logo
Democrats' Chances of Flipping Joni Ernst's GOP Senate Seat in Iowa—Polls

Democrats' Chances of Flipping Joni Ernst's GOP Senate Seat in Iowa—Polls

Newsweeka day ago
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Democrat Jackie Norris jumped into the Iowa Senate race to challenge GOP Senator Joni Ernst on Tuesday in a race Democrats are hoping they can make competitive next November.
Bryan Kraber, Ernst's campaign manager, told Newsweek Iowans will "reject this Obama-era bureaucrat" in a statement responding to Norris' candidacy.
Newsweek also reached out to Norris' campaign for comment via email.
Why It Matters
Democrats are facing a challenging Senate map ahead of the midterms, despite hopes that President Donald Trump's diminishing approval rating could fuel a 2018-style "blue wave" across the country.
The party has to turn to states like Iowa, a former battleground that has shifted rightward over the past decade, as potential flip opportunities if they have any hope of taking back control of the upper chamber.
Iowa has not elected a Democratic senator since 2008 and backed Trump in each of his three presidential bids—including by 13 points last November, an indication of how Republican the state has become. Nonetheless, Democrats remain hopeful that a strong national environment, as well as backlash over Ernst's recent Medicaid comments, can make the race more competitive than expected.
Iowa Senator Joni Ernst speaks during The Hill & Valley Forum 2025 at The U.S. Capitol Visitor Center on April 30, 2025, in Washington.
Iowa Senator Joni Ernst speaks during The Hill & Valley Forum 2025 at The U.S. Capitol Visitor Center on April 30, 2025, in Washington.for 137 Ventures/Founders Fund/Jacob Helberg
What To Know
Norris emphasized her experience as a teacher and school board member in a video announcing her candidacy released on Tuesday.
"As a teacher and a school board member, you see the invisible burdens families are carrying," she said. "Take the Medicaid cuts. Who is it impacting? Middle class families right now, they can't afford to put food on the table. We have to find a way to make things more affordable for families."
Early polls of the race suggest Ernst will have an advantage in Iowa.
A Public Policy Polling survey found that Ernst would lead a generic Democrat by about two percentage points—45 percent to 43 percent, with 12 percent still unsure. However, the poll did not ask voters about specific Democratic candidates.
The survey of 568 Iowa voters was taken from June 2 to June 3.
A Data for Progress poll from May found that Ernst would have a lead over most Democratic candidates on an informed ballot. When asked about Norris, voters preferred Ernst by about six points (50 percent to 44 percent).
Democrat Nathan Sage fared better, leading Ernst by about two points (47 percent to 45 percent). Ernst also led State Representative J.D. Scholten by six points (49 percent to 43 percent) and State Senator Zach Wahls by 10 points (52 percent to 42 percent).
The poll surveyed 779 likely voters from May 7 to May 12.
Republicans are favored to hold the Iowa Senate seat, according to Kalshi betting odds, which give the GOP a 74 percent chance and Democrats a 26 percent chance of winning next November.
Outside of Iowa, Democrats view the Maine seat held by Senator Susan Collins and the open North Carolina seat as their best opportunities to pickup a win in a GOP-held seat next November. Maine backed former Vice President Kamala Harris by about seven points, while North Carolina backed Trump by about three points last November.
Republicans currently have a 53-47 majority, so Democrats need to win multiple double-digit Trump states like Iowa, Ohio or Texas to win back control of the Senate. Democrats are also defending seats in Georgia and Michigan, both of which backed Trump last year.
What People Are Saying
Bryan Kraber told Newsweek: "Our state is ruby red because Iowans reject higher taxes, open borders, and woke ideology, just like they will reject this Obama-era bureaucrat"
Democratic hopeful Jackie Norris wrote in a press release: "Red versus blue isn't fixing anything. Iowa needs a Senator who doesn't just talk tough but rolls up their sleeves, and has the grit and experience to actually get something done."
Sabato Crystal Ball forecasters J. Miles Coleman and Kyle Kondik wrote in a June update: "In 2014, [Ernst] won as part of a broader GOP wave—and she got help from a gaffe-prone opponent. Six years later, she won reelection as Trump was carrying Iowa by a strong margin (Ernst ran a little bit behind Trump). It's possible that 2026 could be like 2018: Iowa did not have a Senate election that year, but Democrats did end up winning three of the state's four U.S. House seats that year, and we suspect that if Iowa had had a Senate election, it likely at least would have been close."
What Happens Next
Ernst has not confirmed her plans for the 2026 election. Both the Cook Political Report and Sabato's Crystal Ball consider the race to be Likely Republican.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US to Scale Back Human Rights Accusations Against 3 Countries: Report
US to Scale Back Human Rights Accusations Against 3 Countries: Report

Newsweek

time26 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

US to Scale Back Human Rights Accusations Against 3 Countries: Report

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The administration of President Donald Trump is scaling back criticism of certain foreign governments over their human rights records, including their treatment of LGBTQ+ people, in a shift from the traditional U.S. promotion of rights, The Washington Post reported. The newspaper reviewed leaked draft reports on El Salvador, Israel and Russia being prepared for the State Department's annual report on human rights practices in countries around the world. Newsweek reached out to the State Department for comment Wednesday night. Why It Matters The leaked reports for the three countries underscore how the Trump administration is rethinking the U.S. role in global human rights advocacy. The apparent shift on human rights reflects a pattern of disengagement from international conventions and comes as the administration has already moved to abandon long-held positions and norms in areas like trade, the environment and relations with allies. Diplomats in U.S. embassies around the world have drawn up the annual rights report for almost 50 years. Their findings are considered the most thorough and wide-ranging of their kind. President Donald Trump, left, greets Nayib Bukele, president of El Salvador, as Bukele arrives at the White House on April 14 in Washington, D.C. President Donald Trump, left, greets Nayib Bukele, president of El Salvador, as Bukele arrives at the White House on April 14 in Washington, D.C. Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP What To Know The Post said the documents it reviewed are consistent with internal guidance circulated this year by State Department leaders who advised staff to shorten the reports to the minimum required by statutory guidelines and executive orders and to remove references to government corruption, gender-based crimes and other abuses the U.S. government historically has documented. "The 2024 Human Rights report has been restructured in a way that removes redundancies, increases report readability and is more responsive to the legislative mandate that underpins the report," the newspaper cited a senior State Department official as saying. According to the Post, the reports it reviewed are significantly shorter than the ones prepared last year by the administration of former President Joe Biden. They cut all references to LGBTQ+ people or crimes against them, and the descriptions of government abuses that remain have been softened. The draft for El Salvador says it had "no credible reports of significant human rights abuses" in 2024. The previous report for El Salvador, documenting 2023, identified "significant human rights issues" there—including government-sanctioned killings, instances of torture and "harsh and life-threatening prison conditions." "A comparison of the documents covering El Salvador shows the Trump administration downplaying the country's history of prison violence, emphasizing that there has been a reduction overall while stating that purported deaths were under government review," the newspaper reported. El Salvador's president, Nayib Bukele, a close ally of Trump, has offered to house people from other countries deported by the U.S. in a mega-prison built to detain gang members. "Scrutiny of corruption and judicial independence also is significantly scaled back in the draft report for Israel," the newspaper said, adding that the Israel draft is 25 pages compared with more than 100 pages last year. The draft for Israel makes no mention of corruption or threats to the independence of its judiciary. The 2023 report compiled by the Biden administration addresses the corruption trial of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and judicial overhaul efforts, which critics say threaten the independence of the judiciary. Previous reports also mentioned Israeli surveillance of Palestinians and restrictions of their movement but the issue is not addressed in the draft, the Post said. Keifer Buckingham, who worked on LGBTQ+ issues at the State Department until January, told the Post that the failure to include any mention in the reviewed reports of gender-based violence or violence against LGBTQ+ people was a "glaring omission" in the case of Russia, where its Supreme Court had banned LGBTQ+ organizations and labeled them "extremist," with raids and arrests last year. What People Are Saying Buckingham, also managing director at The Council for Global Equality, said: "Secretary (of State Marco) Rubio has repeatedly asserted that his State Department has not abandoned human rights, but it is clear by this and other actions that this administration only cares about the human rights of some some countries, when it's convenient to them." The senior State Department official cited by the newspaper said: "The human rights report focuses on core issues." What Happens Next It is not clear if the reports eventually transmitted to Congress and released to the public will mirror the drafts. The ones for El Salvador and Russia are marked "finalized," while the draft for Israel is marked "quality check," the Post reported.

Texas AG to investigate O'Rourke-linked group amid map row
Texas AG to investigate O'Rourke-linked group amid map row

UPI

time26 minutes ago

  • UPI

Texas AG to investigate O'Rourke-linked group amid map row

Texas has launched an investigation into Beto O'Rourke's Powered by People group in connection to Democrats who fled the state over the weekend. File Photo by Kevin Dietsch/UPI | License Photo Aug. 6 (UPI) -- Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton on Wednesday launched an investigation into potential Democratic presidential candidate Beto O'Rourke over allegations that he "bribed" Democratic state lawmakers who fled the Lone Star State to prevent Republicans from passing GOP-favorable congressional maps that critics say strip power from voters of color. Paxton announced the investigation amid a deepening row between the state's Democrats and Republicans. The state's minority Democrats fled Texas over the weekend to deny Republicans the quorum needed to certify the controversial maps. The state's Republican leadership has responded with threats of arrest and to vacate their congressional seats if they don't return by Friday, as well as investigations into anyone who solicits funds to support their effort. Paxton said Wednesday that he is investigating the O'Rourke-led Powered by People, which is reportedly covering the costs of Texas Democrats who fled the state. He also said the Powered by People group may have violated bribery laws and state laws, such as those governing campaign or officeholder contributions and expenditures, coercion of a public servant and abuse of office. "Any Democrat coward breaking the law by taking a Beto Bribe will be held accountable," Paxton said in a statement announcing the investigation. "These jet-setting runaways have already lost public trust by abandoning our state, and Texans deserve to know if they received illegal bribes to do it." The new maps, if certified, are expected to give Republicans five additional seats in the U.S. House of Representatives ahead of next year's midterm elections. Critics and Democrats argue that the maps draw lines that dilute the voting power of Latino and Black people, while serving as a power grab by President Donald Trump through rigging the GOP representation in the House. Democrats have widely supported their Texan colleagues' actions to prevent quorum. Republicans have viewed the move as a shirking from their responsibilities. O'Rourke has been traveling throughout several swing states, including Missouri, Wisconsin, Indianapolis, Nebraska and others, trying to generate grassroots support for the Texas Democrats. In response to the investigation, O'Rourke accused Paxton of hypocrisy. "The guy impeached for bribery is going after the folks trying to stop the theft of five congressional seats," he said on X. Paxton was impeached by the state House but was acquitted of all corruption charges by the Senate. The Republican attorney general has vowed that he will seek "aggressive legal action" against any Democrat who is not present at the House on Friday, while Abbott has called for their arrests.

Bitter partisanship threatens to engulf Senate as critical deadlines loom
Bitter partisanship threatens to engulf Senate as critical deadlines loom

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bitter partisanship threatens to engulf Senate as critical deadlines loom

The battle over nominations is spelling trouble for the Senate in other areas, as lawmakers on both sides of the aisle feel the pressure to ratchet up the partisanship in an extended tit for tat with no obvious off-ramp in sight. The Senate adjourned Saturday until next month after protracted talks to expedite the confirmation of dozens of President Trump's lower-level nominees in the face of Democratic resistance went belly up. This left Republicans fuming and increasingly likely to 'go nuclear' by changing the chamber's rules to quicken the confirmation process. At the same time, Democrats are under pressure to oppose Trump at every turn, with the confirmation process and the looming government funding fight being the most immediate examples. It's all leading much of Washington to wonder if the bipartisanship train can get back on the tracks — and at a crucial time. 'I think it is a complete breakdown of the Senate and just absolutely destructive that there can't be a deal reached on nominations, appropriations, confirmations,' said Jon Kott, a longtime top aide to former Sen. Joe Manchin ( 'The Senate used to work pretty easily in a bipartisan way on those three issues,' Kott continued. 'And when you break down on those three, you're really close to breaking the Senate and turning it into the House.' While the Senate hasn't had a sea change moment along the lines of eliminating the filibuster, the chamber could be on the precipice of a major overhaul starting next month. Chief among them are potential rule changes eyed by Senate Republicans, who were outwardly exasperated toward the final days before August recess over the Democratic blockade of Trump nominees. Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) told reporters Tuesday that talks have centered on chopping down the amount of time between cloture and confirmation votes. Other members have raised the idea of eliminating a cloture vote altogether, or the possibility of working through multiple nominees at the same time. The South Dakota Republican also said that if he had his druthers, members would change the law to shift one-quarter to one-third of the roughly 1,200 jobs that currently require Senate approval to just need a presidential appointment. 'That's too many,' Rounds said. 'Most members of the Senate will tell you that they don't believe it is necessary to go that deep into government to have Senate approval on them.' Under regular order, Senate rule changes require 67 votes. But Republicans could use a shortcut that requires only 51 votes, giving them the ability to bypass Democratic opposition. That rarely used shortcut, which more and more Republicans are floating, is known as the 'nuclear option' because it is viewed as a major escalation of partisanship. Going that route could have major ramifications for Senate work coming down the rails, and not just on nominations. Congress faces a Sept. 30 shutdown deadline, and while the Senate passed its first three-bill government funding package prior to breaking for recess, that lone bit of bipartisan work could be overtaken by the one-two punch of a rule change or a second bill to claw back already appropriated funding. Democrats were already outraged last month when Congress passed a first package with only GOP votes to claw back funds that had been previously appropriated through a bipartisan process. They warned a second such bill would only poison the well further — as a rule change without Democratic buy-in would also likely do. 'One of these days, Trump is going to have to learn that he needs to work with Democrats to help the American people,' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) told reporters Saturday. 'The Trump-Republican 'go-it-alone' strategy ain't working, and the American people aren't happy.' Complicating the state of play is the pressure both leaders are facing. Schumer, in particular, in a tricky bind as he attempts to manage a conference that wants to take on Trump at every juncture, but faces a government funding deadline next month. He came under heavy fire for marshaling Democrats to help pass a GOP spending bill in March, and lawmakers in his party are already warning him against doing so again. In addition, the Democratic leader will have to balance home-state politics, where the New York City mayoral race is among the preeminent races this fall, with progressives and Democrats siding with Zohran Mamdani over former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) in the primary. According to a recent survey, Schumer is underwater by 18 percentage points with the electorate in his backyard, with 70 percent of respondents also saying they are dissatisfied with the direction of the city. Fifty-one percent also said that they want the next mayor to 'stand up' to the president rather than work with him to secure federal funding. Across the aisle, Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) has gotten high marks for his opening months atop the conference, having helped shepherd members through the passage of Trump's mammoth tax package and the rescissions bill, as well as the confirmation of a number of high-stakes nominees. But balancing a potential rule change with the government funding process and maintaining as much harmony as possible will be a difficult task. In the background are his past calls to uphold the filibuster, which he maintained during his leadership bid that he will not weaken. 'I do think they see the value in the Senate's role as the cooling saucer for the hot cup of tea. I think that you can still say that with a straight face,' one former Senate GOP leadership aide said. 'I don't think it's in anyone's interest, and I don't think Republicans want to do it first,' the former aide continued. 'But I do think all the pressure building up on the noms [nominations] side needs a valve, and it probably will get and needs the valve on the personnel side.' Over the last 15 years, the filibuster has remained despite a number of attempts to chip away at it. Former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's (D-Nev.) decision to change the threshold for lower-court judicial nominees from 60 votes to 51 votes creaked open the door, which was finally blasted open by Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) when he extended that threshold to Supreme Court nominees. Senate Democrats twice during former President Biden's tenure also pushed to overturn the legislative filibuster, but were thwarted by Manchin and former Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (I-Ariz.). Whether there is a way out of this tumult remains to be seen. Rounds believes the government funding exercise coupled with the upcoming work on the annual National Defense Authorization Act is a prime chance to steer in a bipartisan direction. But the rules change for nominees and a second rescissions bill looms, potentially dashing those hopes. 'If you turn [the Senate] into the House, you're going to lose a lot of the top people who want to be in the Senate, who want to actually get huge legislative wins done for the country,' Kott warned. 'And that … will be the death knell for Congress if that happens.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store