Ditching Russian gas could cost EU state €16 billion
Slovakia could face €16 billion (over $18 billion) in penalties for cutting short a long-term gas deal with Russia's Gazprom under the EU's proposed phaseout plan, the country's state-owned gas importer SPP has warned, according to Reuters.
Under the so-called REPowerEU plan, Brussels aims to eliminate the EU's reliance on Russian fossil fuels by 2028. The controversial legislation, supported by Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, would ban new gas contracts with Russia from 2026 and long-term ones by the end of 2027. The Commission has said it is considering legal avenues to enable European companies to claim force majeure, allowing them to terminate Russian gas contracts without penalties.
SPP, which has a supply agreement with Gazprom until 2034, said on Tuesday that even if it invokes force majeure, the Russian energy giant may still seek compensation if an EU-wide import ban comes into force.
Slovakia has repeatedly stressed the risks of cutting off Russian supplies, warning it would drive up prices across Europe and undermine energy security. Along with Hungary, Austria and reportedly Italy, Bratislava has opposed sanctions on Russian gas, which currently require unanimous backing from all EU member states. Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico slammed the new phaseout plan as 'economic suicide.'
Unlike sanctions, however, this plan is expected to be introduced as trade legislation, requiring the support of just 15 out of 27 EU members to pass, Reuters noted.
Slovakia's energy setup leaves it particularly vulnerable. The landlocked country depends on Russia for about 85% of the gas it uses. In February, Slovakia began receiving Russian supplies via the TurkStream pipeline after Kiev halted gas transit through Ukraine, avoiding a domestic energy crisis. The country had already experienced a significant reduction in Russian gas imports due to Ukraine-related sanctions on Moscow and the 2022 sabotage of the Nord Stream pipeline.
The EC's proposal will now go through the EU's co-decision legislative process, requiring approval from both the European Parliament and the Council.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
4 hours ago
- Russia Today
Ditching Russian gas could cost EU state €16 billion
Slovakia could face €16 billion (over $18 billion) in penalties for cutting short a long-term gas deal with Russia's Gazprom under the EU's proposed phaseout plan, the country's state-owned gas importer SPP has warned, according to Reuters. Under the so-called REPowerEU plan, Brussels aims to eliminate the EU's reliance on Russian fossil fuels by 2028. The controversial legislation, supported by Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, would ban new gas contracts with Russia from 2026 and long-term ones by the end of 2027. The Commission has said it is considering legal avenues to enable European companies to claim force majeure, allowing them to terminate Russian gas contracts without penalties. SPP, which has a supply agreement with Gazprom until 2034, said on Tuesday that even if it invokes force majeure, the Russian energy giant may still seek compensation if an EU-wide import ban comes into force. Slovakia has repeatedly stressed the risks of cutting off Russian supplies, warning it would drive up prices across Europe and undermine energy security. Along with Hungary, Austria and reportedly Italy, Bratislava has opposed sanctions on Russian gas, which currently require unanimous backing from all EU member states. Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico slammed the new phaseout plan as 'economic suicide.' Unlike sanctions, however, this plan is expected to be introduced as trade legislation, requiring the support of just 15 out of 27 EU members to pass, Reuters noted. Slovakia's energy setup leaves it particularly vulnerable. The landlocked country depends on Russia for about 85% of the gas it uses. In February, Slovakia began receiving Russian supplies via the TurkStream pipeline after Kiev halted gas transit through Ukraine, avoiding a domestic energy crisis. The country had already experienced a significant reduction in Russian gas imports due to Ukraine-related sanctions on Moscow and the 2022 sabotage of the Nord Stream pipeline. The EC's proposal will now go through the EU's co-decision legislative process, requiring approval from both the European Parliament and the Council.
Russia Today
9 hours ago
- Russia Today
Brussels makes EU ‘as uncompetitive as possible'
Officials in Brussels are completely undermining the EU's competitiveness, according to Kirill Dmitriev, the CEO of the Russian Direct Investment Fund and presidential envoy. His comment follows the European Commission's proposal to eliminate all Russian oil and gas imports within two years. EU Energy Commissioner Dan Jorgensen unveiled the plan, which is backed by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, on Tuesday. It seeks to ban all new gas contracts with Russia, and presents measures to facilitate the end of Russian oil imports by the end of 2027. 'EU Commission bureaucrats seem obsessed – with making the EU as uncompetitive as possible on the global stage,' Dmitriev, who is also the Russian president's special envoy for investment and economic cooperation, wrote on X. 'Mission accomplished or still in progress?' The comment came in response to criticism from Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto, who warned that the plan represents 'a serious violation' of Hungary's sovereignty. He claimed that the EU is 'ready to dismantle Hungary's secure and affordable energy supply.' EU Commission bureaucrats seem obsessed—with making the EU as uncompetitive as possible on the global stage. Mission accomplished or still in progress? The legislation seeks to apply EU trade law mechanisms to imports of Russian oil and gas, enabling Brussels to bypass potential vetoes from countries such as Hungary and Slovakia. Energy prices across Europe soared following Ukraine-related sanctions in 2022. Jorgensen said the latest phaseout is not about Ukraine, but because 'Russia has weaponized energy' against the EU. Moscow has called the sanctions illegitimate and counterproductive. Russian President Vladimir Putin has set the lifting of sanctions as a condition for resolving the Ukraine conflict. The Kremlin also noted that Russia has been a reliable energy supplier to the bloc. Russia, once the EU's main gas supplier, sharply reduced exports three years ago amid Western sanctions and the Nord Stream pipeline sabotage. Its share of EU pipeline gas fell from over 40% in 2021 to around 11% in 2024. While most EU countries have cut Russian gas, landlocked members, including Hungary, Slovakia, Austria, the Czech Republic, and Serbia, still rely on limited supplies through various exemptions. Meanwhile, Russian LNG imports to the EU have surged, making up 17.5% of the bloc's supply last year – second only to the US at 45.3%. France, Spain, and Belgium took in 85% of these shipments, according to the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA).
Russia Today
9 hours ago
- Russia Today
Zelensky seeks $40bn a year for ‘resilience'
Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky has called on Western donors to commit $40 billion annually to prop up his country's budget, following a high-profile snub by US President Donald Trump at the G7 summit. Zelensky made the appeal Tuesday during the gathering in Kananaskis, Canada, where he failed to get an audience with Trump, who left early. Posting a photo on social media of himself speaking to six leaders, Zelensky demanded sustained donations. 'It's crucial to have $40 billion annually in budgetary support for Ukraine – to ensure our resilience and the ability of our country to carry on,' he said, urging the US to approve the aid. Trump 'does not apply strong enough pressure on Russia,' Zelensky claimed, despite Kiev purportedly defending Washington's global interests. He called on other G7 members to lobby the US leader, while advocating investment in Ukraine's arms production and new sanctions against Russia. The summit's results have been reported as a disappointment for Kiev and have cast doubt on the prospects of a Trump-Zelensky meeting at a NATO leaders summit scheduled for next Tuesday. 'It is a permanent hazard that Ukraine is a victim of events and Trump's short attention span,' a Ukrainian official told The Guardian. 'There had been all sorts of promises for this summit – including new US arms deliveries being offered.' G7 leaders did not issue a joint statement on Ukraine, reportedly due to Trump's refusal to endorse language critical of Russia. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney's chair summary noted that participants supported Trump's efforts to broker a 'just and lasting peace in Ukraine' and backed Kiev's call for an unconditional ceasefire. Russian officials have dismissed the Ukrainian demand as a ploy to give Kiev's forces time to regroup. During recent peace talks in Istanbul, Moscow offered two options for a conditional truce: A withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from territories that have joined Russia, or a halt to Ukraine's military mobilization and Western arms deliveries. Kiev rejected both proposals.
