West London couple used Apple AirTag to retrieve stolen Jaguar
A west London couple said they tracked down and reclaimed their stolen Jaguar after police were "too stretched" to help.Mia Forbes Pirie and husband Mark Simpson discovered the theft from outside their home in Brook Green, Hammersmith, on the morning of Tuesday, 3 June.They reported the theft to police, explaining that an Apple AirTag had been left in the car. But after receiving what they described as a "vague" response, they used the tracker to locate the vehicle in Chiswick - and retrieved it themselves.The Metropolitan Police confirmed the couple had informed officers of their intention to recover the car and were advised to contact police again if assistance was needed at the scene.
Ms Forbes Pirie said: "I went to use the car that morning, walking up and down the street and I was unable to find it, with my husband saying he hadn't moved it."I thought it was weird, we both thought it was unlikely it was stolen because it had two immobilisers and so I was quite shocked and my stomach dropped."
'Bit of an adventure'
As well as having an immobiliser fitted, which means the Jaguar E-Pace would not start without the correct PIN code, it also had an AirTag inside.The couple dialled 999 to report the theft. Ms Forbes Pirie said the police were "vague" and told them they might send a patrol car and would inform them if they found anything. Ms Forbes Pirie said they told the police they had the tracker and could could trace the car's location - explaining that it was only a nine minute drive away, in Chiswick."I wanted to act quite quickly as my fear was that we would find the AirTag and not the car when it was discarded on to the street without the car, so I told them that we were planning to head to the location," she said."It felt like a bit of an adventure, it was exciting, a little bit of a fun thing to do, to see if we could find our car."I didn't really think car thieves would hurt us, more that they would try to get away."
She said they were "relieved" to find the car where the AirTag had led them - in a parking space on a street in Chiswick.However, the immobiliser code did not work, so they had to contact the software company to retrieve the vehicle. After showing proof of ownership of the £46,000 car, the company came to the location and unlocked the vehicle for them.Speaking of the thieves, Ms Forbes Pirie said: "I think they wanted just to take the car somewhere quiet. The thieves appeared to be quite sophisticated. "They had managed to bypass the immobiliser that came with the car, but not the one that we had fitted. "We were told they did quite a good job and got quite close."I think I thought the police would act quicker considering they had a location for it, but I know they also very stretched."
Met figures show there were 33,530 offences of "theft or unauthorised taking" of a motor vehicle in the capital in 2024, a 1.6% increase on the year before. There were only 326 "positive outcomes", which can include a charge or caution, from those cases, representing a success rate of lower than 1%.
A Met Police spokesperson said the couple confirmed with police that they had found the vehicle and that it was being recovered by a truck back to the victim's home address."This investigation is ongoing and officers met the victim on Tuesday, 10 June as part of their inquiries," the spokesperson added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Move faster on firms' public contracts ban, Grenfell survivor urges Government
Efforts to ban companies linked to the Grenfell fire from public contracts must speed up, a survivor of the fire has said ahead of the eighth anniversary. Bereaved and survivors of the blaze will gather on Saturday in west London for the annual commemoration of the disaster which claimed 72 lives. It is likely to be the final anniversary which takes place with the tower still standing in its current form, as demolition work could begin in September. Former tower resident Edward Daffarn, who had previously raised safety concerns and predicted a 'catastrophic event' at the tower seven months before the fire, said this year's memorial will be 'all the more poignant' for that reason. But Mr Daffarn is hopeful a new documentary about the blaze, due to air on Netflix next week, will spur Government efforts to take action against companies linked to fire. He told the PA news agency: 'One thing that this documentary needs to do is it needs to put pressure on the Government to ensure that the companies involved are not able to access public funding, and I'm hoping that this documentary will accelerate that process.' The Cabinet office confirmed in February that seven companies were facing possible bans – cladding firm Arconic, insulation firm Kingspan, former Celotex owners Saint-Gobain, fire inspectors Exova, design and build contractor Rydon, architect Studio E and subcontractor Harley Facades. It is understood investigations were launched into all of them in March, looking into whether any engaged in professional misconduct for the purposes of the Procurement Act 2023, potentially leading them to be debarred from public contracts. No timeline has been given for how long it might be before outcomes are known. The final Grenfell Tower Inquiry report, published in September, concluded victims, bereaved and survivors were 'badly failed' through incompetence, dishonesty and greed. The west London tower block was covered in combustible products because of the 'systematic dishonesty' of firms who made and sold the cladding and insulation, inquiry chairman Sir Martin Moore-Bick said. He called out 'deliberate and sustained' manipulation of fire-safety testing, misrepresentation of test data and misleading of the market. Mr Daffarn said the documentary will be the first 'that truly exposes and brings into people's living rooms' the 'cowardice of the corporates and how profit was put before people'. He said; 'I hope that people who watch the documentary come to understand that although Grenfell happened eight years ago, there's a lot that still hasn't been resolved and, as a consequence, the companies involved with Grenfell just seem to want to brush everything under the carpet and carry on making money. 'And I think the documentary clearly exposes how little these companies and individuals have been held to account for their roles in Grenfell.' On Government efforts, which Sir Keir Starmer first announced last September, to debar companies, Mr Daffarn said the process is 'too slow' and bereaved and survivors are 'still waiting' for companies to face consequences. He said anyone left angered by the documentary could avoid buying products from companies criticised in the report to 'make sure that those companies understand that there is a consequence of their actions'. Bereaved and survivors have long campaigned for criminal charges to be brought over the disaster. Police and prosecutors have previously said investigators would need until the end of 2025 to complete their inquiry, with final decisions on potential criminal charges by the end of 2026. The near 10-year wait for justice has been described by families as 'unbearable'. The decision to bring the tower block down was confirmed earlier this year and prompted mixed reaction, with some people feeling their views had not been properly taken into consideration. Sharing his own opinion, and acknowledging the difficulty others feel in seeing the tower regularly, Mr Daffarn said: 'I think the anniversary is made all the more poignant by the fact that this is the last time that we will meet with the tower in situ. 'We haven't got justice yet. It feels wrong to be pulling the tower down while so much remains unresolved.' The Government said while some had hoped the building could remain in place as a reminder of what happened, others had reported this would be 'too painful'. The demolition process is expected to take around two years. A Government spokesperson said: 'As we approach the eighth anniversary of the Grenfell Tower tragedy, our thoughts remain with the bereaved families, survivors and the immediate community. 'This government remains committed to ensuring that what happened at Grenfell is never forgotten, and to delivering the change needed so it can never happen again.'
Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE My tenant from hell left my £4m Belgravia home in ruins after changing the locks, dumping my possessions in a garage and secretly subletting it to football fans on Booking.com
A trusting pensioner's £4million Belgravia home was wrecked after a tenant changed the locks and secretly sublet the property to droves of tourists on booking sites. The four-bedroom London pad has been owned by Anabel Loyd's family for over three decades, and more recently the 69-year-old's mother decided to officially hand her the home. After renting it out to family 'here and there', as well as a successful stint hiring it out as an AirBnB to various tourists, the Wiltshire woman decided to turn the property into long-term let due to 'slower periods during the winter'. A family friend worked for Foxtons estate agents so she decided to go ahead with the firm, and soon a potential tenant emerged hoping for a two-year contract, which the 69-year-old accepted with break clauses, and a rent of £1,600-a-week. They passed all of the estate agents checks, so Ms Loyd assumed all was well - but things started to go wrong almost immediately. Upon moving into the home, the tenant claimed it was 'inhabitable' because of black marks on the windows despite a deep clean being carried out by the estate agents, according to Ms Loyd. But the problems didn't end there, as the tenant changed the property's locks, dumped droves of Ms Loyd's items into a garage he shouldn't have had access to and began to rent the house out on Ms Loyd told MailOnline: 'I was completely furious. [The tenant] was subletting to huge numbers of people and they would go to the pub for a drink, so the people in the pub, who are truly wonderful, knew exactly what was going on. 'There were all these people going and kind of minibuses of people arriving, I mean, sort of 12 people at a time in a house which isn't terribly big, I mean you could have perhaps fitted eight at a pinch. 'The house, meanwhile, has clearly, progressively been disintegrating.' 'My language on the subject has been truly spectacular. I really felt like going round and smashing my own front windows so that they couldn't let it anymore. 'I was flabbergasted, and very bad tempered. It so bizarre that you almost are laughing about it too because you can't quite believe it is possible. She added: 'It is like having your house burgled, you feel everything is sort of dirty, in a strange way.' 'I wish I could say when I visit for the first time that I will be standing there in floods of tears, but I will be standing there in a tiring fury.' And although her property is currently in the hands of another, a tenant subletting a property without permission is usually considered a civil matter, rather than a criminal one. Recalling the moment she was told of hordes of unassuming Wigan supporters were descending on her home with crates of lager, she added: 'You do end up laughing because you can't believe it. 'And I have nothing against Wigan supporters at all.' On the property advertised by Ms Loyd's tenant as 'Regal Haven Four Bed Home Near Buckingham Palace' Luckily, her local publican and neighbours alerted her to the 'minibuses' of tourists packing into her property, which she said could only fit around seven or eight people 'at a pinch'. After briefly searching online, she quickly found her 'unprincipled' tenant had been advertising her home via describing it as a 'regal haven', boasting a 9.3 rating out of 10. And although to find her home on offer to strangers was 'salt to the wound', a string of images showing the damage to the property was 'the straw that broke the camel's back.' 'The sort of straw in the camels back was a US couple who had stayed at the property contacting us,' she said. 'There was dirty laundry, the doorknobs were falling off, a hole in the front door, and the three-foot high weeds in the backyard.' Ms Loyd estimates she would have lost £20,000 in costs after repairing her home, a stone's throw away from Buckingham Palace, as she would have to re-carpet, repaint and more. 'Its accumulative damage and mainly cosmetic, but living in London, anything like that costs a lot of money to get. 'I know I am lucky to live somewhere else, and to have another home, but this is a story of when s**t hits the fan.' 'It doesn't really make it any better. all the same.' And to add insult to injury, her tenant had also piled her possessions in the garage. Ms Loyd also argued they shouldn't have had access to this part of her home, as the author feared some of belongings may be damaged. 'There may be some things that would be of a certain value that would be very difficult to replace. 'Some things you can't rectify if they are really damaged as opposed to paintwork.' While she echoed concerns for books belonging to her husband's family, her main worry was for a painting of her beloved late pet. 'If they smash the picture of my late dog , I will wrangle somebody, because I just really mind about it. I mean, it's a pet long since gone.' she added. And although she says Foxtons have offered to return the deposit and commission fee, she doesn't think it will touch the sides on repairs as well as money spent on renting - which includes a £499.20 a month management fee to the estate agents. She added: 'The truth is had this been anywhere other than a small mews where everybody knows everybody business. 'It it wasn't for the local pub, no one would have known. From that point of view the tenant picked the wrong place for this sort of thing.' She added: 'I think I would only consider renting to someone who was not to me or at least people I know in future.' In light of her ordeal, Ms Loyd urged others to 'do their homework' when letting their properties, saying: 'Really press any agent before you let them let do something.' It is understood Foxtons had been in contact with the tenant 12 times between April and May, having also issued him with a Section 8 during this time. It is also understood the tenant has now signed a Deed of Surrender, a formal written agreement to end a tenancy earlier, and has until July 14 to vacate the property.
Daily Mail
7 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Moment 'killer' attacks police officers with samurai sword as they try to arrest him after schoolboy was slashed to death in street
This is the horrifying moment police officers were attacked by a man with a sword, in footage which was shown to the jury at the Daniel Anjorin murder trial. The schoolboy, 14, was 'slain' with a samurai sword on his way to school in Hainault, east London on April 30 last year. Marcus Monzo denies murder and four counts of attempted murder. He appeared at the Old Bailey today. The court heard Monzo had driven into Donato Iwule in his van before attacking him with a sword and beginning a 20-minute rampage. After killing Daniel, he went into the home of Sindy Ariasand Henry De Los Rios Polina and attacked them next to their four-year-old. He also attacked police officers PC Yasim Mechem-Whitfield and Inspector Moloy Campbell. In footage shown to jurors, police arrive at the scene where Monzo is stood holding a sword, standing over a body. When one officer attempts to help the victim, Monzo approaches while holding the sword. Officers are heard shouting at Monzo 'drop it' while he asks them 'do you believe in god.' Monzo then shouts: 'Is there anybody here who believes in god.' Officers attempt to use a spray to stop the defendant, but he begins to flee, going into nearby gardens. Police bodycam footage then shows officers chasing Monzo down an alleyway. As they approach the end, Monzo appears and strikes one of the officers with his sword. An officer is heard shouting: 'Police officer stabbed.' Another video captures the moment just before a second officer is stabbed in the arm while trying to block the sword with a baton. Monzo is then seen on a roof as he attempts again to get into people's gardens. An officer shouts 'Lock your doors, everyone lock your doors'. Jurors were then shown police body worn footage of Monzo being tasered and then handcuffed while lying on the floor in a garden. He was seen earlier in the video holding his sword as paramedics arrived at the scene Giving evidence Inspector Moloy Campbell said he was on his way to the scene when he heard over the radio that a police officer had been stabbed. 'Members of the public were walking briskly in the opposite direction to where we were travelling and many were gesturing in the general direction of the incident.' He said he arrived and went behind some garages to find Monzo. 'Our purpose was to arrest, and protect the other officers. I decided to confront the defendant. 'I decided to first try and use my PAVA spray to keep as big a distance as possible. 'It had no effect, the defendant blocked the spray and then began to come for me. 'I dropped my PAVA spray and drew my baton. I struck him or attempted to strike him. 'Mr Monzo was slashing at me with the large sword. He made contact with my hand and with my bodyworn video camera. 'I was disappointed because it meant I couldn't carry on with what I was trying to do. 'It was frightening. I remember my priority being to try and carry on the police response. 'I looked down down and my black baton was now red. 'I was being backed into a coroner and I withdrew away from the corner.' He was treated at the scene and taken to hospital. Forensic pathologist Dr Ashley Fegan-Earl, who conducted a post-mortem, told the court that Daniel's injuries were 'unsurvivable'. 'They were unsurvivable however quickly medical attention could be brought,' he said. Monzo, who was born in Brazil, had told his customers he was an Elon Musk fan and believed the earth was flat and the Pope was an evil lizard, the court has heard. He skinned and deboned his own cat Wizard before carrying out the Hainault attacks. Jurors were played a 999 call Monzo made after he attacked Daniel. Some shouting could be heard but Monzo did not answer the operator's questions. Monzo could be heard asking police officers if they believe in God while they told him to drop his sword. He remained on the call while he attacked PC Mechem-Whitfield and went into the bedroom of Mr De Los Rios Polina and Ms Arias. Monzo entered the bedroom and said: 'Do you believe in God? Just tell me now, do you believe in God?' while the couple screamed. The operator continued to ask Monzo if he could hear her but he did not respond. He eventually came to the phone and said 'Hi, I need people who believe in God, the same as me. Faith. I promise my life to God and I'm ready.' The operator told Monzo 'please don't hurt anybody' and asked where he was.
