Man to be charged for buying KrisFlyer accounts illegally to use air miles on purchases
Man to be charged for buying KrisFlyer accounts illegally to use air miles on purchases
SINGAPORE - An Indonesian man is to be charged in court on May 29, after he allegedly bought KrisFlyer accounts illegally and used the accumulated air miles to make purchases.
KrisFlyer is Singapore Airlines' rewards programme, which allows members to earn and redeem miles.
In a statement on May 28, the police said they received a police report from Singapore Airlines on Oct 11, 2024, about suspected fraudulent transactions using KrisFlyer miles.
The transactions were detected by local merchants earlier in June. Officers from the Airport Police Division (APD) later identified the 28 -year-old man, but he had left the country in September before the report was lodged.
When the man returned to Singapore on Jan 11, 2025 , he was detained by APD officers at Changi Airport.
Preliminary investigations found that while he was overseas, he had illegally bought and accessed some KrisFlyer accounts that belonged to other people.
After arriving in Singapore in June 2024, he allegedly used the miles in these accounts to buy a Samsung phone and phone cover from a shop in Changi Airport, and some pastries from a store in Bugis.
These purchases added up to more than $ 1,600 , said the police.
He is slated to be charged in court on May 29 with two counts of unauthorised access to computer material, and two counts of unauthorised modification of computer material.
The public should protect their online accounts by enabling multi-factor authentication or two-factor authentication, said the police.
They added: 'If you notice any suspicious or unauthorised transactions, please report the incident to your service provider or bank immediately.'
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Singapore Law Watch
3 hours ago
- Singapore Law Watch
Woman who claimed ‘voices' told her to abuse maid has jail term more than doubled to 7 years
Woman who claimed 'voices' told her to abuse maid has jail term more than doubled to 7 years Source: Straits Times Article Date: 30 May 2025 Author: Selina Lum Anita Damu, 57, was initially sentenced to two years and seven months' jail in 2018. A maid abuser had her prison sentence more than doubled to seven years after she appealed to the High Court to avoid jail time on grounds that she heard voices telling her to hurt the domestic worker. Anita Damu, 57, was initially sentenced to two years and seven months' jail in 2018, after a district judge accepted two psychiatric reports that she had abused the victim under the influence of auditory hallucinations. This explanation has since been rejected by the court. In increasing her sentence on May 26, Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon said the sentences imposed by the lower court on each of the charges she faced were manifestly inadequate. 'Among other things, they were infected by the erroneous assumption that the acts of abuse were caused by the auditory hallucinations,' he said. Anita, who is also known as Shazana Abdullah, had inflicted serious physical and psychological abuse on her 29-year-old Indonesian helper between 2014 and 2015. The abuse came to light in April 2015 after a Ministry of Manpower officer received information that the maid was being abused by her employer, and visited the flat. The officer reported the matter to the police after observing that the helper had welts on her face, burn marks on her hands and scars on her body. In September 2018, Anita pleaded guilty to five charges: one each for depriving the victim of rest, splashing her with hot water, burning her with an iron, poking her with a metal prong, and hitting her in the face with a slipper. Four other charges – for slapping the victim, pinching her with pliers on two occasions and pushing a cup of hot water towards her mouth – were taken into consideration for sentencing. During a sentencing hearing in October 2018, while her lawyer was arguing for her to be given a fine, she suddenly felt giddy and had to be taken to hospital. In December that year, she was sentenced to two years and seven months' jail. She was also ordered to pay $8,000 in compensation to the victim. Both she and the prosecution appealed against the sentence. The prosecution also appealed for a higher sum of compensation. She has paid an additional $4,000 in voluntary compensation on top of the ordered sum. When the appeal was first heard in 2019, Chief Justice Menon ruled that the psychiatric reports alone were not sufficient for the district judge to conclude that the woman was hearing voices when she abused the maid. The Chief Justice sent the case back to the lower court to determine whether she had suffered from such a condition. He said the offender should take the stand, as it was incumbent on her to present the best evidence available to support her assertion. Before she could testify, Anita was diagnosed with schizophrenia. She was assessed to be of unsound mind and unable to understand and follow court proceedings. Since June 2023, she has been confined at the Institute of Mental Health. On Aug 5, 2024, she was certified to be of sound mind and capable of standing trial. She and her family members eventually took the stand to testify before the district judge. In a judgment dated April 2, the district judge concluded that she did not suffer from auditory hallucinations and that her claim was a 'fabrication'. The appeal before Chief Justice Menon resumed on May 26. Deputy Public Prosecutor Timotheus Koh sought a jail term of four years and seven months, standing by the prosecution's submissions in 2019. He also sought a further $9,588 in compensation. Chief Justice Menon said the sentence sought by the prosecution was 'manifestly insufficient', looking at the totality of the offending behaviour, the harm to the victim and the cruelty towards the victim. He said he will explain his sentencing decision in a written judgment at a later date. He also allowed the prosecution's appeal on the compensation order. This means Anita has to pay a total of $21,588 to the maid. Chief Justice Menon noted that while most foreign domestic workers are well-provided for, occasionally some do not adjust well or have employers who fail to care for them. 'At times, they even fail to accord them the basic dignity due to a fellow human being. Sadly, this is such a case,' he said. He added that it was a 'matter of regret' that the case has taken this long to be resolved, in large part because of the litigation choices made by the accused. Selina Lum is senior law correspondent at The Straits Times. Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction. Print
New Paper
12 hours ago
- New Paper
Woman who claimed 'voices' told her to abuse maid has jail term more than doubled to 7 years
A maid abuser had her prison sentence more than doubled to seven years after she appealed to the High Court to avoid jail time on grounds that she heard voices telling her to hurt the domestic worker. Anita Damu, 57, was initially sentenced to two years and seven months' jail in 2018, after a district judge accepted two psychiatric reports that she had abused the victim under the influence of auditory hallucinations. This explanation has since been rejected by the court. In increasing her sentence on May 26, Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon said the sentences imposed by the lower court on each of the charges she faced were manifestly inadequate. "Among other things, they were infected by the erroneous assumption that the acts of abuse were caused by the auditory hallucinations," he said. Anita, who is also known as Shazana Abdullah, had inflicted serious physical and psychological abuse on her 29-year-old Indonesian helper between 2014 and 2015. The abuse came to light in April 2015 after a Ministry of Manpower officer received information that the maid was being abused by her employer, and visited the flat. The officer reported the matter to the police after observing that the helper had welts on her face, burn marks on her hands and scars on her body. In September 2018, Anita pleaded guilty to five charges: one each for depriving the victim of rest, splashing her with hot water, burning her with an iron, poking her with a metal prong, and hitting her in the face with a slipper. Four other charges - for slapping the victim, pinching her with pliers on two occasions and pushing a cup of hot water towards her mouth - were taken into consideration for sentencing. During a sentencing hearing in October 2018, while her lawyer was arguing for her to be given a fine, she suddenly felt giddy and had to be taken to hospital. In December that year, she was sentenced to two years and seven months' jail. She was also ordered to pay $8,000 in compensation to the victim. Both she and the prosecution appealed against the sentence. The prosecution also appealed for a higher sum of compensation. She has paid an additional $4,000 in voluntary compensation on top of the ordered sum. When the appeal was first heard in 2019, Chief Justice Menon ruled that the psychiatric reports alone were not sufficient for the district judge to conclude that the woman was hearing voices when she abused the maid. The Chief Justice sent the case back to the lower court to determine whether she had suffered from such a condition. He said the offender should take the stand, as it was incumbent on her to present the best evidence available to support her assertion. Before she could testify, Anita was diagnosed with schizophrenia. She was assessed to be of unsound mind and unable to understand and follow court proceedings. Since June 2023, she has been confined at the Institute of Mental Health. On Aug 5, 2024, she was certified to be of sound mind and capable of standing trial. She and her family members eventually took the stand to testify before the district judge. In a judgment dated April 2, the district judge concluded that she did not suffer from auditory hallucinations and that her claim was a "fabrication". The appeal before Chief Justice Menon resumed on May 26. Deputy Public Prosecutor Timotheus Koh sought a jail term of four years and seven months, standing by the prosecution's submissions in 2019. He also sought a further $9,588 in compensation. Chief Justice Menon said the sentence sought by the prosecution was "manifestly insufficient", looking at the totality of the offending behaviour, the harm to the victim and the cruelty towards the victim. He said he will explain his sentencing decision in a written judgment at a later date. He also allowed the prosecution's appeal on the compensation order. This means Anita has to pay a total of $21,588 to the maid. Chief Justice Menon noted that while most foreign domestic workers are well-provided for, occasionally some do not adjust well or have employers who fail to care for them. "At times, they even fail to accord them the basic dignity due to a fellow human being. Sadly, this is such a case," he said. He added that it was a "matter of regret" that the case has taken this long to be resolved, in large part because of the litigation choices made by the accused.
International Business Times
a day ago
- International Business Times
Indonesian Man Arrested for Computer Misuse Act Offences After Returning to Singapore
A 28-year-old Indonesian man will be charged on Thursday, May 29, for Computer Misuse Act offenses that were allegedly committed at retail shops located at Changi Airport and Bugis. On October 11, 2024, at about 4.47pm, Singapore Airlines lodged a police report regarding suspected fraudulent transactions using KrisFlyer ("KF") miles that were detected by local merchants in June 2024. Officers from the Airport Police Division (APD) were able to identify the individual through ground investigations and CCTV images, but he had already left the country in September 2024 before the report was filed. When the man returned to Singapore on January 11, 2025, APD police arrested him at Changi Airport. According to preliminary investigations, he obtained other people's KF accounts while abroad by making illicit internet purchases. In June 2024, he took a plane to Singapore, where he allegedly used the KF miles from these accounts to buy a Samsung phone and cover from a Changi Airport retail store and several pastries from a Bugis restaurant, totaling over $1,600. The man will be charged in court for two counts of unauthorized access to computer material under Section 3(1)(a) of the Computer Misuse Act 1993, which carries a fine of no more than $5,000, a maximum sentence of two years in prison, or both. In addition, he will also be charged for two counts of unauthorized modification of computer material under Section 5(1)(a) of the Computer Misuse Act 1993, which carries a maximum fine of $10,000, a maximum sentence of three years in prison, or both. In an effort to improve security, the police reminded the public how important it is to protect online accounts by turning on Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) or Two-Factor Authentication (2FA), if at all possible. They also advised notifying the bank or service provider once you come across any unusual or suspicious transactions. In case of emergency, people may contact the police hotline at 1800-255-0000 or submit the information online at if anyone has any information on such crimes Every piece of information will be kept completely private. In case of immediate police assistance, one can dial '999'.
