You're not going to believe this: Apple AirPods Pro 2 are down to $149 at Amazon
The Apple AirPods Pro 2 Wireless Earbuds haven't gone below $155 since Black Friday 2024, until now.
Amazon just marked the best-selling Apple earbuds down to $149 and everyone is freaking out. Personally, I can't imagine the price going any lower at this point. Plus, 40% off is a worthy discount. Shop the Prime Day Apple deal right here.
Apple's second-generation AirPods Pro are known for their active noise cancellation, transparency mode, and adaptive audio that adjusts to your surroundings. With the USB-C charging case, they're even more convenient for users with newer Apple devices.
Original price: $249 | Prime Day price: $149 | Savings: $100
$149 at Amazon (Save $100)
More: Amazon just slashed Apple prices for Prime Day: 4 deals to add to your cart ASAP
USA TODAY Shopping will be covering all the savings leading up to Prime Day 2025, during the sale and post-Prime Day deals, so stay here:
Amazon Prime Day 2025 will run from Tuesday, July 8 at 12:00am PT/3:00am ET through Friday, July 11.
Yes, you must be an Amazon Prime member to access the best Prime deals. The July Prime Day sale has tons of special Prime-exclusive discounts on select products that can help members save more than anyone else. Plus, joining Prime helps guarantee you get other perks like fast shipping all year long, access to Prime Video, Prime Reading, Prime Gaming and more.
→ More: Is an Amazon Prime membership worth it? Here's what you need to know
New members can try one week of Amazon Prime benefits for just $1.99. After that, Prime costs $14.99 per month or $139 per year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
4 minutes ago
- CNBC
Ives: Musk suing Apple would be a massive headache and headwind
Dan Ives, Wedbush global head of tech research, tells Worldwide Exchange Musk's potential Apple lawsuit could escalate fast, as App Store placement is critical for Grok and X adoption.
4 minutes ago
Epic Games wins partial victory in Australian court against Google and Apple
MELBOURNE, Australia -- Epic Games, the company behind the popular online game Fortnite, won a partial victory in an Australian court in U.S. billionaire chief executive Tim Sweeney's claim that Google and Apple engaged in anti-competitive conduct in running their app stores. Federal Court Justice Jonathan Beach on Tuesday upheld key parts of Epic's claim that the tech giants breached Australian competition laws by misusing their market power against app developers and using restrictive trade practices. Google and Apple 's dominance of the app market had the effect of substantially lessening competition and breached Australian law, Beach found. But the judge rejected some of Epic's claim including that Google and Apple engaged in unconscionable conduct as defined by Australian law. Sweeney is also challenging Google and Apple dominance in the app markets through the courts in the United States and Britain. The litigation began in August 2020 when Apple's App Store and Google's Play Store expelled Fortnite because Epic installed a direct payment feature in the extraordinarily popular game. The court ruled both companies pressured app developers including Epic through contracts and technology to sell their products through the two dominant app stores. Epic posted online that the judgment was: 'Another HUGE WIN for Epic Games!' Apple said the company 'faces fierce competition in every market where we operate.' 'We welcome the Australian court's rejection of some of Epic's claims, however, we strongly disagree with the Court's ruling on others,' Apple said in a statement. Google said it would review the judgment. Google and Apple could potentially appeal the ruling before the Federal Court full bench. 'We disagree with the court's characterisation of our billing policies and practices, as well as its findings regarding some of our historical partnerships, which were all shaped in a fiercely competitive mobile landscape on behalf of users and developers,' a Google statement said. Beach has yet to release a 952-page judgment on Epic's case against Apple or his 914-page judgment on the case against Google. The judge gave an oral summary of his findings during a 90-minute hearing Tuesday.
San Francisco Chronicle
5 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Epic Games wins partial victory in Australian court against Google and Apple
MELBOURNE, Australia (AP) — Epic Games, the company behind the popular online game Fortnite, won a partial victory in an Australian court in U.S. billionaire chief executive Tim Sweeney's claim that Google and Apple engaged in anti-competitive conduct in running their app stores. Federal Court Justice Jonathan Beach on Tuesday upheld key parts of Epic's claim that the tech giants breached Australian competition laws by misusing their market power against app developers and using restrictive trade practices. Google and Apple 's dominance of the app market had the effect of substantially lessening competition and breached Australian law, Beach found. But the judge rejected some of Epic's claim including that Google and Apple engaged in unconscionable conduct as defined by Australian law. Sweeney is also challenging Google and Apple dominance in the app markets through the courts in the United States and Britain. The litigation began in August 2020 when Apple's App Store and Google's Play Store expelled Fortnite because Epic installed a direct payment feature in the extraordinarily popular game. The court ruled both companies pressured app developers including Epic through contracts and technology to sell their products through the two dominant app stores. Apple said the company 'faces fierce competition in every market where we operate.' 'We welcome the Australian court's rejection of some of Epic's claims, however, we strongly disagree with the Court's ruling on others,' Apple said in a statement. Google said it would review the judgment. Google and Apple could potentially appeal the ruling before the Federal Court full bench. 'We disagree with the court's characterisation of our billing policies and practices, as well as its findings regarding some of our historical partnerships, which were all shaped in a fiercely competitive mobile landscape on behalf of users and developers,' a Google statement said.
