Enbridge says federal support for oil and gas not yet clear
'I'm optimistic about our ongoing conversations and the alignment we're seeing today on both sides of the border to advance projects and legislation,' said Greg Ebel, chief executive of Calgary-based Enbridge on a Friday call to discuss second-quarter results
But while both governments are talking, project plans and customer demand is being drawn more to the U.S., he said.
'Our customers at this point in time really want to go south,' said Ebel. 'That's the premium market.'
The company reported earnings of $2.18 billion for the quarter ending June 30, up from $1.85 billion in the same quarter last year, as Ebel touted its stable returns and wide array of potential projects to take on.
As Enbridge completes capacity expansions to the U.S. Gulf Coast, it could look to projects to serve the Canadian West Coast, but it's still not clear how much government support there is for such projects.
'The issue is one of government policy setting the conditions for that to get investment to occur. Let's be honest, the government has not done that yet, and it's not clear they intend to, at least from our perspective.'
He pointed to both the oilsands emissions cap and the West Coast tanker ban as barriers to building a new oil pipeline. A natural gas pipeline would have been slightly easier, but the issue is also that any Canadian project will have to compete on returns with projects in the U.S., he said.
'Only those projects and those jurisdictions that provide better returns, i.e., lower build multiples, are going to get serviced, right? So I would tell you right now, that's a challenge to do more in a place like British Columbia or even Ontario relative to Ohio or, say, Texas.'
The U.S. both has more export capacity to global markets, while the Trump administration is also working to strip environmental reviews and open up protected land to boost oil and gas production.
The U.S. government is also actively cutting funding and permits for renewable projects, but Ebel said the actions aren't expected to affect Enbridge's already sanctioned projects.
'The One Big Beautiful Bill Act is not expected to impact any of our sanctioned projects, but we'll continue to monitor future developments in this fast moving policy environment.'
Enbridge said its adjusted earnings worked out to $1.42 billion for the quarter, up from $1.25 billion last year.
Adjusted earnings was 65 cents per common share, compared to 58 cents per share last year.
The mean analyst estimate had been for earnings of 57 cents per share, according to LSEG Data & Analytics.
Ebel said steady demand and low-risk commercial frameworks have led to predictable results despite geopolitical and macroeconomic volatility.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 1, 2025.
Companies in this story: (TSX:ENB)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
26 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Apple to commit another $100 billion for U.S. manufacturing, White House says
Apple, which was singled out by the Trump administration earlier this year over its production practices, plans to take a further step to highlight its commitment to boosting investment in the U.S. The tech giant will pledge to spend an additional $100 billion on domestic manufacturing, a move that could ease tensions between the tech giant and President Trump who wants iPhones built in the United States. A White House official on Wednesday said Trump will announce a new manufacturing program aimed to bring more of Apple's supply chain to the United States, confirming an earlier report from Bloomberg. Apple's commitment will increase the Cupertino-based company's U.S. investment to $600 billion over four years as it seeks to avoid the cost of tariffs. The company announced a $500-billion U.S. investment commitment in February. Nonetheless, Trump in May criticized Apple for expanding iPhone production in India, threatening to hit the company with a 25% tariff. Apple and other tech companies have touted their U.S. commitments, but analysts and economists have said shifting manufacturing to the United States could take years and result in higher prices for smartphones and other popular electronics. Some analysts have said it would take at least five years for Apple to shift production to the U.S. and the prices of iPhones could reach $3,500 if the smartphone was made in America. The iPhone 16 Pro is made up of roughly 2,700 parts sourced from 187 suppliers in 28 countries, according to an April report from TechInsights. As companies look to keep costs down and consumers watch their budgets, tariffs add another wrinkle to efforts to slash spending. Taylor Rogers, a White House spokesperson, said in a statement, that the Trump and Apple's announcement is 'another win for our manufacturing industry that will simultaneously help reshore the production of critical components to protect America's economic and national security.' This week, Trump said he was doubling tariffs on India to 50%, stating in an executive order that the country's government 'is currently directly or indirectly importing Russian Federation oil.' Apple didn't respond to a request for comment. The move marks the latest apparent effort by Apple to show its commitment to hiring U.S. workers. Last month, the smartphone leader announced the opening of its Apple Manufacturing Academy in Detroit. The program begins Aug. 19 and offers free workshops on artificial intelligence and advanced manufacturing to small and medium-sized businesses. Apple has more than 450,000 jobs with thousands of suppliers and partners across all 50 states. While Apple designs its products in California, it also relies on a global supply chain involving various countries including China, Vietnam and India. Apple is already spending more because of Trump's tariffs. Last week, Apple Chief Executive Tim Cook said during an earnings call that the company has incurred roughly $800 million in tariff-related costs. Apple expects $1.1 billion in tariff-related costs in the fiscal fourth quarter ending in September.
UPI
27 minutes ago
- UPI
Analysis: Lebanon's decision on weapons corners Hezbollah
The weapons decision, adopted during a Cabinet session chaired by President Joseph Aoun on Tuesday, not only ends the political cover Hezbollah has enjoyed for decades, but also undermines its legitimacy as a 'resistance organization,' according to military and political analysts. Photo by Wael BEIRUT, Lebanon, Aug. 6 (UPI) -- Lebanon, caught between mounting international pressure and the risk of another devastating war with Israel, made a game-changing decision by tasking the Army with preparing a plan to enforce a state monopoly on weapons by the end of the year. The move poses a new challenge to the once-powerful Hezbollah, which has been left with almost no options after being significantly weakened during last year's war with Israel. The decision, adopted during a Cabinet session chaired by President Joseph Aoun on Tuesday, not only ends the political cover Hezbollah has enjoyed for decades, but also undermines its legitimacy as a "resistance organization," according to military and political analysts. Addressing Hezbollah's weapons had long been a taboo topic; until September, when Israel escalated its attacks on the group, killing its longtime leader, Seyyed Hassan Nasrallah, along with many of its top military commanders. In addition, the Iran-backed Shiite group reportedly lost the bulk of its military capabilities in ongoing Israeli airstrikes targeting its positions in southern and eastern Lebanon. Hezbollah had no alternative but to accept the Nov. 27 ceasefire agreement, brokered by the United States and France, to end the 14-month war with Israel that killed or wounded more than 20,000 people and left border villages in southern Lebanon in ruins. However, the agreement marked an opportunity for Lebanon to reclaim its long-lost sovereignty after decades of lawlessness, military occupation and the dominance of armed non-state actors. Tuesday's decision was "certainly a historic" one, according to Riad Kahwaji, who heads the Dubai-based Institute for Near East and Gulf Military Analysis. "Hezbollah has lost the political cover that has given it legitimacy as a resistance organization," Kahwaji told UPI. He maintained that the militant group is now viewed as an armed militia that must comply with the 1989 Taif Accords -- which ended the 1975-1990 civil war -- and U.N. Resolution 1701, both of which call for the disarmament of all armed groups and affirm that only the Lebanese Armed Forces should hold a monopoly on weapons in the country. While Hezbollah implicitly agreed to discuss its weapons as part of a national defense strategy, it resisted government efforts to set a timetable for disarming -- a key U.S. condition for unlocking much-needed international and Gulf Arab funding to support Lebanon's reconstruction and economic recovery. In line with the government decision, the Army was to submit its implementation plan on disarming Hezbollah and other Palestinian armed factions to the cabinet by the end of August for discussion and approval, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam said after the Cabinet meeting. Hezbollah and its main ally, the Shiite Amal Movement led by Speaker of Parliament Nabih Berri, rejected in separate statements Wednesday the Cabinet's decision as a "grave sin" that offers "free concessions to the Israeli enemy" and weakens Lebanon, rather than ending Israel's ongoing attacks, its occupation of Lebanese territory and securing the release of Lebanese prisoners. Hezbollah has maintained that it is unwilling to lay down its arms as long as Israel continues to occupy parts of Lebanese territory -- an argument that was considered legitimate until the recent Cabinet decision. "Its weapons will become illegitimate by the end of the year, in accordance with Lebanese law," said Abdul Rahman Chehaitli, a retired major general and author of The Lebanese Land and Maritime Borders: A Historical, Geographical, and Political Study. "But it still enjoys popular legitimacy." Chehaitli noted that Lebanon still faces "external threats" from Israel and from armed groups operating outside the control of the new Syrian leadership and that are deployed along the eastern border. He explained that Lebanon would need an agreement similar to the 1949 Armistice Accord to guarantee Israel's withdrawal and to demarcate the border, as well as a separate border agreement with Syria to enable the Lebanese Army to carry out its mission. "The government is serious, but no one can say what will happen the next day or what additional demands the U.S. and Israel might push forward," he told UPI, referring to concerns among Lebanon's Shiite community about their future and political role in the country. The question remains whether Hezbollah is still capable of fighting Israel after losing much of its power. Kahwaji said the group was "trying to put on a strong face," but clearly, "the Hezbollah we knew is no longer there. ... It's much weaker." He argued that Hezbollah's "calculations have continuously and miserably failed" since Oct. 7, 2023, which is why the group was "badly defeated and degraded." "It has lost the halo it carried for years. All its attempts to recreate the illusion of deterrence and to intimidate the state have also failed," he said. While Israel claimed to have destroyed 70 percent of Hezbollah's arsenal, Chehaitli said, "no one really knows. ... It remains a mystery." "It could still have military capabilities it hasn't used -- or it could have none," he added, emphasizing that Hezbollah, in any case, would not initiate a war but could fight back if one is imposed. The devastating blows Hezbollah suffered during the war with Israel have reportedly prompted the group -which has been fighting Israel since its establishment after the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982- to engage in a comprehensive internal review. The situation has shifted significantly due to the accelerated developments in the region following the Gaza war. Hezbollah, which was the principal component of Iran's "Axis of Resistance" carrying out missions outside Lebanon, has been forced to shift its focus. Kassem Kassir, a political analyst who specializes in Islamic movements and is close to Hezbollah, explained that the group is engaged in internal discussions, as well as talks with other political forces in the country, to develop "a new vision." "But so far, it hasn't produced a comprehensive or complete one," Kassir told UPI. What is clear, however, is that Hezbollah is now focusing on Lebanon and its future role as part of the state.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Claire's, known for piercing millions of teens' ears, files for Chapter 11, 2nd time since 2018
NEW YORK (AP) — Mall-based teen accessories retailer Claire's, known for helping to usher in millions of teens into an important rite of passage — ear piercing — but now struggling with a big debt load and changing consumer tastes, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. Claire's Holdings LLC and certain of its U.S. and Gibraltar-based subsidiaries — collectively Claire's U.S., the operator of Claire's and Icing stores across the United States, made the filing in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Delaware on Wednesday. That marked the second time since 2018 and for a similar reason: high debt load and the shift among teens heading online away from physical stores. Claire's Chapter 11 filing follows the bankruptcies of other teen retailers including Forever 21, which filed in March for bankruptcy protection for a second time and eventually closed down its U.S. business as traffic in U.S. shopping malls fades and competition from online retailers like Amazon, Temu and Shein intensifies. Claire's, based in Hoffman Estates, Illinois and founded in 1974, said that its stores in North America will remain open and will continue to serve customers, while it explores all strategic alternatives. Claire's operates more than 2,750 Claire's stores in 17 countries throughout North America and Europe and 190 Icing stores in North America. In a court filing, Claire's said its assets and liabilities range between $1 billion and $10 billion. 'This decision is difficult, but a necessary one,' Chris Cramer, CEO of Claire's, said in a press release issued Wednesday. 'Increased competition, consumer spending trends and the ongoing shift away from brick-and-mortar retail, in combination with our current debt obligations and macroeconomic factors, necessitate this course of action for Claire's and its stakeholders.' Like many retailers, Claire's was also struggling with higher costs tied to President Donald Trump's tariff plans, analysts said. Cramer said that the company remains in 'active discussions' with potential strategic and financial partners. He noted that the company remains committed to serving its customers and partnering with its suppliers and landlords in other regions. Claire's also intends to continue paying employees' wages and benefits, and it will seek approval to use cash collateral to support its operations. Neil Saunders, managing director of GlobalData, a research firm, noted in a note published Wednesday Claire's bankruptcy filing comes as 'no real surprise.' 'The chain has been swamped by a cocktail of problems, both internal and external, that made it impossible to stay afloat,' he wrote. Saunders noted that internally, Claire's struggled with high debt levels that made its operations unstable and said the cash crunch left it with little choice but to reorganize through bankruptcy. He also noted that tariffs have pushed costs higher, and he believed that Claire's is not in a position to manage this latest challenge effectively. Competition has also become sharper and more intense over recent years, with retailers like jewelry chain Lovisa offering younger shoppers a more sophisticated assortment at low prices. He also cited the growing competition with online players like Amazon.
