Australia pays US second $800m for AUKUS amid review
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese confirmed the latest instalment on Wednesday, following an initial $A500 million paid in February.
In 2023, the United States, Australia and Britain unveiled details of a plan to provide Australia with nuclear-powered attack submarines from the early 2030s to counter China's ambitions in the Indo-Pacific.
Australia committed to spend $A368 billion over three decades in its biggest-ever defence deal. Canberra is due to pay the US $A3 billion by the end of the year to support the expansion of American submarine shipyards, Reuters reported in April.
"There's a schedule of payments to be made. We have an agreement with the United States as well as with the United Kingdom, it is about increasing their capacity, their industrial capacity," Albanese told national broadcaster ABC.
"As part of that as well, we have Australians on the ground, learning those skills."
Trump launched a formal review of AUKUS in June to examine whether the pact met his "American First" criteria. It will be led by Elbridge Colby, who in the past has expressed scepticism about AUKUS.
Australia, which sees the submarines as critical to its own defence as tensions grow over China's military build-up, has maintained it is confident the pact will proceed.
"We support AUKUS," Albanese said.
"We have an agreement to a treaty level, with our partners, signed, of course in San Diego with the United States and United Kingdom."
Washington will sell several Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarines to Australia, while Britain and Australia will later build a new AUKUS-class submarine.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
28 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
ATO accused of dumping tax bill for ex-PM Paul Keating's company
The Australian Tax Office (ATO) has been accused of writing off more than $950,000 in penalties and interest owed by one of Paul Keating's investment companies after negotiations with the former prime minister and his advisers, the ABC reports. There is no suggestion of wrongdoing by Keating, but the report raises questions for the ATO about its treatment of the rich and powerful as any challenge to an ATO decision like this would usually require the aggrieved party to contest the matter in the Federal Court, according to the ABC Four Corners report. Keating and the ATO have been contacted for comment. The penalties and interest bill relate to the sale of a successful investment by Keating in Australian audio group Lake Technology with was sold to US group Dolby Laboratories in 2004 at a valuation of $23 million. Keating was a major investor along with adman John Singleton. 'The Lake board runs the risk of doing another MIM; giving the company away to Americans who have been influenced by Lake's exceptionally poor management,' Keating said in 2003 as the takeover bid from Dolby got under way. Loading According to the ABC report, the interest and penalties bill was issued after the ATO discovered in 2012 that one of Keating's companies, Brenlex had not reported profits from a Lake Technology share sale and owed $446,000 in tax. Brenlex agreed to pay the tax debt, but the ATO demanded – at that stage – more than $600,000 in interest and penalties which had accrued in the years since the share sale.
The Age
28 minutes ago
- The Age
ATO accused of dumping tax bill for ex-PM Paul Keating's company
The Australian Tax Office (ATO) has been accused of writing off more than $950,000 in penalties and interest owed by one of Paul Keating's investment companies after negotiations with the former prime minister and his advisers, the ABC reports. There is no suggestion of wrongdoing by Keating, but the report raises questions for the ATO about its treatment of the rich and powerful as any challenge to an ATO decision like this would usually require the aggrieved party to contest the matter in the Federal Court, according to the ABC Four Corners report. Keating and the ATO have been contacted for comment. The penalties and interest bill relate to the sale of a successful investment by Keating in Australian audio group Lake Technology with was sold to US group Dolby Laboratories in 2004 at a valuation of $23 million. Keating was a major investor along with adman John Singleton. 'The Lake board runs the risk of doing another MIM; giving the company away to Americans who have been influenced by Lake's exceptionally poor management,' Keating said in 2003 as the takeover bid from Dolby got under way. Loading According to the ABC report, the interest and penalties bill was issued after the ATO discovered in 2012 that one of Keating's companies, Brenlex had not reported profits from a Lake Technology share sale and owed $446,000 in tax. Brenlex agreed to pay the tax debt, but the ATO demanded – at that stage – more than $600,000 in interest and penalties which had accrued in the years since the share sale.
The Advertiser
28 minutes ago
- The Advertiser
US beef unlikely to flood Australia as ban lifted
Australian cattle producers have been left blindsided by a decision to lift a ban on US beef, but the level of American product arriving in Australia is expected to be very low. The federal government on Thursday revealed it would lift biosecurity restrictions on US beef as it seeks a way to dampen the blow of President Donald Trump's volatile tariff regime. Australia has been mulling over the move for months after Mr Trump requested a lift on the ban, and Agriculture Minister Julie Collins stressed the decision follows a decade-long science-based review. Cattle Australia CEO Will Evans believed the move would not have been made unless the government had the utmost confidence in the science, but said some would still be unhappy with its decision. "There's going to be a lot of people today who feel blindsided by this, there's going to be a lot of people who are going to feel really frustrated and threatened by this," he told ABC radio. "We need to talk to them. "The US is an incredibly important trading partner - we need to maintain access and we need to maintain relationships with them." Some have raised worries US beef could impact Australia's domestic market, industry representatives remain relatively unperturbed. "It's a bit like selling ice to Eskimos," Australian Meat Industry Council CEO Tim Ryan told ABC. The domestic beef industry is self-sufficient and any imports of US beef are "unlikely to have any effect on the market here", Mr Evans said. The US can't even meet its own needs, he noted, and remains one of the main export markets for Australian beef. Likewise, Australian beef is one of the country's biggest exports to the US and was worth $14 billion in 2024. But the US president has taken issue with the perceived one-sidedness of this relationship, saying in April, "they won't take any of our beef". The US has been able to send beef to Australia since 2019, though any beef raised in Canada or Mexico before being slaughtered and processed in the US was previously barred due to biosecurity concerns. One concern was that Mexico's livestock tracking system could inadvertently lead producers to import beef from parts of the continent where there were disease outbreaks. But the latest announcement will lift the ban on beef sourced from Canada or Mexico after the US introduced more robust movement controls in late 2024 and early 2025, allowing for improved identification and tracing throughout the supply chain. "We have not compromised on biosecurity," Ms Collins told reporters in Canberra. "Australia stands for open and fair trade - our cattle industry has significantly benefited from this. "(The department) is satisfied the strengthened control measures put in place by the US effectively manage biosecurity risks." The change is widely viewed as a bargaining chip Australia could use while attempting to push for tariff exemptions from the US. Nationals Leader David Littleproud said he held concerns about its "swiftness". "It looks as though it's been traded away to appease Donald Trump, and that's what we don't want," he told ABC radio. Opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan also said there are more questions to be answered and maintained the government needed to ensure biosecurity protocols had not been weakened. Ms Collins insists the decision has been part of a years-long science-based process that precedes Mr Trump's tariffs. Many Australian goods sent to the US currently face the baseline 10 per cent tariff, while steel and aluminium products have been slapped with a 50 per cent tariff. Mr Trump has also threatened a tariff on pharmaceutical imports to the US, which is one of Australia's biggest exports to its ally. Australian cattle producers have been left blindsided by a decision to lift a ban on US beef, but the level of American product arriving in Australia is expected to be very low. The federal government on Thursday revealed it would lift biosecurity restrictions on US beef as it seeks a way to dampen the blow of President Donald Trump's volatile tariff regime. Australia has been mulling over the move for months after Mr Trump requested a lift on the ban, and Agriculture Minister Julie Collins stressed the decision follows a decade-long science-based review. Cattle Australia CEO Will Evans believed the move would not have been made unless the government had the utmost confidence in the science, but said some would still be unhappy with its decision. "There's going to be a lot of people today who feel blindsided by this, there's going to be a lot of people who are going to feel really frustrated and threatened by this," he told ABC radio. "We need to talk to them. "The US is an incredibly important trading partner - we need to maintain access and we need to maintain relationships with them." Some have raised worries US beef could impact Australia's domestic market, industry representatives remain relatively unperturbed. "It's a bit like selling ice to Eskimos," Australian Meat Industry Council CEO Tim Ryan told ABC. The domestic beef industry is self-sufficient and any imports of US beef are "unlikely to have any effect on the market here", Mr Evans said. The US can't even meet its own needs, he noted, and remains one of the main export markets for Australian beef. Likewise, Australian beef is one of the country's biggest exports to the US and was worth $14 billion in 2024. But the US president has taken issue with the perceived one-sidedness of this relationship, saying in April, "they won't take any of our beef". The US has been able to send beef to Australia since 2019, though any beef raised in Canada or Mexico before being slaughtered and processed in the US was previously barred due to biosecurity concerns. One concern was that Mexico's livestock tracking system could inadvertently lead producers to import beef from parts of the continent where there were disease outbreaks. But the latest announcement will lift the ban on beef sourced from Canada or Mexico after the US introduced more robust movement controls in late 2024 and early 2025, allowing for improved identification and tracing throughout the supply chain. "We have not compromised on biosecurity," Ms Collins told reporters in Canberra. "Australia stands for open and fair trade - our cattle industry has significantly benefited from this. "(The department) is satisfied the strengthened control measures put in place by the US effectively manage biosecurity risks." The change is widely viewed as a bargaining chip Australia could use while attempting to push for tariff exemptions from the US. Nationals Leader David Littleproud said he held concerns about its "swiftness". "It looks as though it's been traded away to appease Donald Trump, and that's what we don't want," he told ABC radio. Opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan also said there are more questions to be answered and maintained the government needed to ensure biosecurity protocols had not been weakened. Ms Collins insists the decision has been part of a years-long science-based process that precedes Mr Trump's tariffs. Many Australian goods sent to the US currently face the baseline 10 per cent tariff, while steel and aluminium products have been slapped with a 50 per cent tariff. Mr Trump has also threatened a tariff on pharmaceutical imports to the US, which is one of Australia's biggest exports to its ally. Australian cattle producers have been left blindsided by a decision to lift a ban on US beef, but the level of American product arriving in Australia is expected to be very low. The federal government on Thursday revealed it would lift biosecurity restrictions on US beef as it seeks a way to dampen the blow of President Donald Trump's volatile tariff regime. Australia has been mulling over the move for months after Mr Trump requested a lift on the ban, and Agriculture Minister Julie Collins stressed the decision follows a decade-long science-based review. Cattle Australia CEO Will Evans believed the move would not have been made unless the government had the utmost confidence in the science, but said some would still be unhappy with its decision. "There's going to be a lot of people today who feel blindsided by this, there's going to be a lot of people who are going to feel really frustrated and threatened by this," he told ABC radio. "We need to talk to them. "The US is an incredibly important trading partner - we need to maintain access and we need to maintain relationships with them." Some have raised worries US beef could impact Australia's domestic market, industry representatives remain relatively unperturbed. "It's a bit like selling ice to Eskimos," Australian Meat Industry Council CEO Tim Ryan told ABC. The domestic beef industry is self-sufficient and any imports of US beef are "unlikely to have any effect on the market here", Mr Evans said. The US can't even meet its own needs, he noted, and remains one of the main export markets for Australian beef. Likewise, Australian beef is one of the country's biggest exports to the US and was worth $14 billion in 2024. But the US president has taken issue with the perceived one-sidedness of this relationship, saying in April, "they won't take any of our beef". The US has been able to send beef to Australia since 2019, though any beef raised in Canada or Mexico before being slaughtered and processed in the US was previously barred due to biosecurity concerns. One concern was that Mexico's livestock tracking system could inadvertently lead producers to import beef from parts of the continent where there were disease outbreaks. But the latest announcement will lift the ban on beef sourced from Canada or Mexico after the US introduced more robust movement controls in late 2024 and early 2025, allowing for improved identification and tracing throughout the supply chain. "We have not compromised on biosecurity," Ms Collins told reporters in Canberra. "Australia stands for open and fair trade - our cattle industry has significantly benefited from this. "(The department) is satisfied the strengthened control measures put in place by the US effectively manage biosecurity risks." The change is widely viewed as a bargaining chip Australia could use while attempting to push for tariff exemptions from the US. Nationals Leader David Littleproud said he held concerns about its "swiftness". "It looks as though it's been traded away to appease Donald Trump, and that's what we don't want," he told ABC radio. Opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan also said there are more questions to be answered and maintained the government needed to ensure biosecurity protocols had not been weakened. Ms Collins insists the decision has been part of a years-long science-based process that precedes Mr Trump's tariffs. Many Australian goods sent to the US currently face the baseline 10 per cent tariff, while steel and aluminium products have been slapped with a 50 per cent tariff. Mr Trump has also threatened a tariff on pharmaceutical imports to the US, which is one of Australia's biggest exports to its ally. Australian cattle producers have been left blindsided by a decision to lift a ban on US beef, but the level of American product arriving in Australia is expected to be very low. The federal government on Thursday revealed it would lift biosecurity restrictions on US beef as it seeks a way to dampen the blow of President Donald Trump's volatile tariff regime. Australia has been mulling over the move for months after Mr Trump requested a lift on the ban, and Agriculture Minister Julie Collins stressed the decision follows a decade-long science-based review. Cattle Australia CEO Will Evans believed the move would not have been made unless the government had the utmost confidence in the science, but said some would still be unhappy with its decision. "There's going to be a lot of people today who feel blindsided by this, there's going to be a lot of people who are going to feel really frustrated and threatened by this," he told ABC radio. "We need to talk to them. "The US is an incredibly important trading partner - we need to maintain access and we need to maintain relationships with them." Some have raised worries US beef could impact Australia's domestic market, industry representatives remain relatively unperturbed. "It's a bit like selling ice to Eskimos," Australian Meat Industry Council CEO Tim Ryan told ABC. The domestic beef industry is self-sufficient and any imports of US beef are "unlikely to have any effect on the market here", Mr Evans said. The US can't even meet its own needs, he noted, and remains one of the main export markets for Australian beef. Likewise, Australian beef is one of the country's biggest exports to the US and was worth $14 billion in 2024. But the US president has taken issue with the perceived one-sidedness of this relationship, saying in April, "they won't take any of our beef". The US has been able to send beef to Australia since 2019, though any beef raised in Canada or Mexico before being slaughtered and processed in the US was previously barred due to biosecurity concerns. One concern was that Mexico's livestock tracking system could inadvertently lead producers to import beef from parts of the continent where there were disease outbreaks. But the latest announcement will lift the ban on beef sourced from Canada or Mexico after the US introduced more robust movement controls in late 2024 and early 2025, allowing for improved identification and tracing throughout the supply chain. "We have not compromised on biosecurity," Ms Collins told reporters in Canberra. "Australia stands for open and fair trade - our cattle industry has significantly benefited from this. "(The department) is satisfied the strengthened control measures put in place by the US effectively manage biosecurity risks." The change is widely viewed as a bargaining chip Australia could use while attempting to push for tariff exemptions from the US. Nationals Leader David Littleproud said he held concerns about its "swiftness". "It looks as though it's been traded away to appease Donald Trump, and that's what we don't want," he told ABC radio. Opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan also said there are more questions to be answered and maintained the government needed to ensure biosecurity protocols had not been weakened. Ms Collins insists the decision has been part of a years-long science-based process that precedes Mr Trump's tariffs. Many Australian goods sent to the US currently face the baseline 10 per cent tariff, while steel and aluminium products have been slapped with a 50 per cent tariff. Mr Trump has also threatened a tariff on pharmaceutical imports to the US, which is one of Australia's biggest exports to its ally.
