R.I., Mass., among states suing Trump administration over immigration status-based restrictions to safety net programs
'For the first time, millions of people are facing a new demand before they can access the Nation's most essential programs: 'show me your papers,'' the lawsuit states. 'This is not America, and it is not the law.'
Get Rhode Map
A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Rhode Island Attorney General
Advertisement
'By changing the rules with no notice, agencies and organizations that receive federal funding for critical services must quickly pivot or risk shuttering,' Neronha said in a statement. 'For example, if access to mental health and substance use disorder services is lessened or eliminated, already overburdened hospitals across the country could become further overwhelmed. These federal funding streams are critically important to the health and well-being of all Rhode Islanders, as well as our health care system, and we will fight to ensure they remain uninterrupted.'
Advertisement
Attorneys general from every New England state except New Hampshire joined the lawsuit, along with Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawai'i, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Wisconsin, Washington, and the District of Columbia.
People in the country illegally are ineligible for federal public benefits such as food stamps, student loans and financial aid for higher education. However, they have been able to access community-level programs.
And, for nearly 30 years and through five presidential administrations, according to the lawsuit, the federal government was consistent on the requirements of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act, known as PRWORA.
States needed to verify a person's lawful status before allowing them to access certain federal programs, such as Medicaid and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families. At the same time, the federal agencies told the states that PRWORA didn't require them to check someone's papers to allow them access to other community programs, such as food banks, Head Start, shelters, or rehabilitation clinics.
Not anymore.
On July 10, the US Departments of Health and Human Services, Education, Labor, and Justice changed the rules.
The new rules restrict states from using federal funds to provide services to individuals who cannot verify immigration status. That means state safety net programs — soup kitchens, domestic violence shelters, Head Start, crisis counseling centers, senior nutrition programs, health centers in schools — must screen for immigration status.
Under the new rules, undocumented immigrants will be prevented from
Advertisement
The Departments of Education and Labor placed education and workforce training programs within the statute's scope.
The rules took effect with minimal notice and affect not only undocumented immigrants, but also, Neronha said, some lawful visa holders and even US citizens who lack access to formal documentation.
The state programs are expected to comply immediately, but most providers can't implement major regulatory changes overnight, so they face losing federal funding.
Neronha said these abrupt restrictions could impact the 'tens of millions' of dollars funding programs related to opioid treatment, homeless services, and mental health program in all public schools in Rhode Island, according to the state Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities & Hospitals.
Funding changes to those community programs could lead to a health care crisis.
The lawsuit argues that the federal government acted unlawfully by issuing these changes without following required procedures under the Administrative Procedure Act, and by misapplying PRWORA to entire programs rather than to individual benefits. The changes also violate the Constitution's Spending Clause by imposing new funding conditions on states without fair notice or consent.
The coalition is asking the court to declare the new rules unlawful, halt their implementation through preliminary and permanent injunctions, vacate the rules and restore the long-standing agency practice, and prevent the federal government from using PRWORA as a pretext to dismantle core safety net programs in the future.
Amanda Milkovits can be reached at
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Should Indians feel ‘ashamed' for speaking English?
India's ruling government is questioning the country's reliance on English, igniting debates over identity, inclusion, and opportunity. It comes as the government is working to erase remnants of colonial history, from renaming school textbooks to changing street name. Yet, some warn that sidelining English could undermine the nation's future, even as language politics continue to fuel tensions.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Major update on plan to slash prescription medications to $25 for millions
The federal government will introduce legislation to parliament to cap the cost of Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) prescriptions to $25 this week. The cost-of-living move was one of Labor's major election promises and will save Aussies $200 million per year. Once passed, eligible medicines would be lowered from $31.60 to $25 from January 1 next year. Pensioners and concession cardholders will continue to pay just $7.70 for their prescriptions until at least 2030. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the cap was an example of cost-of-living relief that helped 'every Australian'. RELATED Major update on $5,520 HECS cash boost for millions to lift them out of debt Major warning after Aussie receives random $350 payment in her bank account Aussie 'appalled' by $4,000 ATO tax bill after common deductions rejected 'The size of your bank balance shouldn't determine the quality of your healthcare. My government will continue to deliver cost-of-living relief for all Australians,' he said. Health Minister Mark Butler said the move meant medicines would be their cheapest in decades. 'Cheaper medicines are good for the hip pocket and good for your health,' he said. 'For general patients, medicines haven't been this cheap since 2004." The change would lower the price of medicines by more than 20 per cent and follows an earlier round of price reductions in 2023. The government previously cut the maximum price of a PBS script from $42.50 to $30. The bill comes after US President Donald Trump flagged tariffs of up to 200 per cent on pharmaceuticals earlier this month. Pharmaceuticals are one of Australia's biggest exports to the US. According to the UN's Comtrade database, Australia exported $2.2 billion in products to the US last year. The Australian government has said it is not willing to trade away or do deals on the PBS. How will the cheaper medicines work? The PBS is the government subsidy program that allows Australians to get a wide range of prescription medicines at more affordable prices. There are two main prices for PBS medicines. The general rate is what applies to most people and is what would be lowered from $31.60 to $25. The concessional rate applies to concession-card holders and is currently frozen at $7.70 until 2030. There are more than 900 medicines on the PBS schedule, spread across more than 5,000 brands. You can check if your medication is on the PBS here.
Forbes
10 hours ago
- Forbes
The New Majority Of Students Spotlights Mental Health And Basic Needs
Basic Needs paper sign Many people think of college students as young adults living on campus and focused on developmental concerns, such as establishing new friends, feeling homesick, and academic pressure. Indeed, many campus support services are designed to fit these perceptions. For example, a 2024 report on outlined how many campus counseling centers were traditionally designed to treat developmental stress. However, because more students are now entering college with significant clinical concerns, new models of campus counseling are needed in the field of college mental health. Likewise, to better promote student wellbeing on a national scale, there needs to be a shift in the mainstream perceptions about who college students are and what their needs might be. The New Majority Of College Students According to a report last month on non-traditional students are the new majority of learners within higher education. Highlights from this report indicated that 40.2% of college students were older than 22, 39.1% had children, and 69.3% had jobs. Furthermore, a 2025 report by Inside Higher Ed outlined a national survey of student basic needs from 91 institutions across 16 states. This survey was conducted by The Hope Center for Student Basic Needs, which is a research action center that guides policies and helps colleges and universities address basic needs insecurities on campuses. The survey found that 59% of students experienced at least one form of basic need insecurity, such as food or housing, and that this number increased to 73% when the definition of basic needs included mental health care, childcare, transportation or internet and technology access. Dr. Sara Abelson is The Senior Director of Training and Education at The Hope Center and a faculty member at Temple University. According to Abelson, there's a significant association between mental health challenges and basic needs. She stated, 'It's important to acknowledge that mental health is also a basic need, and one that is impacted by other basic needs.' According to Abelson, many students who lack essential resources become stressed and anxious, which can trigger mental health challenges like depression. Conversely, mental health symptoms can hinder a student's abilities to secure basic needs. Basic Needs For The New Majority Of College Students Rising tuition costs pose significant challenges for many college students, but it's important to note that many schools cannot randomly decide how much tuition will cost. A 2015 report on outlined various factors that determine how much a school's tuition will cost. Some of these factors include annual changes in the general consumer price index, if the state collects sales or income taxes, instructional expenditures, and how much discretionary spending a state legislature has. Furthermore, many schools are making attempts to curb the rise in tuition costs. For example, according to another 2025 report by Inside Higher Ed, tuition discounts are at an all-time high amongst private schools. According to Abelson, many students in the new majority face multiple financial barriers. She said, 'It's not just the cost of college that is increasing but living costs across the board.' In addition to inflation, a 2025 report by outlined changes to federal funding support for college students. Furthermore, many non-traditional students have lingering financial and family obligations. As Abelson pointed out, 'They are working. They are caregiving. They are commuting. And far too many are struggling to afford food, housing, transportation, and mental health care while trying to graduate into a world increasingly stacked against them.' The Importance Of Addressing Students' Basic Needs Basic needs insecurities are related to poor academic outcomes, such as lower GPAs, credit achievement, completion rates, and retention rates. Some might argue that students should not enroll in college unless their basic needs are already met; however, Abelson argued that meeting students' basic needs benefits society because it reduces the number of individuals on public benefits and/or involved in the community health care system. She stated, 'Most students with college degrees also break cycles of poverty and become healthier residents.' Furthermore, Abelson argued that the infrastructure of higher education can improve the efficiency and utilization of established government assistance programs. She stated that many individuals who are eligible for public benefits do not know how to access services, but that college campuses can serve as navigation hubs, even for community members, to address this gap. In addition, she reported that informed policies, such as allowing college enrollment to meet the work requirements in public benefits programs, can increase the utilization of dedicated government funding. Abelson's comments were consistent with the report on which argued that the infrastructure of higher education can be a low-cost service delivery model for mental health in America. Colleges and universities can partner with The Hope Center to collect data and develop systematic ways to address basic need insecurities on their campuses. A 2025 report on The Hope Center's website outlined how these partnerships can work. Abelson argued that since many students face multiple types of basic needs insecurities, schools need to prioritize holistic approaches while addressing the mental health and basic needs of students. She commented, 'Mental health challenges do not exist in isolation; any solutions must address the close link between mental and behavioral health challenges and financial or material basic needs insecurity.'
