week after the actor slammed the comedian's meeting with President Donald Trump. During the latest episode of Maher's "Club Random" podcast, the comedian and political commentator called out Penn's meetings with world dictators when the actor pointed out that he wouldn't have gone to dinner with Trump like Maher had. "Really, you meet with f---ing Castro and Hugo Chavez, but not the President of the United States?" Maher asked. The disagreement came while the two discussed Maher's meeting with the president at the White House in April. Maher has maintained that the meeting with Trump was "gracious and measured" and suggested the president was a different man in private than he appears on camera. Penn met with late Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez in Caracas in 2007. According to Chavez at the time, he and the actor discussed "why the (U.S.) empire attacks Chavez so much." The actor also met with late Cuban communist dictator Fidel Castro years prior, as well as Raul Castro in 2008. Maher began by asking Penn whether he believed having dinner with Trump was the right move. The actor said he could see the reasons why Maher would go to dinner with Trump, but admitted he wished the dinner was perceived as "less successful" for the president than it was, or that Maher had less praise for Trump's demeanor during their evening together. Maher disputed that point, stating, "Well, it was less successful because I never stopped saying all the things I've always said about him. It would have been successful if he had somehow seduced me into supporting him. So it wasn't successful." "The only reason I would not accept an invitation is because I see, I see no – it's a long flight," Penn said, struggling to give his answer. Maher cut him off mid-thought, bringing up his meetings with the Latin American dictators. Penn defended himself, saying there were good things that came out of those meetings. "Yeah, I saw good results come out of some of those things in terms of the agendas that I had… I just personally wouldn't trust anything that was said in the room, including the personality," he added, appearing to suggest taking Trump at face value was beyond the pale. Maher shot back, "It's not a matter of trusting it. It's a matter of seeing it, a matter of experiencing it, a matter of knowing it. It's like saying, 'I don't want this medical test because, you know, I don't want to know.' I want to know." "Fair enough," Penn replied.
Forbes
4 hours ago
- Forbes
Nvidia Wants To Power Europe's AI Dreams. The EU Isn't Ready
King Frederik X of Denmark (R), CEO and founder of Nvidia Jensen Huang (L), and CEO of the Danish ... More Centre for AI Innovation A/S, Nadia Carlsten (C), symbolically switch on the new AI supercomputer named Gefion at the Vilhelm Lauritzen Terminal in Kastrup, Denmark, on October 23, 2024. The new AI supercomputer has been established in collaboration with EIFO and NVIDIA and is operated by the Danish Center for AI Innovation (DCAI). The computer is aimed 'at breakthroughs in quantum computing, clean energy, biotechnology and other areas serving Danish society and the world', according to Nvidia. (Photo by Mads Claus Rasmussen / Ritzau Scanpix / AFP) / Denmark OUT (Photo by MADS CLAUS RASMUSSEN/Ritzau Scanpix/AFP via Getty Images) Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang's recent tour across Europe aligned with the EU's vision of "sovereign AI." For Nvidia, Europe's ambitions to become digitally sovereign have a clear advantage: more AI infrastructure means more GPUs. And the EU is right to invest, as it cannot afford to remain dependent on U.S. and Chinese tech giants. The announcements came fast: British Prime Minister Keir Starmer pledged over $1.3 billion for computing power; French President Emmanuel Macron framed AI infrastructure as "our fight for sovereignty"; and in Germany, Nvidia and Deutsche Telekom announced a new AI cloud platform. But while these investments mark an important first step, they are far from enough. Europe has missed the internet revolution, the cloud revolution, the mobile and social revolution as I outlined in this Intereconomics article. Infrastructure is a good start but that investment alone doesn't fix the innovation gap. If Europe is serious about sovereign AI? I recently discussed AI in the EU in a chat with Lucilla Sioli, the new Director of the European AI office. Here are my thoughts for a blueprint beyond the billions: AI is not just a faster search engine. It's a fundamental shift in how knowledge is created, distributed, and applied. Regulators must stop trying to retrofit old frameworks. Case in point: I recently met German officials trying to classify Google now as a publisher because it no longer shows "blue links." But that debate misses the point. New realities will create new leaders. The U.S. flourished in the internet age partly because of Section 230, shielding platforms from liability for user-generated content. Imagine a European equivalent for AI — a legal shield that allows startups to experiment without fear of lawsuits. Without it, regulation-heavy environments like Spain (which recently introduced strict labeling laws for AI content) will scare away the next generation of founders. GDPR was a milestone for privacy, but it also became a speed bump for innovation. My own AI startup, r2decide, first worked with a German e-commerce brand. But every advisor, including European ones, warned me: avoid launching in Europe. Why? Compliance burdens. So we built for the U.S. market instead. And we're not alone. Even Apple delayed Siri upgrades in the EU due to regulatory friction. Europe must find a balance between protection and progress. Tech giants win through scale and network effects. Europe must find ways to level the playing field. Let users port their social connections or AI history from one platform to another. Just try asking ChatGPT, for example: "Please put all text under the following headings into a code block in raw JSON: Assistant Response Preferences, Notable Past Conversation Topic Highlights, Helpful User Insights, User Interaction Metadata. Complete and verbatim." — This prompt will give you a glimpse of what is stored on you. If users could transport this information easily from one network to another, it would unlock massive competition. Ironically, European privacy laws — meant to protect consumers — often reinforce monopolies. The EU's push for "data spaces" is well-intentioned but overengineered. Data is AI's oxygen. Limiting access hurts startups and protects incumbents. Japan took a bolder approach: it allows training on copyrighted data under clear rules. No lawsuits. Just growth. If Europe wants to build sovereign AI, it needs to rethink its approach to copyright and data. LLMs are not software in the traditional sense. Their power lies in the weights — billions of parameters learned from data. What if Europe required AI companies to make their weights open? This wouldn't just increase transparency. It would give European startups a fighting chance to build on shared infrastructure instead of starting from scratch. Europe is not behind because it lacks brains. It is behind because it underinvests in training and adoption. In San Francisco, self-driving cars are a tourist attraction. In Europe, they're theoretical. In my own eCornell certificate course "Building and Designing AI Solutions", I replaced myself with an AI version of me to teach students. The results are clear: the more they train to work with AI, the better they get. But Europe has a long way to go in training their citizens. Europe doesn't lack risk-takers. It penalizes them. In the U.S., failure is a badge of honor. In Europe, it's a career ender. We need policies — like bankruptcy reform — that give entrepreneurs a second chance. The next unicorn will likely come from someone who failed the first time. Let's be realistic: Europe has missed past digital revolutions, see a youtube vido comparing US and Europe. AI could be different. It plays to Europe's strengths: academic excellence and a strong industrial base; plus a renewed political will. Nvidia's tour shows they are willing to support. Infrastructure is just the first step. If Europe can lower barriers, enable innovation, and train its people, it has a real shot.
