Alibaba (BABA) Bulls Rejoice as U.S.-China Trade War Nears Ceasefire
Elevate Your Investing Strategy:
Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence.
Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week.
Now trading around the key psychological level of $100 per share, Alibaba has nearly 50% upside over the next 12 months, according to Wall Street consensus. The message is clear: for investors who believe U.S.-China trade tensions are easing—and that the tariff concerns were overstated from the start—taking a bullish position in BABA stock is a logical move. Buying near the $100 intramonth lows and watching the stock climb toward $150 within a year presents a compelling opportunity for short-medium term opportunistic investors.
Alibaba Is a World-Class Investment Right Now
When I look at Alibaba today and set aside the macro noise, what stands out is a fundamentally undervalued tech powerhouse. As China's largest tech conglomerate, Alibaba operates across a wide range of high-growth sectors—including e-commerce, cloud computing, digital payments, logistics, and AI-driven services.
The valuation case is hard to ignore. Alibaba trades at a forward non-GAAP P/E of just 11, significantly below the sector average of 18. Its forward diluted EPS growth rate is 8.4%, compared to 6% for the broader industry. By traditional metrics, this positions Alibaba as clearly undervalued—a strong foundation for any investment thesis.
Add investor sentiment to the equation, and the opportunity becomes even more compelling. Western investors, who control a large share of global capital, have remained hesitant due to ongoing geopolitical tensions and perceptions of anti-Western sentiment in China. But that sentiment may be shifting.
The U.S. has reasserted its global influence, and while friction under Donald Trump's second term has been pronounced, recent trade de-escalation and diplomatic signals point toward a possible turning point in U.S.-China relations. If sentiment continues to improve, Alibaba is well-positioned to benefit meaningfully from the rebound.
Western Sentiment is Quietly Shifting
Major investors have been quietly accumulating shares of Alibaba, signaling growing confidence in the stock despite ongoing geopolitical concerns. Notably, Bridgewater—led by the legendary Ray Dalio—has made Alibaba its fourth-largest holding, now accounting for roughly 3.5% of its portfolio. The market is clearly applying a 'geopolitical discount' to Chinese equities, but savvy investors are choosing to look beyond the headlines and place their bets on a more stable global outlook. I count myself among them.
The shift in sentiment is also visible in the data. During the height of Trump's trade war rhetoric in March and April, Chinese equities saw $3.8 billion in outflows. By May, however, that trend had reversed, with $402 million in inflows following signs of diplomatic thawing. According to TipRanks' price data, BABA has outperformed U.S. benchmarks like the S&P 500 (SPX) despite the trade war rhetoric being ramped up every week.
Optimism around a so-called 'ceasefire' is very real, and there's reason to believe it could persist. Trump has every incentive to maintain stability with China; a breakdown in diplomacy that leads to a Taiwan conflict would crash the markets and tarnish his legacy. A stable China-U.S. relationship benefits everyone, including investors.
From a valuation standpoint, Alibaba remains compelling. A re-rating from its current 11x forward earnings to a more normalized 15–20x range could drive the stock up 50% or more. That's entirely reasonable if Alibaba delivers on the consensus estimate of 15% normalized earnings growth for Fiscal 2027.
By comparison, Amazon (AMZN) is forecast to grow EPS by 20% and trades at a forward P/E of 36. If Alibaba can close even a small portion of that gap, it will likely close the valuation gap as well.
Sentiment Flips Faster than Fundamentals
The reality is, I don't think the market has fully recognized Alibaba's upside potential yet, though analysts clearly have. The valuation re-rating I've been highlighting hasn't materialized, despite early signs that Chinese equities are starting to emerge from the shadows. Alibaba's 35% gain over the past 12 months is impressive, yet the recent 12.5% pullback in the past month presents a compelling entry point. As the saying goes, be greedy when others are fearful.
The stock price is currently trading moderately above the 50-week and 200-week moving averages, and the 14-week RSI (Relative Strength Index) is at 45, so this is at the very least fair value, and from the perspective of the fundamentals, a deep undervaluation.
That's why I think Alibaba is primed to buy, no matter how you look at it, as long as you can get over the macro fears around the U.S.-China relationship, which has to ease—the alternative is too severe for geopolitical figures to even seriously consider. Diplomacy seems to be the only path forward.
What Is the Price Target for Alibaba Stock?
On Wall Street, Alibaba has a consensus Strong Buy rating based on 14 Buys, one Hold, and zero Sells in the last three months. BABA's average stock price target of $156.43 indicates a 46% upside potential over the next 12 months.
Even the most conservative analyst estimate puts Alibaba at $130, implying nearly 25% upside from the current price of around $105. In other words, it's hard to see a bad outcome here. This is a classic case of a fundamentally strong stock being mispriced due to macro-driven noise.
It's Time to Bet Big on China
For Alibaba, the main downside risk lies in escalating China-U.S. tensions. However, even in the unlikely event of a full-scale conflict—given ongoing diplomatic efforts—U.S. equities would also suffer significantly. This creates a strong incentive for both nations to maintain peaceful relations, in which case Alibaba stands to benefit over the coming year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
27 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
The New Third Rail in Silicon Valley: Investing in Chinese AI
The backlash came swiftly for Benchmark, one of Silicon Valley's top venture capital firms, after Bloomberg News reported in late April that it was investing in an AI startup founded in China. Republican senators framed the deal as Benchmark effectively aiding the Chinese government, and suggested Congress should take action. Fellow venture capitalists said Benchmark was acting irresponsibly. 'You're just investing into your enemy,' says Delian Asparouhov, a 31-year-old partner at Founders Fund. 'Why would we be funding the Russia space program in 1972? Why would we be funding the Chinese AI race in 2025? To me, those are the same questions. It just seems to be beyond the realm of logic.' Benchmark declined to comment. But the grumbling came as a surprise to Bill Gurley, a longtime partner at the firm who scaled back his responsibilities in 2020 and wasn't involved directly in the deal. In a May episode of BG2, his podcast, Gurley supported the firm's decision to lead a $75 million investment in Butterfly Effect, the creator of the AI agent Manus. The product, he noted, only operates atop large language models developed in the US, such as Anthropic's Claude; and the startup has offices outside China and doesn't store any customer data there. He rejected the notion that it posed a threat to US national security. 'In not being a China hawk, people accuse you of being a sinophile. And there's a lot of room in between those things,' said the 6-foot-9-inch Gurley, one of the most recognizable figures in the venture industry.
CNBC
29 minutes ago
- CNBC
Inflation report Tuesday should provide clues on the impact tariffs are having on prices
June's inflation report will be looked at not so much for what the headline numbers show than what's in the underlying data, especially whether tariffs are starting to have an impact. The consumer price index, due Tuesday at 8:30 a.m. ET, is expected to show an uptick in both headline and core readings, with the latter still well above the Federal Reserve's target. But what will really matter is the extent to which President Donald Trump's tariffs are hitting prices and potentially driving inflation higher. "June is the first reading [when] these tariffs are really going to start to bite in a very noticeable way," said Chris Hodge, head U.S. economist at Natixis CIB Americas. CPI, which measures a broad basket of goods and services across the U.S. economy, is expected to show a 0.3% monthly increase for both headline and core rates, with the latter excluding volatile food and energy costs. On an annual basis, the index is expected to show a 2.7% headline reading and 3% on core. For the Fed, both numbers will still be north of its 2% target, though central bank policymakers use a separate Commerce Department gauge as their primary forecasting tool. More importantly, though, the CPI will provide a glimpse into how the Trump duties have worked their way into consumer pockets. When Hodge views the report, he will be looking at two key areas. "I'm looking at autos and I'm looking at apparel, and last month's reading was very low for both of them, which is very counterintuitive to what you would have" expected, he said. "These are two sectors that are very sensitive to increased tariffs." In fact, the May reading was subdued overall and seemed to indicate little upward pressure from the limited tariffs that went into effect in April. Both headline and core CPI rose just 0.1% on a monthly basis. New (-0.3%) and used (-0.5%) vehicle prices fell while apparel was off 0.4% and energy prices declined 1%. Those numbers are generally expected to turn around, though Goldman Sachs economists notably think used vehicles still may have seen a decline based on trends at recent auto auctions. Goldman is forecasting a below consensus gain of 0.2% in core CPI for June. Fed officials believe core provides a better guide to long-term inflation trends. Broadly speaking, economists will be looking to core goods trends as the best barometer for tariff impacts. The category includes items such as apparel and footwear, electronics, housing goods and furniture. Goldman expects increases in auto insurance and air fares, and a general contribution from tariffs of some 0.08 percentage point to the core reading. Tariff-impacted sectors such as furniture, recreation, education, communication and personal care could see price hits, the firm said. Economists also will keep an eye on shelter prices, which have been a stubborn component keeping readings higher. "Our forecast reflects a sharp acceleration in most core goods categories but limited impact on core services inflation, at least in the near term," Goldman said in a note. The White House also will be watching the report closely — Trump and other administration officials have been pressuring the Fed to lower interest rates, and a higher than expected inflation reading could cause central bankers to dig in their heels further on policy easing. "The Fed is going to want to make sure that longer run expectations are not becoming unanchored, and I think that the Fed is going to have to see that peak of tariff-induced inflation before they're going to be comfortable cutting," said Hodge, the Natixis economist. "We're at a time right now where breaking down [the inflation report] into individual components is more useful and more necessary than ever."
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dem report: China to seize global advantage from Trump international spending cuts
China will seize influence on the global stage as a result of the Trump administration's major cuts to international spending, according to a report published Monday by the Democratic staff on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (N.H.), the panel's top Democrat, commissioned the report as a wake-up call to her colleagues over the damage she says will be wrought by President Trump's policies six months into his term. The report comes as the Senate is considering a Trump administration rescissions package that would cut hundreds of billions in foreign funding. It also comes as Congress moves toward appropriations season; the House Appropriations Committee on Monday proposed a 22 percent funding cut for national security, Department of State, and related programs. 'I can't imagine that anybody who has a thoughtful strategy for how to address what's happening in the world would have done the kinds of actions this administration has done,' Shaheen said in a call Monday previewing the report. The report is based on open-source research, official staff travel, meetings with the Trump administration, foreign government officials, U.S. companies and international nongovernmental organizations. 'In private, our allies tell us that Chinese officials are gleeful, characterizing the United States as unreliable,' Shaheen wrote in the opening letter of the report. 'In some cases, China is filling the void we have left behind, buying up now-vacant radio frequencies to broadcast its propaganda to millions. But in many cases, Beijing is doubling down on its own long-term investments — in overseas infrastructure, critical minerals exploitation and exchange programs that bring foreign talent to Chinese universities — all while America withdraws.' The 91-page report covers cuts to foreign aid, economic assistance, democracy initiatives, free media and law enforcement. One case study includes U.S. budget cuts toward Africa and how they will impact efforts to develop the continent's exports of critical minerals. Trump has put a spotlight on Africa in the first six months of his term, brokering a peace agreement between the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda that could provide access to that region's critical minerals; touting $2.5 billion in deals and commitments at the recent U.S.-Africa Business Summit in June; and hosting five West African leaders at the White House in July. But the Democratic report says the Trump administration's gutting of the U.S. Agency for International Development has disrupted tens of millions of dollars in funding for projects complementing the development of infrastructure surrounding critical mineral extraction. It highlighted the Lobito Corridor project, a railway that brings critical minerals from Congo and Rwanda to Angola for shipment across the Atlantic Ocean. China is working on a similar project called the TAZARA Railway, which would connect Tanzania and Zambia and allow for exports of critical minerals across the Indian Ocean. The TAZARA Railway 'includes Chinese political training and other soft power initiatives to export the Chinese Communist Party's authoritarian style of government. Whichever project is successful will dictate whether critical minerals flow towards the Atlantic Ocean and the United States or towards the Indian Ocean and China,' the report warns. The report also highlights the Trump administration's halting of funds for the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) and specifically a $649 million infrastructure project in Indonesia, a Muslim-majority nation and regional leader that maintains ties with both the U.S. and China. The MCC funds projects in poor but stable countries to help drive new investment opportunities for American businesses. While the MCC funds were reinstated, the initial pause 'delayed the launching, opening, evaluation and signing of bids for significant procurements,' the report notes. 'Following consultations with Indonesian counterparts, Senate Foreign Relations Committee Minority Staff also concluded that the pause has damaged America's standing and credibility with leadership in Jakarta,' the report read. Shaheen, a centrist Democrat who has worked with Republicans in the past, is using the report to push GOP colleagues to help reverse cuts or save bipartisan initiatives that are on the chopping block with the Trump administration's rescissions request. 'I think there are some aspects of the report that we talk about where there's a real interest in seeing them continue — the Millennial Challenge Corporation is one of those, again, a Bush initiative that has been very effective,' Shaheen said in response to a question of whether any GOP lawmakers would get behind the report's recommendations. Shaheen also pointed out the Trump administration's request to cut 91 percent of funding for U.S.-led international narcotics and law enforcement programs as standing in direct opposition to the president's commitment to combat the opioid epidemic and proliferation of fentanyl. The report also highlights the administration's termination of funding for international law enforcement to target cyber crime emanating from Southeast Asia. In 2024, Americans suffered $13.7 billion in losses from cyber-related scams, a 66 percent increase from 2023, the report notes. 'I can't imagine that there's any serious strategy that eliminates that kind of international law enforcement activity if you're really serious about addressing what the PRC is doing,' Shaheen said, referring to the People's Republic of China (PRC). Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
