Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon: US State Department describes Trump as transparent, clear leader
US State Department
on Tuesday (local time) reaffirmed the
Trump administration
's stance on Iran's nuclear program, emphasising that "Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon," amid escalating tensions between Iran and Israel.
Addressing a press briefing, US State Department Spokesperson Tammy Bruce said that President
Donald Trump
's commitment to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear capabilities is a policy consistent since taking office.
"Now with the conflict between Iran and Israel, President Trump is also clear that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon...The fact that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon is clear. As the white house reminds us, since taking office, President Trump has clearly stated that Iran cannot be allowed to have a nuclear weapon...," said Bruce.
President Trump has never wavered in his stance that Iran cannot be allowed to have a nuclear weapon -- a pledge he has made repeatedly, both in office and on the campaign trail, according to White House release.
— ANI (@ANI)
Live Events
Since taking office, President Trump has clearly stated no fewer than a dozen times that Iran cannot be allowed to have a nuclear weapon. He made the same pledge no fewer than 40 times on the campaign trail and even earlier.
This stance is consistent with Trump's previous actions, including withdrawing from the 2015 nuclear deal and imposing sanctions on Iran.
She added that to ensure the safety and security of American citizens, the State Department has established a Middle East Task Force. This task force coordinates support for US citizens, diplomatic missions, and personnel in the region. Over 30 security alerts have been issued to countries in the region to keep US citizens informed and reminded US citizens to not travel to Israel, Iraq, or Iran.
"One of the highest priorities of the Trump administration is the safety and security of the American people. To that end, the Department of State has established the Middle East Task Force to help coordinate support for US citizens, our US Diplomatic missions, personnel, and diplomatic engagements... To keep US citizens involved, we have issued more than 30 security alerts to countries in the region...," said Bruce.
Bruce described Trump as a transparent and clear leader who is committed to peace and making America great again.
"I'm certainly not going to characterise what President Trump says or tweets. He's one of the most transparent, one of the most clear individuals that we've known... He is the singular guiding hand about what will be occurring from this point forward...," she added.
Bruce echoed Trump's view on national sovereignty and peace efforts, saying every country has the right to define its own future, with the US offering help when needed. However, she declined to comment on whether the US desires regime change in Iran, leaving the administration's position on this matter unclear.
"Every country, as President Trump has stated, has the right to define its own future. He offers his help, and it's up to the country whether or not they will accept it...He could have chosen to have this be about anything other than peace and making America great again, but he is committed to that and is part of his overall commitment to the country. I would not speak about the nature of the other country's decision-making; that is up to them, but we are happy we have a President who is willing to help," added Bruce.
US President Donald Trump, who demanded an "unconditional surrender" by Iran, met Tuesday with his national security team, according to the White House.
Israel and Iran are trading strikes for a sixth day, with civilians in flashpoint areas facing waves of attacks. Israel's defense minister said the country plans on striking "very significant targets in Tehran." Early Wednesday local time, explosions from incoming Iranian missiles were reported over Tel Aviv.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Will US join the Israel-Iran war? Ex-Harvard professor says his AI can predict wars
As the Israel-Iran war enters its sixth day, global concerns are growing over potential U.S. involvement. While President Trump claims the U.S. is not directly part of the conflict, American fighter jets have entered Iranian airspace, raising questions about Washington's role. Amid escalating missile exchanges, former Harvard professor Arvid Bell has introduced an AI tool called North Star, designed to simulate geopolitical scenarios and predict war outcomes. The system uses digital models of world leaders to forecast responses to military actions. While the AI aims to prevent war through early insights, critics warn of its potential misuse. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads AI That Predicts War: How It Works The Ground Reality: Sixth Day of Conflict Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads US Involvement: Ambiguity and Pressure Can AI Prevent What Comes Next? As missile exchanges continue between Iran and Israel, the global community is on edge — not only over the potential spread of violence but also over whether the United States will deepen its involvement. While U.S. President Donald Trump has stated that Washington is not directly participating in Israel's ongoing military operations, the rhetoric and movement of American forces suggest a complex strategic stance. Meanwhile, an ex-Harvard academic claims that his AI system may already know what happens Business Insider, at the recent AI+ Expo in Washington, Arvid Bell, a former Harvard professor and current CEO of the startup Anadyr Horizon, showcased an AI tool called North Star. The system, designed in collaboration with Nobel Prize-winning physicist Ferenc Dalnoki-Veress, generates simulations of geopolitical conflict using artificial 'digital twins' of world leaders. These models respond to different scenarios — such as economic sanctions or military actions — offering probabilistic forecasts of how real-world events might AI was previously used to simulate the consequences of enforcing a no-fly zone over Ukraine, predicting a 60% chance of further escalation by Russia. Some believe similar modeling could help anticipate developments in the Israel-Iran conflict and guide diplomatic choices before violence spirals out of Israel-Iran conflict, now in its sixth consecutive day, has escalated significantly. Israel launched 'Operation Rising Lion' on June 13, targeting Iranian nuclear sites. Tehran responded with missiles and drones, claiming to have fired hypersonic Fattah-1 missiles into Israeli territory. The Israeli military has reported multiple missile barrages from Iran, with explosions heard in Tel Aviv. Meanwhile, Israeli airstrikes targeted military installations near Tehran, prompting civilian evacuation Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has vowed to retaliate without restraint, while Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has declared further attacks are imminent. Iran also claims to have hit intelligence sites in Tel Aviv, while Israel asserts that it has maintained control over Iran's death toll is rising. Iranian sources report over 220 fatalities, including dozens of civilians, while Israeli officials acknowledge at least 20 deaths on their side. Humanitarian concerns are mounting, with international groups confirming casualties and injuries on both President Trump's public denial of direct U.S. participation, he has issued a warning to Iran and called for its 'unconditional surrender.' Reports also confirm that U.S. fighter jets have entered Iranian airspace, raising questions about America's neutrality. At the G7 Summit in Canada, world leaders urged de-escalation. French President Emmanuel Macron stated that Trump was considering a ceasefire proposal, while Germany noted that Israel and the U.S. combined could potentially dismantle Iran's nuclear U.S. intelligence has acknowledged Iran's extensive ballistic missile arsenal, warning of its deterrent power across the region. Concerns have also emerged about Iran's ability to target American bases and hopes his AI model can offer early warnings to prevent conflicts rather than merely predict them. However, critics caution against over-reliance on such systems. Some fear that governments may act rashly based on AI-driven forecasts, possibly triggering the very wars they hope to avoid. Others are wary of the opaque nature of the technology and its funding links to defense-sector interest in the tool is growing. Anadyr Horizon has drawn support from high-level entities, including former Google CEO Eric Schmidt's office. Bell maintains that the system is meant to safeguard peace — not manipulate the situation between Israel and Iran intensifies, all eyes are on whether U.S. involvement will deepen — and whether AI might soon play a role in shaping not just how wars are fought, but whether they begin at all.
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Amid Israel-Iran conflict, FBI's secret file on Albert Einstein's anti-nuclear fears resurfaces
As Israel 's strikes on Iran and counterstrikes continue to rattle global nerves—targeting top nuclear scientists and key infrastructure—an eerie echo from the past is capturing public imagination: the FBI's massive, once-secret 1,400-page file on Albert Einstein. On Reddit and social media, many are stunned to learn that America's most celebrated physicist spent over two decades under government surveillance—not for his science, but for his politics, pacifism, and powerful opposition to nuclear warfare. The Guardian recently reported that Israel's attacks, though tactically impactful, have not critically derailed Iran's nuclear program. Experts warn that this military gamble could, paradoxically, hasten Iran's nuclear ambitions if no diplomatic resolution follows. Amid this volatile context, Einstein's historic warning about unchecked nuclear proliferation is more relevant than ever. Why Einstein Alarmed the FBI Albert Einstein, whose 1939 letter to President Franklin D. Roosevelt helped catalyze the U.S. atomic program, would later become one of its fiercest moral critics. Yet, what truly irked J. Edgar Hoover's FBI wasn't just Einstein's views on war—it was his unwavering activism. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo According to the FBI file, which ballooned to 1,427 pages by the time of Einstein's death in 1955, Hoover branded him 'an extreme radical.' The file details years of spying on the Nobel laureate for opposing segregation, speaking out against capitalism, and maintaining friendships across racial and ideological lines. It also flagged his association with civil rights icons, like African-American singer Marian Anderson, who once stayed at his home after being denied hotel entry in segregated New Jersey. In a quote cited from Einstein's 1931 writing, he stated, 'I regard class differences as contrary to justice and, in the last resort, based on force.' This, during the Great Depression and amidst the rise of communism, was enough to draw the ire of Hoover's Red Scare-fueled regime. You Might Also Like: Living Nostradamus had warned of Iran-Israel conflict escalation last year. What are his predictions for rest of 2025? — IntlSpyMuseum (@IntlSpyMuseum) A Complicated Bond With the Bomb Einstein's involvement in the creation of nuclear weapons was reluctant but prescient. Though a committed pacifist, he warned in his 1939 letter that Nazi Germany might be developing atomic bombs, pushing the U.S. to act. But after Hiroshima and Nagasaki , Einstein was filled with regret. He championed global nuclear disarmament , describing modern warfare as 'a form of insanity,' and insisted that the future of nuclear technology be governed by international cooperation. According to a report in The Guardian , Israel's military efforts have only bought 'a few months' of delay in Iran's nuclear breakout capability—if that. Some U.S. intelligence assessments, as cited by CNN , even suggest Iran is not actively pursuing a bomb at this moment. Yet, the stakes remain sky-high, with tensions in the Middle East feeding global anxieties over a potential nuclear escalation. — phalpern (@phalpern) Einstein's Prophetic Warnings in a Nuclear World In the same week that Stockholm International Peace Research Institute reported on the growing stockpiles of nuclear weapons across nine countries, Einstein's warnings are ringing louder. His call for a world where war was obsolete and nuclear arms were tightly controlled was not naïve—it was urgent. As his biographer Walter Isaacson noted, Einstein loved America not for its power, but for its 'tolerance of free thought, free speech, and nonconformist beliefs.' But this same nation kept him under surveillance for decades, fearful that his ideas might challenge the status quo. You Might Also Like: Will US join the Israel-Iran war? Ex-Harvard professor says his AI can predict wars One viral Reddit comment sums up public reaction to the resurfaced file: 'Anyone that can 'change the world with ideas' is a threat to those in power.' Another adds, 'I didn't know this was a thing… damn.' The Cycle of Nuclear Fear Nearly seventy years after Einstein's death, his fears are once again being played out on the global stage. Nuclear capability remains a bargaining chip and a threat. Iran says its enrichment is peaceful; Israel fears otherwise. Meanwhile, the U.S., China, Russia, and other nuclear powers continue to expand their arsenals while urging restraint in others. Einstein once warned, 'The unleashed power of the atom has changed everything save our modes of thinking—and thus we drift toward unparalleled catastrophe.' That drift now seems less hypothetical and more real.
Indian Express
22 minutes ago
- Indian Express
The shared history of California & Mexico, why anti-ICE protestors were waving Mexican flags
Amid the Trump administration's sweeping crackdown on illegal immigration, which critics say specifically targets Hispanics, cities across the United States have witnessed massive anti-Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) protests this month. These protests began on June 6 in Los Angeles after military-style ICE raids resulted in the detention of 44 people, mostly of Mexican heritage. California, especially the city of Los Angeles, has been the epicentre of these protests. This is in no small part due to almost 40% of Californians being Hispanic, and more than 30% tracing their ancestry to Mexico, with whom the state shares a border as well as deep historic, cultural, and economic ties. Here's a brief history. The Spanish colonisation of the New World began in the late 15th century and continued till the end of the 19th century. At its peak, Spanish territory in the Americas touched Alaska in the north and extended to Tierra del Fuego in the southern tip of South America. The southern tip of the Baja peninsula (today the Mexican states of Baja California and Baja California Sur) was spotted by Conquistadors in the 16th century. They erroneously likened their 'discovery' to the mythical island of Californias mentioned in the Spanish novel Las Sergas de Esplandián (The Adventures of Esplandián) written in 1510 by Garci Rodríguez de Montalvo. Upon venturing inward, the conquistadors realised that the region was not an island as previously imagined. The peninsular region came to be called Baja California, while the territories to its north, which today make up the American state of California, were called Alta California. Another two centuries would pass before the Spanish colonial project, driven by the edict 'gold, God and glory', would claim the Californias for the empire. There are a few different reasons for this. * One, Spaniards were kept busy elsewhere. The Viceroyalty of New Spain was formally established in 1535 with its capital in Mexico City, and would swell to include territories ranging from the Philippines to the Caribbean and northern parts of South America. * Two, the discovery of gold and silver deposits in Mexico, central America and South America, as well as the lack of (known) deposits in California, discouraged conquistadors from making the difficult, often deadly journey. Spanish interest in the region picked up when Russia looked to settle in the Californias in the mid-18th century. While Jesuit missionaries had been proselytising in the region for decades at that point, King Charles of Spain formally ordered the colonisation of California in 1761. Junípero Serra, regarded today as the patron saint of California, would go on to establish 21 missions which 'developed' the region. The Californian economy would be defined by agriculture and livestock-rearing. But colonisation was also devastating for Native Americans, who had been inhabiting the region for many millennia. 'Mission Indians' were forcefully converted to Catholicism and forced to work as farm labour. Demographer Sherburne F Cook estimates that the population of indigenous Californians fell from 310,000 in 1769 to only 25,000 in 1910. (The Population of the California Indians 1769-1970, Sherburne F. Cook, 1976) The Spanish empire saw a steep decline in the 19th century. As Napoleon Bonaparte pummelled Spain in Europe, the Bourbon monarchy struggled to suppress revolutionary tendencies across its colonies. Growing resentment over Spanish rule, stemming from rampant economic exploitation and social inequalities, set the stage for the Mexican War of Independence in 1810. Mexico would formally secede from Spain in 1821. But the new republic was far from politically stable, and witnessed 40 different governments before 1848. The undivided Californias province had been split into two — Alta California and Baja California — in 1804. While the new Mexican republic retained this division, the territories immediately witnessed a host of changes. For one, all restrictions on trade with foreigners were eased, allowing the Californian settlers or 'Californios', to trade in commodities, finished goods and luxuries. Trade with Anglo-Americans helped initiate the economic detachment of Alta California from central Mexico, as ships transported Californian hides and tallow in exchange for English and American manufactured goods. The Mexican government struggled to assert control over these territories, which grew closer to the US economically. Foreigners in the Californian territories were also given land-holding rights after converting to Catholicism, spurring immigration by hordes of US citizens between the 1820s and the 1840s. As American interest in the Californias surged, the US and Mexico signed the Treaty of Limits in 1828, recognising the borders between the two nations according to the 1819 Adams-Onis Treaty between Spain and the US (in which the Spanish Crown ceded Florida to the US). This treaty was further amended in 1836 when the Republic of Texas became independent from Mexico. The concept of 'Manifest Destiny', a belief that the expansion of the US throughout the American continents was both justified and inevitable, drove the United States' westward expansion in the 19th century. And it was this belief, along with ever-growing Anglo-Saxon connections to erstwhile Spanish territories in the American West, that set the stage for the Mexican-American War of 1846-48. In 1845, Texas became the 28th state of the US, prompting Mexico to sever all ties with Washington. But US President James K Polk wanted more territory, including Alta California and present-day New Mexico. When his offer to purchase these territories was rebuffed, he moved US troops into Texas and Mexican territory, and claimed all land between Nueces and the Rio Grande rivers in January 1846. Mexico retaliated in April, causing 16 casualties among the American troops, triggering a wave of nationalism in the US, and a declaration of war by the Congress. The 16-month-long war saw the US military leverage strategy, brutality and luck, eventually capturing Mexico City. When the war ended in 1848, the US acquired present-day California, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, Utah, and parts of Colorado and Wyoming from Mexico for only $15 million. That said, even before the war had completely ended, the discovery of gold in 1848 at Sutter's Mill in Sierra Nevada, California, had set off what was known as the California Gold Rush. More than 300,000 people moved to California over the next four years, hoping to, quite literally, strike gold. California was officially given statehood by the US in 1850. Seeing the Mexican flag waved during anti-ICE protests was an affront for many, a rejection of the United States and American identity. But ask the protestors and they will tell you a different story. 'It's about refusing to be erased,' Mexican journalist Enrique Acevedo wrote for The Washington Post. '…Mexican identity isn't foreign [in Los Angeles]. It's foundational. This was Mexico once and remains part of the memory, culture, street names, food and families who never crossed a border because the border crossed them. In that context, the Mexican flag isn't necessarily a symbol of separation or rejection. Sometimes, it's a claim: We are both. We are Mexican and American, not divided but layered…,' he wrote.
