Iran, US fifth round of talks today in Rome
Iranian and US negotiators meet in Rome on Friday for a fifth round of nuclear talks, after a public disagreement over Tehran's uranium enrichment. The talks, which began in April, are the highest-level contact since the United States quit a 2015 nuclear accord during President Donald Trump's first term.
"The fifth round of talks is to begin in Rome later today. Both sides aim to explore peaceful solutions and foster a conducive dialogue environment to reach an understanding regarding the outstanding issues," the Foreign Ministry said.
Since returning to the office, Trump has revived his "maximum pressure" campaign on Iran, backing talks but warning of military action if diplomacy fails.
Iran wants a new deal to ease sanctions, which have battered its economy.
The last round of talks, in the capital Muscat, ended with differences over enrichment.
US envoy Steve Witkoff said Washington "could not authorise even one percent" enrichment -- a position Tehran called a red line, citing its rights under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
- 'Fundamental differences'
- Ahead of Friday's talks, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said "fundamental differences" remained with the United States, while adding that Tehran was open to its nuclear sites undergoing more inspections.
"We will not have an agreement at all" if the United States wants to prevent Iran from enriching uranium, Araghchi said.
Iran's official IRNA news agency reported that the talks in the Italian capital were scheduled to begin at 1:00 pm (1100 GMT). They come ahead of a June meeting of the UN nuclear watchdog, the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and the October expiry of the 2015 accord.
The deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, aimed to allay Western suspicions that Iran was seeking a nuclear weapons capability, an ambition that Tehran has consistently denied. In return for curbs on its nuclear programme, Iran had received relief from international sanctions.
However, the accord was torpedoed in 2018 when Trump unilaterally withdrew the United States and reimposed sanctions.
A year later, Iran responded by ramping up its nuclear activities. It is now enriching uranium to 60 percent -- far above the deal's 3.67 percent cap but below the 90 percent level needed for a nuclear warhead.
- 'It's quite simple' - Analysts in Tehran said Iran was unlikely to back down. "It's quite simple; if the US expects Iran to halt nuclear enrichment, then there can't be a deal," said Mohammad Marandi, a political scientist who was once an adviser on the nuclear issue.
The Atomic Energy Organization of Iran says the country's nuclear industry employs 17,000 people, similar to other countries where uranium is enriched for civilian use.
"The Netherlands, Belgium, South Korea, Brazil, and Japan enrich (uranium) without possessing nuclear weapons," its spokesman, Behrouz Kamalvandi, said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times of Oman
2 hours ago
- Times of Oman
EU seeks fair market access as China tightens trade control
BRUSSELS: Concerns have been raised within the European Union regarding the need for balanced trade relations with China, emphasizing that economic growth should not come at the expense of European industries. A call has been made for adherence to global trade rules, ensuring that multilateral commitments align with fair market practices. Key issues such as subsidies, barriers to market access, restrictions on critical mineral exports, and trade diversion have been highlighted as areas requiring urgent attention. During discussions at an international economic summit, the necessity of easing controls on rare earth minerals and magnets was underscored, given their significant impact on European industries. The broader objective remains to establish a more equitable trade environment, where reciprocal access and fair investment conditions contribute to healthy competition in global markets. The EU-China trade dispute has intensified amid Donald Trump's return to the White House, exposing both to overlapping tariffs as the US pressures firms to shift production domestically. EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic stressed the importance of transparency and stable supplies, particularly for magnets, now restricted by China's export policies. While the EU remains engaged with China on bilateral and global issues, Sefcovic underscored the need to resolve trade imbalances, warning that strained cooperation affects industries, citizens, and the global economy. China, controlling 90% of rare earth processing, imposed export curbs in April in response to Trump's tariffs. The EU seeks a balanced relationship to safeguard its industries and ensure fair economic competition. Rare earths comprise 17 elements. On April 4, Beijing tightened export controls on seven—dysprosium, gadolinium, lutetium, samarium, scandium, terbium, and yttrium—along with several rare earth magnets. This move followed Trump's tariff announcement, requiring export licenses. European firms are urging China to simplify and accelerate approvals. EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic pressed Wang to distinguish between minerals with military applications and magnets largely used for civilian industries. Another EU concern is trade diversion from Trump's tariffs, as Brussels worries that cheap Chinese goods could flood European ports, undermining local manufacturers. On Thursday, the commission released initial findings from a monitoring tool launched in April, revealing significant suspected rerouting of discounted Chinese exports. By late May, the European Union witnessed a sharp surge in imports across various industries, raising concerns about trade imbalances. Light-emitting diodes saw a 156 percent jump in shipments, with prices tumbling by 65 percent. Industrial robot imports skyrocketed by 315 percent, coupled with a 35 percent price drop. The most striking increase was in steel alloy bars and rods, which surged over 1,000 percent while costs plunged 86 percent. While these numbers are not exclusively tied to China, its exports are likely a major factor, given the impact of U.S. tariffs. Maria Martin-Prat, the EU's deputy trade chief, issued a stern warning to Beijing, urging it to address European grievances or risk facing retaliatory actions. She pointed to the bloc's expanding toolkit of autonomous trade measures, signalling a willingness to act if needed. As the EU prepares for a leaders' summit in July, Martin-Prat emphasized the necessity of structural reforms in China's economy. The EU is pushing for improvements in market access, particularly in strategic sectors like agriculture and cosmetics. With trade tensions escalating, Brussels seeks a more balanced relationship that ensures fair competition while mitigating risks posed by China's export policies and the broader global economic landscape. The European Union has warned Beijing that its policies are eroding confidence in the global trade system that China has long benefited from. Maria Martin-Prat emphasized that restrictive actions are driving countries away from openness and fair competition. During a panel discussion, British Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds echoed concerns, calling China's non-market practices a major economic security threat. Reynolds pointed to persistent state-led subsidies and industrial overcapacity as ongoing issues, arguing that such tactics distort fair trade and weaken competition. He noted that these practices are increasing, creating further imbalance in global markets. Without addressing these concerns, Europe risks losing its ability to sustain critical industries and key technologies domestically. The EU is urging Beijing to acknowledge and address these challenges before they further undermine trust and stability in the international economic system. The upcoming leaders' summit presents an opportunity for direct engagement on these pressing trade concerns. British Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds acknowledged the disruptive impact of global trade on U.S. politics, questioning whether Washington's policies are a reaction to economic shifts or a driving force behind them. Meanwhile, Ilse Henne, CEO of Thyssenkrupp's materials services division, stressed the urgent need for stronger protections against cheap Chinese steel imports, warning that European industries are struggling to stay afloat. The EU's concerns have intensified following the U.S. decision to double tariffs on steel imports to 50%, a move criticized by Brussels as detrimental to global trade. European steelmakers are facing mounting pressure, with the sector experiencing a downturn due to high energy costs and declining demand. As the EU prepares for upcoming trade negotiations, policymakers are exploring defensive measures to safeguard domestic industries while balancing economic cooperation with China. The steel industry's future hinges on decisive action to ensure fair competition and market stability.
Observer
3 hours ago
- Observer
ME airspace shut after Israel strikes Iran, airlines cancel flights
SEOUL/LONDON: Airlines steered clear of much of the Middle East on Friday after Israeli attacks on Iranian sites forced carriers to cancel or divert thousands of flights in the latest upheaval to travel in the region. Proliferating conflict zones around the world are becoming an increasing burden on airline operations and profitability; and more of a safety concern. Detours add to airlines' fuel costs and lengthen journey times. Israel on Friday said it targeted Iran's nuclear facilities, ballistic missile factories and military commanders at the start of what it warned would be a prolonged operation to prevent Tehran from building an atomic weapon. Tel Aviv's Ben Gurion Airport was closed and Israel's air defence units stood on high alert for possible retaliatory strikes from Iran. Israel's El Al Airlines said it had suspended flights to and from Israel as did Air France KLM and budget carriers Ryanair and Wizz. Wizz said it had re-routed flights affected by closed airspace in the region for the next 72 hours. Israeli airlines El Al, Israir and Arkia were moving planes out of the country. FlightRadar data showed airspace over Iran, Iraq and Jordan was empty, with flights directed towards Saudi Arabia and Egypt instead. About 1,800 flights to and from Europe had been affected so far on Friday, including approximately 650 cancelled flights, according to Eurocontrol. With Russian and Ukrainian airspace closed due to war, the Middle East region has become an even more important route for international flights between Europe and Asia. The escalation of the Middle East conflict knocked shares in airlines around the world with British Airways owner IAG down 4.6 per cent, Delta Air Lines down 4 per cent and Ryanair off 3.5 per cent. A surge in oil prices after the attack also stirred concerns about jet fuel prices. Many global airlines had already halted flights to and from Tel Aviv after a missile fired by Yemen's Ansar Allah fighters towards Israel on May 4 landed near the airport. Passengers gather in front of the ticket counter of Air India airlines, as the flights got delayed and cancelled after airlines divert flights following Israeli strikes in Iran, in Delhi, India. — Reuters Iranian airspace has been closed until further notice, according to state media and notices to pilots. Air India, which flies over Iran on its Europe and North American flights, said several flights were being diverted or returned to their origin, including ones from New York, Vancouver, Chicago and London. Germany's Lufthansa said its flights to Tehran have been suspended and that it would avoid Iranian, Iraqi and Israeli airspace for the time being. Emirates also cancelled flights to and from Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon and Iran while Qatar Airways axed flights to Iran, Iraq and Syria. Iraq early on Friday closed its airspace and suspended all traffic at its airports, Iraqi state media reported. Eastern Iraq near its border with Iran contains one of the world's busiest air corridors, with dozens of flights crossing between Europe and the Gulf, many on routes from Asia to Europe, at any one moment. Jordan, which sits between Israel and Iraq, also closed its airspace several hours after the Israeli campaign began. Russia's civil aviation authority Rosaviatsia said it had instructed Russian airlines to stop using the airspace of Iran, Iraq, Israel and Jordan until June 26. It said flights to airports in Iran and Israel were also off limits for civil carriers. FlyDubai has cancelled 22 flights scheduled for June 13-14 to Dubai from 10 Russian airports, Russia's RIA news agency said, citing Rosaviatsia. "Traffic is now diverting either south via Egypt and Saudi Arabia, or north via Türkiye, Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan," according to Safe Airspace, a website run by OPSGROUP, a membership-based organisation that shares flight risk information. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict in the Middle East since October 2023 led to commercial aviation sharing the skies with short-notice barrages of drones and missiles across major flight paths — some of which were reportedly close enough to be seen by pilots and passengers. Six commercial aircraft have been shot down unintentionally and there have been three near misses since 2001, according to aviation risk consultancy Osprey Flight Solutions. — Reuters
Observer
6 hours ago
- Observer
Oil market on edge as ME tensions threaten Iranian exports
MUSCAT: Rising tensions between Iran and Israel are fuelling fresh concerns in global energy markets, with economists warning that any disruption to Iranian oil exports could trigger a sharp rise in prices, even without a direct military escalation. A regional economic expert stated that while a nuclear confrontation remains unlikely, the most plausible scenario is a targeted disruption to Iran's oil shipments. He noted that such a scenario, particularly if it impacts the Strait of Hormuz, would have immediate consequences for energy markets, given the strait's role as the world's most critical oil transit chokepoint. Iran currently exports around 1.6 million barrels per day of crude oil and an additional 0.4 million barrels per day of refined petroleum products. Together, this amounts to roughly two million barrels per day flowing into international markets. Any threat to this supply — whether direct or indirect — could send prices sharply higher without triggering a full-blown conflict. Recent developments in the region have already pushed oil prices upward. Brent crude surged more than four per cent in trading on Friday, with analysts forecasting that prices could soon reach or exceed $80 per barrel. Markets remain volatile and investors are closely watching for signs of further escalation. Several major financial institutions have revised their outlooks in light of the rising risks. J P Morgan has warned that oil prices could jump to as high as $120 per barrel if the conflict expands to include the Strait of Hormuz or key Gulf infrastructure. Goldman Sachs and Vitol have indicated that oil prices are likely to stay in the $70 to $85 per barrel range throughout 2025, with possible spikes above $80 if Iranian exports are affected. The Economist Intelligence Unit has raised its forecast for average oil prices in 2025 to $80.8 per barrel, citing increased geopolitical tension in the Middle East. The economic consequences of any significant disruption would be felt globally. Higher oil prices would drive up inflation, slow economic growth and complicate monetary policy decisions in both developed and emerging economies. For the Gulf Cooperation Council states, the current crisis underscores the strategic importance of maintaining open and secure shipping lanes through the Strait of Hormuz and ensuring regional energy stability. In the short term, countries like the UAE and Saudi Arabia could play a role in stabilising the market by boosting output or offering alternative supply routes. However, energy analysts caution that the situation remains highly sensitive. Even a limited strike on energy infrastructure or miscalculation could shift the market from moderate concern to full crisis mode. As diplomatic efforts intensify behind the scenes, the world is watching to see whether oil will become the next casualty of an already volatile geopolitical landscape.
