Eugene Fama and David Booth on the Birth of Modern Finance
Listen to Odd Lots on Apple Podcasts
Listen to Odd Lots on Spotify
The 1970s were a pretty eventful time in markets. There was high inflation, the end of the gold standard, and a stock market crash. There was also a bunch of ideas coming out of the University of Chicago that would go on to be famous and highly influential for investors. Perhaps the most prominent is the Efficient Market Hypothesis, posited by Nobel Laureate Eugene Fama, which says that markets are right and it's useless for investors to try to outguess them. Fama later teamed up with David Booth, the founder of Dimensional Fund Advisors, and has been a longtime collaborator with the firm, which now has $777 billion under management. Today, they're releasing a documentary directed by Errol Morris and called " Tune Out the Noise," which chronicles this important time. We speak to both of these investment legends about the development of their theories, how they put them into practice, subsequent criticism, and what comes next.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
I'm a Gen Zer who landed a 6-figure job at Morgan Stanley before graduation. Here's what the process was like — and why you should refresh a surprisingly important part of your résumé.
Sara Thomas, a University of Chicago student, secured a role at Morgan Stanley before graduation. She said networking, campus finance clubs, and an often overlooked resumé section helped her land the role. Gen Z continues to be attracted to Wall Street careers, despite the long hours and high demands. This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Sara Thomas, 22, a 2025 graduate from the University of Chicago and incoming investment banking analyst at Morgan Stanley. Business Insider's recent "Path to Wall Street" series highlighted how finance careers continue to attract young talent, despite the industry's long hours and demanding entry-level roles. Entry-level bankers typically earn about $110,000 a year, not including bonuses. This interview has been edited for length and clarity. I had barely decided on banking as a career choice when I had to start preparing for interviews. My experience was similar to most stories I've heard about the banking world: the recruiting process starts early. Before submitting my internship applications, I spoke to about five people at each major bank — mostly recent UChicago grads and people the university's career advancement program connected me with — so they would recognize my name when they saw my résumé. Cold LinkedIn messaging didn't work very well for me. Those introductions are often necessary to get an interview. At most banks, I interviewed for multiple rounds, including calls focused on my personality and technical skills and a two-hour "super day." The whole process lasted about two weeks. Then, by the spring of my sophomore year, I was done. I landed an internship at Morgan Stanley, and I knew my full-time job would be set as long as I got a return offer. My prior internships had been at Bain Capital and the Chicago-based firm Ariel Investments. The only other career trajectory I considered in college was academia. I studied economics and considered getting involved with economics research, but I realized it wasn't for me. I just work better in a faster-paced finance environment. In my free time at school, I tried to focus on clubs and internships that would keep me close to startups and entrepreneurship, so I joined a venture capital fund on campus. I was also involved in a campus group for women and minorities interested in finance and investing. Those opportunities really helped me build my industry chops. I would tell any college student hoping to land a Wall Street or Silicon Valley job: be decisive. Even if investment banking or consulting isn't your lifelong passion, plan to commit to a career path sooner rather than later, so that you can give yourself the most amount of time to prepare, network, and do really well in the interviews. And, for the application process, students need to be careful with what they put on their résumé — recruiters pay a lot of attention to the "skills and interests" section at the bottom. Don't say that you're a mountain climber if you have never climbed a mountain, because people will ask you about your hobbies, and you need to be able to genuinely talk about them. Of course, your credentials matter, but I've found that recruiters are most interested in meeting well-rounded people. Job applications and postgrad life make me anxious sometimes. I've leaned on my friends a lot: Some aren't going into finance, others have gone through recruiting alongside me. I'm also grateful for my family — my Morgan Stanley role will be in San Francisco, and it will be the first time I've moved far from home, since I grew up in Chicago. Exercise has always been a coping strategy for me, too. I'm trying to build healthy habits and make sure I don't isolate myself. Those are the main ways I'm dealing with stress. Long, long term, my biggest goal is to be able to work for myself in some way. That could mean working at a big company that gives me a lot of autonomy to make decisions or starting my own company, if I am brave enough to do that. For now, I'm excited to keep building my career and learning from my coworkers. Having engaging conversations with people you've never met can be the most challenging part of the finance industry, but it's also the most rewarding. Do you have a story to share? Contact this reporter at allisonkelly@ or via Signal at alliekelly.10; here's our guide to sharing information securely. Read the original article on Business Insider
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
I'm a Gen Zer who landed a 6-figure job at Morgan Stanley before graduation. Here's what the process was like — and why you should refresh a surprisingly important part of your résumé.
Sara Thomas, a University of Chicago student, secured a role at Morgan Stanley before graduation. She said networking, campus finance clubs, and an often overlooked resumé section helped her land the role. Gen Z continues to be attracted to Wall Street careers, despite the long hours and high demands. This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Sara Thomas, 22, a 2025 graduate from the University of Chicago and incoming investment banking analyst at Morgan Stanley. Business Insider's recent "Path to Wall Street" series highlighted how finance careers continue to attract young talent, despite the industry's long hours and demanding entry-level roles. Entry-level bankers typically earn about $110,000 a year, not including bonuses. This interview has been edited for length and clarity. I had barely decided on banking as a career choice when I had to start preparing for interviews. My experience was similar to most stories I've heard about the banking world: the recruiting process starts early. Before submitting my internship applications, I spoke to about five people at each major bank — mostly recent UChicago grads and people the university's career advancement program connected me with — so they would recognize my name when they saw my résumé. Cold LinkedIn messaging didn't work very well for me. Those introductions are often necessary to get an interview. At most banks, I interviewed for multiple rounds, including calls focused on my personality and technical skills and a two-hour "super day." The whole process lasted about two weeks. Then, by the spring of my sophomore year, I was done. I landed an internship at Morgan Stanley, and I knew my full-time job would be set as long as I got a return offer. My prior internships had been at Bain Capital and the Chicago-based firm Ariel Investments. The only other career trajectory I considered in college was academia. I studied economics and considered getting involved with economics research, but I realized it wasn't for me. I just work better in a faster-paced finance environment. In my free time at school, I tried to focus on clubs and internships that would keep me close to startups and entrepreneurship, so I joined a venture capital fund on campus. I was also involved in a campus group for women and minorities interested in finance and investing. Those opportunities really helped me build my industry chops. I would tell any college student hoping to land a Wall Street or Silicon Valley job: be decisive. Even if investment banking or consulting isn't your lifelong passion, plan to commit to a career path sooner rather than later, so that you can give yourself the most amount of time to prepare, network, and do really well in the interviews. And, for the application process, students need to be careful with what they put on their résumé — recruiters pay a lot of attention to the "skills and interests" section at the bottom. Don't say that you're a mountain climber if you have never climbed a mountain, because people will ask you about your hobbies, and you need to be able to genuinely talk about them. Of course, your credentials matter, but I've found that recruiters are most interested in meeting well-rounded people. Job applications and postgrad life make me anxious sometimes. I've leaned on my friends a lot: Some aren't going into finance, others have gone through recruiting alongside me. I'm also grateful for my family — my Morgan Stanley role will be in San Francisco, and it will be the first time I've moved far from home, since I grew up in Chicago. Exercise has always been a coping strategy for me, too. I'm trying to build healthy habits and make sure I don't isolate myself. Those are the main ways I'm dealing with stress. Long, long term, my biggest goal is to be able to work for myself in some way. That could mean working at a big company that gives me a lot of autonomy to make decisions or starting my own company, if I am brave enough to do that. For now, I'm excited to keep building my career and learning from my coworkers. Having engaging conversations with people you've never met can be the most challenging part of the finance industry, but it's also the most rewarding. Do you have a story to share? Contact this reporter at allisonkelly@ or via Signal at alliekelly.10; here's our guide to sharing information securely. Read the original article on Business Insider
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Global streamers fight CRTC's rule requiring them to fund Canadian content
OTTAWA — Some of the world's biggest streaming companies will argue in court on Monday that they shouldn't have to make CRTC-ordered financial contributions to Canadian content and news. The companies are fighting an order from the federal broadcast regulator that says they must pay five per cent of their annual Canadian revenues to funds devoted to producing Canadian content, including local TV news. The case, which consolidates several appeals by streamers, will be heard by the Federal Court of Appeal in Toronto. Apple, Amazon and Spotify are fighting the CRTC's 2024 order. Motion Picture Association-Canada, which represents such companies as Netflix and Paramount, is challenging a section of the CRTC's order requiring them to contribute to local news. In December, the court put a pause on the payments — estimated to be at least $1.25 million annually per company. Amazon, Apple and Spotify had argued that if they made the payments and then won the appeal and overturned the CRTC order, they wouldn't be able to recover the money. In court documents, the streamers put forward a long list of arguments on why they shouldn't have to pay, including technical points regarding the CRTC's powers under the Broadcasting Act. Spotify argued that the contribution requirement amounts to a tax, which the CRTC doesn't have the authority to impose. The music streamer also took issue with the CRTC requiring the payments without first deciding how it will define Canadian content. Amazon argued the federal cabinet specified the CRTC's requirements have to be "equitable." It said the contribution requirement is "inequitable because it applies only to foreign online undertakings and only to such undertakings with more than $25 million in annual Canadian broadcasting revenues." Apple also said the regulator "acted prematurely" and argued the CRTC didn't consider whether the order was "equitable." It pointed out Apple is required to contribute five per cent, while radio stations must only pay 0.5 per cent — and streamers don't have the same access to the funds into which they pay. The CRTC imposes different rules on Canadian content contributions from traditional media players. It requires large English-language broadcasters to contribute 30 per cent of revenues to Canadian programming. Motion Picture Association—Canada is only challenging one aspect of the CRTC's order — the part requiring companies to contribute 1.5 per cent of revenues to a fund for local news on independent TV stations. It said in court documents that none of the streamers "has any connection to news production" and argued the CRTC doesn't have the authority to require them to fund news. "What the CRTC did, erroneously, is purport to justify the … contribution simply on the basis that local news is important and local news operations provided by independent television stations are short of money," it said. "That is a reason why news should be funded by someone, but is devoid of any analysis, legal or factual, as to why it is equitable for foreign online undertakings to fund Canadian news production." In its response, the Canadian Association of Broadcasters said the CRTC has wide authority under the Broadcasting Act. It argued streamers have contributed to the funding crisis facing local news. "While the industry was once dominated by traditional television and radio services, those services are now in decline, as Canadians increasingly turn to online streaming services," the broadcasters said. "For decades, traditional broadcasting undertakings have supported the production of Canadian content through a complex array of CRTC-directed measures … By contrast, online undertakings have not been required to provide any financial support to the Canadian broadcasting system, despite operating here for well over a decade." A submission from the federal government in defence of the CRTC argued the regulator was within its rights to order the payments. "The orders challenged in these proceedings … are a valid exercise of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission's regulatory powers. These orders seek to remedy the inequity that has resulted from the ascendance of online streaming giants like the Appellants," the office of the attorney general said. "Online undertakings have greatly profited from their access to Canadian audiences, without any corresponding obligation to make meaningful contributions supporting Canadian programming and creators — an obligation that has long been imposed on traditional domestic broadcasters." The government said that if the streamers get their way, that would preserve "an inequitable circumstance in which domestic broadcasters — operating in an industry under economic strain — shoulder a disproportionate regulatory burden." "This result would be plainly out of step with the policy aims of Parliament" and cabinet, it added. The court hearing comes as trade tensions between the U.S. and Canada have cast a shadow over the CRTC's attempts to regulate online streamers. The regulator launched a suite of proceedings and hearings as part of its implementation of the Online Streaming Act, legislation that in 2023 updated the Broadcasting Act to set up the CRTC to regulate streaming companies. In January, as U.S. President Donald Trump was inaugurated for his second term, groups representing U.S. businesses and big tech companies warned the CRTC that its efforts to modernize Canadian content rules could worsen trade relations and lead to retaliation. Then, as the CRTC launched its hearing on modernizing the definition of Canadian content in May, Netflix, Paramount and Apple cancelled their individual appearances. While the companies didn't provide a reason, the move came shortly after Trump threatened to impose a tariff of up to 100 per cent on movies made outside the United States. Foreign streamers have long pointed to their existing spending in Canada in response to calls to bring them into the regulated system. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 8, 2025. Anja Karadeglija, The Canadian Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
