
Study reveals exact number of times women should have sex per week 'to be happiest'
Women who have sex at least once a week are the 'happiest' in their relationship, according to a new study.
Scientists found 85 per cent of women who had a weekly romp were 'sexually satisfied', according to a study of nearly 500 heterosexual women.
In contrast, only 66 per cent of wives and girlfriends who had sex once a month reported the same level of relationship bliss.
And the figure fell to 17 per cent among those women who had intercourse less than this.
Author of the new study Alexandra Janssen, a researcher at the University of Manchester, said the findings show the importance of regular intimate relations.
'Women having sex less than once a week were far less likely to be satisfied in their sexual relationships,' she told The Sun.
'Therapists working with women to improve their sexual relationship satisfaction might focus on increasing the frequency of sex.'
Ms Janssen's study also found that women who rated sex as 'very important' had happier love lives than those who did not.
She said: 'It seems unlikely that low self-rated importance of sex causes low sexual satisfaction. That may cause women to rate the importance of sex as low as a coping strategy.'
Other findings from the study, published in the International Journal of Sexual Health, found that of the women surveyed those aged 18-24 were most likely to report being sexually satisfied.
In contrast, women over the age of 45 were the least likely to report being happy with their intimate relationship.
Satisfaction was also higher for women who reported more regular orgasms and rated sex as an important part of their life.
The study was based on a survey of 483 women from New Zealand who had been in a committed relationship within the past year.
The authors noted their study did have some limitations.
One was that being a survey, there was no way to verify if what the women reported was true.
Another was that the group of women surveyed was not very diverse, which could limit the scope findings to other groups.
YouGov figures reveal that six in 10 Britons have sex less often than once a week.
One in 10 claim to have sex weekly, and 15 per cent claim to be sexually intimate more often.
Regular sex doesn't just boost your mood, multiple studies have concluded that it is great for our overall health, and can even potentially help us live longer.
A study by Michigan State University found women aged between 57 and 85 who still enjoyed sex were less likely to have high blood pressure, reducing the risk of heart attacks and strokes.
Similarly, a study by Indiana University found women with healthy sex lives produce higher levels of antibodies, which can help fight off infections.
Another 2013 study, by UK-based neuropsychologist Dr David Weeks, found that regular intercourse can make you look younger.
He questioned more than 3,500 people about their sex lives over 10 years.
Results revealed those who have regular, healthy sex lives look up to seven years younger than people who do not get intimate two-to-three times a week.
Dr Weeks concluded that this was due to the release of feel good chemicals that released during intimate moments that boost circulation and reduce stress, as well as the production of human growth hormones, which promote skin elasticity.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
11 minutes ago
- BBC News
MSPs vote in favour of scaled-back social care reforms
MSPs have unanimously passed legislation which will allow people in care homes to receive visits from a named loved one even in restricted Care Reform (Scotland) Bill will also introduce changes to social care procurement and a new right to breaks for unpaid legislation was backed by 116 votes to to introduce a national care service, which were initially part of the bill, were dropped in January after unions withdrew support and a number of health boards and care organisations expressed concerns. What changes to social care are planned? One of the big changes planned under the new law is a legal right to breaks for unpaid mean councils will have a duty to decide whether a carer is able to take sufficient breaks from their caring they are not, then the local authority will provide support to enable this, such as providing funding for short respite policy, given Scotland has around 700,000 unpaid carers, will cost between £196m and £315m by 2035/36, according to the Bill's financial it remains a fraction of the £13.9bn that unpaid care is currently saving Scotland every to the way information is shared in health and social care - to make it less likely that people will have to repeat their information - as well changes to procurement rules in the sector are also up the powers that watchdogs can take against failing care providers is also part of the most high-profile part of the Care Reform (Scotland) Bill is Anne's Law, which allows people in care homes to receive visits from a named loved one even in restricted is named after Anne Duke, who died aged 63 in November 2021 after being cut off from her family while battling early-onset dementia during the Covid pandemic. Why was the National Care Service ditched? The original proposal for a National Care Service, inspired by the NHS, was to take social care provision and staff away from local authorities into a new national was then dropped in favour of creating a national care board to supervise service delivery and improve consistency - but this failed to win over a growing number of body Cosla and trade unions then withdrew their support for the project, while a number of health boards and care organisations also expressed plan, which was also subject to a series of delays, was eventually scrapped in January after £30m was spent on the Care Minister Maree Todd said at the time she was "still committed to the ambitions of the National Care Service" but added the SNP no longer had the support it needed in parliament to pass its original plans into law.


BBC News
36 minutes ago
- BBC News
Poppy Lindop: Nurse 'didn't check' baby's medicine dose
A hospital nurse who accidently gave a critically ill new born baby a large overdose of medication has accepted there were two missed opportunities to check the dose, an inquest has Lindop, who was born 10 weeks premature, died within 24 hours of being born at Manchester's St Mary's Hospital in March was already gravely ill with a serious infection when nurses mistakenly 10 times the correct dose of a muscle relaxant, Manchester Coroners Court heard. Nurse Fahima Begum earlier told the inquest the nursing team on the neo-natal intensive care unit "should have gone back and checked it, but that wasn't done". Polly suffered a cardiac arrest six minutes after the overdose and died within a few a post-mortem examination found the primary cause of her death was sepsis and prematurity, and that she had suffered severe lung Begum and her colleague Nurse Akila Pandoor were responsible for preparing the drug, Atracuriam, to be given to Polly."When you're making up an infusion, you should be checking", Ms Begum said."I believe it should have been checked again."Ms Pandoor told the inquest she "didn't physically look at the pump once the infusion started", even though she accepted it was standard practice to check the nurses, who were not directly responsible for Polly's care, said they did not feel under pressure to get the drug ready quickly. A hospital consultant in charge of Polly's treatment told the court that due to the severity of Polly's condition, he believed she "would not have survived", even without the mistake by the nursing team."What happened with Polly has gone around in my head for the past two years," Dr Gareth Penman told the court. "Did it [the overdose] cause her cardiac arrest to happen earlier? I'm not sure. But what I do think is that Polly was not going to survive this infection."Dr Penman described how Polly's condition worsened overnight, despite numerous treatments."It was an intense situation, things were moving rapidly," he hearing was told there was no mention of the overdose when Dr Penman reported Polly's death to the coroner. Dr Penman said: "I recognise I should have put it in at that point. I didn't think it had contributed to her death."In the following days and fter speaking with hospital staff and Polly's family, Dr Penman informed the coroner of the mistake."I apologise to Polly's parents if they thought I was trying to cover this up….that was not my intention," he Polly's death, Greater Manchester Police started an investigation into possible gross negligence the force later said no criminal charges were being inquest continues. Listen to the best of BBC Radio Manchester on Sounds and follow BBC Manchester on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Nottingham maternity scandal hospital data was ‘maliciously' deleted, police say
A computer file containing the details of cases linked to the NHS's largest maternity scandal was 'intentionally' and 'maliciously' deleted, a police investigation has found. Nottinghamshire Police launched a probe earlier this year after records held by Nottinghamshire University Hospitals Foundation Trust (NUH) and linked to the alleged maternity failings were temporarily lost. The data was later recovered and 300 more cases are expected to be added to the inquiry into the scandal after a discrepancy was noted by a coroner. NUH is currently being investigated for potential corporate manslaughter after The Independent revealed babies had died or suffered serious injuries at its maternity units. The investigation into the deleted hospital data is not related to the corporate manslaughter probe. The trust is also the subject of an inquiry led by top midwife Donna Ockenden, who is investigating the cases of 2,400 families who experienced maternity care at the trust, including deaths and injuries. Detectives launched a criminal investigation into Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust in September 2023 after concerns were raised about severe harm allegedly linked to the trust's maternity services. In an email to the affected families, seen by The Independent, police said that the data loss was 'most likely to be the action of an individual who had knowledge of the existence and location of the material'. Police said they were satisfied the data was not lost due to 'systemic corruption' and said 'it is most likely to have been done intentionally/maliciously rather than accidentally'. But officers were unable to identify the individual responsible. Families affected by the scandal told The Independent they would like to thank the police for their investigation. They said: 'We are distressed that they were unable to find who did this. We are appalled to hear this news, though sadly we are not surprised.' 'To know it is most likely an individual who most likely intentionally/maliciously deleted files of such importance is of grave concern. As families, we all gave our trust to NUH staff in our most vulnerable state of life and we deserved better. 'To know that there is most likely an individual who is capable of such behaviour is devastating for the already harmed and for the future of NUH safety. We call for openness at the worrying time and for the individual, their colleagues or anyone who knows anything about this to come forwards as a matter of urgency. This is a patient safety emergency.' In 2020, an exposé by The Independent found evidence of repeated poor care, spanning a decade at the NUH, with families accusing the hospital of covering up what happened to them. The investigation, conducted jointly with Channel 4, found 46 cases of babies who had been left with permanent brain damage, 19 stillbirths and 15 deaths. Several families and staff came forward to The Independent with stories of failings by the trust. A major review was commissioned in July 2020, but was soon superseded by Ms Ockenden's independent review. Commenting on the data loss investigation, temporary deputy chief Constable Rob Griffin said: 'Following consultation with HM Coroner and the Donna Ockenden review, a difference in the number of referred cases was identified. With the agreement of all involved, NUH appointed someone to review some of these cases. 'That person created a digital file in relation to their work. Along the journey, that file was found to have been deleted and NUH alerted Nottinghamshire Police to this fact. 'The file was recovered and provided to Nottinghamshire Police and a meticulous investigation has taken place. 'This has been completed by our cyber and digital teams, and although evidence suggested that this was more likely to have been deleted through an intentional individual action, we have not been able to identify a person responsible for this. NUH was approached for comment.