Thousands march against plan to build massive bridge linking Sicily to Italy's mainland
ROME (AP) — Thousands of people marched in the Sicilian city of Messina on Saturday to protest a government plan to build a bridge that would connect the Italian mainland with Sicily in a massive 13.5-billion-euro ($15.5 billion) infrastructure project.
Protesters staunchly oppose the Strait of Messina Bridge project over its scale, earthquake threats, environmental impact and the specter of mafia interference.
The idea to build a bridge to connect Sicily to the rest of Italy has been debated off and on for decades but always delayed due to these concerns. The project, however, took a major step forward when a government committee overseeing strategic public investments approved the plan this week.
Transport Minister Matteo Salvini, the project's main political backer, called it 'the biggest infrastructure project in the West.'
Salvini cited studies estimating the project would create up to 120,000 jobs annually and help stimulate economic growth in economically lagging southern Italy, as billions more are invested in surrounding road and infrastructure improvements.
Opponents are not convinced by these arguments. They are also angry that about 500 families would have to be expropriated in order for the bridge to be built.
'The Strait of Messina can't be touched,' protesters shouted as they marched in Messina. Many carried banners that said 'No Ponte' (No Bridge). Organizers estimated crowd size at 10,000 people.
The proposed bridge would span nearly 3.7 kilometers (2.2 miles) with a suspended section of 3.3 kilometers (more than 2 miles). It would surpass Turkey's Canakkale Bridge by 1,277 meters (4,189 feet) to become the longest suspension bridge in the world.
Preliminary work could begin as early as late September or early October, pending approval from Italy's Court of Audit. Full construction is scheduled to begin in 2026, with completion targeted between 2032 and 2033.
Plans for a bridge have been approved and canceled multiple times since the Italian government first solicited proposals for one in 1969. Premier Giorgia Meloni's administration revived the project in 2023.
With three car lanes in each direction flanked by a double-track railway, the bridge would have the capacity to carry 6,000 cars an hour and 200 trains a day — reducing the time to cross the strait by ferry from up to 100 minutes to 10 minutes by car. Trains would save 2/12 hours in transit time, Salvini said.
The project could also support Italy's commitment to raise defense spending to 5% of GDP targeted by NATO, as the government has indicated it would classify the bridge as defense-related.
Italy argues that the bridge would form a strategic corridor for rapid troop movements and equipment deployment, qualifying it as 'security-enhancing infrastructure.'
Environmental groups, however, have lodged complaints with the EU, citing concerns that the project would impact migratory birds.
Italy's president has also insisted that the project remain subject to anti-mafia legislation that applies to all large-scale infrastructure projects. Salvini pledged that keeping organized crime out of the project was a top priority.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
14 minutes ago
- New York Times
For D.C., Threats of a Federal Takeover Were Familiar. Now They Are a Reality.
Muriel Bowser, the mayor of Washington, D.C., was born just a year before the city's residents were given the right to elect their mayor. In the five decades since, Washington has wrestled with challenges common to many U.S. cities, like violent crime. It has also faced challenges that, given its peculiar status under federal law, it shares with no other American city. But even in Washington's unique history, there was no episode quite like the one that Ms. Bowser, in her third term as mayor, had to confront on Monday afternoon. 'We know that access to our democracy is tenuous,' the mayor said to reporters just hours after the city's most prominent resident, President Trump, announced that the federal government was going to take over the local police department and deploy the National Guard to the streets of Washington. 'While this action today is unsettling and unprecedented,' the mayor said, 'I can't say that, given some of the rhetoric of the past, that we're totally surprised.' Indeed, Mr. Trump has not been shy about his feelings toward the nation's capital, calling it a 'filthy and crime-ridden embarrassment' and 'a rat-infested, graffiti-infested shithole.' For a city that federal law leaves vulnerable to the prerogatives of the White House, the raw rhetoric was a warning. Under the Home Rule Act of 1973, which gave residents the power to elect a mayor and a city council, Washington has a degree of self-governance, but it is limited. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Bloomberg
44 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
What a Trump Bid for Cut of Chip Revenue Means for China
A revenue-for-exports deal between the US government and two of the world's biggest chipmakers opens a new front in a trading regime turned upside down by Donald Trump. Bloomberg's Minmin Low and Tom Giles break down what we know so far. (Source: Bloomberg)
Forbes
44 minutes ago
- Forbes
Retirements And Businesses Face Risk From Administration Actions
The topic of regulation often sits in the penumbra of companies. Many executives hate them. Some regulation is overdone. Much of it isn't, being instead expressions of restraint when corporations behave recklessly, damaging the public and the balance of the economic system. Large regulatory packages have often enabled greater trust, attention to operations, and ultimately higher profitability overall. As often as regulation is necessary for companies, it is also required through laws and constitutional guarantees for government entities and officials who otherwise would misuse their powers over businesses and the many millions of retirement accounts that require economic success to thrive. Tech Companies And Law Firms Under Attack Donald Trump has established a practice of singling out both individuals and particular companies. Criticism on the part of the nation's chief executives, whether publicly or privately expressed, isn't new. They are people and will act as people do. However, the newest expression of it is unusual. Trump reportedly demanded that U.S. chip companies, Nvidia and AMD, pay the government a percentage of their revenue from sales to China, according to the Financial Times. The two companies agreed so they could get the export licenses necessary to ship products, reportedly admitting it to the newspaper. Also, according to the story, unnamed expert sources said that this type of arrangement was 'unprecedented.' Companies have never before paid commissions for permissions. On August 7y, 20205, Trump called on Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to resign because a Republican senator was concerned about Tan's reported investments in Chinese companies, Business Insider reported. Holding shares in Chinese companies is a common part of investment portfolio diversity. Days later, Trump praised Tan's 'success' online, Business Insider separately wrote. However, in a broader sense, this is not the first attempt by Trump at deals following economic threats. In April, Trump announced a deal with five major law firms for $600 million in free legal work, as The Hill and others reported. The payoff for the firms was that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission would withdraw letters asking about hiring practices in an alleged attempt to target diversity, equity, and inclusion programs. 'The EEOC is prepared to root out discrimination anywhere it may rear its head, including in our nation's elite law firms,' acting EEOC Chair Andrea Lucas said in a statement, as The Hill reported in a separate article. Trump had also chosen law firms for their past clients and cases. Banks And Pharma Join The Ranks Trump accused banks in early August of political discrimination, wrote The Wall Street Journal. He wrote an executive order claiming that banks 'have engaged in unacceptable practices to restrict law-abiding individuals' and businesses' access to financial services on the basis of political or religious beliefs or lawful business activities.' According to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, there can be illegal discrimination if based on 'race, color, religion, national origin, sex or marital status, or age.' Political beliefs are not a protected category. Last week, Trump told major pharmaceutical to lower prices or face punishment, as Agence France-Presse wrote. He wanted the companies to work with the administration to make changes within two months, including a 'most favored nation' policy that would require the companies to sell at the lowest price paid by other countries. Foundational Problems For Commerce And Retirement The efforts to force companies in multiple industries to act one way or another remain highly unusual and speak to the reason why such actions are considered so unusual and undesired. A president can exert enormous power from the bully pulpit alone. Extend efforts to the powers of the state and what a president can do is terrible. It harkens back to Richard Nixon's famous enemies list and his willingness to use such agencies as the IRS and FBI to attack political adversaries. In the present, the actions the Trump administration has taken show the reasons why such activities have been either illegal or considered unacceptable as norms. They can unbalance industries, upend commerce, and disturb complex social and financial mechanisms without consideration of the extent of damage that might happen. All these perturbations, as tariffs on GM profits showed, can effectively become taxes on everyone's retirement funds. With a large aging segment of the population, this ultimately is not good for anyone.
