
Are Semiconductors a 'Sell' After Trump Tariffs?
VIEW IN BROWSER
In yesterday's Digest, we reported on President Trump's plan to unveil new tariffs on semiconductor companies 'within the next week or so.'
Well, that 'week or so' turned into about an hour.
Shortly after that Digest hit your inbox, Trump confirmed plans for a 100% tariff on imported semiconductors, with one big caveat – companies that manufacture chips in the U.S., or commit to doing so, will be exempt.
Apple's CEO Tim Cook stood by Trump during the announcement after Apple pledged an additional $100 billion in U.S. investment (bringing its total domestic commitment to about $600 billion) and received that exemption.
So, what does this mean? And what's the investment step?
The headline '100% chip tariff' is dramatic. But the actual policy functions more like a policy lever than a full‑blown blockade.
This isn't a death knell to the overall AI/semiconductor story or AI profits (which is why the tech sector isn't plummeting as I write Thursday). But neither is it a nothingburger.
As to how to respond, here are three guidelines:
Prioritize companies investing in U.S. manufacturing – firms such as TSMC, Samsung, Nvidia, and GlobalFoundries are expanding their U.S. operations and are in a good position to benefit from exemptions
Maintain your core AI holdings – the new tariffs don't undermine long-term demand for semiconductors. Hold your top-tier AI plays
Look past the headlines for long-term opportunity – if more drama and downward volatility is ahead of us, look for favorable entry points on AI/semi leaders selling off in sympathy
Bottom line: Though the headlines sound frightening, this is ultimately bullish for well‑positioned AI players.
Yesterday, McDonald's beat earnings expectations, but…
While Wall Street applauded the numbers, the company's tone was cautious for one main reason…
Weakness among low-income consumers.
From CEO Chris Kempczinski:
Reengaging the low-income consumer is critical, as they typically visit our restaurants more frequently than middle- and high-income consumers.
This bifurcated consumer base is why we remain cautious about the overall near-term health of the U.S. consumer.
Longtime Digest readers will recognize this 'bifurcated consumer base' and recall the term we've used within this broader conversation: the 'Technochasm.'
There's a growing divide today between the 'haves' and 'have nots' – both in the market and in our society. One of the most influential factors driving this growing divide is wealth generated from investments in cutting-edge technology and artificial intelligence, something our experts have coined, 'The Technochasm.'
This bifurcation – strength from higher earners, fragility among lower-income households – is becoming a recurring theme in earnings reports across industries. And it's a valuable clue into the true health of the U.S. consumer.
This is especially important in the wake of last Friday's jobs report – the weakest in over a year – and Tuesday's ISM data, which caused legendary investor Louis Navellier to say:
We are teetering on a recession here, folks, and I don't like to use that R word, but that's what's happening.
Can high-income earners spend us out of a recession?
I've been a part of some interesting conversations with InvestorPlace analysts that tackle whether higher-income consumers can spend enough to offset the tightening we're seeing from lower-income households.
There's some evidence suggesting this has been happening.
For example, earlier this year, credit card data showed that upper-income households were spending regularly, particularly on experiences like travel, fine dining, and entertainment.
Here's CNBC from the spring:
Lower-income earners are reining in their transactions to focus on essentials, while the wealthy continue to spend freely on perks including dining out and luxury travel, according to first-quarter results from U.S. credit card lenders…
For instance, at Synchrony, which provides store cards for retail brands including Lowe's and T.J. Maxx, spending fell 4% in the first three months of the year…
That compares to a 6% spending jump at American Express and a similar rise at JPMorgan Chase, both of which cater to wealthier users with higher credit scores than Synchrony.
AmEx said its customers spent 7% more on dining and 11% more on first class and business class airfare than a year earlier.
These consumers are benefiting from rising asset values, higher interest income, and – thanks to the AI boom – significant gains in tech-heavy investment portfolios.
But we're starting to see signs of fatigue
Let's jump to Fortune from last week:
More than half (58%) of six-figure earners no longer feel financially successful, according to a recent report from Clarify Capital…
More than seven in 10 of these high earners are now being forced to shop at discount grocery chains to save cash.
Around 74% also say they're cutting back on dining out, 54% are skimping out on entertainment, 51% are getting thrifty with buying clothes, 49% are scaling back their subscriptions, and 49% are spending less on travel…
About 85% of six-figure workers say they feel stressed and anxious due to increased living costs.
Fortune goes on to report that the delinquency rate among high-income borrowers has surged 130% over the last two years.
As to the investment implications, there are many ways we can take this
Let's briefly walk through four options.
Invest in the companies at the forefront of the technologies that will continue to explode the Technochasm
Clearly, that's AI.
But as we've been profiling here in the Digest, the latest evolution is 'Physical AI' (think robots/humanoids).
On Monday through Wednesday, we brought you interviews from Louis Navellier, Eric Fry, and Luke Lango detailing this opportunity. And they just released a new portfolio of Physical AI leaders in their AI Revolution Portfolio investment service.
Regardless of how you do it, giving your portfolio at least some exposure to cutting-edge AI is imperative.
Focus on fundamentally superior companies that are growing their earnings, despite a broader consumer slowdown
This has been the cornerstone of Louis' market approach for decades.
Earlier this week, in the same Flash Alert market update in which Louis warned of a potential recession, he also congratulated his Growth Investor subscribers on three earnings wins from earlier this week.
Here's how those stocks have performed since Tuesday:
AXON: +13%
KGC: +11%
PLTR: +9%
As Louis loves to say: 'earnings are working.'
Trade companies successfully catering to lower-income Americans
Lower-income shoppers are still buying from certain retailers, causing Wall Street to push up prices.
Our hypergrowth expert Luke Lango is in one such retailer in Breakout Trader – Dollar Tree (DLTR). After opening the trade in late-April, they're sitting on 31% gains.
These lower-income trades aren't necessarily 'hold forever' stocks, but for however long cost-conscious shoppers help drive their prices higher, stick with bullish momentum.
Refresh yourself on the valuations of every stock you own
If even higher-income consumers are beginning to pull back, earnings are likely to be next. And when earnings fall, eventually, stock prices do too – especially those priced for perfection.
So, refamiliarize yourself with the valuation of each stock you hold. Make sure you're comfortable.
(If you missed Eric's recent free research report on which expensive AI stocks he's selling today – and which stocks he's recommending to replace them – you can check it out right here.)
Coming full circle to McDonald's…
Its earnings report is a snapshot of the Technochasm in action.
Yes, certain consumers are still spending. But for many – especially at the lower end of the income spectrum – the strain is becoming undeniable.
Bottom line: When McDonald's says it's having to 'reengage' its most loyal customers through cheaper meals, we should take notice. That's a macro warning.
Checking in on Jonathan Rose's NioCorp trade
Back in July, we put a new speculative trade on your radar – NioCorp Developments (NB) – thanks to a heads-up from veteran trader Jonathan Rose.
Jonathan had just closed a 700% win on rare earth play MP Materials. And he had recently recommended a trade on NB as another early-stage name riding the same wave: U.S. demand for critical minerals tied to defense, energy, and the AI boom.
At the time, we emphasized caution. As with any speculative trade, risk mitigation is key because volatility was likely. To that end, Jonathan had recommended a defined-risk trade.
Well, the very next day, NB traded sharpy lower.
Jonathan explained that the selloff was driven by a capital raise – standard behavior for small-cap names funding their growth. He wasn't concerned for the trade.
If you took advantage of that selloff, congrats
Fast-forward to today, and NB is soaring, rapidly approaching its pre-capital-raise high.
It's up 54% from its late-July low, so if you bought on that weakness, congrats, you're likely sitting on double-digit gains.
Better still, even higher prices appear on the way…
A major new catalyst for growth
On Tuesday, we learned that the U.S. Department of Defense has awarded up to $10 million to NioCorp's Elk Creek Resources unit to support its domestic production of scandium – a rare earth metal critical for advance defense and aerospace systems.
This is a big deal.
Virtually the entire global scandium supply comes from China, Russia, and Ukraine. The U.S. hasn't mined scandium since 1969 – until now.
NioCorp's Elk Creek project is also sitting on high-value niobium and titanium, both essential for hypersonic missiles and other military applications.
The company already has binding long-term deals in place for 75% of its planned niobium output, and it just inked its largest scandium deal ever.
From CEO Mark Smith:
This is a grant, not an investment.
It shows strong U.S. government backing and how critical niobium and scandium are for defense.
In short, this is no longer just a speculative story; it's becoming big business, with real government backing.
We'll repeat ourselves from our July 16 Digest:
If you're looking for what could be the market's next major overnight winner, consider yourself in the loop.
Before we sign off, a quick 'congratulations' to Jonathan's Advanced Notice subscribers
They're on a roll right now.
Since March, here are their closed trade results:
18 trades: 14 winners, 4 losers
113.73% average return across all closed positions
169.91% average return across the winning positions
77.8%-win rate
Average trade hold period: 36 days
As we've said many times, Jonathan is one of the best traders in the biz.
To get a better sense for how and why, join him for his free Masters in Trading Live broadcasts at 11:00 a.m. Eastern time every day the market is open.
They're a great way to deepen your understanding of trading – and to see firsthand the strategies Jonathan uses to capture triple-digit gains, sometimes in just days.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
After Sitting on the Sidelines For 14 Months, Warren Buffett Could Be Buying One of His Favorite Stocks Again
Key Points Warren Buffett has been a net seller of stocks in each of the last 11 quarters. While he doesn't time the market, Buffett won't buy stocks if they don't trade below his estimate of intrinsic value. This stock's price has come down from its all-time high while its financials improve, making it a more appealing value right now. 10 stocks we like better than Berkshire Hathaway › Warren Buffett hasn't seen a lot to like in the stock market recently. In fact, he and his team of investment managers at Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.A) (NYSE: BRK.B) have been net sellers of stocks for 11 straight quarters. Buffett's stock sales have accelerated over the past five quarters. That includes monster sales of Berkshire's stakes in Apple and Bank of America. In the meantime, he's stopped buying one stock investors had seen him buy consistently each quarter since mid-2018. As a result, Berkshire's cash pile has climbed to a whopping $344 billion. But the market may be offering Buffett an opportunity to start buying his favorite stock again, and investors should consider doing the same. Buffett isn't timing the market Buffett's big stock sales over the last few years and his lack of purchases may be seen by some as the Oracle of Omaha trying to predict the future and time the market. While it might look like market timing, Buffett is merely sticking to what's worked for him as an investor for the last 60 years or so. "We try to price, rather than time, purchases," Buffett wrote in his 1994 letter to shareholders. The same could be said of Berkshire's stock sales. If the market is offering a massive premium on one of Berkshire's holdings, Buffett ought to sell it, pocket the cash, and look for opportunities in stocks trading well below their intrinsic value. That could even include buying Berkshire Hathaway shares themselves. In fact, the board of directors updated its share repurchase policy in 2018, allowing Buffett to buy back shares of the company as long as it traded below its intrinsic value, conservatively determined. Buffett quickly went to work buying back shares following that change, indicating that the stock looked like a bargain. Between 2018 and May 2024, Buffett spent $78 billion buying back shares of Berkshire Hathaway. Over the last 14 months, however, Buffett hasn't spent a single dollar buying back the stock based on Berkshire's quarterly earnings reports. He holds himself to the same high standards he expects of the CEOs of all the companies Berkshire invests in. "All stock repurchases should be price-dependent. What is sensible at a discount to business-value becomes stupid if done at a premium," he wrote in his 2023 letter to shareholders. But Berkshire shares have fallen considerably since Buffett announced he would step down as CEO at the end of the year during the company's annual meeting in May. And after a further sell-off sparked by its second-quarter earnings report, shares are starting to look a lot more appealing. That could open the door for Buffett to start buying back Berkshire's stock. Will Buffett start buying again? Berkshire Hathaway's earnings disappointed many investors, leading the market to sell off the stock. After a stellar 2024, the insurance business is back to more normalized operations, including big payouts earlier this year due to the California wildfires. That's led to a drop in underwriting profits, which pushed the conglomerate's total operating earnings down nearly 4% last quarter. It's worth noting, however, that Berkshire faced significant foreign exchange headwinds last quarter, which negatively affected operating earnings. Berkshire also wrote down its Kraft Heinz investment by $5 billion. That follows a $3 billion impairment charge it took in 2019. That further negatively affected reported earnings. Nonetheless, Buffett has seen the book value per share of Berkshire Hathaway climb, including a 2.1% gain from the first quarter, and a 10.9% increase from a year ago. Combined with the declining stock price over the last three months, Berkshire Hathaway shares now trade for a price-to-book ratio of about 1.5. That's an important valuation, because when Buffett last repurchased shares of Berkshire, the stock traded below that valuation. The stock has rarely dipped below that price since last May. But shares are certainly more attractive after the sell-off. A couple of factors could keep Buffett from buying at the current price. First, Berkshire's marketable equity portfolio is a significant factor in its book value. Buffett may still see most of the stocks in the portfolio as overpriced, especially as stocks continued to climb over the past year. That would push him to require a lower multiple for Berkshire stock, since repurchasing Berkshire shares would also mean purchasing a small piece of its equity portfolio. The other factor is that he may want to use a significant chunk of cash to bolster the railroad business in the near future. Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern have agreed to a merger, threatening the competitiveness of Berkshire's Burlington Northern Santa Fe. When you consider the strength of Berkshire's balance sheet and that it's not relying on insurance float for any capital at this point, it should trade for a higher price-to-book value ratio than it has historically. With shares trading around 1.5 times book value, the stock finally looks to be trading near its intrinsic value again, making it worth buying. Should you buy stock in Berkshire Hathaway right now? Before you buy stock in Berkshire Hathaway, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Berkshire Hathaway wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025 Bank of America is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Adam Levy has positions in Apple and Union Pacific. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple and Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool recommends Kraft Heinz and Union Pacific. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. After Sitting on the Sidelines For 14 Months, Warren Buffett Could Be Buying One of His Favorite Stocks Again was originally published by The Motley Fool


The Hill
5 minutes ago
- The Hill
Ukrainian Ambassador to the US: Ukraine ‘prays' for Trump-Putin meeting to ‘be effective'
The Ukrainian ambassador to the U.S. on Sunday said 'all of Ukraine prays' for the Friday meeting between President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin to be 'effective and to have great results.' 'So yes, we want Putin to stop, and we really are hopeful that this push from President Trump, and the sanction packages which are on the table, and secondary sanctions which are already implemented against those who help Russia, will convince President Putin that this is time for him to finally stop his aggression,' Oksana Markarova told CBS News' Margaret Brennan on 'Face the Nation.' Markarova said she appreciated Trump pushing to end the war, and Vice President Vance's recent trip to England to discuss Trump's efforts towards peace. She later reiterated Trump raising tariffs on India as something that made her feel 'confident that the U.S. will be coming from the position of strength, you know, peace through strength, and that will allow us, together, to find a solution to stop Russia's aggression.' Last Wednesday, Trump announced he would raise tariffs on India by 25 percent due to its buying of Russian oil, bringing the total tariffs the president has placed on the Southeast Asian country to 50 percent. The president also said last week he will meet with Putin in Alaska on Friday, hosting him for talks on ending the war in Ukraine. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is not currently expected to attend. However, earlier on Sunday, U.S. Ambassador to NATO Matthew Whitaker said 'it's possible' that Zelensky attends the upcoming meeting between Trump and Putin in Alaska. Markarova did not confirm if Zelensky would be showing up. Moscow has shared a ceasefire agreement with the Trump administration, demanding control of Eastern Ukraine in exchange for a halt in the three-year-long war. However, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who is not currently invited to the Alaskan meeting, adamantly opposed the new deal. 'Any decisions that are against us, any decisions that are without Ukraine, are at the same time decisions against peace. They will not achieve anything. These are stillborn decisions,' Zelensky posted on X.


Forbes
6 minutes ago
- Forbes
Meet CNN's Jessica Dean: ‘We Take People All Over The World'
For CNN anchor Jessica Dean, the weekends are anything but quiet. Having just passed the one-year mark as host of the primetime weekend edition of CNN Newsroom, she leads around seven hours of live coverage every Saturday and Sunday — hours that often unfold against the backdrop of history in real time. Since officially taking the role on August 3 of last year, Dean and her small team have found themselves at the center of some of the most consequential breaking news of the past 12 months. They've navigated the chaos of the assassination attempt on President Trump in Butler, Penn.; reported on the fall of the Assad regime; covered former President Biden's cancer diagnosis; delivered updates on the Boulder fire attack; and tracked U.S. military strikes on Iran. 'You have to think really fast and you have to trust yourself,' Dean says about the work. 'And you also have to trust your team.' That trust comes from years in the field — which, for Dean, has included stints doing local news in Arkansas and Philadelphia, joining CNN in 2018 and covering the midterms that year, traveling with then-candidate Joe Biden's presidential campaign, and reporting through the early Covid pandemic. Dean says her job now feels like the culmination of all those experiences. 'People come to CNN when big things happen,' she says. 'We take people all over the world… and there's such value in that — to give them on-the-ground reporting and to help them through those moments. 'Going back to Iran, you know, we had Fred Pleitgen in Iran. We had Clarissa Ward in Israel. We're able to take people there … It's tough out there right now for news. It's a moment for us, I think, where we really need to prove ourselves to viewers and they need to be able to trust us. And, especially on our show, I really try to honor that, and we work really hard to get it right and make sure people, if they're going to spend their time with us, walk away knowing more and are better informed.' CNN faces a new era as viewers shift to digital Dean's work, needless to say, also comes at a pivotal time for CNN and for cable news in general. The network, founded in 1980 as the first 24-hour television news channel, built its reputation on major live events — from the Gulf War to election nights. Today's viewers, of course, don't get their news the same way anymore. People might bounce between live TV and clips on social media — or even no TV at all, preferring to get their news in snackable bites from social media. For CNN, the challenge is holding onto its reputation for real-time, trustworthy coverage while finding new ways to reach an increasingly scattered digital audience. Dean sees that as an opportunity. 'CNN has a lot of exciting things ahead as we transition more into the digital world,' she says. 'Right now, you can watch us on linear television, which is amazing. But being able in the next year to kind of expand beyond that is going to be exciting. And one thing I know for sure — there will not be a shortage of news.' Cable news viewership has been under pressure industry-wide, with competition from on-demand content and shifting demographics. But when a major story breaks, audiences (or at least a portion of news audiences) still turn one or more of the big three — CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC. Dean's weekend broadcast is often where those first crucial hours play out for CNN. 'It's not my job to tell people what to think,' she says. 'It's my job to give them information and let them decide what makes sense to them.' The pressure to be accurate, measured, and fast is real. 'We don't want to be alarmist, but we also want to make sure viewers are getting all of the information,' she says. 'It's not my job to tell people what to think. It's my job to give them information and let them decide what makes sense to them. And I've found that people respond really well to that.' The year ahead will bring continued experimentation for CNN as it looks to integrate more digital-first storytelling without losing its core live-news DNA. Dean, for her part, is focused on her lane. 'Those seven, maybe eight, maybe nine hours each weekend — we can do that well. We can get it right.'