Lawyer shaves his head in protest but misses a spot
A lawyer brought out a shaver in front of reporters to protest his government's failure to constitute an assembly for the fiftieth time in a row.
Standing in front of the Kosovo Assembly in Prishtina, attorney Arianit Koci defiantly shaved his white locks as onlookers filmed in awe.
He said of his actions: 'They are a symbolic act. Our statehood in Kosovo is also being threatened. Friends and enemies are becoming convinced that we are not capable of maintaining a state.'
Though his actions were done to make a point, it appears the passion of the moment caused him to miss quite a few patches of hair. It can always grow back, right?
Koci has been met with support from Kosovans, who applauded his individual protest.
One supporter wrote: 'You are the clear conscience of the nation! Every action of yours fills me with hope, and gives me the message that this country has no end.'
Another added: 'Respect. Don't mess with these fools.'
But the bizarre antics came as tensions in Kosovo continue to rise, as a political stalemate has persisted months after MPs were voted into office.
The deadlock stems from the fact that outgoing Prime Minister Albin Kurti's party Vetevendosje, which topped February polls, did not win enough seats to have its choice for speaker installed.
PM Kurti has been accused by other MPs of 'overthrowing constitutional order' in Kosovo by not forming an assembly 162 days after the elections.
'162 days is not a lot for Albin Kurti because for him, this time is part of a plan. For the overthrow of the constitutional order, for the delegitimisation of democracy and institutions and for the undoing of the very DNA of our society.
'You will not succeed because this is not just a political crisis, it is a moral crisis, and we must stop it,' MP Vlora Çitaku said.
Koci brought donkeys (notoriously stubborn animals) outside the parliament last month in another form of protest about the deadlock.
Kosovo is no stranger to wild political moments. In 2023, chaos erupted when an opposition party member sprayed water at PM Kurti.
The brawl became so heated that police got involved to separate the politicians. More Trending
Kosovo declared independence in 2008 from Serbia. The country's independence has continued to be threatened by Serbian nationalists.
The war between Kosovo and Serbia in the late 1990s saw thousands of ethnic Albanian Kosovars murdered by Serbian troops in what many dubbed a genocide.
The war ended when NATO intervened by beginning air strikes in March 1999, lasting a total of 78 days, which resulted in forces withdrawing from Kosovo.
By the end of the conflict, nearly 90% of Kosovo's Albanian population had been displaced. Many fled to neighbouring countries, including Albania and Macedonia.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Ragtag Zohran Mamdani protest likened to Netflix comedy sketch
MORE: Deaths, fires and prison breaks: The mystery behind the eerie Annabelle doll
MORE: Burglar takes 30 seconds to steal rare Pokémon cards worth £80,000 from shop
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
8 hours ago
- The National
Trump acts like a tinpot Caesar demanding tribute from his vassals
His recent sojourn to Turnberry, that gilded monument to his vulgarity, was not a diplomatic mission but a thuggish display of extortion, a brazen shakedown of Europe's ruling elites by a man whose grasp of statecraft is as profound as his understanding of basic syntax. Trump, that oafish imbecile, that blustering buffoon, conducts himself not as a statesman but as a swaggering mob boss, squeezing concessions from his subordinates with all the subtlety of a knee-capping enforcer. His meeting with Ursula von der Leyen was less a negotiation than a ritual humiliation, as the European Commission president prostrated herself before the whims of an American imperialist regime that views trade not as mutual exchange but as plunder. READ MORE: Scottish Labour councillor suspended for 'bullying' member of the public The resulting 'deal' is a grotesque farce – Europe, trembling before its mercantile overlord, agrees to higher tariffs, coerced purchases of US goods, and the funnelling of billions into the maw of the American war machine. This is not diplomacy; it is tribute exacted by a gangster. And what of Keir Starmer, that eager supplicant, scurrying to Turnberry to kiss the ring of his transatlantic patron? His obsequiousness was met with the usual Trumpian blend of ignorance and malice – vague platitudes on Ukraine, half-brained mutterings on Gaza, and the usual litany of lies about stolen aid and imaginary victories. Starmer, ever the loyal vassal, could do little but nod along, his own political fortunes tethered to the whims of a man who views international relations as a protection racket. But let us not mistake this for mere farce. The stakes are dire. The European bourgeoisie, though seething at their subjugation, dare not defy their American paymasters, for fear of provoking an all-out trade war – or worse, losing the military backing that sustains their own imperialist ventures in Ukraine. They are trapped in a spiral of their own making, forced to bankroll US arms shipments, to prop up Nato's blood-soaked adventures, all while their own workers face the coming storm of economic devastation. History teaches us that empires built on extortion do not endure. The Roman tax farmers, the Habsburg enforcers, the British East India Company – all eventually crumbled beneath the weight of their own rapacity. Trump's gangster diplomacy is no different. It will end the same way. Alan Hinnrichs Dundee ON Monday, we were informed on BBC Scotland that a celebration had taken place in respect of the 70th anniversary of the opening of the Dounreay nuclear power plant. In attendance was a chap calling himself King Charles and a non-Scottish manager of the site who made me feel squeamish as I listened to his sycophantic fawning over the said King's attendance. Can I just clarify the background to this development back in 1955? The idea of developing nuclear energy at that time was filled with the possibility of a major disaster happening. The year, 1955, was just a decade after the horrific Hiroshima and Nagasaki tragedies. Nuclear weapons and power production were issues of dread for the general population. So, if this development was going to happen, where should it go? Obviously, Westminster decided that it should be located as far away from London as possible. Look at your map and you will see that Dounreay is as far from London as you can get without ending up in the Pentland Firth. The residents of Thurso and Wick would be obliterated if anything untoward happened, but they were expendable. In fact, probably most of Scotland would end up the same way. I was a wee boy in a small rural Highland primary school back in the mid-50s. I well remember the gift we were all given at that school. It was a glossy magazine with the front cover showing the impressive Dounreay dome. It was designed at deflecting attention from the dangers and promoting the idea that we were at the cutting edge of technology. I believe all schoolkids up here would have been given a copy too, so that our minds would be shaped to accept this thing that terrified those down south. A few jobs were created for workers at Dounreay but that was insignificant compared to the perceived dangers. Along with the nonsensical Protect And Survive booklet that was distributed at that time regarding saving yourself in the event of a nuclear attack, this magazine that we children received was just government propaganda to influence, lie to and control the population. Officials must have been laughing to themselves as they prepared them. Today, they still use the same methods and our voters are still inclined to believe them. Without truth, what hope is there for Scotland or even society at large? Alasdair Forbes Farr, Inverness-shire THE statement by Keir Starmer that the UK would move to recognise a Palestinian state, if Israel did not agree to a ceasefire and take steps to end the war, is more than a little contradictory given previous statements. The statement noted that Palestinian statehood is the 'inalienable right of the Palestinian people' and the UK Government is committed to delivering a two-state solution, with a 'safe and secure Israel alongside a viable and sovereign Palestinian state'. It therefore seems rather odd that, despite a previous commitment to recognising a Palestinian state, this should now come with conditions attached. Alex Orr Edinburgh
Metro
9 hours ago
- Metro
Trump ally running for office representing Georgia spells it wrong in ad campaig
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video A pro-Trump lawmaker running for the Senate embarrassingly misspelled the name of his own state in his ad campaign. Congressman Mike Collins of Georgia unveiled a 38-second video that starts with him saying that 'this place is broken, out of touch Democrats like our two US senators who fight harder for MS-13 gang members than they will nursing students at UGA (University of Georgia)'. His voiceover on the clip continues that 'we've got to be absolutely unrelenting, we've got to be unafraid to fight', with footage of a 'truckers for Trump' MAGA hat. It then has audio of President Donald Trump saying, 'Mike Collins, great job you're doing'. The ad posted on X (formerly Twitter) on Sunday wraps up with Collins saying he is going to 'put the hammer down' and 'we're going to get it done'. It ends with an American flag-inspired truck logo and the slogan: 'Georiga, Let's Ride'. That glaring misspelling of Georgia was quickly ridiculed by social media users, but it was still on Collins' campaign X account @TeamOverhaulGA as of Wednesday. 'Take it down! Quick,' wrote an X user who shared a screengrab of the 'Georiga' gaffe. Another wrote: 'Where is Georiga?' 'GEORIGA needs you!' quipped another user. Collins' campaign shared a video on Monday on YouTube, but without the botched slogan. More Trending Currently representing Georgia's 10th congressional district, Collins, 58, is challenging Democratic Senator Jon Ossoff in next year's race. Collins has branded himself as an avid supporter of Trump. Collins co-owns a family trucking firm. It is not the first time that a Republican running for office has had a fumble around the Peach State. In September 2024, Trump's campaign ran ads on Facebook and Instagram targeting the swing state, that featured lush rolling hills that were actually from the Eastern European country of Georgia. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: How 8.8-magnitude earthquake and tsunamis are causing major flight disruption worldwide MORE: Boeing 787 Dreamliner narrowly avoided crash after engine failure MORE: Donald Trump 'seriously considering' a presidential pardon for Sean 'Diddy' Combs
Metro
9 hours ago
- Metro
Recognising Palestine is not rewarding Hamas - and it shouldn't come with string
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video 'Appeasement towards a jihadist state. Rewarding Hamas's monstrous terrorism.' That was how Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reacted to Keir Starmer's announcement that, unless certain conditions are met, the UK will recognise Palestinian statehood. That take is as false as it is dangerous. Yet this is the line pushed by Netanyahu and his officials, echoed by some in Washington, and parroted by too many British politicians still afraid to show moral leadership. Let's be clear: nothing about diplomatic recognition excuses the horrors of 7 October. Hamas's attack was barbaric. There's no ifs. No buts. The pain it caused is real and enduring, with dozens of hostages still held in Gaza. Recognising Palestine is not about Hamas. In fact, it's one of the few moves left that could help ensure Hamas does not shape the political future of the Palestinian people. Hamas claims to be the only effective representative of Palestinian resistance but recognition would empower alternative leadership – someone credible, moderate and internationally recognised. Then, and only then, can we begin to shift the conversation from war to peace and vengeance to diplomacy. Recognition is about the principle that Palestinians, like Israelis, deserve the right to live in peace, in security, and with dignity. Denying that right – and delaying it endlessly, as Britain and our allies have done for too long – only deepens the sense that the world is comfortable with a permanent occupation and the slow suffocation of a people. So, was Starmer's announcement a positive step? Yes. But it doesn't go far enough. Conditional recognition still treats Palestinian rights as a reward for good behaviour, not as a fundamental entitlement under international law. Spain, Norway and Ireland recognised Palestine unconditionally. France is preparing to be the first G7 country to do the same. Britain's insistence on attaching strings makes us look timid, not principled. Our position is not just morally incoherent. It is increasingly embarrassing. 147 out of 193 UN member states have already recognised Palestine. Even close US allies in the Global South – like Brazil and South Africa – are shifting. We are running out of allies to hide behind. If Starmer truly wants to reset Britain's global role – and let's be honest, post-Brexit we've not exactly been leading the pack – then he must break from the Trump-style conditionality that has only ever stalled peace. I've written and spoken extensively about how proud I am of our country, for many reasons. At our best, we are a moral compass for the world – clear-eyed, principled, and willing to lead. We might not have the military might of America or China, but the world watches what we do because we provide a rare moral clarity. On Ukraine, we have been flawless: consistent, courageous, morally certain. We didn't blink before picking a side. We punched above our weight – and rightly so. On Gaza, however, we have been hesitant and slow. And I hate to say it, but that hesitation will mark our history. The attempted logic that recognition should come after negotiations has failed Palestinians for decades. You cannot ask people to negotiate for their humanity while denying they are even a people. Recognition is not a reward. It is a precondition for any meaningful peace process. Speaking as someone from a Jewish background, I feel this acutely. 7 October triggered deep, generational trauma. That fear, grief, and fury are real. But that pain does not justify the collective punishment of more than two million Gazans, nor blind us to the basic rights of Palestinians – the same rights we all enjoy. It's precisely because I believe in safety and justice for Israelis that I must also believe in safety and justice for Palestinians. That truth is not a threat – it is the only path forward. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Britain has a historic role here and a monumental moral responsibility. From the Balfour Declaration to our colonial legacy, Britain helped shape many of the conditions that define today's conflict. That history demands that we do more than watch. So, we can continue to wring our hands while homes are flattened, hospitals bombed, famine looms, and children starve to death. Or we can do as we have in Ukraine and draw a line. We know this isn't right – we feel it in our core. That's why just 14% of Britons oppose recognition of a Palestinian state, according to recent YouGov polling, and why we are nearly twice as likely to sympathise with Palestinians over Israelis. Not because we are antisemitic. Not because we are anti-Jewish. We're not. Our country has an incredibly proud history of welcoming Jewish people, and long may that continue. More Trending But it's past time to join those countries willing to say: enough is enough. The path to peace begins with recognising that both peoples belong, and we must recognise Palestine quickly – without conditions. When the world turned against apartheid South Africa, nobody said, 'prove you're ready for dignity.' It was granted because it was a right, not a prize. Recognition will not end the war overnight, but we owe it, first and foremost, to the people of Palestine. And in doing so, we can reaffirm Britain's role as a moral leader by sending a clear message: we refuse to let Hamas or Netanyahu define what peace is. Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing Share your views in the comments below. MORE: Watch this terrifying film tonight – it might change your life MORE: I get hotel upgrades by sending a simple email — this is exactly what it says MORE: Bonnie Blue's 1000 Men documentary has totally changed my mind about her
