
The most likely upsets in the South region for the 2025 Men's NCAA Tournament
Brackets explode most spectacularly when both sides of a matchup cooperate to produce an upset. And the South will provide multiple chances for that to happen: Two favorites with glaring weaknesses are set to face the region's two strongest underdogs, pending the results of a play-in game.
Below, you'll find a game-by-game analysis of every first-round matchup with Bracket Breaker implications in the South. As a reminder, to qualify as a Bracket Breaker game, opponents need to be separated by at least five seeds (which is why we don't cover 8 vs. 9 or 7 vs. 10 games). Our analysis adjusts teams' basic strengths according to how closely they statistically resemble favorites and underdogs from past tournaments and, where appropriate, by style matchups. We can't tell you how to pick — that depends on how richly your pool rewards deep upsets and your risk tolerance. But if you're interested in how our model works, check out this piece.
Advertisement
You'll also find links to the other regions as we post them, and stay tuned later in the week for upset odds for every potential second-round matchup.
Odds from BetMGM. For more March Madness coverage, check out all of our bracket advice.
More Bracket Breakers: Men's Top 10 Upsets | West Region Preview | Women's Top 10 Upsets
Upset Chance: 43.2 percent for San Diego State; 32 percent for UNC
Maybe not often, but sometimes, in statistics, as in life, things are simple. We write this over and over (and over): When it comes to top seeds and potential Cinderellas, the single most important thing a top dog can do to ward off pesky upstarts is to secure offensive rebounds. Hit the offensive boards hard, and a team can prevent prolonged dry spells. Well, Ole Miss ranks an abysmal 313th in the country with a 25.4 offensive rebounding percentage. That won't buy them any early-round insurance.
Further, because Mississippi doesn't produce a possession advantage at either end of the court, it falls into the category of favorites we call 'Generic Giants.' This group is significantly more vulnerable to early upsets. And it's easy to find recent historical comparisons for a slow-paced, defensively efficient squad like the Aztecs knocking off teams that statistically resemble Ole Miss. North Carolina State over Marquette last year, Iowa State over Wisconsin in 2022 and Rhode Island over Creighton in 2017 are a few that popped up in Slingshot's similarity scores. With giant and underdog characteristics and matchups factored in, the gap in strength between these teams nearly disappears. It's just that simple.
Meanwhile, North Carolina is not our model's idea of a dangerous underdog for reasons unrelated to blue blood. The Tar Heels play fast (over 70 possessions per game). They don't force turnovers (15.2 percent of opponent possession, ranking 310th). They don't hoist tons of threes (37 percent of attempts). Indeed, Slingshot estimates that UNC's statistical profile would cost it 7.6 points per 100 possessions in a tournament scenario against an average upper seed. That's a pretty steep penalty. Yet our model gives North Carolina a nearly one-in-three shot to win this matchup anyway. Despite the difference in their seeds, UNC is almost as strong as Mississippi straight-up in our power rankings. And Ole Miss just doesn't build possessions. Again, this one is simple.
Advertisement
Upset Chance: 37.3 percent
The announcement of this matchup during the NCAA Tournament selection show set off klaxons, red lights, buzzing phones — every kind of alarm here at Bracket Breakers Central. We've had our eyes on the Tritons for months. They've risen impressively from Division II, putting together a roster of smart, efficient players like Hayden Gray, who leads the nation in steal percentage, and star guard Aniwaniwa Tait-Jones (19.5 ppg). UC San Diego specializes in disrupting opponents' defense and has built a ginormous advantage in possessions from its turnover differential: 23.4 percent for its opponents vs. only 13.4 percent for the Tritons.
And now they face Michigan, the team that's probably most associated with 'turnover issues,' as coach Dusty May keeps having to talk about it in postgame press conferences. The Wolverines rank 328th in turnover rate on offense — 328th! That's terrible, and often lethal, for any upper seed looking to advance by playing safely. Early this season, Michigan was able to win despite turning the ball over on more than one of every five possessions because they were shooting the lights out. But that's not sustainable. And the Wolverines' problems with throwing the ball away don't seem fixable anytime soon, particularly when they play a starting lineup that features two 7-footers (Danny Wolf and Vladislav Goldin).
We've got a nearly irresistible force meeting quite a movable object. And in the 10 games most similar to this contest in our database, underdogs won in four of the matchups, including Florida Atlantic over Kansas State in 2023. History could very well repeat itself — if, that is, UC San Diego actually winds up as the dog in this game. We're not so sure they should be.
Upset Chance: 16.6 percent
If our model could be distracted by interesting statistical cases, it could waste entire days staring at the data for these teams. Texas A&M is comically extreme in its inability to execute on offense. The Aggies lose the ball on 18.8 percent of possession (ranking 249th), shoot terribly from inside (48 percent, ranking 283rd), and are even worse from long range (31.7 percent, ranking 317th). Yet they rank 44th in the nation in offensive efficiency because they've got a massive 42 percent offensive rebounding percentage, the best in the country. As was true last year, their best offensive play is probably a missed shot. And this season, their defense is dramatically better at cutting off opponents' shooting.
Advertisement
Yale, meanwhile, went 13-1 in the Ivy League, which had three of the worst teams in college basketball and never really tested the Bulldogs. And they've got some risk-averse statistical traits that our model dislikes in underdogs, like an emphasis on protecting the ball rather than forcing turnovers, and on defensive rather than offensive rebounding. But James Jones' teams have played diverse styles over the years. Yale can shoot 3s (38.5 percent) when it needs to and launched 26 against Purdue, their toughest opponent of the season. Three of the 10 most similar games to this matchup in our database were won by the lower seeds. And Texas A&M can go dry for long stretches. Yale has a puncher's chance here, but maybe not as good of one as some pundits think.
Upset Chance: 10.8 percent
Ah, they grow up so fast. Three years ago, in T.J. Otzelberger's first year at the helm, Iowa State leapt from 2 to 22 wins, including two big tournament upsets, by embracing chaos and forcing opponents into truckloads of turnovers. The Cyclones just kept getting better, morphing quickly from David into Goliath. Now, they're still disrupting opposing offenses (turnovers on 21.8 percent of opponent possessions, ranking 14th), but also rebounding at both ends and shooting 3s selectively and well. They're a top-20 team in offensive efficiency, top-10 on defense, and looked like a legitimate title contender — until they lost Keshon Gilbert to a strained groin. Now, the Cyclones' upside is severely limited.
Against this, Lipscomb offers a mixed bag of tricks. They keep things slow and hoist a lot of 3s (ranking 26th in 3PA/FGA) but force few turnovers (15.8 percent of opponent possession, ranking 270th) and grab very few of their own missed shots (24.1 percent OR%, ranking a woeful 329th). That mix doesn't yield anything like the secret sauce it would take to close the gap of more than 20 points per 100 possessions between these teams in our basic power ratings.
Upset Chances: 3.3 percent for Alabama St.; 4 percent for St. Francis
As it updates its calculations, Slingshot has to respect the fact that 15- and 16-seeds have been winning more first-round games in recent years. However, St. Francis was founded in 1799 by an emigrant Russian priest named Demetrius Augustine Gallitzin, and we're pretty sure even he wouldn't have thought the Red Flash, clearly the worst team in the field of 68, have a 4 percent chance to beat Auburn. (Fun fact: The New York version of St. Francis shut down all its athletic programs in 2023, but we all still specify that this school is St. Francis of PA.) They rate slightly higher than the SWAC champions as a giant killer because they play a little slower and shoot a few more 3s. But not well.
Upset Chance: 3.2 percent
Advertisement
Let's take a moment to salute the Bulldogs, a fun bunch that crushed three straight opponents in the America East tournament, thereby ending Vermont's decade-long reign as the archetypical schoolyard bully. Bryant's got some size and works the boards. But they're an even mangier underdog than the 16-seeds in this region because of their tempo. Motoring at 73.1 possessions per game, the sixth-fastest pace in the country, they simply run themselves out of games against better opponents. This is a team that gave up 112 points to Grand Canyon, 99 to St. John's and 90 to, yes, Siena. That's no way to compete with Michigan State, which is typically excellent on the defensive glass and around the perimeter and has the fifth-best defense in the country.
(Photo of Hayden Gray, Justin Rochelin and Yaqub Mir: Ian Maule / Getty Images; Illustration: Will Tullos, The Athletic)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
7 hours ago
- Boston Globe
North Carolina players embrace new world with Bill Belichick as coach
North Carolina players hadn't spoken to reporters since last year's team ended its season with a Fenway Bowl loss to UConn three days after Christmas, all of which came after Belichick had been hired as coach for the 2025 season. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up So Tuesday marked the first time UNC had made players available to reporters since then to discuss Belichick's arrival. That has meant being coached by someone with a long track record of success at the sport's highest level, along with getting a peek behind the terse and grumpy persona he was known for with the Patriots. Advertisement Defensive back Will Hardy said the players are used to curiosity that comes with being coached by the NFL lifer now giving college a try. 'There's a lot of that, you get a lot of 'How is Coach Belichick? What's new? What's different?'' Hardy said. 'So I've rehearsed these questions a lot with family and friends.' Advertisement The school hired Belichick in December to elevate the program at a time when football's role as the revenue driver in college sports has never been bigger. He and general manager Michael Lombardi have described their goal as building a pro-style model at the college level. It's been a key pitch as the 73-year-old Belichick made his first foray onto the recruiting trail, as well as the volume of players transferring in and out of the program. Belichick's first on-field work in Chapel Hill came during spring workouts, lodged between portal windows in December and April. 'Look, these are great kids to work with, they really are,' Belichick said Tuesday. 'We've had great buy-in. There have really been no problems at all. These guys are on time, they're early, they work hard, they put in the work in the weight room, out on the field. They spend time on their own, whether it's doing extra training or coming over and watching film and that type of thing. 'They've made a ton of improvement and these guys are a lot better than they were when we started in January, on every level. So it's exciting to see where that's going to take us.' For the players, part of the adjustment had been the reality that their coach was winning Super Bowls with quarterback Tom Brady while they were growing up and watching on TV. 'I mean, maybe at first when you see him, all you see is the Super Bowls that he's won,' said offensive lineman Christo Kelly, a Holy Cross transfer and Belichick's first portal commitment. 'But when you get here and you see the way he cares, you see the way that he approaches the game, you see how hard he works, there's no question why he has the success that he has. Advertisement 'The attention to detail, the emphasis on fundamentals, and really just kind of creating competition for the guys, that's what's getting built here. Guys are embracing it. He treats everybody with tremendous respect and it's been great.' Defensive back Thad Dixon had met Belichick before when he was at Washington, playing under Belichick's son Steve — now the Tar Heels' defensive coordinator and linebackers coach. The two shared a few conversations then, and he jumped at the chance to head east. 'I really just wanted the opportunity just to learn from somebody like that, that had did it in the league for so long,' Dixon said. Yet not every surprise has been about X's and O's. Sometimes it's simply when Belichick has dropped the all-business facade to expose an unexpectedly humorous side. 'I feel like that's the biggest curveball, you're coming to the first meeting and you're expecting it to be serious, 100 percent locked in,' said Shipp, who played 12 games for UNC last season. 'He comes in and he introduces himself and then he busts a joke. That's the second thing he said.' Hardy pointed that vibe, too. 'There are times when he'll just crack a joke out of nowhere,' he said. 'And just him being kind of monotone sometimes will make those jokes so funny.' Still, Hardy noted it's mingled amid the work, such as film sessions when 'there's no hiding' when Belichick highlights a mistake. UNC opens the season on Labor Day against TCU in a college version of Monday Night Football. Advertisement 'I've loved having 1-on-1 conversations with him,' Hardy said. 'It's cool to see and meet him personally, because you grow up and see him on TV and everything. And he's just a completely different coach and guy when you get to be around him all day. It's cool.'


USA Today
8 hours ago
- USA Today
Diversity in College World Series field reminds us what college sports is all about
Diversity in College World Series field reminds us what college sports is all about Show Caption Hide Caption Jeremiah Smith, Ryan Williams on cover of EA Sports College Football '26 EA Sports chose Ohio State's Jeremiah Smith and Alabama's Ryan Williams to be on the cover of College Football '26. We talk to the athletes about what this moment means to them. This week, with the approval of the House vs. NCAA settlement, college sports officially split into two. The power conference schools are going to pay their athletes, make their own rules and take the responsibility of enforcement and punishment from an NCAA that was never very good at it in the first place. Is there fear and resentment across the rest of the college sports landscape about where this is all headed? Of course there is. Schools at the lower end of Division I see a power grab led by the Big Ten and SEC and wonder if the clock is ticking on their conference's automatic access to NCAA championships and perhaps even a full divorce. To many folks in the smaller conferences, it feels like they're paying the price for a problem they didn't cause. But in a world where it increasingly feels like the new financial realities of the Big Ten and SEC are driving a land grab for postseason bids, starting with the College Football Playoff but undoubtedly trickling down to every sport in the future, this year's College World Series shows why some traditions are worth preserving. The eight teams that advanced to Omaha over the last few days represent seven different conferences: The SEC (LSU and Arkansas) The Big 12 (Arizona) The ACC (Louisville) The Big Ten (UCLA) The Sun Belt (Coastal Carolina) The Missouri Valley (Murray State) The Pac-12 (Kind of. Oregon State played as an independent this season but was crucial in the effort to resurrect a new Pac-12, which will begin play in the 2026-27 academic year.) Is such a huge conference spread a bit of an anomaly? Absolutely. In recent renditions of the CWS, you'll see a whole lot of SEC and ACC representation, some strong Big 12 and Pac-12 programs (before it imploded) and your occasional interloper from outside the power conferences. But this year's field underscores a very simple point that the SEC and Big Ten would be wise to remember as they go about the business of remaking college sports: At the end of the day, competition is what this is all about. And even if that means you come up on the short end some years, it's nothing to be afraid of. That's just sports. Though we can find a thousand things the NCAA has done wrong on its journey toward the professionalization of college sports, it did one thing that was really genius. In constructing its format for national championship tournaments, it ensured that all Division I conferences would be represented by an automatic qualifier. This means that when the men's basketball players at SIU-Edwardsville began last season, they could dream of playing in March Madness. Was there a realistic chance to win a national championship? Of course not. Were they even likely to win a game? Heck no. Were they better than dozens of basketball teams who missed the tournament? According to the computers, they weren't even in the top 200. But they won their conference, earned their moment on the big stage and got blown off the court by Houston. That's what usually happens. But every now and then, you get an upset everyone remembers. Either way, the possibility of that moment keeps those programs viable and those communities invested in college basketball. Overall, it's a pretty great system. Folks at those lower levels have good reason to wonder if they'll keep those automatic bids going forward, not just in basketball but a variety of sports. SEC commissioner Greg Sankey, in particular, has made public comments that could be considered threatening to the notion of equal access regardless of conference size or strength. Meanwhile, there was talk a few weeks back that the SEC and Big Ten could be interested in a 16-team CFP format where they get four automatic bids each, with the ACC and Big 12 getting two apiece and one going to the top-ranked Group of Five champion. It seems as if that idea has subsequently died down. Even though the ACC and Big 12 locking in two bids each might have been tempting on the surface, formalizing an existence as second-class citizens would not have gone over well with those fan bases. If you were to construct the CWS on the same kinds of principles that the Big Ten and SEC have been flirting with this year in their CFP expansion discussions, you'd never have seven conferences involved like this year. And the reason it's such a timely development for college sports is that it should remind people in the industry why they do this in the first place. Everyone understands that a true level playing field is impossible, but competition is about more than revenue on a spreadsheet. And when it comes to the structure of Division I, giving an automatic bid to every conference underlines that they are partners in an enterprise whose mission is to deliver a good product – even if a lot of those partners can't stack up competitively to the mighty SEC. You can't deliver as good of a product for the sport – the entire sport – by stacking the deck and using historical performance to engineer future outcomes in your favor. You can only do it by making the postseason possibility available to everyone and letting the chips fall where they may. Even in a more complicated and professionalized world, you don't need to apologize for the outcome when you just let sports do its thing.

NBC Sports
14 hours ago
- NBC Sports
NCAA says online abuse related to sports betting declined during this year's March Madness
INDIANAPOLIS (AP) — Online abuse related to sports betting decreased during the NCAA's March Madness basketball tournaments compared with the prior year, but people involved in the competition still received more than 3,000 threatening messages, the NCAA said Tuesday. The NCAA hired Signify Group to monitor messages directed at athletes, coaches, game officials, selection committee members and others with official roles in the tournament. Signify used both artificial intelligence and human analysts to confirm the threats and, when necessary, report them to law enforcement. Overall, abuse related to sports betting was down 23%, the NCAA said in a news release. The men's March Madness bracket was notable this year for the scarcity of upsets, with all four No. 1 seeds advancing to the Final Four and Florida, a popular pick to win it all, claiming the national title. On the women's side, three top seeds made the national semifinals and No. 2 seed UConn, among the pre-tournament favorites, won the championship. The NCAA's analysis found that overall, abusive statements directed at people involved in the men's tournament increased by 140% — much of it directed at the selection committee and coaches — while abuse related to sports betting was down 36%.