logo
Three accused get seven-year RI after pleading guilty

Three accused get seven-year RI after pleading guilty

BENGALURU: Marking the first conviction in the 2020 KG Halli-DJ Halli riots case, a special National Investigation Agency (NIA) court on Wednesday sentenced three accused, who had pleaded guilty during the framing of charges, to seven years rigorous imprisonment with penalty.
Accused no. 14 Syed Ikramuddin alias Syed Naveed (44), A-16 Syed Asif (46) and A-18 Mohammed Atif (26) were charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the Karnataka Prevention of Destruction and Loss of Property Act (KPDLP) and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).
On August 11, 2020, a mob attacked the KG Halli and DJ Halli police stations as well as the residence of Congress MLA Akhanda Srinivas Murthy. The violence was triggered by a provocative social media post allegedly made by the MLA's nephew, Naveen. The riots involved incidents of stone throwing, petrol bomb attacks and assaults on police personnel. Four people died when the police opened fire to bring the situation under control.
Of the 199 accused in the case, 187 have been arrested and chargesheets filed against 138. The NIA took over the investigation on September 21, 2020, and filed its chargesheet on February 2, 2021. The NIA also established that the accused had links to the banned Popular Front of India (PFI).
'The police are charged with the duty of maintaining law and order as well as public order. When such custodians of law and order are attacked, public confidence in the efficiency of the police is likely to be shaken, thereby disturbing public order. We, the people, feel secure when we have a robust police force. The act of the accused in torching the KG Halli police station has shaken the confidence of the public and their sense of security,' said special public prosecutor for NIA, Bengaluru, P Prasanna Kumar.
He added, 'This judgment has not only restored public confidence in the police force, but has also vindicated the action of the Central government in declaring the Popular Front of India (PFI) as an unlawful association.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Interstate firearms syndicate busted, one arrested with 10 pistols
Interstate firearms syndicate busted, one arrested with 10 pistols

Hindustan Times

time24 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Interstate firearms syndicate busted, one arrested with 10 pistols

Police have arrested a 'key member of an inter-state illegal firearms syndicate' and recovered a large cache of weapons including 10 semi-automatic pistols from his possession on Wednesday evening, in a major crackdown ahead of Independence Day, officials said on Saturday. An FIR under Section 25(8) of the Arms (Amendment) Act, 2019, has been registered at Sarita Vihar police station. (Representational image) According to the police, the accused, identified as Amit Kumar, 29, a resident of Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, was nabbed near the Kos Minar roundabout in Jasola by the Special Task Force (STF) of Delhi Police's southeast district. The arrest yielded 10 semi-automatic pistols of .32 bore, 20 live cartridges and seven extra magazines, in addition to the 10 standard magazines supplied with the weapons — a total of 17 magazines, said deputy commissioner of police (southeast) Hemant Tiwari. 'Acting on month-long surveillance of known firearms suppliers in Madhya Pradesh, STF teams developed specific intelligence about Kumar's movements. A trap was laid between 8.30pm and 9.30pm at the Jasola location. At 8.45pm, Kumar, carrying a bag, was intercepted by a police team. A search of the bag revealed the consignment,' he said. He said that Kumar had procured the arms from a manufacturer in Dhar, Madhya Pradesh. 'During interrogation, he admitted to having supplied over 150 pistols in Delhi-NCR in the past two years, catering primarily to criminal networks. He also admitted that he had bought each pistol for ₹12,000–15,000 in Madhya Pradesh and sold them to criminals for ₹30,000–40,000 in Delhi-NCR and other states. Initially roped in by a fellow villager, he began as a courier but soon established his own distribution network. Kumar, a graduate, also worked as a recovery agent in a private bank in UP's Bhadohi district,' he added. An FIR under Section 25(8) of the Arms (Amendment) Act, 2019, has been registered at Sarita Vihar police station. 'Efforts are on to identify and nab other members of the syndicate. The recovery has dealt a significant blow to illegal arms trafficking in the region, especially ahead of the high-security Independence Day period,' Tiwari added.

EC delists 334 parties for failing to follow norms of registration
EC delists 334 parties for failing to follow norms of registration

Indian Express

time24 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

EC delists 334 parties for failing to follow norms of registration

The Election Commission on Saturday said it has delisted 344 Registered Unrecognised Political Parties (RUPPs) for failing to comply with the conditions for registration as political parties under the Representation of the People Act, 1951. As per the Act, parties have to give details, including names, addresses and details of office-bearers, during the registration and have to inform the Election Commission if there are changes in the details. The parties will also be delisted if they don't contest any elections for six years. In an order passed on Saturday, the EC said these 334 parties were 'found to be non-existent at their registered address after a physical verification' and had also not contested any elections since 2019. In June, the EC had asked the Chief Electoral Officers (CEO) of states and Union Territories to verify if 345 RUPPs were meeting these conditions. 'CEOs conducted enquiries, issued show-cause notices to these RUPPs and provided each party an opportunity to respond… 334 RUPPs… have been found not complying with the above conditions…,' an EC statement said.

Delhi HC upholds conviction of man accused of acid attack in 2009
Delhi HC upholds conviction of man accused of acid attack in 2009

Hindustan Times

time24 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Delhi HC upholds conviction of man accused of acid attack in 2009

An acid attack driven by frustration over a refusal to marry is not only among the most heinous crimes against women, but is also a blatant violation of someone's fundamental right to live with dignity, the Delhi High Court observed as it upheld the conviction of a 27-year-old man for throwing acid on a 16-year-old girl after she rejected his marriage proposal Delhi HC upholds conviction of man accused of acid attack in 2009 A bench of justice Neena Bansal Krishna, in a ruling released on Friday, dismissed the man's appeal against his 2012 conviction, describing the case as an 'unfortunate incident.' The assault took place in 2009 when the Class 10 student was on her way to school. According to the prosecution, the accused stopped her and threw acid on her face from a steel glass. The attack was the culmination of months of harassment. Seven to nine months earlier, the man had been stalking the girl and pressuring her to marry him. He even took her to court under false pretences and had her sign documents. When she ultimately refused to marry him, he retaliated with the acid attack. The trial court had convicted him under Indian Penal Code sections 341 (wrongful restraint) and 326 (causing grievous hurt by dangerous means) and sentenced him to five years' imprisonment in July 2012. He was later released on bail in October that year. While the man challenged his conviction on grounds of contradictions in witness statements, the victim sought an enhancement of the sentence, citing that he attacked her again with a surgical blade while out on bail. Delhi Police told the court that the acid attack caused 15 to 18% superficial deep burns, leaving the victim with lasting trauma and mental agony. Rejecting the appeal, the court said, 'Attacking a victim with acid out of frustration over refusal to marry is one of the most heinous crimes against women and a blatant violation of human dignity… such cases are a direct attack on human rights, particularly the right to life and dignity.' The court observed that acid attack victims face lifelong trauma, enduring both physical pain and emotional scars. It refused to enhance the punishment, noting the convict had already been sentenced to seven years in the separate case of the later blade attack, but directed him to surrender within 10 days.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store