Deaths from cancer cost UK economy £10.3bn every year
People dying early due to cancer costs the UK economy £10.3 billion every year, according to the most comprehensive analysis of its kind.
Researchers from Cancer Research UK calculated the number of working years lost to the disease, alongside people's expected economic output in that time.
They found that cancer deaths among young adults aged 25 to 49 are having a significant effect on overall economic output, costing the economy £3.2 billion every year.
And when it comes to cancer type, lung cancer accounts for the biggest overall earning loss to the economy of £1.7 billion a year, with 54,000 total productive years of life lost.
Bowel cancer accounts for £1.2 billion with 39,000 years lost, while brain cancer accounts for £0.75 billion and 26,000 years, and pancreatic cancer £0.61 billion and 20,000 years.
The figures relate to lost earnings and do not include carer costs for looking after people with cancer or the cost of diagnosing or treating the disease.
In an accompanying report, Cancer Research UK said improving cancer survival and catching the disease early could boost economic growth.
In his foreword to the study, executive director of policy Ian Walker argued that 'cancer isn't just a health challenge, but also an economic one'.
He added: 'Current evidence shows that focusing on prevention and early detection and diagnosis is both the right thing to do for people affected by cancer, and the smart thing to do in economic terms.'
Overall, each individual adult cancer death was found to cost an average of £61,000 to the economy.
The impact was particularly big if people died when younger, owing to the larger loss in terms of working life.
In 2023, some 119,000 years were taken from the future working lives of adults under 50, amounting to £3.2 billion in lost output.
In the future, losses could grow even more as cancer cases and deaths are projected to rise, with half a million cases diagnosed every year by 2040.
Michelle Mitchell, chief executive of Cancer Research UK, said: 'Cancer has an immeasurable impact on patients and their loved ones.
'But this report reveals there is also a significant economic cost.
'At a time of tight budgets and overstretched services, the UK Government can't afford to wait any longer.
'The upcoming national cancer plan is an opportunity to transform cancer survival in England.
' Action to prevent more cancers and diagnose them early will give people more moments with those they love, whilst relieving pressure on the NHS and building a stronger, healthier economy.'
As part of its plan, Cancer Research UK wants the Government to take further action on smoking, obesity and alcohol, all of which contribute to cancer.
It also wants to see earlier diagnosis, including fully rolling out lung screening across England, and prioritising research.
Annalisa Belloni, lead economist at Cancer Research UK, said: 'The UK Government won't deliver growth without delivering for people affected by cancer.
'Dedicating energy and resources to tackling this disease shouldn't be seen as a cost – it's a necessary investment.'
The Department of Health has been contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
33 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Why your addictive personality is increasing your cancer risk
When we talk about addiction, it's usually smoking or drinking alcohol that comes to mind. Most of us are aware that these are behaviours that may rush us towards poor health and, potentially, a cancer diagnosis. The statistics speak for themselves: six million people smoke, 24 per cent have too much alcohol and two-thirds are overweight or obese and, since 1995, cancer cases have increased every year in England (with the exception of 2020, when the drop in diagnoses is widely considered a result of a pandemic-fuelled NHS disruption.) But there are other lower-level addictions that go under the radar that can be just as damaging to our health. It's these lesser-known dependencies that are subtly increasing our risk of cancer that Dr Raphael Cuomo, a cancer epidemiologist and professor at the University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, wants to draw our attention to. You might jokingly confess that you've got an 'addictive personality', you're 'addicted to crisps' or 'addicted to looking at your phone' – but Dr Cuomo wants us to take these addictive behaviours more seriously. In his new book, Crave: The Hidden Biology of Addiction and Cancer, he explores how our supposed addictions to sugar and excessive screen time could be reshaping our biology to make us more susceptible to cancer. 'These are the addictions that we may not appreciate as seriously – like the constant need to be on a phone and scrolling through social media, the constant need to snack on processed foods.' They might not be classed as cancer-causing by leading cancer authorities, but Dr Cuomo argues that these habits trigger cellular changes that are depleting our health and can make us more vulnerable to the disease. 'I want to raise awareness that these low-grade addictions are not just a negative thing in isolation but they have a bigger consequence on the long-term risk of disease,' Dr Cuomo says. Screen addictions mess with your hormone production – and your health 'Even when you're just scrolling through your phone, you see something interesting and it gives you this low-grade high, this dopamine rush – and you want more,' Dr Cuomo says. This process, of exposure to engaging pictures and videos mixed in with less interesting content, is known as variable reinforcement, which he likens to playing on a slot machine. 'It keeps you scrolling and scrolling, hoping that you're going to get that dopamine hit,' he explains. 'We are hoping for the high of something interesting showing up on the newsfeed. The companies that make these products know about these mechanisms and they're manufactured with this in mind.' While addiction to screens is not widely medically recognised, the NHS launched a National Centre for Gaming Disorders in 2019 amid a rising number of people seeking help for being unable to control their video game use. Compulsive time spent scrolling through our devices causes spikes in the stress hormone, cortisol. 'The cortisol will prevent the relaxation needed in order to repair DNA breaks and it will also prevent our immune system from clearing out damaged cells,' Dr Cuomo argues. 'When you're looking at screens constantly, especially late at night, you get exposed to blue light which suppresses melatonin,' he says. This is a hormone that supports our body clock and has cancer-protective effects. Being addicted to sugar compromises your immune system In the UK, we're hooked on sugar, eating 18 teaspoons on average per day when a maximum of eight teaspoons is recommended – and Dr Cuomo believes we're addicted. Just last year, a collection of renowned experts gathered at the International Food Addiction Consensus Conference to get addiction to highly processed junk foods officially recognised as a condition by both WHO and leading psychiatry institutions. 'When we consume sugary or junk food, it tastes good and makes us feel good,' he says. Sugar triggers the release of the neurotransmitters dopamine and serotonin, which are associated with pleasure. 'We eat this food and suddenly we're feeling better,' he says. This pattern causes us to seek out sugary, high-calorie food repeatedly, which Dr Cuomo believes is sugar addiction. The problem is that when sugar enters our system, it spikes our insulin levels and stimulates insulin-like growth factor one (IGF-1), a hormone that promotes cell growth. In short bursts, these responses are normal, but when experienced repeatedly, cells begin to divide and multiply more rapidly, Dr Cuomo says. 'Repeatedly, over time, that will promote the development of tumours.' The types of food that we're most likely to become hooked on – which are high in sugar, refined carbohydrates and additives – also trigger low-grade inflammation, which hampers our immune system and could make it less equipped to identify and eliminate abnormal cells, he says. Three ways to tackle your addictive behaviours 'These addictive behaviours are not fixed,' Dr Cuomo notes. 'People can escape them and reverse the risk of cancer.' This is seen among smokers who quit as, after around 12 years of no longer using cigarettes, their risk of lung cancer is half that of someone who still smokes. 'Risk is fluid and, ideally, to keep risk minimal, we would engage in these behaviours not very much overall,' he adds. These are his tips on kicking your reliance on sugar and screens. 1. Tackle the root cause of your behaviours We turn to addictive behaviours as a way of displacing stress and as a source of comfort. 'We're seeking a kind of distraction to prevent us from dealing with the bigger issues, from relaxing and allowing our bodies to sit and repair,' Dr Cuomo says. It's uncomfortable to stop and think about what you're trying to escape from, but tackling the source of stress or trigger for reaching for food or your phone can help to replace it with healthier behaviours, he suggests. 2. Take an enforced break 'I would encourage people to attempt a reset,' Dr Cuomo says. 'I think that if you can achieve seven days without something, then you tend to start to break free from the addiction.' This would mean going for a whole week without eating sugar or engaging with the screen-based activity you feel you're addicted to, such as social media. 'Then you can re-engage, but you shouldn't be dependent upon it.' 'Seven days is a very high bar for a lot of people,' he notes. If it seems like too much, then start with one-day breaks, building up until you reach seven. 'Create barriers,' Dr Cuomo recommends. These include not buying any sugary foods or putting them in a more awkward location to get to, such as the top shelf of a cupboard. To cut back on using certain apps, you can remove them from your phone. 'You want to make the habits you've developed an addiction to be more difficult to engage with.' 3. Stick to a sleep schedule A regular sleeping pattern can help to regulate cortisol and melatonin levels, and it interrupts the loop of compulsive reward-seeking, better equipping you to steer clear of your unhealthy habits. 'Do the same thing every night before bed,' Dr Cuomo suggests. 'Go to sleep at the same time every night and wake up at the same time every morning, even on the weekend.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Cancer experts alarmed over ‘gut-wrenching' Trump plan to cut research spending by billions
More patients may die as a result of plans drawn up by the Trump administration to cut billions of dollars from the National Cancer Institute (NCI), veteran federal government workers and experts have warned. Nearly $2.7bn would be cut from the agency, which is the largest funder of cancer research in the world – a decline of 37.2% from the previous year – under a budget proposal for 2026, in the latest effort to cut staff and funding. 'These cuts are absolutely gut wrenching,' Erin Lavik, former deputy director and chief technology officer at the NCI's division of cancer prevention, told the Guardian. Lavik was fired along with a swath of probationary workers at the institute in February; put on administrative leave in response to a judge's ruling to halt the firings in March; and then terminated again in April. 'We're not making things more efficient or better,' she said. 'What's being left is sort of the non-impactful iterative work, and we're pruning all of the potential for transformative science.' The American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network has cautioned that the proposed cuts 'will set this nation back dramatically in our ability to reduce death and suffering' and noted that cancer is expected to kill more than 618,000 Americans this year. Julie Nickson, vice-president of Federal Advocacy and Coalitions, said: 'This wouldn't just be a blow to science, it's a blow to families, communities, and our economy. Every day counts in the fight against cancer and with more than 2 million Americans expected to be diagnosed with this horrible disease in 2025 alone, now is not the time to go backwards.' Jennifer R Brown, secretary of the American Society of Hematology and director of the Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Center of the Division of Hematologic Malignancies at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, told the Guardian that cuts under Donald Trump have 'already been devastating', with key research halted that can't easily be restarted. 'What the public needs to know is that the science that may not sound so obvious, or that they may not know that much about, is really what drives our cancer treatments and our cancer cures. And so if we cut that, we're going to lose it,' said Brown. Cancer research historically funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), which houses the NCI, 'is the basic science that figures out what to target in the cancer cell', she said. 'Then a drug may be developed that may be from an academic, it may be from a pharma company, but the trials are then also run by academics and pharma in collaboration, and academics who are funded by NIH, who do the legwork to figure out how the drug is working in patients. 'Pharma companies take the drug to the finish line. And so if we don't have this basic research, we're not going to be able to identify new targets, and that means we're not going to have new therapies, and ultimately more patients may die.' Brown sees a direct link between NIH-funded academic research and cancer drugs for chronic lymphocytic leukemia that helped patients live longer. 'People who would have died in a few months, lived for years with the first version of this drug,' she said. Hundreds of staff have been terminated from the NCI in recent months, including dozens of communications workers. 'Our website, is used worldwide and is the ground truth for cancer information,' said one fired communications employee at the institute, who requested to remain anonymous. 'Science isn't finished until it's communicated.' Between 28 February and 8 April, more than $180m in NCI grants were cancelled by the Trump administration. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion NIH declined to comment, deferring to comments on the budget proposal cuts to the office of management and budget, which did not respond to requests for comment. NIH did not comment on how many employees at the agency remain after several rounds of cuts and layoffs. Lavik said the cuts are likely to threaten large-scale research programs, such as the National Community Oncology Research program, which covers community hospitals all over the US and ensures patients have access to clinical trials, cutting edge cancer care, prevention and screenings. 'I am deeply concerned about the future of these really important clinical trials programs that are really hard to rebuild if you stop them,' she said. 'In the prevention program, there are large scale screening trials, and they have large data sets. We were working really hard on policies to make those data sets more accessible and available to the research community. And we're all gone.' Drastic cuts across federal science funding is causing scientists to consider leaving science and eliminating opportunities for younger scientists to enter training pipelines as undergraduate researchers, graduate researchers and postdocs, according to Lavik. 'The things that are transformative are fundamentally high-risk, high-reward research,' she said. 'We start to move into the clinic, and that's what leads to the new kinds of treatments that don't just help a little bit, but really change the face of how we treat patients, how we prevent cancers, how we treat other conditions. 'You have to be willing to do lots and lots of things that don't work. There are so many ways we should be more efficient about what we do. But to do that, you really need those young scientists, those new people in the field; you need the people who've come into the NIH and the NCI, who are thinking differently about doing things and willing to take those big swings.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS David Beckham in hospital with mystery injury as Victoria shares picture of star with arm in sling
David Beckham is in hospital with a mystery injury. The footballer has been pictured bandaged up while recovering in a hospital bed Posting a message to her husband on Instagram on Friday morning, Victoria, 51, wrote: 'Get well soon daddy.' David was pictured smiling as he posed with his arm in a blue sling but there was no indication as to how the injury happened. A second photo showed David with a bracelet which read: 'Get well soon' More to follow
