Julian Assange open to political action as Cannes hosts documentary
By Hanna Rantala and Miranda Murray
CANNES, France (Reuters) -WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who is at the Cannes Film Festival this week for the documentary "The Six Billion Dollar Man," is thinking about how to become politically active again once he has fully recovered from prison, said his wife, Stella.
Assange, 53, returned to his native Australia after pleading guilty last June under an agreement with U.S. officials to one count of illegally obtaining and disclosing national security materials.
The plea ended Assange's five-year stay in a British prison, which followed seven years at the Ecuador embassy as he sought to avoid extradition to Sweden on sexual assault allegations.
Assange denied those allegations and called them a pretext to extradite him to the United States over WikiLeaks.
WikiLeaks in 2010 released hundreds of thousands of classified U.S. military documents on Washington's wars in Afghanistan and Iraq - the largest security breaches of their kind in U.S. military history - along with swaths of diplomatic cables.
"He was in a very grave situation in the prison. He's recovering from that," Stella Assange told Reuters in Cannes.
"But now he's coming to understand how grave the situation outside (prison) is and thinking, making plans to find the means of what to do about it," she added.
"He's very, very concerned about the state of the world and the state that we're all in right now," said Stella, who met Assange in London in 2011 while working as part of his legal team.
Julian and Stella Assange, wearing a brooch with a picture of British designer Vivienne Westwood holding a sign saying "Stop Killing," walked the red carpet on Wednesday evening.
Julian has so far not spoken at any of his appearances.
The documentary from Emmy-winning director Eugene Jarecki takes on the tone of a high-tech international thriller to recount Assange's fight against extradition, using WikiLeaks footage and archives, and previously unpublished evidence.
Jarecki, who began filming before Assange was released, said he never expected to see him walk around Cannes as a free man.
By inviting Assange, the festival was sending a message about the need for freedom of information and a free press, Jarecki told Reuters, as those values are in decline in many parts of the world according to an index from Reporters without Borders.
The director called Assange "a canary in the coal mine" in foretelling the U.S. government's current moves to exert more control over media access to U.S. President Donald Trump.
"If we had taken that bit more seriously, we might have seen a bunch of this coming," said the U.S. director.
Assange's lawyer, Jennifer Robinson, told Reuters that the film portrayed the WikiLeaks founder as he should be shown.
"This film is absolutely necessary in terms of telling the story of free speech and what Julian Assange, his case means for the world, not just for him, but for the world," she said.
(Reporting by Hanna Rantala and Miranda Murray; Editing by Sandra Maler)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
'Anything goes': Yoshitomo Nara on his creative process as London exhibition opens
LONDON, - Artworks by Yoshitomo Nara go on display in London this week in what organisers say is the largest European retrospective of the Japanese artist. The show, running at the Hayward Gallery by the River Thames, features more than 150 works - drawings, paintings, sculptures, ceramics and installations - nodding to the longtime influences of Nara's works including music, nature, the importance of home and the peace movement. "This is about 40 years' worth of my work," Nara told Reuters at a press preview on Monday. "When I look at my work I don't think what I'm trying to say has actually changed in that time. Whatever period I look at reflects a part of myself, which is why this exhibition is not done chronologically." Nara, 65, is best known for his portraits of child-like characters with big gazing eyes. "I think all the pictures I've created are like my reflections," he said when asked about them. On display are plenty of those kinds of paintings and drawings as well as sculptures. "Anything goes," says Nara, who was born in Aomori Prefecture in northern Japan and lived in Germany early in his career before moving back home, said of his creative process. "I don't think about what I'm doing, but when I've done something good I can feel the reason behind it almost like a kind of hindsight." The show is an expanded version of a touring exhibition previously put on at the Guggenheim in Bilbao and Museum Frieder Burda in Baden-Baden. "What's quite interesting, I think, for audiences in London and in Europe overall ... we don't actually get to see Nara's work in person that often," exhibition curator Yung Ma said. "We've all seen his paintings and drawings on our I think all these kind of images, they don't do the works justice. So it's actually quite important to come and see because you can actually then understand ... he's a really good you can actually really see the texture of the works and the colours and the layering of the paint." The exhibition runs from June 10 to August 31.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Protests intensify in Los Angeles after Trump deploys hundreds of National Guard troops
Tensions in Los Angeles escalated on Sunday (June 8, 2025) as thousands of protesters took to the streets in response to President Donald Trump's extraordinary deployment of the National Guard, blocking off a major freeway and setting self-driving cars on fire as law enforcement used tear gas, rubber bullets and flash bangs to control the crowd. Many protesters dispersed as evening fell and the police declared an unlawful assembly, a precursor to officers moving in and making arrests of people who don't leave. Some of those remaining threw objects at police from behind a makeshift barrier that spanned the width of a street, and others hurled chunks of concrete, rocks, electric scooters and fireworks at California Highway Patrol officers and their vehicles parked on the closed southbound 101 Freeway. Officers ran under an overpass to take cover. Protest against Trump's immigration crackdown Sunday's protests in Los Angeles, a sprawling city of 4 million people, were centered in several blocks of downtown. It was the third and most intense day of demonstrations against Trump's immigration crackdown in the region, as the arrival of around 300 Guard troops spurred anger and fear among many residents. The Guard was deployed specifically to protect federal buildings, including the downtown detention centre where protesters concentrated. Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell said officers were 'overwhelmed' by the remaining protesters. He said they included regular agitators who show up at demonstrations to cause trouble. Protesters clashed with police in the streets and freeways of Los Angeles, as demonstrations over federal immigration raids stretched into a third day, and thousands of California National Guard troops deployed by President Trump began arriving in the city — Reuters (@Reuters) June 9, 2025 Several dozen people were arrested throughout the weekend of protest. One was detained Sunday for throwing a Molotov cocktail at police, and another for ramming a motorcycle into a line of officers. Mr. Trump responded to McDonnell on Truth Social, telling him to arrest protesters in face masks. 'Looking really bad in L.A. BRING IN THE TROOPS!!!' he wrote. In San Francisco, officers monitoring protests arrested dozens of people on Sunday night after a group of people refused to comply with an order to disperse, police said in a statement on social media. Officers were monitoring a protest in the area of Sansome and Washington streets but declared an unlawful assembly when people in the group became violent, the San Francisco Police Department said. Many people left the scene, but some remained and some moved to Market and Kearny streets, where people vandalized buildings and a police vehicle. A small group continued to Montgomery Street and when they didn't comply with a dispersal order, police said officers arrested 60 people. Three officers were injured, including one who was taken to a hospital, police said. 'Individuals are always free to exercise their First Amendment rights in San Francisco but violence — especially against SFPD officers — will never be tolerated,' the statement said. In Los Angeles on Sunday morning, National Guard troops stood shoulder to shoulder, carrying long guns and riot shields as protesters shouted 'shame' and 'go home." After some closely approached the guard members, another set of uniformed officers advanced on the group, shooting smoke-filled canisters into the street. Minutes later, the Los Angeles Police Department fired rounds of crowd-control munitions to disperse the protesters, who they said were assembled unlawfully. Much of the group then moved to block traffic on the 101 freeway until state patrol officers cleared them from the roadway by late afternoon. Nearby, at least four self-driving Waymo cars were set on fire, sending large plumes of black smoke into the sky and exploding intermittently as the electric vehicles burned. By evening, police had issued an unlawful assembly order shutting down several blocks of downtown Los Angeles. Flash bangs echoed out every few seconds into the evening. Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom requested Trump remove the guard members in a letter Sunday afternoon, calling their deployment a 'serious breach of state sovereignty.' He was in Los Angeles meeting with local law enforcement and officials. The deployment appeared to be the first time in decades that a state's national guard was activated without a request from its governor, a significant escalation against those who have sought to hinder the administration's mass deportation efforts. Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass blamed the increasingly aggressive protests on Trump's decision to deploy the Guard, calling it a move designed to enflame tensions. They've both urged protesters to remain peaceful. 'What we're seeing in Los Angeles is chaos that is provoked by the administration," she said in an afternoon press conference. 'This is about another agenda, this isn't about public safety.' But McDonnell, the LAPD chief, said the protests were following a similar pattern for episodes of civil unrest, with things ramping up in the second and third days. He pushed back against claims by the Trump administration that the LAPD had failed to help federal authorities when protests broke out Friday after a series of immigration raids. His department responded as quickly as it could, and had not been notified in advance of the raids and therefore was not pre-positioned for protests, he said. Newsom, meanwhile, has repeatedly said that California authorities had the situation under control. He mocked Trump for posting a congratulatory message to the Guard on social media before troops had even arrived in Los Angeles, and said on MSNBC that Trump never floated deploying the Guard during a Friday phone call. He called Trump a 'stone cold liar.' The admonishments did not deter the administration. 'It's a bald-faced lie for Newsom to claim there was no problem in Los Angeles before President Trump got involved,' White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said in a statement. The arrival of the National Guard followed two days of protests that began Friday in downtown Los Angeles before spreading on Saturday to Paramount, a heavily Latino city south of the city, and neighboring Compton. Federal agents arrested immigrants in LA's fashion district, in a Home Depot parking lot and at several other locations on Friday. The next day, they were staging at a Department of Homeland Security office near another Home Depot in Paramount, which drew out protesters who suspected another raid. Federal authorities later said there was no enforcement activity at that Home Depot. Immigrant arrests in the LA The weeklong tally of immigrant arrests in the LA area climbed above 100, federal authorities said. Many more were arrested while protesting, including a prominent union leader who was accused of impeding law enforcement. The protests did not reach the size of past demonstrations that brought the National Guard to Los Angeles, including the Watts and Rodney King riots, and the 2020 protests against police violence, in which Newsom requested the assistance of federal troops. The last time the National Guard was activated without a governor's permission was in 1965, when President Lyndon B. Johnson sent troops to protect a civil rights march in Alabama, according to the Brennan Center for Justice. In a directive Saturday, Trump invoked a legal provision allowing him to deploy federal service members when there is 'a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States.' He said he had authorized the deployment of 2,000 members of the National Guard. Trump told reporters as he prepared to board Air Force One in Morristown, New Jersey, Sunday that there were 'violent people' in Los Angeles 'and they're not gonna get away with it.' Asked if he planned to send U.S. troops to Los Angeles, Trump replied: 'We're gonna have troops everywhere. We're not going to let this happen to our country.' He didn't elaborate. About 500 Marines stationed at Twentynine Palms, about 125 miles (200 kilometers) east of Los Angeles were in a 'prepared to deploy status' Sunday afternoon, according to the U.S. Northern Command.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Karnataka HC adjourns RCB plea against stampede case, state agrees not to take coercive action
A single-judge bench of the Karnataka High Court has adjourned to Wednesday a plea filed by the Royal Challengers Sports Limited, the owners of the Royal Challengers Bengaluru cricket team, for the quashing of an FIR registered against unnamed team officials in a case of culpable homicide over the death of 11 fans in a stampede on June 3. Justice S R Krishna Kumar adjourned the pleas of the RCB management, as well the owners of the DNA Entertainment Networks Pvt Ltd, an event management firm, to allow the state government to file objections to the pleas. The HC noted a 'gentleman's understanding' between the advocates for the state and the lawyers of the petitioners that the Karnataka police will not take any coercive action against officials of the two firms in the form of arrest until Wednesday and that the officials of the two firms will not attempt to leave the country. The HC, meanwhile, adjourned to Tuesday the hearing of bail pleas filed by Nikhil Sosale, marketing head at RCB, and Sunil Mathew, a vice-president at the DNA Networks, who were arrested on June 6 in connection with an FIR filed by the Cubbon Park police in central Bengaluru against RCB, DNA and the state cricket association over the June 3 stampede. Eleven people were killed in the stampede at the M Chinnaswamy cricket stadium in Bengaluru on June 3, which occurred around a victory celebration organised for the IPL-winning RCB team at the stadium operated by the Karnataka State Cricket Association. The event was managed and organised by DNA Network. The police have alleged that the stampede occurred due to open invitations issued to RCB fans on social media by the private cricket club for a victory parade without obtaining clearances for the event from the Bengaluru police as mandated. During the arguments on Monday, senior counsel Sandesh Chouta, appearing on behalf of Nikhil Sosale, said the arrest of the RCB marketing executive was vitiated in law since no arrest intimation was provided at the time of his detention and that the arrest was made by the Bengaluru Central Crime Branch police despite the case filed by the Cubbon Park police being transferred to the CID of the Karnataka police. The advocate for Sosale also argued that the arrests by the Bengaluru police were carried out on the basis of an order of the Karnataka chief minister, which was also stated by Siddaramaiah at a press conference–and not on the basis of investigations. Advocate-General K M Shashikiran Shetty argued that RCB had declared on June 3 itself in Ahmedabad, where the IPL finals was held, that there would be victory celebrations in Bengaluru and that social media messages were put out at 7 am on June 4 by RCB about a victory parade in Bengaluru, without obtaining permissions from the Bengaluru police. 'A Rs 1,000-crore company (RCB) with an annual revenue of Rs 450 crore has announced a compensation payment of just Rs 10 lakh for the victims,' he said. The HC adjourned the hearing on the pleas by Sosale and Mathew to June 10 after the advocate-general sought time to respond to arguments that the arrests in the case were carried out by the Bengaluru police even after the case was transferred to the CID. Last week, the Karnataka HC bench of Justice S R Krishna Kumar granted protection from arrest until June 16 to officials of the Karnataka State Cricket Association, including president Raghuram Bhat. The KSCA is named in the cricket stadium stampede FIR along with RCB and DNA. On Friday the Karnataka HC granted conditional interim protection from arrest to three KSCA officials, including its president Raghuram Bhat, a former cricketer, in the stampede case. The KSCA officials have claimed in their HC petition that officials of the event management firm DNA held a meeting with the Bengaluru police on June 3 for holding a celebration event for RCB at the M Chinnaswamy Stadium in the event of RCB winning the IPL finals. The KSCA has said that IPL events are held at the stadium by RCB with event managers DNA Networks. The bench of Justice S R Krishna Kumar said while posting the case to June 16 that 'by way of an interim arrangement and without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties, the respondents are directed not to take any precipitative / coercive steps'. A division bench of the HC headed by acting Chief Justice V Kameswar Rao is due to hear a suo motu public interest petition on the stadium stampede deaths on Tuesday. Last week the division bench posed nine questions to the Karnataka government including 'When and who has taken the decision to hold the victory celebration and in what manner?'
