
Even Porsche can't find its lane in China as foreign automaker sales skid
Foreign automakers in China face an increasingly urgent challenge at this year's Shanghai auto show - winning back Chinese buyers while their domestic rivals churn out slick, affordable electric vehicles at a relentless pace.
The world's biggest automakers have steadily lost market share in recent years as Chinese-brand sales have soared. The destruction of legacy-brand equity is spreading fast from low- and mid-priced segments to luxury automakers now struggling to match Chinese rivals with superior EV drivetrains and a dizzying array of high-tech interior features.
Germany's
Porsche
- among the world's most powerful premium brands for decades - has become the new poster child for legacy automaker decline in China. Its sales in the country plunged 42% in the first quarter, an acceleration of previous losses since the legendary sports-car maker hit record China annual sales of 95,671 just four years ago - nearly a third of its 2021 global total.
Unlike other Volkswagen Group brands VW and Audi, which showcased five new electric models at the Shanghai show, Porsche retreated to its combustion-engine heritage. The automaker unveiled two limited-edition variants of its 911 in a display surrounded by vintage examples of the legendary sports car. A lighted sign read: "There is no substitute."
Chinese customers aren't buying it. Instead, they're buying increasing futuristic luxury and sport substitutes from domestic competitors including BYD's Yangwang brand and Xiaomi, an electronics and appliances giant that only entered the car business last year. Xiaomi's first car, the electric SU7 sport sedan, caused a sensation with Porsche-inspired styling at a much lower price.
When Xiaomi introduced an absurdly fast, 1,548-horsepower SU7 Ultra variant in February priced from 529,900 yuan ($72,591), it said it racked up about 10,000 pre-orders in two hours - slightly more than the first-quarter China sales of all Porsche models. The least expensive Porsche 911 sells for 1.468 million yuan, or $201,170, in China and has 394 horsepower, according to Porsche's website.
"Porsche is done" in China, said Tu Le, founder of consultancy Sino Auto Insights.
Porsche is hardly alone among foreign automakers in losing sales to Chinese rivals, which in many cases are not yet profitable.
Foreign automakers "understand the challenge," said Yu Zhang, managing director of Shanghai-based consultancy Automotive Foresight. "But they're still not moving fast enough to solve it."
In September 2022, investor faith in Porsche's storied brand was so strong that, shortly after its initial public offering, its value soared past its vastly larger parent Volkswagen.
The automaker's shares are now down 44% from its stock market debut and 21% year-to-date. Porsche's China sales have fallen for three straight years.
Volkswagen and Porsche CEO Oliver Blume dismissed concerns about declining
Porsche sales in China
as he addressed reporters after unveiling VW and Audi models on Tuesday ahead of the Shanghai show.
"We don't care about the volume," Blume said, adding he was more concerned about keeping prices high - at a level "appropriate for Porsche."
Blume denied Porsche competed directly with Chinese brands such as Xiaomi and Yangwang: "They are cool cars," he said, but they lack Porsche's "driving ability" and play in a "lower pricing segment."
Blume said the company might abandon the EV segment entirely in China, where more than half of new cars sold are now EVs and hybrids. Porsche sells two EVs here, the Taycan and Macan. It does not report specific model sales by country but Blume said Porsche's EV sales in China were "relatively low."
"We will see in the next two to three years whether Porsche exists as an electric brand here," he said.
The core attributes that have historically made a Porsche a Porsche - the throaty roar of a 911's flat-six-cylinder engine, for instance - don't have the same appeal in China as in other Porsche markets.
"The concept of Porsche as a golden brand means nothing to younger generations in China," said Bo Yu, China country manager at research firm JATO Dynamics.
TURNING UP THE VOLUME
The Chinese automakers that are increasingly moving into high-end segments do care about sales volumes.
Xiaomi sold 137,000 SU7s last year, more than double Porsche's total full-year China sales of just under 57,000, out of global sales of 310,718. Last month, Xiaomi raised its vehicle-sales target for 2025 to 350,000.
Small premium Chinese EV maker Nio saw sales rise 38.7% last year to 221,970 vehicles. CEO William Li said Nio expected to double its volume this year - calling it a "harvest year" - as it introduces nine new or updated EV models.
The rapid growth of China's industry has translated directly to steep sales declines for foreign automakers across all segments.
"They won't get that market share back," said Andrew Fellows, global head of automotive and mobility at technology consultancy Star.
Some are nonetheless fighting to remain relevant in China. Financially troubled Nissan said at the show it will invest an additional $1.4 billion in China and launch 10 new vehicles in the coming years to reverse its sales slide.
"The Chinese brands were too fast, to be honest" in releasing compelling models, said Nissan China chief Stephen Ma. "Now, I think we have reset."
Bright Spot
General Motors is also rebooting after recording $5 billion in charges on its China operations in December. Its comeback efforts hinge largely on its premium Cadillac brand, which displayed four all-electric models in Shanghai.
Buick's GL8 has been one bright spot for GM in China. It remains a leader in China's multi-purpose vehicle, or MPV, segment, more commonly called minivans in the United States.
MPVs are prized by Chinese consumers as both family haulers and chauffeured luxury vehicles for executives.
Buick displayed a new concept GL8 that brand design executive Matt Noone said will come only in EV or hybrid variants and loaded with interior technology to counter Chinese competitors, including reclining and massaging seats and a "fragrance system."
Buick aims to fight off MPV competitors from BYD's Denza brand, Li Auto and Xpeng, which launched a redesigned X9 MPV featuring a built-in refrigerator ahead of the Shanghai show.
Geely's Zeekr just launched the 009 Grand, a four-seater MPV that also has a fridge, along with a 43-inch (109 cm) wide TV and 24-karat gold Zeekr logos because, as one spokesperson put it, the "Chinese love gold."
"We're under attack here," Buick's Noone said. "We need to maintain our GL8 dominance before it's taken from us."
"And it's a race against the clock."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Mint
25 minutes ago
- Mint
China risks overplaying its hand by curbing rare earth exports
China has once again weaponized its dominant position in the supply of rare earth minerals. It has imposed stringent export curbs on these elements that are critical inputs in a range of industries from automobiles to aerospace and defence. The move comes as a response to US restrictions on the export of semiconductor technology to China. These battles are being waged against the backdrop of a broader truce in the once-escalating trade war between the world's two largest national economies. The Chinese chokehold on the supply of rare earth minerals has sent a jolt through many industries in other parts of the world, including India. For example, there are fears that assembly lines in the automobile industry will grind to a halt in the coming weeks unless China starts exporting rare earth minerals again. Also Read: Barry Eichengreen: US export curbs on high-tech enablers have rarely worked This is not the first time that Beijing has restricted the flow of rare earth minerals across its borders. It did so in 2010 after a dispute with Japan on the high seas, and was forced to roll back its export curbs by the World Trade Organization in 2015. Even though China's export ban was targeted at Japan, other countries naturally saw it as a signal of what could happen in the years ahead. The effectiveness of any export restriction depends on three factors. First, how important the input is in the production structure of the country's economy. Second, how easy or difficult it is to increase the production of that input in response to higher prices that naturally follow restricted supplies. Third, how concentrated the production of that input is in one country or in a small cartel of countries. Rare earth minerals are needed in many important industries, their supplies are inelastic and China has a massive share in their production. That suggests that the rest of the world will be at the mercy of China. Also Read: China's export ban on key minerals may have a silver lining for the US However, such events create incentives for governments as well as private companies to respond strategically. There is perhaps a lesson to be learnt here from what happened after the first oil shock to hit the world in 1973. The oil embargo that year brought many economies to their knees, but it also led to a search for new energy supplies as well as incentivized companies in sectors such as automobiles to build more fuel-efficient products. Can that happen in the case of rare earth minerals as well? In a recent paper titled 'Trade and Industrial Policy in Supply Chains: Directed Technological Change in Rare Earths, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper,' four economists have taken a closer look at the broader consequences of the earlier supply squeeze. Laura Alfaro, Harald Fadinger, Jan S. Schymik and Gede Virananda have shown that export restrictions on rare earth minerals imposed by China in 2010 triggered a surge elsewhere in technological innovations as well as exports in sectors that used rare earth minerals as inputs. More specifically, they found a surge in patents in downstream industries that use rare earth minerals, both in terms of using them more efficiently as well as developing alternatives. This increase in patents in countries outside China exceeded the overall rise in patents in industries that use rare earth minerals. Productivity, as proxied by exports growth, also improved. In other words, technological dynamism helped the rest of the world adapt to Chinese monopoly power in rare earth minerals. Also Read: Ajit Ranade: The success of 'Made in China 2025' alarmed the West This is a more general lesson. Jensen Huang, the head of chip-maker Nvidia, said at a recent technology industry event in Taipei that firm attempts by successive US administrations to deny China access to advanced technology have actually spurred rather than hindered Chinese innovation. 'The local companies are very, very talented and very determined, and the export control gave them the spirit, the energy and the government support to accelerate their development," Huang was quoted as saying by The Guardian. Parsing his statement provides two lessons. First, that there needs to be a private sector innovation ecosystem that has the ability to respond to either higher prices or restricted supplies. Second, there have to be at least some additional government incentives as well as policy clarity for innovators. They complement each other. The point is not to tell a sanguine story about how all will be well in the long run. It is instead to point out that dynamic economies adapt to changing circumstances. 'In capitalist reality as distinguished from its textbook picture, it is not (traditional) competition that counts but competition from the new commodity, the new technology, the new source of supply, the new type of organisation," wrote the prophet of innovation, Joseph Schumpeter, in Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, his classic work. The Chinese dominance in rare earths is undoubtedly a strategic lever that Beijing will use to increase its geopolitical heft in an unsettled world. However, the overuse of such power will create strong incentives for others to adapt by innovation—as everyone from West Asians to Americans have learnt over the years. The author is executive director at Artha India Research Advisors.


Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Panama Canal boss says MSC ports deal threatens neutrality, Infra News, ET Infra
Advt The sale of two ports near the Panama Canal to a global consortium led by Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC) threatens the canal's principle of neutrality, the canal's head Ricaurte Vasquez told the Financial Times."There is a potential risk of capacity concentration if the deal comes the way it is structured as we understand right now," Vasquez told the FT in a report published on Tuesday."If there is a significant level of concentration on terminal operators belonging to an integrated or one single shipping company, it will be at the expense of Panama's competitiveness in the market and inconsistent with neutrality."MSC is one of the world's top container shipping groups. MSC and the Panama Canal Authority did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. CK Hutchison confirmed last month that MSC, run by the family of Italian billionaire Gianluigi Aponte , was the main investor in a group seeking to buy 43 ports, including the two ports in Panama, for $22.8 clarification follows weeks of scrutiny and criticism in China over CK Hutchison's plan to sell the ports to a consortium, which was previously led by US investment firm BlackRock . BlackRock remains part of the proposed sale has also drawn the attention of US President Donald Trump , who has repeatedly expressed his desire to reduce Chinese influence around the Panama Canal and termed the deal a "reclaiming" of the waterway after it was first April, China's top market regulator said it was paying close attention to CK Hutchison's planned sale and that parties to the deal should not try to avoid an antitrust added that the canal should use the ports deal as an opportunity to become a terminal operator itself by reactivating a project to build a terminal in the Port of Corozal at the Pacific end of the canal, according to the FT.


Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
US ocean container imports tumble in May as China tariffs take hold, ET Infra
Advt US seaborne imports of goods from China dropped 28.5 per cent year-over-year in May, the sharpest decline since the pandemic, as President Donald Trump's 145 per cent tariffs took hold, supply chain technology provider Descartes said on is the top US supplier of goods that enter through seaports, including the nation's busiest in Los Angeles/Long Beach. Domestic businesses ranging from retailer Walmart to automaker Ford depend on those goods to US seaborne imports in May tumbled 7.2 per cent from the year earlier to 2.18 million 20-foot equivalent units - snapping a streak of near-record increases fueled by companies frontloading goods to avoid higher duties."The effects of US policy shifts with China are now clearly visible in monthly trade flows," Descartes said in a Coast ports are more dependent on China trade and bore the brunt of the declines. From April to May, the nation's busiest seaports in Long Beach and Los Angeles experienced steep drops in goods from China, 31.6per cent and 29.9 per cent, respectively, Descartes imports from China included furniture, bedding, plastic goods, machinery, toys and sporting United States and China agreed to a 90-day pause on punitive tit-for-tat tariffs last month. US and Chinese officials met in London on Monday to defuse the high-stakes trade dispute between the world's largest executives and shipping consultants expect volume from China to rebound during the tariff truce, albeit at a more moderate level. That's because the US lowered the tariff for many goods from China to 30 per cent during the pause."China-origin imports may continue to soften in the months ahead as importers reassess sourcing strategies amid rising landed costs," Descartes said.