Gossip Might Be Secret Ingredient For Romance, Bring Couples Closer, Study Finds
Gossip isn't just about spreading rumours or negativity; it can also be a way to build intimacy and trust with your partner.
Sharing small tidbits about others can contribute to happiness among romantic partners, leading to deeper connections and bonding. The couples who gossip together are happier and more connected than those who don't, the study found.
"Whether or not we want to admit it, everyone gossips," Chandler Spahr, first author of the study, as quoted by phys.org. "Gossip is ubiquitous."
Offline romance and in-person interactions also play a significant role in building connections.
The study was conducted by researchers at the University of California, Riverside, to find the role of gossip in producing positive outcomes in both same-gender and different-gender couples.
A total of 76 people participated. They wore a portable listening device called the Electronically Activated Recorder (or EAR). About 14 per cent of their daily conversation was recorded and analysed.
The findings revealed that the participants who spent about 38 minutes per day gossiping, with about 29 of those minutes gossiping with their romantic partners.
The study also noted that woman-woman couples produced the greatest amount of gossip.
"Negatively gossiping with one's romantic partner on the way home from a party could signal that the couple's bond is stronger than with their friends at the party, while positively gossiping could prolong the fun experiences," the study authors wrote.
"It may reinforce the perception that partners are 'on the same team,' enhancing feelings of connectedness, trust, and other positive relationship qualities, as well as contributing to overall well-being."
As per the study, the gossip may help in establishing and expectations and behaviours for a good relationship. It can function as a "social regulation tool".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Eliminating this one food for just 9 days can reduce fatty liver and reverse damage, as per US research findings
People commonly hear warnings about the negative impact of sugary drinks together with processed foods. Scientific studies demonstrate that fructose added to beverages and snacks, creates serious health threats. The sugar causes harm to your liver cells, which could result in serious medical conditions. However, there is good news now! Research reveals that eliminating added fructose for nine days will start to repair damaged liver tissue. Let's dig deeper.... How sugar harms your liver The liver develops fat deposits from fructose consumption which results in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) ranks as the leading liver disease among contemporary adults, and impacts approximately 30% of people living in developed nations. NAFLD exists in 90 percent of obese individuals and people with diabetes. Fructose differs from glucose, because it undergoes liver processing to become fat. The presence of liver fat leads to inflammation and causes damage to liver cells, which results in impaired liver operation. The condition results in both insulin resistance and increased risks of developing diabetes and heart disease, and various metabolic disorders. What do studies say Scientists at Touro University and the University of California, San Francisco conducted groundbreaking research with obese Latino and African-American youths who consumed high-fructose diets. The scientists exchanged fructose-rich foods with glucose-rich foods while maintaining the same daily calorie intake. A short period of nine days led to a significant 20% reduction in liver fat, according to MRI results and an enhancement of insulin sensitivity. The participants experienced liver benefits without significant weight changes because their body weight decreased by less than 1%, so the effects were directly related to fructose reduction. Research findings show that NAFLD in its early stages does not need to be permanent, because dietary modifications can reverse the condition within a short period. The culprit? Fructose High-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) found in sodas and processed foods, has led to the increased presence of fructose in modern diets. Research demonstrates that eating large amounts of fructose creates two major health issues, which include fatty liver disease and obesity. The human body processes fructose from processed foods and drinks differently than natural sugars found in whole fruits, because these products contain fewer beneficial compounds such as fiber and antioxidants. The excessive amount of fructose consumption causes liver damage through fat accumulation and metabolic disturbances. Quitting processed sugar When people replace sugary beverages and processed foods with starches and natural foods containing whole sugars, their livers become healthier while decreasing their chances of diabetes and heart disease. Simple dietary changes according to the Touro-UCSF study demonstrate that they can effectively fight against increasing health issues. Practical steps to protect your liver Replace all sugary drinks and sodas with water, herbal tea or natural water infused with fruits. Look for processed foods which contain high-fructose corn syrup and added sugars by checking labels to avoid them in snacks and cereals and sauces. Eat whole foods that contain natural sugars with fiber content, instead of processed foods. Home cooking allows you to maintain control over ingredients and sugar content. Limit your consumption of 100% fruit juices, because their fructose content remains high despite the lack of added sugars. Consult your doctor: If you have obesity, diabetes, or suspect fatty liver disease, seek medical advice early. Sodas and processed foods contain sugar that functions as a hazardous substance, which causes harm to liver tissue and metabolic wellness. Reducing your fructose consumption for a short period allows you to establish both protective measures, and reverse existing liver damage which supports future health. References: UCSF News - Switching Sugar for Starch Leads to Less Fatty Liver in Kids: PMC Article - Effects of Dietary Fructose Restriction on Liver Fat: PMC Article - Effect of a High-Fructose Weight-Maintaining Diet on Liver: UCSF News - Obese Children's Health Rapidly Improves With Sugar Reduction: - Fructose restriction study:
Time of India
4 days ago
- Time of India
EV fast chargers have a surprising health downside
Hundreds of public fast chargers are popping up across the US to serve electric vehicle drivers seeking a cleaner alternative to gas-powered cars. But they come with a surprising risk: Charging stations create air pollution. While EVs contribute vastly less to air pollution than combustion-powered vehicles, fast-charging stations are what a recent study called an 'overlooked source of air pollution.' The US added 703 high-speed charging stations in the second quarter, bringing the total across the country to 11,400, according to Energy Department data. Charging firms are planning to install hundreds more before year-end, making it important to address health risks now before the infrastructure becomes entrenched. The problem 'can be solved,' said Yuan Yao, a co-author of the study and a postdoctoral researcher at the University of California, Los Angeles' Fielding School of Public Health. 'We want to make sure that EV adoption is clean.' The emissions are likely tied to the fans used in direct current fast chargers ' power cabinets. While they help keep equipment cool, the recent study indicates they likely have the unintended side effect of kicking up particles from tires, brakes and dust into the air. Researchers took air quality measurements at 50 direct current fast charging stations in Los Angeles County, California, the majority of which were Tesla Inc. Supercharger locations. The company didn't respond to a request for comment. The average concentration of fine particulate matter in the air at the charging sites was 15.2 micrograms per cubic meter, slightly higher than what researchers found at gas stations and significantly higher than in other urban locations such as parks. Nearly half of the charging sites had daily fine particulate matter emissions that exceeded the World Health Organization's air quality guidelines. (The study focused on non-exhaust emissions and therefore didn't measure many types of pollution related to gas-powered cars.) EV charging companies can include filtration in charging cabinets to mitigate pollution, the study's authors said. They can also avoid putting the chargers near places like schools and residential areas. Some companies say they've already taken measures to reduce the risks of particulate matter. 'On all of our current DC fast chargers, ChargePoint enforces a minimum height for the air intake and exhaust to limit the ingress of dust, debris and water,' said a spokesperson for ChargePoint Holdings Inc. , which operates the largest charging network in the US. The company plans to add air filters to its 'DC chargers to further reduce the risk of dust or water entering the system, or particulates being expelled.' Gas-powered cars are still a much more potent health risk, both because of their emissions and gas stations' environmental impact, said Joe Allen, an air quality expert and professor at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health who was not involved in the study. Research shows fueling stations are major sources of volatile organic compounds, a category of chemicals that includes the carcinogen benzene, while internal combustion vehicles produce smog-forming pollutants. Greenhouse gas emissions also adversely affect health due to their influence on climate change. 'I'd much rather be charging my EV than filling my gas-powered car at the gas station,' Allen said. 'As we expand EV charging — especially fast-charging stations — we should also pay attention to potential emissions from the charging equipment itself,' Yao said.
Time of India
4 days ago
- Time of India
EV fast chargers have a surprising health downside
Hundreds of public fast chargers are popping up across the US to serve electric vehicle drivers seeking a cleaner alternative to gas-powered cars. But they come with a surprising risk: Charging stations create air pollution. While EVs contribute vastly less to air pollution than combustion-powered vehicles, fast-charging stations are what a recent study called an 'overlooked source of air pollution.' The US added 703 high-speed charging stations in the second quarter, bringing the total across the country to 11,400, according to Energy Department data. Charging firms are planning to install hundreds more before year-end, making it important to address health risks now before the infrastructure becomes entrenched. The problem 'can be solved,' said Yuan Yao, a co-author of the study and a postdoctoral researcher at the University of California, Los Angeles' Fielding School of Public Health. 'We want to make sure that EV adoption is clean.' The emissions are likely tied to the fans used in direct current fast chargers ' power cabinets. While they help keep equipment cool, the recent study indicates they likely have the unintended side effect of kicking up particles from tires, brakes and dust into the air. Researchers took air quality measurements at 50 direct current fast charging stations in Los Angeles County, California, the majority of which were Tesla Inc. Supercharger locations. The company didn't respond to a request for comment. The average concentration of fine particulate matter in the air at the charging sites was 15.2 micrograms per cubic meter, slightly higher than what researchers found at gas stations and significantly higher than in other urban locations such as parks. Nearly half of the charging sites had daily fine particulate matter emissions that exceeded the World Health Organization's air quality guidelines. (The study focused on non-exhaust emissions and therefore didn't measure many types of pollution related to gas-powered cars.) EV charging companies can include filtration in charging cabinets to mitigate pollution, the study's authors said. They can also avoid putting the chargers near places like schools and residential areas. Some companies say they've already taken measures to reduce the risks of particulate matter. 'On all of our current DC fast chargers, ChargePoint enforces a minimum height for the air intake and exhaust to limit the ingress of dust, debris and water,' said a spokesperson for ChargePoint Holdings Inc. , which operates the largest charging network in the US. The company plans to add air filters to its 'DC chargers to further reduce the risk of dust or water entering the system, or particulates being expelled.' Gas-powered cars are still a much more potent health risk, both because of their emissions and gas stations' environmental impact, said Joe Allen, an air quality expert and professor at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health who was not involved in the study. Research shows fueling stations are major sources of volatile organic compounds, a category of chemicals that includes the carcinogen benzene, while internal combustion vehicles produce smog-forming pollutants. Greenhouse gas emissions also adversely affect health due to their influence on climate change. 'I'd much rather be charging my EV than filling my gas-powered car at the gas station,' Allen said. 'As we expand EV charging — especially fast-charging stations — we should also pay attention to potential emissions from the charging equipment itself,' Yao said.
