
‘Secession of the Successful' by Sanjaya Baru is part history of emigrations out of India and part reflection on what constitutes New India
The government under Modi is viewed by many as the first government that is neither corrupt nor incompetent, unlike the governments in the past. What's more, national interest pervades all public life. India is now more united, more prosperous and more ambitious than anytime in recent history. As such, India is emerging as the destination for international investors, attracting best talent from across the world. Gone are the days when Indians would do anything to somehow escape from the country and go to some part of the so-called developed world. After all, who would want to leave India at this golden juncture? As it turns out, it is the rich and the well-to-do. What's more? They are taking their riches out of the country as well. And that, on the face of it, is the focus of the book, as the title suggests.
The data is rather damning. On August 1, 2024, the Minister for State for External Affairs told the Parliament that a total of 2,25,260 Indians had 'renounced their Indian citizenship' in 2022, and another 2,16,219 did so in 2023. In 2014, this number was 1,29,234. Between 2011 and 2023, the minister said that a total of 18,80,559 Indians had given up their citizenship. It is another matter that the minister chose to see the data in a positive light stating: 'A successful, prosperous and influential diaspora is an asset for India.'
But the truth is, unlike the past when either Indians left as indentured labourers (under the British rule) or as skilled professionals (doctors and engineers leaving India since the 1970s), it is the wealthy who are now fleeing the country, states Baru. He lists four phases of Indians emigrating and this is the fourth phase.
'It is still in its incipient stage but has already acquired a high profile. It is the migration of the children of the wealthy as well as of high net worth individuals (HNIs) and the politically and socially powerful and influential elite… the fourth wave, in many ways, amounts to a 'secession of the successful',' writes Baru. He quotes data from Morgan Stanley that an estimated 23,000 Indian millionaires had left the country since 2014. It is important to note the setting as well: The net wealth of Indian billionaires has grown by 280 per cent in the period 2014-22, which amounts to 10 times the growth rate of India's national income over this period.
'India's super rich have funds to secure multiple homes around the world. However, more importantly, they are now securing residence status and citizenship too,' states Baru.
The reasons for this flight out of New India are not very difficult to guess but Baru categorises the emigrants into four categories: Fugitives from the law — 'the Choksis, Mallyas and Modis'; first generation wealthy who are wary of the political and bureaucratic regime at home — essentially the rich who have weak political connections; those desirous of de-risking and diversifying 'from an uncertain economic, regulatory and governance environment in India'; wealthy Indians seeking a better lifestyle or quality of life — those who are 'tired of living in First World ghettos in Third World India'.
But here is the most perverse aspect of this flight. Baru writes that 'the Indian industry fights shy of globalisation and external liberalisation, seeking high tariff walls to protect their business interests at home but Indian business leaders want a liberal regime for taking their wealth out of India'. In other words, the rich are using India's high tariffs to keep out competition and make profits and then taking this wealth outside the country.
'Neither industry organisations nor the government, nor indeed many in the academic and media world, seem to view with much concern the fact that a low-middle income developing economy is declaring with pride its export of capital to a high income developed country,' warns Baru.
While Baru raises a timely alarm through this book, by itself, the book's title is misleading. For the most part, the book is part history of emigrations out of India and part reflection about what constitutes New India. The specific bit about the 'secession of the successful' is largely dealt with in just two of the 12 chapters; the first of which comes well after the mid-way mark. As such, the title of the book is, at once, the smartest and the most misleading aspect of the book.
And considering the hardcover edition is priced at Rs 799 when the average daily income of an Indian is Rs 652, perhaps an average Indian, who can only dream of leaving New India, can put that money to better use; a mutual fund SIP maybe.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
a few seconds ago
- Business Standard
Timeline: How Rajasthan became India's top solar hub in just a decade
A decade ago, Rajasthan's vast desert stretches, scorching in the day and freezing at night, were seen as empty, unforgiving land, hostile to most forms of development. Today, those same empty plains sparkle with millions of solar panels, making the Thar one of the most powerful clean energy engines in the world. From the dusty villages of Jodhpur to the futuristic sprawl of Bhadla, the state has dramatically transformed–no one could have seen that coming. With great policy support, billions in investment, and overwhelming geography, Rajasthan has vastly climbed to the top of India's renewable energy map. What once was a story of survival in the desert has become one of scale, ambition, and leadership in the race to a low-carbon future. Here is how the journey unfolded. The journey of solar power production over a decade The foundation for Rajasthan's solar success was laid in December 2014, when the Centre launched the Solar Parks and Ultra Mega Solar Power Projects Scheme. Rajasthan was among the earliest states to sign up, with Bhadla identified as the flagship site for large-scale development. Just a few years later, in 2017, the Bhadla Solar Park in Jodhpur district began to take shape, attracting major developers such as ACME, Adani, and Hero Future Energies through Solar Energy Corporation of India Limited (SECI) auctions. The same year proved decisive for India's tariff story as well. In May 2017, Bhadla's competitive auctions discovered a record-low solar tariff of ₹ 2.44 per unit, a benchmark that redefined expectations for solar pricing nationwide and continued to shape auctions through 2018. By 2020, Rajasthan's installed solar capacity had grown to about 5.1 GW, a figure that positioned it for the surge to follow. That surge came between 2021 and 2022, when Rajasthan added capacity on an unprecedented scale. In 2022 alone, the state brought online 6.7 GW of new solar and wind power, about 43 per cent of all renewable capacity added in India that year. By June 2022, Rajasthan's large-scale solar had already reached close to 13 GW, thanks largely to central auctions conducted by SECI. The growth story soon began drawing global capital. In 2023, funds such as Brookfield poured money, financing projects in Rajasthan through a ₹3,380-crore pool. Masdar, the Abu Dhabi-based developer, tied up with Hero Future Energies on a 2.2 GW India platform, with 1.5 GW of that capacity linked to projects in Rajasthan and Haryana. Indian companies like ReNew were also continuing to create their presence across the solar clusters in the state. By early 2024, Rajasthan is estimated to be above 20 GW, even tracker companies placing its operational solar base above 21 GW, and this is a lead which none of the other states can match. This trend continued till mid-2025, and official MNRE data demonstrated that Rajasthan had achieved 32.32 GW of solar capacity by July 31. Not only does this establish Rajasthan as India's undisputed leader in renewables, but it also calls itself home to the world's largest solar park in Bhadla at 2,245 MW installed capacity. Why Rajasthan leads in solar power production Rajasthan's dominance in solar energy is rooted in its geography, policy, and scale. The state enjoys consistently high solar irradiation of around 5.5-6.5 kWh/m²/day, coupled with vast stretches of arid land across its western districts that are ideally suited for gigawatt-scale solar parks. The early decision to participate in the Centre's Solar Park Scheme gave Rajasthan a head start, while a clear state framework for aggregating land and setting up park-specific special purpose vehicles reduced developer risk and shortened project timelines. Scale has also been central to Rajasthan's rise. The Bhadla Solar Park, spread across about 56 square kilometers and was developed in multiple phases starting from 2015, became the world's largest single solar park with an installed capacity of 2,245 MW and a showcase of pooled land, ready infrastructure such as roads and pooling stations, and competitive auctions that pushed tariffs to record lows of under ₹2.50 per kWh. Alongside this, investments in transmission under the Green Energy Corridor ensured that power could be evacuated both within and outside the state. Phase II of the corridor, approved in January 2022, is on track for commissioning by March 2026, promising even greater grid flexibility. What's next for renewable energy in Rajasthan Rajasthan's clean energy journey is expanding beyond solar parks and is being taken one step further. The Centre's National Green Hydrogen Mission has already named the state one of two (the other being Ladakh) leading candidates for large-scale hydrogen production in the country. The rationale is simple and logical - Rajasthan has available land and substantial solar potential, making it a suitable area for electrolyser-based projects, resulting in competitively priced green hydrogen. Additionally, the next wave of hybrid projects that integrate solar, wind, and storage technologies is being accommodated with additional transmission corridors under Green Energy Corridor-II. With over 32 GW of solar installed already, the state should comfortably remain India's top state for solar throughout this decade, which is key for the 500 GW renewable energy commitment by 2030, with hybrid parks and larger storage projects leading the next wave of growth.


Economic Times
3 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Three-lenders cap makes micro borrowers fall in line
Synopsis Borrowing by vulnerable economic groups is changing. The number of borrowers with many lenders decreased significantly. This reflects stricter lending practices. Data shows a drop in borrowers using more than three lenders. However, some older loans still pose a risk. The microfinance sector is now focusing on stability. The market size has contracted. Getty Images The number of bottom-of-the-pyramid borrowers taking loans from four or more lenders has come down 44% from a year ago, reflecting the impact of prudential lending in the most vulnerable economic strata where mounting delinquencies dented the performance of Indian lenders in the last five number of such borrowers queuing up at more than three financiers fell to 3.1 million at the end of the June from 5.7 million a year ago, showed the CRIF High Mark data, illustrating the efficacy of a three-lender exposure cap that took effect from the start of this fiscal. The latest count represents about 4% of an active borrower base of 79.8 3.1 million customers, who could be considered 'higher risk' have ₹35,712 crore of outstanding borrowing between them at the end of June. That amounts to about a tenth of the sector's outstanding loan portfolio of ₹3.6 lakh portfolio relating to borrowers transacting with more than three microfinance lenders remains very vulnerable to slippages, especially after the guardrail 2.0 regime limiting fresh loans from more lenders to such borrowers, Crisil Ratings' director Malvika Bhotika said a fortnight ago. "As per our estimates, almost a fourth of the portfolio with more than three lenders is in the PAR (portfolio at risk) 31-180 days bucket as on June 30, 2025," she said. The portfolio exposure of borrowers with high lender associations declined from 19.2% of the book over the past 12 months, CRIF data this transition has lowered the exposure of MFIs to over-leveraged borrowers, slippages from the legacy portfolio will keep asset quality under pressure, experts said. The issue of borrower overleveraging has been at the heart of the high delinquencies over the past one years leading to severe asset quality stress and loss in income for lenders. It's ironic that lending to the micro borrower segment, which was once known for their robust repayment behaviour, is now being considered risky. "The industry is prioritising risk management and portfolio stabilisation over aggressive growth, reflected in subdued lending activity and a stronger focus on liquidity," CRIF said. This moderation aligns with the implementation of guardrails by self-regulatory organisation Microfinance Institutions Network to mitigate overleveraging risks. This led to a 17% year-on-year contraction in the size of the microfinance market to ₹3.59 lakh active loan accounts fell to 132 million from 159.3 million, with the live customer base declining to 80 million from 86.6 million between June 2024 and June 2025, data compiled by CRIF sector's portfolio at risk for more than 90 days past due remained elevated at 15.54% of the total on- and off-balance sheet book. This means the gross non-performing assets without excluding the technically written-off loans stood at ₹55,820 crore at the end of June. Loans are classified as NPA when borrowers fail to pay interest or principal for more than 90 days.


Economic Times
18 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Peter Navarro to India: Act like a US partner or pay the price
Synopsis Peter Navarro has criticized India's crude oil imports from Russia, deeming them "opportunistic" and warning of consequences for the US-India strategic partnership. He alleges India's actions are financing Russia's war in Ukraine and jeopardizing access to US markets. These remarks precede a postponed US trade negotiation visit and potential tariffs on Indian goods due to continued Russian oil purchases. Reuters Peter Navarro, Senior Counselor for Trade and Manufacturing for U.S. President Donald Trump, speaks to the media outside the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 30, 2025. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein/ File Photo New Delhi: US President Donald Trump's trade adviser Peter Navarro on Monday criticised India's crude oil imports from Russia, calling the move "opportunistic" and warning that if India "wants to be treated as a strategic partner of the US, it needs to start acting like one".In an opinion piece in the Financial Times, Navarro alleged that India was "now cosying up to both Russia and China" and argued that New Delhi's Russian crude purchases must stop as they were financing Moscow's war in Ukraine. His comments come ahead of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping later this month, even as Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi visits New Delhi for talks on the disputed border. "This two-pronged policy will hit India where it hurts-its access to US markets - even as it seeks to cut off the financial lifeline it has extended to Russia's war effort," Navarro said India's reliance on Russian crude was "opportunistic and deeply corrosive of global efforts to isolate Putin's war economy". The remarks assume significance as US trade negotiators have postponed their planned August 25-29 visit for the sixth round of Bilateral Trade Agreement talks, the first tranche of which is targeted for conclusion by autumn. Trump has already imposed a 50% tariff on Indian goods, including a 25% penal levy for continued purchases of Russian oil, despite the external affairs ministry's assertion that India is being unfairly singled out while the US and EU continue to source energy from the 25% tariff on Indian goods entering the US took effect on August 7, the additional 25%, announced as penalty for crude and defence imports from Russia, will kick in on August 27. "India acts as a global clearing house for Russian oil, converting embargoed crude into high-value exports while giving Moscow the dollars it needs," Navarro wrote, adding that it was risky to transfer cutting-edge US military capabilities to a country "cosying up to both Russia and China".