For the privileged few, airport food hits a new height of luxury
The peak of that pecking order has long been the airport lounge, which allows elite passengers a cushioned escape from the tumult of the terminal.
Now, even as airline stocks have tumbled and ticket demand slows, American airlines and credit card companies are reaching for a higher level of luxury and exclusivity – particularly when it comes to food.
At the one-year-old Delta One Lounge at John F. Kennedy International Airport, it is common to hear an employee asking passengers: 'Would you like an ounce of caviar before your flight?'
At the lounge, which includes a full-service brasserie with leather banquettes and gold finishes, the menu of complimentary offerings features sirloin steak with red wine jus and salmon sashimi with blood orange ponzu. The caviar will run you an extra US$85 (S$109) or 8,500 miles.
Amble around the rest of the 40,000 sq ft space, and you might spy Japanese cheesecakes and earl grey lemon shortbread cookie s behind a glass pastry case ; or a spa-goer nursing a pineapple, lemon and butterfly pea flower juice after a massage. You might even catch a bartender pouring a nip of rare Japanese whiskey at the gold-lined Art Deco bar.
To enter, you will need to flash a business class ticket for a long-haul flight on Delta or a partner airline .
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore Tanjong Katong sinkhole backfilled; road to be repaved after LTA tests
Singapore Tanjong Katong Road sinkhole did not happen overnight: Experts
Singapore Authorities say access to Changi intertidal areas unaffected by reclamation, in response to petition
Singapore New Mandai North Crematorium, ash-scattering garden to open on Aug 15
Singapore Not feasible for S'pore to avoid net‑zero; all options to cut energy emissions on table: Tan See Leng
Singapore With regional interest in nuclear energy rising, S'pore must build capabilities too: Tan See Leng
World US and EU clinch deal with broad 15% tariffs on EU goods to avert trade war
Asia Displaced villagers at Thai-Cambodian border hope to go home as leaders set to meet for talks
Airport lounges were once pit stops where business travellers could grab a paper cup of coffee and a handful of wasabi peas before a flight. Now, they dangle wood-fired pizza ovens, seafood towers, sushi bars and espresso martinis on tap.
Lounges operated by American Express are introducing menus by award-winning chefs Kwame Onwuachi, Mashama Bailey, Michael Solomonov and Sarah Grueneberg.
A seafood tower order in the Chase Sapphire Lounge at Laguardia Airport in East Elmhurst, New York.
PHOTO: AMIR HAMJA/NYTIMES
The escalating opulence of lounge food – and the mediocrity of the other offerings in airports – is a sign of just how wide the American wealth gap has grown, said sociologist Cecilia L. Ridgeway, who is a professor emeritus of social sciences at Stanford University.
Airline trave l u sed to be a symbol of luxury. As more people fly, and as tickets become cheaper , she said, the wealthy still want to feel distinguished from th e public in visible ways.
'We need more signs and symbols that you are doing okay, that people are seeing it, that you are moving up.'
A quick tour of seven of the US' new airport lounges showed that the quality of food is similar to what you would find at a wedding buffet – ranging from lacklustre to surprisingly satisfying .
A salad of radicchio and roasted peaches at the United Polaris Lounge in Houston was cloying, while the French toast at the American Express Centurion Lounge at LaGuardia Airport had a crisp exterior and subtle sweetness that explain why it has a following.
But taste may matter less than the fact that the food is free, fancy and makes the lounge guest feel important. The sit-down restaurant at American Airlines' Chelsea Lounge at Kennedy Airport feels like a lavish library – hushed, with lots of gold and glass.
'We like exclusivity,' said Ms Laura Parkey, a luxury real estate adviser from Florida, who was eating there before flying in business class to Switzerland for a river cruise. She sipped Moet & Chandon Champagne and eyed the pommes Anna with caviar at the next table.
Compared with the terminal outside, she said, 'the food is better, and you don't have to deal with the masses'.
These luxe touches are nothing new for international airlines such as Emirates and Cathay Pacific, which for years have accessorised their lounges with dim sum, cocktail pairings and cigar bars.
Their American counterparts have only recently approached that calibre. But today, adding a full-service restaurant has become a baseline part of the expectation for lounges in the US, said Mr Aaron McMillan , managing director of hospitality programmes for United Airlines. It was one of the first American carriers to offer an in-lounge restaurant.
Competition is intensifying as credit card companies enter the lounge game, unburdened by the logistical challenges and costs of running an airline, and seeking to attract frequent travellers as cardholders.
The Chase Sapphire Lounge at LaGuardia Airport – accessible to those who have the Chase Sapphire Reserve card (with an annual fee of US$795), the J.P. Morgan Reserve card (US$795) or the Ritz-Carlton Credit Card (US$450) – looks like a chic hotel lobby.
Its centrepiece is a circular bar with purple velvet chairs. The cocktail menu comes from the popular New York bar Apotheke, and the baristas can make you a sea salt and oat milk latte.
Each table has QR codes for guests to order gnocchi with zucchini and mint, or marinated beets with whipped feta – both created by Fairfax, an all-day cafe in Manhattan.
The Capital One Landing at Ronald Reagan National Airport in Washington has a full-service tapas bar created by chef Jose Andres. Crisp jamon croquetas and gambas al ajillo with a pleasant kick are made to order. Negronis and espresso martinis are available on tap.
While most airport food comes from the same roster of approved suppliers, Andres gets his Iberian ham and picos from the purveyors who supply his restaurants. Each of these vendors had to be approved by airport security, with background checks and X-ray scans.
The 1,200 sq ft kitchen was custom-built to Andres' specifications. One of his company's culinary directors works at the lounge full time.
Ms Charisse Grey, the company's senior director of research and development, said: 'If there was a budget, I was not aware of it.'
The lavish menus in these lounges speak to a new class of affluent travellers, said Mr Ben Schlappig, founder of the travel website One Mile At A Time.
'It used to be that lounges were thought of as stuffy and for business travellers,' he said. Today, the clientele 'skews much younger, and the increased focus on food and drink, and partnering with cool brands is part of that'.
A Capital One spokesperson contended that the company's lounges were more approachable for everyday travellers, who do not need a first-class ticket to experience the luxury amenities – just a Capital One Venture X card, which costs US$395 a year.
But at lounges with that easier accessibility, customers often wait in long lines, or are denied entry because the spaces get overcrowded.
This has prompted some credit card companies to tighten lounge access, just as airlines have. Capital One, which allows cardholders to bring in a certain number of guests without charge, will charge for most additional visitors starting 2026 .
Mr Mitch Radakovich, a data scientist from Cincinnati who was spending his layover en route to Copenhagen at the Capital One Lounge at Kennedy Airport, said it felt almost too good to be true to enjoy such amenities – cheesemongers who will customise a charcuterie board and freshly baked bagels from Ess-a-bagel – with just a US$395-a-year credit card.
'I'm sure the price will go up,' he said. 'It's an interesting maths problem: exclusivity versus luxury.'
With all the money being poured into elite lounges, he wondered what airlines and airports were doing for the average traveller, who has to contend with shrinking onboard amenities, long security lines and thronged terminals.
'I used to fly Cincinnati to Atlanta, and now soda isn't even an option – it's coffee or water,' he said. 'The overall quality has decreased for the public.' NYTIMES

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
12 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Apple to shutter a retail store in China for first time ever
Apple has about 56 stores in the Greater China region, making up over 10 per cent of its footprint of more than 530 outlets globally. San Francisco - Apple is closing a retail store in China for the first time, marking a notable retreat in a market where the iPhone maker is striving to revive sales. The company said on July 28 that it will shut its Parkland Mall store in the Zhongshan District of Dalian City on Aug 9, citing a changing landscape at the shopping complex. The iPhone maker has about 56 stores in the Greater China region, making up over 10 per cent of its footprint of more than 530 outlets globally. 'We're always focused on providing an exceptional experience for all of our customers both online and at more than 50 Apple Store locations across Greater China,' Apple said in a statement. 'Given the departure of several retailers at the Parkland Mall, we have made the decision to close our store there.' China is grappling with deflationary pressures as consumption wanes and global tariffs hurt exports, a major engine of the world's No. 2 economy. Retail sales growth has fallen short of forecasts, and home prices dropped at a faster pace in June. The closing store is one of two locations in Dalian City. The other, a store at the Olympia 66 shopping complex, remains open. Employees at the site that's closing will be given opportunities to work elsewhere, the company said. The two locations are roughly 10 minutes apart. More broadly, Apple has been looking to stage a comeback in China. Sales in the country fell 2.3 per cent to US$16 billion (S$20.6 billion) in the second quarter, which ended March 29. Analysts had predicted US$16.8 billion. Apple is opening a new store at Uniwalk Qianhai in Shenzhen on Aug 16. It's also planning additional locations in Beijing and Shanghai over 2026, Bloomberg News has reported. It opened a store in the Anhui province in January. The company is also expanding soon with new stores in Detroit, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and India. A location in Osaka opened on July 26, and a major new flagship store debuted in Miami in January. The company also opened its first store in Malaysia last year. While Apple is still adding new stores, overall retail expansion has slowed since the pandemic hit. Apple has instead focused on opening up its online retail store in new places, such as India and Saudi Arabia, and updating or moving older physical locations. The company also appears to be becoming more selective in renewing its leases, announcing plans to shutter a store in Bristol in the UK on same day as its closure in China. Other upcoming closures include the Partridge Creek store in Michigan and the Hornsby location near Sydney. Apple isn't the only major brand to back out of China's Parkland Mall. Earlier in 2025, the majority shareholder of the complex took full operational control, and retailers like Coach, Sandro and Hugo Boss haven't renewed their leases in recent years. BLOOMBERG
Business Times
12 minutes ago
- Business Times
Succession, scandal and bottled water – the real battle at the heart of Wahaha court case
IN THE heat of a Hong Kong summer, a courtroom clash over a billionaire's estate sent shockwaves through China's corporate landscape and poured fresh fizz into one of the country's most legendary homegrown brands. When three previously unknown individuals, claiming to be the children of the late Wahaha founder Zong Qinghou, filed suit to freeze US$1.8-billion-worth of trust-linked assets, the legacy of China's so-called 'Water King' turned from a succession fairytale into a full-blown family drama. At the centre of the storm is 42-year-old Zong Fuli, long regarded as the sole heir to her father's empire and one of China's most high-profile 'rich second gens'. Overnight, she found her grip on Wahaha's crown threatened, not by competitors or regulators, but by half-siblings from overseas and ghosts from her father's past. With litigation erupting and speculation mounting, Zong faced scrutiny not only of her legitimacy and business authority but over the narrative that once seemed watertight. Wahaha, the bottled water giant once known for its clean-cut nationalism and wholesome family branding, was suddenly China's juiciest soap opera. Questions rippled across the market: Who truly controls Wahaha? What skeletons were buried beneath its boardroom carpet? And how did a brand built to quench thirst become ground zero for one of China's messiest inheritance battles? The began after the death of Zong Qinghou in February 2024. His daughter Zong Fuli, backed by a notarised will, appeared to be the natural successor. She moved swiftly to claim her father's 29.4 per cent stake and began urging senior staff to move from Wahaha to her own beverage group, Hangzhou-based Hongsheng Beverage Group. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up But resistance emerged. Many employees baulked at signing new contracts that would jeopardise their rights under Wahaha's longstanding employee stockholding platform, a cornerstone of the company's egalitarian ethos. Then came July, and with it a bombshell: a resignation letter from Zong Fuli leaked to Chinese social media. In it, she claimed that government-linked shareholders and the Hangzhou district government had questioned her leadership, leaving her 'unable to fulfil her duties'. The letter went viral. Markets panicked. And within a week, negotiations behind closed doors led her to rescind the resignation. But the damage was done. Public curiosity about Wahaha exploded into open speculation. Did Zong Fuli truly have the boardroom backing she claimed? Was the state-owned capital, the largest shareholder, plotting a silent coup? And who were these new heirs from America with their eyes on Zong Qinghou's offshore assets? New claimants, old power struggles By mid-August, Zong Fuli had regained some ground. She was formally named chairman of Wahaha Group and took control of the board. She quickly initiated high-level personnel changes, updated to the company's bylaws, and pushed forward the integration of Wahaha employees into her Hongsheng empire, even if it meant slashing salaries by up to 50 per cent and moving offices eight kilometres across town. The historic Wahaha Tower in Hangzhou, once a bustling symbol of corporate pride, now echoed with emptiness, locals have begun calling it 'the employee graveyard'. Meanwhile, more than 50 lawsuits were filed by disgruntled former employees, all demanding restoration of their stock rights. Then came the real twist: court documents filed in Hong Kong named the three foreign challengers to the succession, Jacky Zong, Jessie Jieli Zong and Jerry Jisheng Zong, all US citizens claiming to be Zong Qinghou's children from his relationship with Wahaha's once-powerful executive Du Jianying. Du, a behind-the-scenes powerhouse in Wahaha's early days, was vice party secretary, second only to Zong himself. She owned shares in several companies indirectly tied to Wahaha's operations and faded from public view after resigning in 2008. Her children's legal challenge reignited longstanding rumours: Was Zong Fuli ever the only true heir, or just the one in the spotlight? As tabloid speculation met corporate intrigue, Wahaha's 'national champion' image began to fade. Was Zong Qinghou really the faithful husband and self-made tycoon the media had lionised for decades? And just how much of the empire had been quietly parcelled out behind the scenes? By the time the inheritance lawsuits were unsealed in Hong Kong, it was clear: Wahaha was not just facing a family feud. It was confronting a full-scale legacy audit, one playing out in courtrooms, boardrooms, and social feeds alike. For Zong Fuli, what started as a seemingly smooth handover has morphed into a high-stakes survival test. And for the business world, Wahaha's drama is a reminder that in China's sprawling family empires, the real succession struggle often only begins after the patriarch's final breath. Power shift, quiet exit Before the lawsuits cracked open Wahaha's carefully curated legacy, Zong Fuli was cast as the unquestioned heir. But within the company walls, old-timers tell a different story. Long before Zong Fuli entered the scene, it was Du who wielded power, running the company's operations and often seen greeting officials on behalf of Zong Qinghou. Du, born in 1966, was 21 years younger than Zong and more than just a trusted lieutenant. After the company's 1999 restructuring, she was the second-largest individual shareholder behind Zong, owning 0.73 per cent of Wahaha's shares. But when Zong Fuli returned from her US education and joined Wahaha in 2004, a slow power shift began to take place. Du receded from the company's frontline. By 2008, she had resigned her management roles, retaining only a symbolic board seat,and then two years later she launched her own investment firm. Meanwhile, Zong Fuli cut her teeth on Wahaha's children's clothing and personal care divisions, both of which underperformed, before taking control of Hongsheng Group, a private firm that quietly absorbed key Wahaha operations. Her father deployed veteran staff to help her succeed, and by 2018, as his health declined, she was visibly stepping up, first as head of public relations, then as vice-president of sales. By 2021, she was officially installed as general manager of Wahaha. With Du out of the picture and Wahaha's performance holding steady, Zong Fuli's succession seemed secure. But as the courts are now revealing, the story was never that simple. Phantom shares, real tensions At the heart of the family conflict is the company's employee shareholding platform, once a symbol of worker empowerment and now a lightning rod for lawsuits and lingering resentment. Back in 1999, the employee stockholding plan looked like a visionary move. Workers, managers and executives were granted access to shares at favourable terms, with allocations tied to job function, tenure and performance. Zong Qinghou retained a controlling 29.4 per cent stake, state capital held 51 per cent, and the rest, nearly a quarter, was collectively owned by thousands of employees through the scheme. At its peak in 2018, more than 11,000 employees were part of it, and dividends from these shares accounted for up to half of many workers' annual income. But that same year, Zong Qinghou launched what he called a 'second reform': staff shares were bought back, at a 3x premium, and replaced with 'dry shares', which gave employees dividend rights but stripped away actual ownership. Zong was now its sole stakeholder, a Wahaha veteran said. The arrangement held until Zong Fuli took over. When she pushed employees to transfer to Hongsheng, many found that doing so meant losing their dry share dividends, which for many meant a 50 per cent cut in income. Promises of performance-based bonuses did little to quell the unease. Veteran employees began questioning the legality of the 2018 buyback, and more than 50 lawsuits were filed, with workers demanding reinstatement of their original ownership. Meanwhile, the shareholding platform's influence diminished. Though still technically entitled to recommend three of Wahaha's board members, most now appear aligned to Zong Fuli. Efforts to manage the optics have had limited effect. At a town hall meeting, Zong Fuli promised to maintain dividend payments and announced record pay increases for frontline workers during the 2024 Chinese New Year celebration. For many veteran staff, it was too little, too late. Profits off the books Behind the headlines, a quiet transformation is reshaping the company: a shift of profits and control from Wahaha Group into a network of privately held 'off-the-books' companies, now under Zong Fuli's command. Insiders point out this is not entirely new. Wahaha's off-structure ecosystem, factories, distributors, and sales companies, not listed under the Group's formal ownership, began under Zong Qinghou. But since his death, Zong Fuli has moved aggressively to absorb these entities into her personal empire. In one 2024 deal, the employee platform handed over a 34.53 per cent stake in a key packaging company, free of charge. Among the crown jewels is Zhejiang Qili Investment, which holds equity in a dozen factories and sales hubs across China. Zong Fuli inherited her father's stake and months later acquired the employee platform's share, becoming the sole owner. She then folded major regional sales arms, companies such as Hangzhou Wahaha Qili Foods Group and Hangzhou Wahaha Honghui Food & Beverages, into Hongsheng and another of her companies Hangzhou Hongchen Marketing, cutting Wahaha Group out of substantial downstream profits. The most glaring example came in the bottled water business. Once a reliable revenue stream, it now sells its product through Xuner Chengtong Trading a third-party distributor fully owned by Hongsheng. Margins are routed outside Wahaha's balance sheet. Production costs average 1.6 yuan (S$0.29) to 1.7 yuan per bottle. Xuner buys at 2.75 yuan and resells for seven yuan, a significant spread now invisible to Wahaha's accounts. After this restructuring, revenues for the bottled water business fell by more than 60 per cent. Alarmed by the drain, Hangzhou's district finance bureau ordered a third-party audit of 18 affiliated beverage companies, including the water division. This probe is still going on. Meanwhile, a proposed transfer of the 'Wahaha' trademark to one of Zong Fuli's companies was abruptly halted after internal resistance. Trademark records confirm the name still belongs to Wahaha Group. In the end, while the spotlight remains fixed on the inheritance feud and courtroom theatrics, the real game-changing shift may be happening in the background, where profit centres are quietly migrating out of public view, leaving behind a shell of the once-mighty empire Zong Qinghou built. Trusts, secrets, showdown Just as Zong Fuli moved to tighten her grip on Wahaha's sprawling domestic empire, the bombshell lawsuit landed in Hong Kong, threatening to expose Zong Qinghou's offshore holdings. In December 2024, Jacky, Jessie and Jerry Zong filed a suit seeking control of a US$1.8 billion HSBC account they say was promised to them in handwritten instructions and verbal assurances made by their father. The account is held by Jian Hao Ventures, a British Virgin Islands shell company whose sole director is Zong Fuli. She assumed the role weeks after her father's death, at the same time as she was moving to claim his domestic shares via notarised inheritance. The plaintiffs argue that Zong Qinghou issued handwritten instructions a month before his death, instructing aides to establish trusts for each of his three children with Du, worth US$700 million each. Their lawyers say the HSBC account was intended to fund these trusts. Zong Fuli, they alleged, has already transferred more than US$1 million out of it, and they are demanding an injunction to freeze the rest. Zong Fuli's legal team contests the claim, saying no formal trust structure was ever created. But Yang Xiang, a civil and commercial law expert, said that in Hong Kong, oral trusts are legally recognised. If the siblings can prove Zong Qinghou clearly intended to establish the trust, even informally, the court may still validate its existence, he said. The case is currently limited to freeze request with a hearing scheduled for Aug 1. Complicating matters further is the anatomy of offshore trusts themselves. Typically set up in the British Virgin Isles, Hong Kong or Singapore, they allow wealthy families to pass assets discreetly across generations. These arrangements often involve complex corporate layering. Experts say if Jian Hao is a 'bottom-tier' company in a longer offshore chain, Zong Fuli's role could technically bypass trustee oversight – at least until challenged in court. For now, Hong Kong courts are not ruling on the trust's validity, only on whether to freeze the HSBC account. But regardless of the outcome, the case is peeling back the curtain on how China's ultra-wealthy navigate succession, secrecy and offshore power plays. It's not a first for the Zongs. Back during Wahaha's infamous war with Danone in the 2000s, at least 10 offshore companies tied to the family were named in asset-freezing orders. Among them: Ever Maple Trading, a British Virgin Isles-registered company that today owns 100 per cent of Zong Fuli's Hongsheng Group. The roots of this offshore maze run deep. And those roots now raise tough questions. Where did the offshore money come from? Were proper tax and forex compliance procedures followed? If not, legal experts warn, any trust, no matter how cleverly built, could be 'pierced' by authorities, especially if public assets or national interests are involved. It is not just about the money. This lawsuit is strategically aimed at unravelling Zong Qinghou's carefully designed cross-border inheritance blueprint, Yang told Caixin. With lawsuits now active in both Hangzhou and Hong Kong, this is a coordinated assault from Du's side, he said. 'This is more than a claim. It's a challenge to the entire succession plan.' Meanwhile, Zong Fuli is not sitting still. As she consolidates domestic operations, she is also rebranding. Companies once named after 'Wahaha Changsheng' are being renamed under the 'Hongsheng' label. Curiously, 'Chang' and 'Sheng' happen to be the given names of her two half-brothers. The legal hierarchy here is unforgiving: in most jurisdictions, trust arrangements trump wills. And if no trust or valid will is proved, Chinese law grants equal inheritance rights to both marital and non-marital children. Which makes this battle as much about legacy as it is about legality. At stake is not just Wahaha's fortune, it is its future. Tsinghua University's Family Business Research Center has rated this conflict a level 6 to 7 on its proprietary 'family war' severity scale, signalling a destructive phase already in motion. If left unchecked, it could escalate into a level 8 or 9 conflict, where both sides seek mutually assured destruction and the company itself becomes collateral damage.
Business Times
12 minutes ago
- Business Times
US dollar strengthens against Singapore dollar, reverses broad weakening trend this year
[SINGAPORE] The US dollar has climbed nearly 1.5 per cent in the past six days, reversing a downward trend that has persisted for much of this year. The US dollar index (DXY) posted a high of US$109.956 on Jan 13, but gradually weakened throughout the year to a low of US$96.776 on Jul 2. It reversed the trend in the past six days, climbing to US$98.634 as at Monday (Jul 28) for its highest close since Jul 17. For the year, however, it is still down 10.3 per cent since the high in January. 'We suspect that the broad USD revival is a quiet acknowledgement that tariffs thus far had not affected the US economy as much as feared,' said Maybank in a note on Monday (July 29). In tandem, most Asia currencies have retreated. 'With the trajectory of the greenback seemingly changing course, most Asian FX are trading on the backfoot with TWD leading in losses, followed by THB,' noted Maybank, referring to the Taiwan dollar and Thai baht. For the latter, the moves also took place in the aftermath of the Thailand-Cambodia conflict. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The Singapore dollar is no exception, with the greenback also strengthening against it this month. The USD-SGD currency pair has climbed 0.8 per cent, from S$1.2768 on Jul 23 to S$1.2868 on Jul 28. As of Tuesday (Jul 29) during Asia afternoon trading hours, it was at S$1.2862. The currency pair is still down around 5.7 per cent year to date, as of Tuesday. 'The US trade deficit is expected to stabilize in June after the blowout in 1Q25 resulting from the frontloading of imports to avoid higher tariffs,' said DBS analyst Philip Wee. Eastspring Investment analysts also concurred that the easing of front-loaded of imports to the US to avoid higher tariffs has eased, but warned that it would lead to 'higher US goods inflation, particularly into Q4, and lower real consumer disposable income.' Meanwhile, Maybank analysts stated in a note that the USD's rise is a 'quiet acknowledgement that tariffs thus far had not affected the US economy as much as feared', but added that it was 'premature' to assume that the tariffs have no impact on price pressure. While Wee was positive about the DXY's trend, pointing out that it closed above its 50-day moving average for the first time since February, he also cautioned that US President Donald Trump remains a 'threat' to the independence of the Fed after he stepped up attacks against Fed Chair Jerome Powell. The next Fed interest rate decision is set to take place this week on July 30. The DXY tracks the value of the greenback against a basket of EUR, JPY, GBP, CAD, CHF and SEK. 'Today, USD could continue to rise, but the major resistance at 1.2900 may be out of reach for now,' said UOB analysts on the USD/SGD rate, adding that 'any pullback is likely to hold above the 'breakout' level of 1.2820.'