National Wealth Fund to put £28m into carbon capture project
Peak Cluster is working towards a pipeline that will take carbon emissions from cement and lime companies in the Peak District and store them below the Irish Sea.
The £28.6 million is coming from the National Wealth Fund (NWF) a body announced by the Government last year with £27.8 billion to invest in clean energy and growth industries, in the hope of catalysing other private investment.
Peak Cluster is also backed by £31 million from the private sector, the Treasury said, and will be the NWF's first investment in carbon capture, since Rachel Reeves said in March that it should be a priority.
The Chancellor said: 'We're modernising the cement and lime industry, delivering vital carbon capture infrastructure and creating jobs across Derbyshire, Staffordshire and the North West to put more money into working people's pockets.'
Energy Secretary Ed Miliband described the investment as a 'landmark' that could help 'deliver thousands of highly skilled jobs'.
'Workers in the North Sea and Britain's manufacturing heartlands will drive forward the country's industrial renewal, positioning them at the forefront of the UK's clean energy transition,' he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Labour ‘only just getting started' says Starmer as he faces ‘tax raid' questions
Labour is 'only just getting started' in Government, Sir Keir Starmer has said as he faced questions about a 'tax raid' later this year. The Prime Minister said he would not 'write the budget months out' from the autumn, after Kemi Badenoch alleged the Treasury could introduce a pensions levy. Reflecting on his first year in Downing Street, Sir Keir told the Commons that Labour MPs will 'happily' face their constituents during the summer recess, which begins next week. He claimed the Government had already paved the way for 4.5 million extra NHS appointments and added: 'So we're going to tell our constituents that, then we're going to tell them about the free school meals we're rolling out, free breakfast clubs, the free childcare and school uniform costs. We'll tell them about that. 'And then when we've done that, we'll move on to affordable houses and tell them about the £39 billion we're investing. When we've finished that, we'll tell them about the rail and road upgrades across the country with a £120 billion investment and, of course, the three trade deals. 'And, Mr Speaker, we're only just getting started.' Sir Keir was responding to Mrs Badenoch during their final Prime Minister's Questions exchange before the recess, after the Conservative leader said: 'It's the end of term, so why don't we go through his end-of-term scorecard? The economy is contracting; inflation, highest in the G7; unemployment up every month under this Government; spending out of control, borrowing costs more expensive than Greece, and this is just the first year.' She also told MPs: 'The fact is, this summer, they're going to have to go to their constituents and explain why they've been making such a mess over the last 12 months. 'And isn't (it) the case that the worst – given that this is just their first year – the worst is yet to come?' Mrs Badenoch had earlier pressed Sir Keir to describe a 'modest income'. Referring to a rise in inflation to 3.6% in June, up from 3.4% in May, she said: 'We just heard that inflation is up again, the worst in the G7. 'We left him with 2% inflation. We have borrowing up, unemployment up, taxes are up under his Government. 'The fact is, the Prime Minister doesn't get it, so let me tell him: his budget last year had high taxes. That's why the economy is contracting. 'But the Government has said that they won't put up taxes for people on modest incomes, but they also seem incapable of explaining who is in that category. 'So can the Prime Minister clear up the confusion and tell us what he thinks a modest income is?' Sir Keir replied: 'I think of the working people across this country who put in every day and don't get back what they deserve, and that's who we're working for. That's who we're fixing the country (for). 'The sort of people that work hard but haven't necessarily got the savings to buy themselves out of problems. 'And that's who we're working for, and that's why we put the national living wage up, that's an extra £1,400.' He added: 'We know exactly who we're working for. She comes here every week and just talks the country down.' Mrs Badenoch denied that and added: 'I'm talking him down.' She said: 'The Chief Secretary to the Treasury (Darren Jones) said that working people are people who don't get a pay slip, but millions of self-employed people don't get a pay slip. So are the self-employed next in line for a Labour tax raid?' The Prime Minister replied: 'The self-employed were the very people who suffered under their watch, repeatedly suffered under their watch, particularly, if I remember, during Covid, when they didn't get the support that they needed. But she talks the country down. She cherry picks.' Mrs Badenoch said the Government is 'considering taxing' pension contributions and asked: 'Does the Prime Minister agree with me that a tax on pension contributions is a tax on working people?' The Prime Minister described his party's manifesto commitments made last year as 'absolutely clear' and said: 'I'm not going to write the budget months out.' He continued: 'I'm proud of the decisions that we took to invest in our NHS, to invest in our public services, all the decisions that they opposed. And it's no wonder that after a first year of a Labour Government business confidence is (at) a nine-year high. That's longer than she's been in government.' To a call of 'withdraw' from the Opposition benches, Sir Keir replied: 'I'm not withdrawing – I'm going to repeat: business confidence is at a nine-year high.' A Conservative spokesman later said: 'Labour won't rule out hitting the self-employed with new taxes. 'They won't rule out a tax raid on pensions. And the Prime Minister says 'modest incomes' refers to anyone without savings, raising the prospect of a tax on savings in the autumn. Labour are treating working people with contempt. 'Hiking taxes is not inevitable – it is a choice brought on by the Government's economic incompetence.'
Rhyl Journal
29 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Lammy hints at sanctions for Israeli minister over Gaza camp plans
David Lammy has condemned defence minister Israel Katz, who has reportedly put forward plans to move 600,000 Palestinians to a so-called 'humanitarian city' in Rafah, Gaza's now largely destroyed southern-most city. They would then be prevented from leaving, with the aim being to eventually move the entire population to the city. He told the Commons International Development Committee on Wednesday that 'no defence minister should be talking about effectively holding people, unable to leave, presumably, in the manner in which he described'. Asked whether Mr Katz would be sanctioned, as other Israeli ministers had been over comments inciting violence against Palestinians, Mr Lammy told the committee he could not comment on future sanctions. But he added: 'You will have heard my statement about Minister Katz and you will have heard my statements previously about ministers Smotrich and Ben-Gvir, and then the decision that I took.' The UK sanctioned Israeli national security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and finance minister Bezalel Smotrich 'in their personal capacity' in June, citing their 'repeated incitement of violence against Palestinian civilians'. Prior to those sanctions, Mr Lammy had described comments by Mr Ben-Gvir and Mr Smotrich on Palestinian 'emigration' from Gaza as 'dangerous, extreme and totally wrong'. Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Norway also sanctioned the two men at the same time, but the decision brought criticism from US secretary of state Marco Rubio, who said it did not 'advance' efforts to secure a ceasefire. Last week, Mr Lammy told the Commons Foreign Affairs Committee that the Government could take further action against Israel if a ceasefire in Gaza was not achieved. On Wednesday, Mr Lammy also stressed the Government's opposition to the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), which has replaced UN aid distribution centres with just four sites in militarised zones run by private security contractors. Hundreds of Palestinians are reported to have been killed or wounded while seeking aid at GHF sites. Mr Lammy told the International Development Committee the GHF system 'must not set a precedent' and was 'outwith of global norms and rules that we all signed up to after the Second World War' as he called for more aid trucks to be allowed into Gaza.
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
The ghost at the feast haunting Rachel Reeves' bombshell speech to the City
It never rains but it pours for Rachel Reeves – today's rise in inflation to 3.6 per cent was higher than expected, and there was a ghost at the feast as the chancellor delivered her Mansion House speech last night – her Budget in the autumn. The audience at her City of London dinner broadly welcomed her relaxation of financial services regulations but wondered whether her next act in this arena will be hostile: there is speculation the Budget will include a levy on the banks' profits and a wider wealth tax. Remarkably, for a second year running, the government has sparked a summer of speculation about which taxes will rise in the autumn. Cue four months of damaging headlines. This is a government that doesn't learn from its mistakes. True, lots of the media speculation will prove wide of the mark. But some mud sticks, and a Labour Party struggling in the opinion polls can't afford to have much more chucked at it. Ministers don't help themselves, firstly struggling to define the 'working people' they will protect from tax rises, and secondly failing to rule out a wealth tax. I suspect the chancellor will not announce a new one – but that her Budget will target the wealthy, and that her allies will quietly tell Labour MPs she is achieving the aim of a wealth tax by other means. Reeves offered a clue in the Commons in May: When Labour's Brian Leishman called for an annual wealth tax on multimillionaires to raise £24bn a year, the chancellor replied: 'At the Budget last year, we increased the rate of tax on non-doms, we increased capital gains tax, we increased the carried interest on bonuses and we introduced VAT on private schools. This government is ensuring that the wealthiest pay their fair share, because that is a basic Labour principle.' After the humiliating climbdown on welfare, Reeves knows she has to keep the Parliamentary Labour Party onside. The financial markets made clear they want her to remain chancellor after her teary Commons appearance, but some Labour MPs do not. Reeves urged people to take more risks by investing more savings in the stock market and promised she would be "bold in regulating for growth". Yet she should be bolder in addressing the long-term risks to the public finances – by ending the freeze and emergency 5 per cent cut in fuel duty; scrapping the triple lock; filling the looming £40bn gap from motoring taxes as drivers switch to electric vehicles and trying again to control the ballooning welfare budget with more carrots and fewer sticks. A genuinely bold approach would mean levelling with the public about the trade-offs needed to balance the nation's books instead of repeatedly scrambling together tax rises and spending cuts to stick to Reeves's fiscal rules in every Budget. This hand-to-mouth approach makes the Starmer government look like it lacks a grand economic strategy and is picking on groups like pensioners or the disabled. Reeves said in her speech that the world is changing, and I'm told that some government figures favour a ' defence precept ' – an earmarked tax rise to fund the 5 per cent rise in the defence budget by 2035 to meet the UK's NATO obligations (as I proposed recently). The problem: it would breach Labour's manifesto pledge not to raise income tax, national insurance or VAT. But there could be a way of not breaking its letter: raising the 45 per cent rate on taxable incomes of £125,140 to 50 per cent. Labour could claim it would not hit ordinary "working people." This "bold" approach would raise tax for defence to leave more money for other public services. Reeves should reform council tax, which becomes more unfair every year. The charge for a home worth £2m in England is the same for one worth £320,000 in the same local authority, and it's based on 1991 property values. This is bonkers. More than half of homes are effectively in the wrong band. New higher bands would cut bills in the north and Midlands and raise them in the south. True, it would be dubbed a 'mansion tax' by the media, but something has got to give, and Labour could win an argument on 'fair tax' on property. Reeves should live up to her own words last night – take more risks and be bold. I don't mean risking economic stability but taking political risks – with some short-term tax rises coupled with long-term reforms to break out of the doom loop of ever-rising taxes which hamper growth. As Helen Miller, the new director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, put it: "The government cannot afford not to be bold."
