India should take a cue from Vietnam, Japan and insist written statement before announcing US trade deal: GTRI
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
Referring to purported differences in understanding of US trade agreements and their clauses with Vietnam and Japan , think tank Global Trade Research Initiative GTRI ) suggested that India tread carefully as it negotiates its trade agreement with the US.GTRI, in a report released on Sunday, called for India to take a cue from the experiences of countries like Vietnam and Japan and insisted that India should ask for a jointly issued, written statement before acknowledging any agreement.There appears to be a contradiction in the understanding of the recently agreed-upon trade deals between the US and Vietnam, as well as the US and Japan.Citing a Japanese government document released on July 25, GTRI asserted that it revealed significant discrepancies between Japan's understanding of a new trade deal with the US and how President Donald Trump had portrayed it."To avoid similar misrepresentation, India must insist on a jointly issued, written statement before acknowledging any agreement," GTRI suggested.Trump claimed on July 22 that the agreement secures massive Japanese investments, strong tariff protections, and guaranteed access for U.S. farm exports, including rice. However, Japan's official summary, published by its Cabinet Secretariat, describes a far more limited framework, still under negotiation and lacking binding commitments, according to GTRI analysis.Trump stated that Japan would invest USD 550 billion in the U.S., with 90 per cent of the profits remaining in America. But Japan's version tells a different story. It says the USD 550 billion includes a mix of equity, loans, and guarantees from state-backed institutions, not a lump-sum investment.Trump announced that Japan would significantly open its markets to US agricultural exports, including rice.However, according to a Japanese government document cited by GTRI, this limitation is restricted to procurement under its existing Minimum Access (MA) scheme, and only applies "depending on domestic demand and supply conditions."In effect, Japan reserves the right not to import US rice if there is no market need.Another area of divergence is found in automotive exports, as noted by GTRI.Trump claimed Japan would remove additional safety testing for US-made vehicles.Japan's document, according to GTRI, confirms that it will allow imports of American cars without additional testing, provided they meet Japanese road safety standards."In other words, this is not a blanket exemption; US manufacturers must still comply with Japanese technical norms," GTRI inferred.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
7 minutes ago
- NDTV
Did Donald Trump Cheat During Golf Game? Video From Scotland Sparks Row
Edinburgh: US President Donald Trump was in Scotland over the weekend, where he played golf at his Trump Turnberry golf course. But social media users soon got hold of a clip that appears to show the American leader cheating in the sport he claims to love-- the latest in a long line of cheating accusations against the 79-year-old on the golf course. A now-viral video, recorded during Trump's Saturday round, shows Trump arriving at a bunker in a cart. He is followed by a caddie in a red vest, who was purportedly seen tossing a ball into the light rough near a bunker, just short of the sand trap. The move seemed to improve the American president's lie before he exited his golf cart. Trump working hard to bring down grocery prices — PatriotTakes 🇺🇸 (@patriottakes) July 27, 2025 Trump reportedly played 18 holes with his son Eric and US Ambassador Warren Stephens at Turnberry during the trip that included trade talks with EU chief Ursula von der Leyen. The latest controversy adds to sports writer Rick Reilly's claim that "Trump is the worst cheat ever" on the golf course. The former Sports Illustrated columnist, who wrote the book titled "Commander in Cheat: How Golf Explains Trump", said in a 2019 interview that the Republican would "cheat you on the course and then buy you lunch." Reilly, who reportedly played the self-regulated sport with Trump, had called the President a habitual manipulator. "I always say golf is like bicycle shorts. It reveals a lot about a man. And golf reveals a lot of ugliness in this president," he said, according to a report by The Guardian. Neither the President nor the White House have issued any statement on the renewed 'cheating' allegations yet. The clip also divided social media users, with several accusing Trump of cheating while others joking about his focus on golf amid trade negotiations. "Trump caught cheating at golf, watch the second guy in the red vest toss a ball behind him," one X user wrote. "Watch his caddy drop the ball in a more favourable location for him. First, he cheated on his wife with children, and now he's cheating at golf. What low will he not stoop to?" another person wrote. "Trump working hard to bring down grocery prices," a third person quipped. The US President's fairness in the port he claims to love has long been questioned, with veterans like Mick Mulvaney noting his competitive edge. The Turnberry incident, while not conclusive proof of cheating, adds to scrutiny over his sportsmanship.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
7 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump strikes 'biggest ever' trade deal with EU: Here's what we know, what we don't
The US and European Union have struck a landmark trade deal imposing a 15 per cent tariff on most EU goods, averting Trump's threatened 30 per cent levy. The agreement promises $750 billion in US energy sales and $600 billion in EU investments, but leaves key issues unresolved read more The United States and the European Union have struck one of the most consequential trade agreements in recent years. Announced by US President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen during Trump's visit to Scotland, the pact establishes a 15 per cent tariff on most EU exports to America, replacing the looming threat of a 30 per cent levy that would have taken effect on August 1. While hailed as a breakthrough, the framework leaves crucial gaps unresolved. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Both sides have presented the deal as a way to prevent a transatlantic trade confrontation, yet analysts are now parsing the details to understand exactly what has been agreed — and where negotiations must continue. The headline numbers: a 15 per cent tariff, billions in investment and major energy commitments. At the centre of the announcement is a 15 per cent tariff applied to 'the vast majority' of European goods shipped to the US — a rate lower than Trump's earlier proposals of 20 per cent and subsequent threats of 50 per cent and then 30 per cent, but still a dramatic jump from the near-zero tariff environment that existed before Trump's return to the White House. The deal is tied to two large European commitments. First, von der Leyen confirmed that the EU would purchase $750 billion (638 billion euros) worth of US natural gas, oil, and nuclear fuel, part of its continuing effort to pivot away from Russian energy sources. Second, European entities would invest $600 billion (511 billion euros) into the US economy, though the sources of this investment have not yet been disclosed. Standing alongside von der Leyen in Scotland, Trump celebrated the outcome, saying: 'I think this is the biggest deal ever made,' and praised the agreement as an expansion of US-EU ties. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He argued that the deal would benefit both sides, claiming it would stabilise trade and create new opportunities for American farmers, energy companies and manufacturers. Von der Leyen, who led months of complex negotiations on behalf of the European Commission, described Trump as a 'tough negotiator' and acknowledged the compromise: 'The 15% rate was the best we could do.' She added that the deal would 'bring stability' and 'predictability' for companies on both sides of the Atlantic. Zero tariffs on these 'strategic' goods Although the 15 per cent tariff applies broadly — including on key sectors like cars, semiconductors and pharmaceuticals — there are notable carve-outs. Both sides agreed to zero tariffs on certain 'strategic' goods: Aircraft and aircraft parts Select chemicals Some generic drugs Semiconductor production equipment A range of agricultural items Critical raw materials and natural resources Von der Leyen stressed that the list is not final: 'We will keep working to add more products to this list.' Even with these exemptions, major questions linger. Tariff treatment for spirits remains unresolved, an issue of particular sensitivity given its impact on producers and consumers in both the US and the EU. Pharmaceuticals — a massive trade category — were intentionally left off the main deal. 'Pharmaceuticals were on a separate sheet of paper,' von der Leyen explained, meaning discussions will continue separately. A major flashpoint is steel. Trump made clear that his administration's 50 per cent tariff on imported steel — introduced earlier as part of his broader trade agenda — would remain in place. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Von der Leyen signalled a willingness to keep talking about potentially replacing that tariff with a quota system, which would cap the amount of steel allowed into the US at lower duty rates. What this means for Americans & Europeans While the 15 per cent tariff avoided the heavier blow of 30 per cent, it still represents a seismic change. Prior to Trump's presidency, average US tariffs on European goods hovered around 1–1.5 per cent; the European Union's own tariffs on American products were similarly low. Trump himself had instituted a 10 per cent 'baseline tariff' while negotiations were ongoing — high enough that the European Commission downgraded its 2025 growth forecast from 1.3 per cent to 0.9 per cent earlier this year. The new tariff effectively cements that higher-cost reality. Import taxes of this scale force two choices for companies selling into the US market: raise prices for American consumers — risking market share — or absorb the cost through lower profit margins. European exporters are bracing for the impact. The Federation of German Industries warned of serious consequences, with senior official Wolfgang Niedermark stating: 'Even a 15 per cent tariff rate will have immense negative effects on export-oriented German industry.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump insists that the tariffs are a tool for fairness, pointing to the long-standing trade imbalance between the two economies. Before his return to office, the US-EU trade relationship — worth around €1.7 trillion ($2 trillion) annually — was largely balanced in services but heavily tilted in goods: in 2024, the EU posted a €198 billion trade surplus with the US. How Europe has reacted Reactions in Europe have been cautious but largely positive — driven by relief that a full-scale trade war has been avoided. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz welcomed the outcome, saying it prevented 'an unnecessary escalation in transatlantic trade relations' and preserved 'our core interests.' He added, however, that 'I would have very much wished for further relief in transatlantic trade.' Markets showed mild optimism. The euro rose about 0.2 per cent against the dollar, sterling, and yen within an hour of the announcement — a sign that investors were reassured by the removal of Trump's August 1 tariff threat. Economists, however, are urging caution. Carsten Brzeski, global chief of macroeconomics at ING, summed up the hesitation, 'The big caveat to today's deal is that there is nothing on paper, yet. With this disclaimer in mind and at face value, today's agreement would clearly bring an end to the uncertainty of recent months. An escalation of the US-EU trade tensions would have been a severe risk for the global economy. This risk seems to have been avoided.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD What about the auto industry Among the industries most affected by Trump's tariffs is the European auto sector. Until now, European carmakers had been paying a 27.5 per cent tariff — made up of Trump's 25 per cent tariff on all imported cars plus the preexisting 2.5 per cent duty. The new agreement cuts that total to 15 per cent, a meaningful reduction but still far above historical norms. Von der Leyen pointed out that the new rate is 'much lower' than the current burden, making it easier for carmakers to sell into the US. Yet for major automakers, the damage has already been done. Volkswagen reported a €1.3 billion ($1.5 billion) hit to profits in the first half of 2025 alone due to higher tariffs. Mercedes-Benz, while somewhat shielded by its Tuscaloosa, Alabama production plant — which makes 35 per cent of Mercedes vehicles sold in the US — warned of 'significant increases' in car prices in coming years. Dealers have said they are holding prices steady 'until further notice,' but acknowledge hikes are coming. Japan deal with a lot of holes The new EU agreement resembles the framework Trump struck with Japan a week earlier, which carried a $550 billion price tag. Like that deal, the EU pact leaves major details unsettled and is being cast by the White House as a victory in its push to 'rebalance' global trade. Trump has long argued that the EU was formed to disadvantage the US economically. He has claimed that tariffs have generated 'hundreds of billions of dollars' in revenue for the American government and dismissed warnings from economists about inflationary effects. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This latest deal fits into his administration's broader goal of signing '90 deals in 90 days' — a goal officials admit hasn't been met, but which has already yielded agreements with UK, Japan, Indonesia and Vietnam. Senior US officials underscored the scale of this latest accord. 'Remember, their economy is $20 trillion … they are five times bigger than Japan,' one official said during a briefing to reporters. 'So the opportunity of opening their market is enormous for our farmers, our fishermen, our ranchers, all our industrial products, all our businesses.' Why the deal is still incomplete Not every issue was resolved in Scotland. Spirits remain a particularly thorny topic, with both US bourbon makers and European wine and liquor producers awaiting clarity on whether they will face tariffs. Steel and aluminium, too, remain at the top of the agenda. Trump is keeping the 50 per cent steel tariff intact, while the EU is pushing for talks to turn it into a quota-based system. There's also the question of pharmaceuticals and non-tariff barriers. US officials claim Europe has agreed to reduce some of these regulatory barriers for automobiles and certain agricultural goods — but EU officials counter that the specifics are still under discussion. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump has also reserved the right to raise tariffs again if the EU fails to follow through on its investment and energy-buying pledges, according to senior administration figures. The US and EU together represent 44 per cent of global GDP, and their trade flows total nearly €1.7 trillion ($2 trillion) annually. For decades, this partnership thrived on low tariffs and deep economic integration, with US goods tariffs averaging 1.47 per cent and EU tariffs on U.S. products averaging 1.35 per cent, according to the Brussels-based Bruegel think tank. Trump's tariffs — starting with steel, then cars, and now a sweeping 15 per cent rate — have disrupted that status quo. With inputs from agencies
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
7 minutes ago
- Business Standard
New York to Tokyo: Japan proposes capital for UN office relocation
Tokyo Governor Yuriko Koike has proposed relocating certain functions of the United Nations (UN) to Japan's capital, citing safety, security, and the cost advantages of operating in Tokyo due to the weak yen, according to several Japanese media outlets. Koike met with UN Secretary-General António Guterres at the organisation's headquarters in New York on July 24, where she expressed Tokyo's readiness to support a broader UN presence. The meeting was part of Koike's official visit to the United States. Speaking to reporters after the meeting, she said, 'Life in Tokyo is advantageous in terms of safety and security, and thanks to the weak yen.' Japan currently hosts several UN bodies, such as the United Nations University and an office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees. Trump admin policies driving cost-cutting and relocation Koike's comments come at a time when the UN is undertaking cost-cutting measures under pressure from the administration of US President Donald Trump. Rising expenses in New York have prompted the relocation of parts of the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) to Nairobi, Kenya, where operational costs are lower. Donald Trump withdraws US from major UN programmes Meanwhile, the United States, under President Trump, has been withdrawing its involvement from several UN programmes. In January, shortly after taking office for his second term, Trump announced the US' withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO). On February 4, Trump signed an executive order pulling the US out of the UN Human Rights Council and cutting funding to the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), citing anti-Israel bias and institutional failure. Last week, he announced the US' formal withdrawal from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (Unesco), effective end-2026. The latest withdrawal was criticised by Unesco Director-General Audrey Azoulay, who stated it contradicts the principles of multilateralism and may impact the agency's partnerships in the US. Several United Nations offices, including UN headquarters, and affiliated agencies operate in the United States, primarily centred in New York City, but also Washington, DC, and other locations. Koike cites weak yen and Tokyo's readiness for UN office relocation Although Koike did not present a specific proposal during the meeting, she had previously suggested transferring functions of UN agencies, including the UN Security Council, the World Health Organisation (WHO), and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), during a session at the Tokyo Metropolitan Assembly in June. Guterres responded that the UN has received similar cooperation offers from other parts of the world. Japan has recently made other moves to enhance its global engagement, including a proposal to host an Asian branch of the International Criminal Court in 2023. Koike's push for Tokyo comes as the UN marks its 80th anniversary this year.
