Why Awami League banned again
Awami League, the majority party in the December 1970 general elections in Pakistan, was banned on March 26, 1971 when President General Yahya Khan refused to transfer power to the party. The banned League launched freedom movement and succeeded in carving the state of Bangladesh out of Pakistan. Thus, Awami League emerged as the founder party of Bangladesh, but ironically Prime Minister Sheikh Mujibur Rehman in January 1975 banned all political parties including, Awami League, and established one-party system in the newly-established country under Baksal party. Years after Mujib's assassination in August 1975, his daughter Sheikh Hasina revived Awami League and managed to come to power in 1996. Later, in 2009, Hasina assumed power for a second time and continued to lead the country till August 2024 when she had to escape to India due to a popular movement against her government. In May 2025, the interim government of Dr Muhammad Yunus banned the League.
Despite Hasina's autocratic and repressive rule spanning more than 15 years, Awami League still has its support base in Bangladesh. Thus the ban on the party might be counter-productive. In its May 12, 2025 issue, The Diplomat writes, "Bangladesh's interim government has banned all activities, including the online presence, of the Awami League (AL), led by former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, until the ongoing trials for crimes against humanity and genocide involving its leaders - these relate to the party's deadly crackdown on the July uprising of 2024 - are concluded."
Why has the interim government banned Awami League and how will it impact the polarised politics of Bangladesh? Will Awami League resurface under the new name? What will be the implications of the ban?
When banned in March 1971 by the military regime in Pakistan, Awami League faced charges of sedition. Banned for the second time, in May 2025, the party is fighting allegations of extrajudicial killings and corruption for which its leaders, including former PM Hasina, are under trial.
The Diplomat further writes, "The decision, which came nine months after Hasina's ouster from power by students-led mass protests, has been taken under the Anti-Terrorism Act, which was enacted by the AL back in 2009. The interim government banned the Bangladesh Chhatra League (BCL), the AL's notorious student wing, under the same act on October 23 last year. The ban on the AL marks a significant escalation in Bangladesh's turbulent political landscape. It also raises questions about the efficacy and implications of banning political parties in a country with a history of such measures."
A few weeks ago, a massive demonstration held outside the residence of Dr Yunus by the newly formed National Citizens Party (NCP) and Jamaat-e-Islami demanded that Awami League be banned because of its role in crushing the student movement of July-August 2024 in which more than 1,400 people were killed. Surprisingly, Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) also welcomed the ban on Awami League even though it had opposed it in October last year. New Delhi has also, quite understandably, criticised the ban, saying it undermines democracy and is meant to promote an exclusive mode of politics.
Despite the fall in Hasina's popularity, particularly due to her taking refuge in India, Awami League is not at all a dead horse and its role in Bangladeshi politics cannot be dismissed. The vacuum left behind due the ban on the League cannot be filed by NCP, Jamaat or BNP. The League will not remain under Hasina's influence forever, and a new leadership will emerge and try to restore its vote bank. As The Diplomat aptly remarked, "The ban on the AL has major implications for Bangladesh. Its removal from the political arena leaves a vacuum in the ideological space once dominated by Bengali nationalism. Since before the country's independence, Bengali nationalism has been the AL's ideological cornerstone and a unifying political tool to justify its regime and marginalize opposition voices, especially those promoting religious or ethnic identity politics."
The ban on Awami League will have three major ramifications:
One, the credibility of the caretaker government will dwindle because it has neither the mandate nor the legitimacy to take major policy decisions. Banning Bangladesh's founder party and attempting to erase Sheikh Mujib from the minds of people - by removing his picture from the currency notes - will not work. Furthermore, taking a decision under the influence of NCP or Jamaat reflects how fragile the caretaker government is. The reports that Dr Yunus wants to resign as the interim chief executive of the country also reflect how vulnerable the caretaker government has become due to the growing resentment against his failure to hold national elections.
Two, Awami League still has a network that is collaborating with India. It's because the decades of the League rule had deepened New Delhi's influence in Bangladeshi bureaucracy, judiciary and civil society. The League-RAW nexus is no secret and India's reaction to the ban on the League is understandable. Economic predicament of Bangladesh and the growing restrictions by New Delhi on trade shipments from Indian ports will have negative fallout on Dhaka. With Bangladesh surrounded by India from three sides and having to grapple with a colossal Indian influence on its media, civil society, bureaucracy and judiciary, the caretaker government of Dr Yunus will be unable to fully protect the sovereignty of Bangladesh. Hundreds and thousands of patients from Bangladesh seek medical treatment in Indian hospitals which may not be possible anymore because of the growing visa restrictions imposed by the Indian missions. China and Pakistan cannot be a substitute to Bangladeshi nationals in the context of medical treatment.
And three, the reports of a rift between the Bangladesh army chief and the caretaker chief executive reflect growing schism between the two pillars of power. The army chief is perturbed over the growing influence of Islamists in Bangladesh under the alleged patronage of the caretaker government. While BNP is demanding general elections this year, there are suspicions that the caretaker government wants to prolong its hold on power. In that case, Bangladesh will plunge into another phase of chaos and disorder.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
5 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Diplomatic success at UN
Listen to article Pakistan has been appointed vice chair of the UNSC Counter-Terrorism Committee and chair of the UNSC panel that oversees the implementation of sanctions on the Afghan Taliban. The pair of moves is not just a recognition of the success of the government in disassociating itself from militancy, but also a slap in the face for India, which has been sending delegations to world capitals to convince them that Pakistan was behind the Pahalgam terrorist attack. The appointments mean that Pakistan — currently one of the rotating members of the UNSC — will have a prominent voice during policymaking, and could well be the loudest voice in the room when it comes to reexamining sanctions on Afghanistan. It is worth noting that just days before Pakistan became chair of the sanctions panel, New Delhi had been sweet-talking Kabul, and anti-Pakistan terrorism from across the border had been on the rise. Since the thaw, the Afghan Taliban have begun taking concrete steps to address terrorism originating on its soil and other CBMs. Meanwhile, India has been left out in the cold, something that is becoming the norm in world capitals. In fact, the events of the past few days show that India's efforts to malign Pakistan have not only failed, but have even backfired. Pakistan is getting support from several countries at the UN and elsewhere, partly due to Islamabad's own diplomatic efforts, but also due to India's refusal to provide any proof to incriminate Pakistan in the terrorist attack. Meanwhile, New Delhi's own state-sponsored terrorism — assassination attempts on overseas dissidents — have led to Prime Minister Narendra Modi getting snubbed by the G7 at a time when it is trying to portray itself as a global diplomatic power. But beyond the comparative diplomatic successes and failures of Pakistan and India, Islamabad has a golden opportunity to use its expertise and relationship with Kabul to influence positive changes in Afghanistan, while also strengthening its credentials as a leader in global security policymaking.
Business Recorder
8 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Palestinian detained in France after rabbi hit with chair
PARIS: A Palestinian man was taken into custody after he threw a chair at a rabbi on a cafe terrace in a wealthy Paris suburb, a police source told AFP, in an attack France's main Jewish association condemned as antisemitic. According to the source, the suspect attacked Rabbi Elie Lemmel in the western Paris suburb of Neuilly-sur-Seine. Lemmel, who wore a traditional kippah cap and a long beard, was taken to hospital with a head injury. The assailant was arrested. Wife of detained Palestinian Columbia student says she was naive to believe he was safe from arrest The attacker is a Palestinian man residing illegally in Germany, said a source close to the case, adding that the man benefits from a status that offers a form of protection for people who cannot be deported to a conflict zone. An investigation has been launched into aggravated assault, prosecutors said. The rabbi said he had been attacked twice in the space of a week. Last Friday he was attacked in the northwestern town of Deauville when three drunk individuals hit him in the stomach. On Friday, the rabbi was talking to a person he had arranged to meet when he was attacked, receiving 'a huge blow to the head'. 'I fell to the ground and heard people shouting 'stop him', and I realised that I had just been attacked,' he told broadcaster BFMTV. 'I am very afraid that we are living in a world where words are generating more and more evil,' he said. The French Jewish community, one of the largest in the world, has faced a number of attacks and desecrations of memorials since the Gaza war erupted on October 7, 2023. In January, the Representative Council of Jewish Institutions of France (CRIF) deplored what it called a 'historic' level of antisemitic acts. While welcoming the fact that attack was not fatal, Prime Minister Francois Bayrou deplored 'the radicalisation of public debate.' 'Day after day, our country is plagued by clashes fuelled by hatred,' he told reporters, also pointing to assaults against 'our Muslim compatriots'. The CRIF condemned 'in the strongest possible terms the anti-Semitic attack on the rabbi'. 'In a general context where hatred of Israel fuels the stigmatisation of Jews on a daily basis, this attack is yet another illustration of the toxic climate targeting French Jews,' the CRIF said on X. Yonathan Arfi, the CRIF president, said: 'Nothing, not even solidarity with the Palestinians, can ever justify attacking a rabbi.' France's Holocaust memorial, three Paris synagogues and a restaurant were vandalised with paint last week. A judge has charged three Serbs with vandalising the Jewish sites 'to serve the interests of a foreign power', a judicial source said on Friday. In 2024, a total of 1,570 antisemitic acts were recorded in France, according to the interior ministry. Officials say the number of such crimes has increased in the wake of the attack on Israel on October 7, 2023 by Palestinian militant group Hamas, which resulted in the deaths of 1,218 people. The attack was followed by relentless Israeli bombardment of the Gaza Strip, which the Hamas-run health ministry has said resulted in the deaths of at least 54,677 people, and an aid blockade.
Express Tribune
11 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Bangladesh announces elections in April 2026, says Yunus
'The government has been doing everything necessary to create an environment conducive to holding the election,' says Yunus Listen to article Bangladesh will hold elections in early April 2026 for the first time since a mass uprising overthrew the government last year, interim leader Muhammad Yunus said Friday. The South Asian nation of around 170 million people has been in political turmoil since former prime minister Sheikh Hasina was ousted by a student-led revolt in August 2024, ending her iron-fisted rule of 15 years. 'I am announcing to the citizens of the country that the election will be held on any day in the first half of April 2026,' said Yunus, the 84-year-old Nobel Peace Prize winner who leads the caretaker government. Political parties jostling for power have been repeatedly demanding Yunus fix an election timetable, while he has said time is needed as the country requires an overhaul of its democratic institutions after Hasina's tenure. 'The government has been doing everything necessary to create an environment conducive to holding the election,' he added in the television broadcast, while repeating his warning that reforms were needed. 'It should be remembered that Bangladesh has plunged into deep crisis every time it has held a flawed election,' he said, in a speech given on the eve of the Eid al-Adha holiday in the Muslim-majority nation. 'A political party usurped power through such elections in the past, and became a barbaric fascist force.' Hasina's rule saw widespread human rights abuses, and her government was accused of politicising courts and the civil service, as well as staging lopsided elections. The interim government had already repeatedly vowed to hold elections before June 2026, but said the more time it had to enact reforms, the better. Reform of 'utmost importance' The key Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), seen as the election frontrunner, has in recent weeks been pushing hard for polls to be held by December. Army chief General Waker-Uz-Zaman, in a speech to officers in May, also said that elections should be held by December, according to both Bangladeshi media and military sources. Days after that speech, the government warned that political power struggles risked jeopardising gains that have been made. 'Those who organise such elections are later viewed as culprits, and those who assume office through them become targets of public hatred,' Yunus said on Friday. 'One of the biggest responsibilities of this government is to ensure a transparent… and widely participatory election so that the country does not fall into a new phase of crisis,' he added. 'That is why institutional reform is of utmost importance.'
