
Here's how Trump's tariffs are starting to cost Americans
News of the tariff impact is mounting, from the Detroit Three automakers announcing they'll face extra costs this year totalling into the billions, to the stainless steel cookware manufacturer in Tennessee hit with a $75,000 (US) tariff bill on one shipment, right down to the coffee shops considering boosting the price of a cup because of tariffs on Brazil.
Until recently, companies have somewhat shielded U.S. consumers from the full effects of the tariffs, either by rushing supplies into the country ahead of Trump's deadlines, or absorbing the levies as a cost of doing business.
But with tariffs on imports from roughly 100 U.S. trading partners due to rise this week from their current baseline of 10 per cent, tariff-related costs are headed nowhere but up.
Alex Durante, senior economist of the Tax Foundation, a Washington-based policy and advocacy group, says the tariffs are hitting a broad range of U.S. businesses that rely on imports.
"I think the administration is going to have a really hard time trying to convince the American people that some of the price increases they're seeing are because of other factors not related to the tariffs," Durante said in an interview with CBC News.
"I just don't think most people are going to be fooled by that," he said.
WATCH | Carney's point man on tariffs takes Canada's message to U.S. television:
Canadian officials confident U.S. trade deal will be reached
1 day ago
Prime Minister Mark Carney and Dominic LeBlanc, the minister responsible for Canada-U.S. trade, expressed confidence a new trade deal will be reached with the United States, even after 35 per cent tariffs were imposed late last week.
Trump, cabinet deny tariffs costing Americans
While on a macro level the U.S. economy is generally chugging along just fine despite Trump's tactics, there's some fresh data suggesting the tariffs are acting as a drag, including:
weak jobs numbers;
rising core inflation;
a sharp drop in orders of durable goods, such as appliances and automobiles.
Trump and his cabinet members quickly brush aside any evidence that the tariffs are costing Americans, with the president even firing the head of the federal statistics agency that produces the country's employment report.
"We have a lot of money coming in, much more money than the country has ever seen, by hundreds of billions of dollars," Trump said Sunday when a reporter asked about tariffs.
U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer flat-out denied that Trump's tariffs policies are a factor in the jobs slump.
"I don't read tariff policy into that number," Greer told the CBS program Face the Nation on Sunday.
But if you're willing to look around, you can find plenty of examples of U.S. businesses feeling the pinch.
Reuters news agency is compiling examples of how major companies around the world are responding to Trump's tariffs, such as hiking prices and issuing profit warnings.
Retailers, big brands raising prices
The Reuters tracker currently shows 22 U.S. companies raising prices, including retail giants (WalMart, Best Buy), footwear brands (Nike, Crocs, Birkenstock) and big-name makers of household goods (Colgate-Palmolive, Procter & Gamble, Clorox).
It's hard to imagine many American consumers haven't bought something from those businesses this year.
Other big-name U.S. firms have in recent days reported tariff impacts.
Tech giant Apple says it faced $800 million in tariff-related costs last quarter alone, and expects that to rise to $1.1 billion this quarter.
Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway blames tariffs in part for a 5.1 per cent quarterly decline in revenue in its consumer goods division, which includes brands like Fruit of the Loom and
Tool manufacturer Stanley Black & Decker estimates its tariff costs will hit $800 million this year.
Those corporate figures don't touch on another trend emerging in the U.S. economy: the downturn in visits by international travellers, dramatically so from Canada.
Perhaps that's not exactly tariff-related, but Trump slamming other nations on trade by describing them as nasty, unfair and ripping off the U.S. is not exactly what you'd call a warm and welcoming tourism ad campaign either.
WATCH | This economist says Canada has a better deal on Trump's tariffs than other countries:
Economist Robert Embree on the impact of U.S. tariffs on the Canadian economy
2 days ago
Higher prices could impact public opinion
While some polling suggests more Americans disapprove of tariffs than approve, the issue does not appear to be a crucial source of public-opinion damage to Trump and the Republicans — at least not yet.
That could change if the tariff costs on businesses accumulate so much that consumers can't help but see the impact.
"We know from the most recent presidential election that voters really disliked seeing higher prices," said Durante.
He sees trouble ahead whether businesses pass along all, some or none of the extra tariff costs to consumers.
"If they're absorbing the price increases, that's less money that they could use to invest in their own businesses and jobs and further production," Durante said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Montreal Gazette
5 minutes ago
- Montreal Gazette
Letters: Dear Canada, please don't abandon us
The letter writer states Canadian-U.S. relations have been permanently tarnished and concludes that 'America has shown us who they are.' But as in most things, perception is in the eye of the beholder. As a grieving American, I ask our irate neighbours to consider a different view. If a good and trusted friend (the U.S.) begins to act weirdly, which we have, should the other (Canada) just decide the relationship is toast? Instead, wouldn't this purported friend delve into what's wrong and perhaps intervene to help? This is not to negate Canadians' disappointment and anger. But please realize the last U.S. presidential election saw Donald Trump triumph over Kamala Harris with only 49.8 per cent of the popular vote. Overall, the turnout was about 64 per cent of eligible voters. And during the 2024 election cycle, Elon Musk donated as much as US$292 million to the victor. Such data, while hardly soothing the profound concern and dismay many Americans are experiencing, suggest apathy and Big Money were instrumental in the result. Finally, Canadians might also temper their scorn by considering their erstwhile friend is utterly embroiled in a battle for its survival. The appeal of the populist movement, which thrust Trump to power, has shown itself to be an insatiable wolf. In short, Canada, don't abandon your stricken neighbour. Understand our plight instead — and pray democracy may yet prevail. R. Jay Allain, Orleans, Mass. Immigration rules to please Trump? Yosniel Alginis Villalon Lopez, a native of Cuba, is yet another potential Canadian who was forced into ICE detention after being rejected by the Canada Border Services Agency at the Lacolle border crossing. And yet he is married to a resident of Quebec. The so-called Safe Third Country Agreement, by which he was refused entry, is only an executive agreement between the Canadian and U.S. governments. It hasn't been passed by Parliament, and only in rare cases does it apply to refugee claimants arriving at Canadian airports from elsewhere. Our federal government's proposed Bill C-2 will make it almost impossible for most people entering Canada via the U.S. to have their refugee claim reviewed by the Immigration and Refugee Board. It has also been severely criticized for provisions affecting human rights in Canada. One may wonder whether all this is intended to please the Trump administration. Shloime Perel, Côte-St-Luc An acronym fit for stats bureau Donald Trump, upset with weaker than expected job numbers and a subsequent hit on markets, fired Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) commissioner Erika McEntarfer. He will, no doubt, replace her with someone who will bend the knee and report numbers that he wants to hear, even if they are untrue. Maybe the bureau's name will be changed from BLS to simply the Bureau of Statistics, or more to the point, BS. Robert Filler, St-Laurent Submitting a letter to the editor Letters should be sent by email to letters@ We prioritize letters that respond to, or are inspired by, articles published by The Gazette. If you are responding to a specific article, let us know which one. Letters should be sent uniquely to us. The shorter they are — ideally, fewer than 200 words — the greater the chance of publication. Timing, clarity, factual accuracy and tone are all important, as is whether the writer has something new to add to the conversation. We reserve the right to edit and condense all letters. Care is taken to preserve the core of the writer's argument. Our policy is not to publish anonymous letters, those with pseudonyms or 'open letters' addressed to third parties. Letters are published with the author's full name and city or neighbourhood/borough of residence. Include a phone number and address to help verify identity; these will not be published. We will not indicate to you whether your letter will be published. If it has not been published within 10 days or so, it is not likely to be.


Globe and Mail
5 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Why Nektar Therapeutics Stock Popped 6% on Friday
Key Points Investors were reacting to the biotech's second-quarter earnings report. Revenue was higher than analysts expected, although the net loss was deeper than the consensus. 10 stocks we like better than Nektar Therapeutics › Biotech Nektar Therapeutics (NASDAQ: NKTR) unveiled its latest quarterly earnings after the stock market's close on Thursday, and the investor reaction was strong the following day. Happily for Nektar, it was largely positive, and the share price increased by 6% today. This was well higher than the 0.8% gain posted by the S&P 500 index. Sweet results In its second quarter, Nektar booked total revenue of just under $11.2 million, which was less than half of the nearly $23.5 million in the same period of 2024. All of this derived from noncash royalty revenue connected to the sales of future royalties. This isn't unusual for a biotech without a commercialized product that depends on royalties and other payouts from partners. Nektar added that its cash and investments in marketable securities stood at just under $176 million at the end of the quarter (June 30). That, plus the roughly $107.5 million it should reap from a recent secondary share issue, should fund its operations into the first quarter of 2027. Meanwhile, the company's net loss for the second quarter was slightly over $39 million, or $2.78 per share. On average, analysts were projecting Nektar would book $9.7 million in revenue and a net loss of only $0.20 per share. I should note here that it can be challenging for even the most experienced professionals to estimate the results of biotechs that don't draw meaningful revenue from commercialized products. On a fast track All that said, there are several potential tailwinds for Nektar just now, and the company wasn't shy about itemizing them in its earnings release. Among the more promising is the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granting its Fast Track designation for rezpegaldesleukin, Nektar's investigational drug targeting severe-to-very-severe alopecia areata (a skin disorder). Should you invest $1,000 in Nektar Therapeutics right now? Before you buy stock in Nektar Therapeutics, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Nektar Therapeutics wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,563!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,108,033!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,047% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 181% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025


CBC
6 minutes ago
- CBC
Trump says he'll meet Putin in Alaska next Friday for first U.S.-Russia summit since 2021
U.S. President Donald Trump said he will meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Aug. 15 in Alaska. Trump announced the meeting in a post on social media and said more details would follow. The announcement came after Trump said Friday that he would meet "very shortly" with Putin to discuss ending the war in Ukraine, a potential major milestone after expressing weeks of frustration that more was not being done to quell the fighting. Speaking to reporters at the White House earlier in the day, he also suggested that his meeting with the Russian leader could come before any sit-down discussion involving Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. "We're going to have a meeting with Russia, start off with Russia," Trump said. If it happens, the meeting would be the first U.S.-Russia summit since 2021, when former President Joe Biden met Putin in Geneva. It could mean a breakthrough in Trump's effort to end the war, although there's no guarantee it would stop the fighting since Moscow and Kyiv remain far apart on their conditions for peace. There was no immediate confirmation from Moscow. Trump also said that a peace deal would likely mean "there will be some swapping of territories" between Ukraine and Russia but didn't provide further details. Analysts, including some close to the Kremlin, have suggested that Russia could offer to give up territory it controls outside of the four regions it claims to have annexed.