
Interfaith marriage a matter of personal liberty, says Delhi HC on couple's petition
The court also ordered the city police to submit a report on allegations that police officers forcibly separated the couple in July and detained the woman at a state-run shelter home. The Delhi police, which was told to ensure the couple's safety at its hearing on July 25, has been asked to continue providing them with police protection.
A bench of justice Sanjeev Narula heard the matter on August 8, following a plea filed last month by a 26-year-old Muslim man and a 25-year-old Hindu woman.
In their petition, the couple stated that they had solemnised their marriage after a relationship of over seven years but were facing strong opposition from the woman's family. They added that although they had written to the Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP), South-East district, on July 23 requesting police protection, the police had forcibly separated the woman from her husband and detained her at Nirmal Chhaya Shelter Home on July 24.
The police maintained that no coercion, unlawful action, or procedural lapse had taken place.
Noting the couple's allegation of being forcibly separated, the court directed the DCP to submit a report on whether any unlawful separation had occurred and to identify the officer responsible, if any.
The plea further said that the woman had taken the decision to marry voluntarily, without any coercion.
The court directed the Delhi Police to continue providing them protection and accommodation in a safe house until they solemnise their marriage under the Special Marriage Act.
Meanwhile, the father's lawyer asserted that his client was deeply troubled by the fact that his daughter had taken the decision to marry the man without his consent. He further submitted that he was concerned for his daughter's welfare.
The bench said that a parent's anguish over their daughter choosing her life partner without consultation cannot eclipse the right of an adult to choose a life partner, since Article 21 of the Constitution safeguards an individual's right to marry a person of one's choice.
'The constitutional guarantee under Article 21 enables every adult citizen [to] shape the course of their own life, free from fear, coercion or unlawful restraint. The choice to marry, especially across lines of faith, may test the resilience of social norms and familial expectations, yet in law, it remains a matter of personal liberty and individual autonomy, immune from any external veto. While the anguish of a parent is understandable, it cannot eclipse the rights of a major to select their life partner,' the court said.
'The Court is mindful of the anguish of the girl's father, who opposes the relationship on grounds that he perceives as legitimate and rooted in his concern for his daughter's welfare. However, upon attaining the age of majority, the right to make decisions regarding marriage becomes the individual's personal prerogative. Parental preference, however well-intentioned, cannot legally override that autonomy,' it added.
The matter will be next heard on September 12.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Crime does not fade even after death'
SLUG: 1989 CUSTODIAL DEATH CASE Ahmedabad: In a significant judgment, the Gujarat high court on Thursday ordered the recovery of a penalty amount from the estate of a deceased cop convicted in a custodial death case, observing that "the crime does not fade even after death. " The case pertained to the custodial death of Kanudo alias Bhoplo at Savarkundla police station in Amreli district in October 1989. Several policemen were convicted in 2000 for the offence. You Can Also Check: Ahmedabad AQI | Weather in Ahmedabad | Bank Holidays in Ahmedabad | Public Holidays in Ahmedabad | Gold Rates Today in Ahmedabad | Silver Rates Today in Ahmedabad One of them, then police sub-inspector B C Bilaval, was sentenced to seven years' imprisonment and fined Rs 25,000. He challenged the conviction but died during the pendency of his appeal. His family members pursued the case to clear his name posthumously. After hearing the appeal, Justice Gita Gopi upheld Bilaval's conviction. Citing legal provisions, the court noted: "Fine, as per the provision of the CrPC, is recoverable from the movable and immovable property of the accused. Section 70 of IPC provides that the death of the offender does not discharge the property from liability and the fine would be payable even after the death of the offender and such fine is recoverable from the property of the deceased. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The #1 Mistake People with Ringing Ears Make Every Night in Bed Derila Ergo Undo " The high court directed the trial court to issue a warrant to the Amreli district collector for recovering the fine amount as arrears of land revenue from the deceased's movable or immovable assets, or both. While ordering the recovery of the fine amount, the HC stated, "It was not a crime buried with the grave, but was in police custody, where every police becomes answerable to the public for his custodial torture. The crime does not fade even after death." The judge further reminded law enforcement: "Let all the police be reminded of the fundamental right enshrined in our Constitution under Article 21 that 'no person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law'." Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Happy Independence Day wishes , messages , and quotes !


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Delhi's Game of Shadows: Secret terror drill plays out across city ahead of I-Day each year
What began in 1995 as a one-off preparedness exercise after the Jammu Mandi terror attack has evolved into an annual, month-long operation that plays out quietly across Delhi before Independence Day. Each year, the Delhi Police special cell plants fake bombs, stages dummy terror strikes, and deploys 'terrorists' carrying mock explosives — all to test the city's security apparatus without the knowledge of its civilian population. (Above) Security outside the Red Fort on Thursday, on the eve of the 79th Independence Day. The inspiration for these drills came in July 2015, when three gunmen in army fatigues stormed Punjab's Gurdaspur, hijacking a car, firing at a bus stand, and attacking a police station. (RAJ K RAJ /HT PHOTO) The drills are planned in complete secrecy. Only the deputy commissioner of the special cell knows the full blueprint — the chosen locations, the timing, and the decoys. Not even senior officers are privy to this information. 'We pick one district at a time, starting with crowded places like monuments, malls, markets, five-star hotels,' said a police office who has been part of the mock drill team. 'The devices have to be hidden well enough so that civilians don't stumble upon them, and we never use the same spot twice. The district staff can't know when or where we plant them. The operation's details are a complete secret.' The inspiration for these drills came in 1995, when an autorickhshaw filled with explosives detonated in the Mandi area of Jammu and killed more than 20 people and injured others. The incident was an unprecedented strike and prompted Delhi Police to prepare for the unexpected. A month later, in August 1995, they staged their first mock drill at Nizamuddin railway station, replicating elements of the Jammu attack. 'Back then, it wasn't well planned. We invited policemen and the public, planted IEDs, and staged a blast to see how people and police would react,' recalled a senior officer. In November 1995, a bomb blast in Delhi's popular restaurant Dilli Darbar left more than 20 people injured. The police then included Connaught Place and other crowded markets to their list of places where the drill would be held. Soon, the scope widened. Drills began targeting high-security spots such as the Red Fort, venues for Independence Day celebrations attended by the Prime Minister, as well as luxury hotels like the Taj and Claridges, and markets such as Sarojini Nagar and Connaught Place. For high-profile locations, the special cell makes detailed maps, fits dummy devices with GPS trackers, and dispatches covert teams to plant them. Sometimes, operatives play 'terrorists' carrying boxes of fake explosives, attempting to move undetected through sensitive areas. 'All materials are prepared well in advance and our staff is trained for such operations,' the officer said. Over the years, the drills have grown more elaborate — but so have the lapses. Officials admit that local police often fail to detect the mock threats. On August 8 this year, a dummy terrorist managed to enter the Red Fort, walk past multiple layers of security, and reach the children's enclosure with a fake explosives box, completely unnoticed. Just a week earlier, seven policemen were suspended over the arrest of five Bangladeshi nationals allegedly living illegally near the monument. Around the same time, the special cell also recovered two live cartridges from the area. Last year, local police managed to detect only about half of the dummy bombs planted near the Red Fort and in the Lutyens' zone. Senior special cell officers stress that the aim is not to embarrass the district police. 'It's not a competition,' one said. 'The idea is to keep them alert. If lapses occur, we call the teams in, discuss the misses, and brief them on improvements.' The tasks are intentionally difficult. 'We design them so they're tough to crack,' said an officer at police headquarters. Each year, close to 70 locations across Delhi — mostly in central, north, west, south, and New Delhi districts — are chosen for dummy bombs. Some sites are picked by the Special Branch, and paramilitary forces and other agencies are also roped in. 'It's purely for practice and to sharpen skills,' another officer said. 'Because when the real thing happens, there will be no second chance.'


NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
IPS Husband And Wife To Get Medals In Assam On Independence Day
Guwahati: In an interesting feat in the history of the Assam Police, an IPS couple from the state will be honoured with prestigious medals on Independence Day in Guwahati for their service to the nation. Guwahati's Commissioner of Police, Partha Sarathi Mahanta, 2006-batch IPS officer, has been conferred the President's Medal for Distinguished Service for his exceptional leadership and unwavering contribution to policing in the state. Mr Mahanta also heads the Assam Police's Special Task Force ( STF ). In the last couple of years, Mr Mahanta has been behind several successful operations of the Assam Police. From busting the fledging sleeper cell network of the Bangladesh-based Ansar ul Bangla Team (ABT), an affiliate of al-Qaeda in Indian Subcontinent (AQIS), to breakthrough in smashing narco networks, Mr Mahanta has left his mark in these recent successes. Terror group ISIS India's head Haris Farooqi alias Harish Ajmal Farukhi and his associate Anurag Singh alias Rehan were arrested in Assam's Dhubri district earlier this year after they crossed over from Bangladesh. Mr Mahanta's team had led the operation. Recently, under his watchful eyes, with help of the Army Intelligence, the Assam Police pulled off Operation Ghost SIM - several people have been arrested from across India for running a fake SIM card racket with links to Pakistani agents. Mr Mahanta's award is among 17 national medals conferred upon personnel of the Assam Police this year by the Ministry of Home Affairs. Three officers were awarded the Police Medal for Gallantry, recognising acts of exceptional bravery; 13 received the Police Medal for Meritorious Service, for consistent dedication, discipline, and contribution to policing. Indrani Baruah, IPS, Deputy Inspector General of Police (CWR) and wife of Mr Mahnata, will be conferred the Chief Minister's Special Service Medal in a Crisis Situation. The Governor of Assam announced the honours as part of this year's state awards to police personnel. In total, nine Assam Police officials received the Chief Minister's Special Service Medal in a Crisis Situation, while 35 officers were awarded the Chief Minister's Police Medal for Outstanding Service, recognising exceptional leadership, professionalism, and commitment to public safety.