Bessent: Trump ‘not going to fire' Powell
Bessent was asked on MSNBC's 'Morning Joe' if the president should say he will let Powell finish his term to give certainty to the markets, after indications that he would try to fire the head of the central bank have rattled the markets. The secretary pushed back on the question.
'I'm not sure where that question comes from because President Trump has repeatedly said he's not going to fire Chair Powell,' Bessent said. 'He might like for him to resign, but he's not going to fire him. He's said that on numerous occasions, I think he may have even said it again yesterday.'
The president said Tuesday he doesn't think Powell should resign before his term is up in May but bashed him for not lowering interest rates.
'I think he's doing a bad job, but he's going to be out soon anyway. In eight months, he'll be out,' the president said.
Also, when pressed on the pressure campaign on the Fed chair to lower rates, Bessent said that's part of the role.
'I think anyone who goes into public service should expect pressure, I get pressure from the president, from the Congress, from constituents,' Bessent said.
Trump last week indicated to Republicans during a meeting in the Oval Office that he plans to fire Powell, a senior White House official told The Hill, and markets quickly dipped, with the S&P 500 falling into the red. He said later that day it is 'highly unlikely,' but he doesn't 'rule out anything.'
While he appeared to reach a breaking point with Powell, he has since backed off amid warnings about how such a move would impact the markets from officials and outside voices.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Former Epstein lawyer says Bondi ‘jumped the gun a bit' on files
David Schoen, a former lawyer for Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, said Attorney General Pam Bondi and other officials 'jumped the gun a bit' in overhyping the Epstein files. Schoen in an interview with BBC 'Newsnight' Thursday said there is no Epstein 'client list' that would highlight connections between the disgraced financier and wealthy individuals. 'If someone were to think that there's actually a list — which Jeffrey Epstein wrote down the name of, you fill in the name of the famous, wealthy person with some young girl — that just doesn't exist,' he said. He also suggested that Bondi and other officials created a hyped environment about what might be included in the files that couldn't be matched by what was released. Schoen was careful to not blame President Trump for overhyping the files. He said he thought Trump had called on the Department of Justice (DOJ) and FBI to release anything big they found and that the others jumped the gun in how they described what was coming. 'I think what happened is, President Trump said he's open to the idea, and it should be disclosed if there's any such file that hasn't been disclosed so far. But he didn't know what was in it,' Schoen said. 'I think that maybe some of the others, the attorney general, director of the FBI, and so on, jumped the gun a bit. They were in favor, for good reasons, of disclosing and full transparency, but they didn't know what they had yet,' he said. 'When they saw what they had, there was no 'smoking gun' and therefore they said there was nothing to release of any substance. And now you see this catch-up,' Schoen said. The controversy over the Epstein files has continued for weeks, causing problems for Trump and Republicans in Congress. Democrats have sought to further divide the GOP over the issue by offering amendments in committee to release more federal information on Epstein. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche on Friday was set to meet with Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell, who is imprisoned on sex trafficking charges. Trump said Friday he hadn't thought about pardoning Maxwell. Republicans in Congress have been divided over how to handle the issue. Some have called for the release of all files on Epstein held by the DOJ, while others have wanted to put guardrails on disclosures. Schoen is far from the first person to argue the files were overhyped. Karl Rove, republican strategist, said Thursday, 'There's hell to pay when those who hyped the conspiracy have closed the books on the case.' Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino as a conservative pundit outside the administration was among those pressing the idea there were files that showed the government could be protecting wealthy associates of Epstein. Epstein's acquaintances include a number of luminaries — including Trump and former President Clinton — which has sparked conspiracy theories for years. Schoen previously made statements that no client list existed and that Trump was not involved in the Epstein case. He stated June 16 on NewsNation that Bondi and Trump were not hiding a client list. On June 5, Schoen posted on social platform X, 'I was hired to lead Jeffrey Epstein's defense as his criminal lawyer 9 days before he died. He sought my advice for months before that. I can say authoritatively, unequivocally, and definitively that he had no information to hurt President Trump. I specifically asked him!' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What You Need to Know Ahead of J. M. Smucker's Earnings Release
Orrville, Ohio-based The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM) manufactures and markets branded food and beverage products. Valued at a market cap of $11.6 billion, the company offers a diverse portfolio that includes coffee, peanut butter, fruit spreads, sweet baked goods, pet snacks, cookies, frozen handheld products, sandwiches and snacks, portion control items, baking mixes, and flour. It is scheduled to announce its fiscal Q1 earnings for 2026 on Wednesday, Aug. 27. Before this event, analysts project this food and beverage company to report a profit of $1.86 per share, down 23.8% from $2.44 per share in the year-ago quarter. The company has surpassed Wall Street's bottom-line estimates in each of the last four quarters. Its earnings of $2.31 per share in the previous quarter outpaced the consensus estimates by 2.7%. More News from Barchart UnitedHealth Stock Spirals Lower Again. Don't Buy the Dip. This Self-Driving Car Stock Is Surging on a Major Nvidia Boost Auto Revenue Keeps Plunging at Tesla. Should You Buy the TSLA Stock Dip or Run Far Away? Get exclusive insights with the FREE Barchart Brief newsletter. Subscribe now for quick, incisive midday market analysis you won't find anywhere else. For the full year, analysts expect SJM to report EPS of $9.14, down 9.7% from $10.12 per share in fiscal 2025. Nonetheless, its EPS is expected to grow by 8.8% year-over-year to $9.94 in fiscal 2027. Shares of SJM have declined 7% over the past 52 weeks, lagging behind both the S&P 500 Index's ($SPX) 17.3% uptick and the Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund's (XLP) 4.6% gain over the same time frame. On Jun. 10, shares of SJM crashed 15.6% after its Q4 earnings release. The company's revenue declined 2.8% year-over-year to $2.1 billion, missing consensus estimates. This top-line shortfall might have lowered investor confidence. Moreover, its gross profit also decreased from the prior-year quarter, driven by higher costs, unfavorable volume/mix, and the noncomparable impact of divestitures. However, on the other hand, while its adjusted EPS of $2.31 fell 13.2% from the year-ago quarter, it exceeded the analyst estimates by 2.7%. Wall Street analysts are moderately optimistic about SJM's stock, with an overall "Moderate Buy" rating. Among 17 analysts covering the stock, six recommend "Strong Buy," two indicate "Moderate Buy," and nine advise 'Hold.' The mean price target for SJM is $112.12, implying a 3.2% premium from the current levels. On the date of publication, Neharika Jain did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Axios
33 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump ignites chain reaction with early redistricting gamble
The Trump White House is pushing ahead with an extraordinary effort to game the system by redrawing congressional maps ahead of the midterms. Democrats are finding it tricky to fight back. Why it matters: The push to add Republican House seats is sparking a chain reaction as the parties fight tooth-and-nail over the majority. "Why the f**k are we responding and reacting to the other side instead of taking offense on these things?" potential Texas Senate candidate Beto O'Rourke told Democrats this week. But going on offense is easier said than done: Democrats would need a court order or special election in most states where they could try to draw more favorable maps. The big picture: Republicans are hoping to pick off more than a half-dozen Democratic-held seats by redrawing congressional maps ahead of 2026. Redistricting for partisan advantage is nothing new, but it's usually done after the census every ten years. The next one's scheduled for 2030. In Texas, Trump has encouraged Republicans to embark on a redistricting project that he's said could net the party as many as five seats. In Ohio, which is required by law to redraw its House map, party strategists believe they can gain two or three seats. In Missouri, Republicans believe they can pick up another seat. Zoom in: Gov. Greg Abbott and other Texas Republicans were at first hesitant to take up redistricting, the Texas Tribune reported. After Trump's call to Abbott, it appeared on the special session agenda. Texas Democrats have limited options to push back, but have considered breaking quorum to prevent a vote on the issue. Republicans are looking to South Texas after Trump performed well with Latino voters there. It could backfire: Adding Democratic voters to GOP districts to build more Republican districts elsewhere risks turning safe seats into competitive races, said Jon Taylor, department chair and political science professor at the University of Texas at San Antonio. The other side: Democrats, led by California Gov. Gavin Newsom, have vowed to punch back by drawing roughly as many new Democratic seats. Newsom will need to act fast. In his case, he's suggested calling a special election to green light redistricting ahead of 2026. Newsom hosted California and Texas lawmakers in Sacramento on Friday to plot strategy. Other big Democratic states — such as New York, New Jersey and Illinois — also have redistricting limits in their state constitutions. They'll need courts to help, or push through fast amendments. Between the lines: The White House has no bigger priority in the midterms than keeping the House. " The battlefield is extremely narrow compared to 10 or 20 years ago. To the extent the GOP can widen it, on favorable terms, that's a huge advantage," said Matt Gorman, a former National Republican Congressional Committee official. Should Democrats seize the lower chamber, it would paralyze Trump's legislative agenda for his final two years in office and potentially lead to him getting impeached. Trump was impeached following the 2018 midterms, when Democrats won the House majority. The bottom line: There's already a warning sign for Republicans as they weigh redistricting.
