
Ross Greer: Forbes exit makes post election SNP Greens deal 'easier'
Mr Greer is currently standing in the Scottish Greens leadership contest following the decision by current co-leader Patrick Harvie to step down from the role.
At his campaign launch in Edinburgh last month, he made clear he would like to see his party return to power with the SNP after the next Scottish Parliament elections and less keen on striking a deal with Labour.
READ MORE:
However, some in his party would be reluctant to go into government with the SNP with Ms Forbes as Deputy First Minister regarding both her economic outlook and her socially conservative views including against equal marriage as major barriers to a new deal.
The Herald on Sunday asked Mr Greer now that Ms Forbes would be leaving Holyrood, would a new BHA be easier to achieve.
"It is no secret that Kate Forbes believes in things that are fundamentally at odds with what the Scottish Greens believe in on LGBT rights, for instance marriage or trans rights, but also on economics as well," he said.
"Kate's economics are clearly to the right of where the SNP has been in the last decade and well to the right of the Scottish Greens. On a personal level it is difficult for me as a queer man to be siting across from someone I know doesn't believe I should have the same rights under the law that she does.
"But Kate is stepping down and the reasons why she is stepping down I have a huge amount of sympathy for. The parliament and our political culture have not done nearly enough for people to get into and stay in elected office and have a family."
Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes (Image: PA) He added: "As far as the Scottish Greens are concerned I think we have a moral obligation to seize the opportunity to deliver the kind of fairer and greener Scotland we believe in. We will not lift children out of poverty, we will not save a single species by remaining in opposition for the rest of our lives.
"When we where in government we delivered transformational policies...we shouldn't be afraid of being in a position of power and influence."
He was pressed if Ms Forbes leaving Holyrood at next May's election made it easier for the SNP and Greens to strike a post election governing deal.
'The short answer is yes," he said.
"But I am not saying deal between the SNP and Greens is likely.
'There is an election to happen. It is for the public to decide what the balance of the parties is in the parliament. There is only going to be a Green SNP deal if there is a Green SNP majority.
'But there is no doubt Kate's position on equality issues particularly and her position on economics would have been a huge barrier to significant co operation between the two parties."
He said it was too early to say what his party's prospective negotiations positions or red lines could be.
However, he pointed to a ban on conversion practices and fossil fuel heatings systems in homes as possible issues. Both were sidelined by the Scottish Government following the collapse of the BHA with ministers in Edinburgh opting to see what progress the UK Government would do on the former.
"The SNP dropping its commitment to ban so-called conversion therapy was absolutely gutting," he said.
"This is a form of torture against the LGBT community. Personally I would want a conversion therapy ban to be part of any future government programme the Greens were involved with. But setting red lines is for our membership as a whole. We are a genuinely democratic party."
Mr Greer, who helped to negotiate the BHA with Nicola Sturgeon's government in 2021, pointed to recent polling suggesting his party could get 15 or 16 MSPs putting it in a strong position to re-enter government with the SNP which polling suggest looks like to be returned as the largest party but with fewer MSPs.
He said there was an opportunity for the Greens to build support among progressive voters as he accused Labour of moving more to the right since coming to government by defeating the Conservatives at last year's general election and the SNP moving to the centre ground.
"The is a huge gap opening up in Scottish politics. Labour have moved to the right. We have a UK Labour Government which looks and feels a lot like the government it replaced while the SNP have moved to the centre," he said.
"They have dropped a lot of progressive policies which we were pursuing jointly when we were in government. That leaves the Scottish Greens as the only party unequivocally on the progressive left."
Announcing her intention to stand down as an MSP next May, the DFM said: 'I have grown up in the public eye, getting married, having a baby and raising a young family. I have consistently put the public's needs ahead of my family's during that time.
"I am grateful to them for accommodating the heavy demands of being a political figure. Looking ahead to the future, I do not want to miss any more of the precious early years of family life – which can never be rewound."
Scottish Labour Deputy Leader Jackie Baillie said 'The Scottish Greens gave up the last of their credibility during their shambolic stint in government.
'Labour has ended over a decade of devastating Tory austerity and is delivering the greatest upgrade to workers rights in a generation and a publicly-owned energy company.
'The truth is only Scottish Labour can put an end to SNP failure and deliver a new direction for Scotland, our public services, our economy and our environment.'
The SNP was approached for comment.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
5 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
TOM HARRIS: Frankly, I'm not buying a meek and mild Nicola Sturgeon
It's just as well that Nicola Sturgeon believes her own hype. Because if early reaction to her less-than-frank memoirs, Frankly, is anything to go by, few others do. The individual described in the 446-page opus will seem unfamiliar to most Scots. The Nicola Sturgeon of Frankly is a nervous, frightened woman completely lacking in confidence, forever seeking the approval of others and almost permanently on the brink of tears. She spends sleepless nights fretting about whether she is good enough to do the job of a politician and she is deeply hurt when anyone says mean things about her. Back on the planet earth, however, those who have observed Ms Sturgeon from her earliest days as an SNP activist all the way through to her dominance of her party as First Minister are more familiar with the 'nippy sweetie', the fierce and unforgiving woman so obsessed with independence that she seemed rarely to allow herself even the occasional smile, except, perhaps, when political opponents humiliatingly lost their seats. But it is the meek and mild Nicola Sturgeon that appears throughout the book. The reader is invited to swallow this attempt to reinvent our former First Minister entirely as someone who only ever sought consensus and who was always loyal to friends and colleagues, until they behaved too badly to tolerate. And even then they were abandoned only with the heaviest heart. For about the first third of the book, I found myself falling for this sleight of hand, starting to feel genuine sympathy for a misunderstood leader thrust almost unwillingly into the public eye. But that's when I began to see the pattern so carefully followed by Ms Sturgeon: the unexpected displays of emotional intelligence – something she has arguably failed to exhibit in public in the last 30 years – were convincing because they were so unexpected. But seen as a whole, the book is no more than an attempt to rewrite crucial parts of Scottish political history and enable the finger of blame to be pointed at anyone but her. Those who might have been looking forward to a detailed explanation of the genuinely perplexing fall-out between Ms Sturgeon and her former friend, mentor and patron, Alex Salmond, will be disappointed. Not only does the author point the finger of blame at the late SNP leader over the leaking to the media of sensitive information regarding complaints of sexual misconduct made about him, but she dismisses as a 'witch hunt' the Holyrood committee set up to investigate the Scottish Government's handling of those complaints after it concluded she had broken the Ministerial Code. A far more, reliable, independent review concluded the opposite, and that's enough for Ms Sturgeon. And on her greatest and most controversial political defeat – her failed attempt to introduce self-ID for trans people – she energetically blames everyone else for sins of which she is herself guilty. It was ordinary, decent Scottish women who raised concerns about the impact on women's rights if men who identified as women were allowed further access to women's spaces like rape shelters and changing rooms. Yet to Ms Sturgeon, 'it is beyond argument that the trans debate has been hijacked by voices on the far right . . . like Putin, Trump and Orbán.' On one page she repeats her appalling assertion that many who campaigned against her Gender Recognition Reform Bill were 'raging homophobes' and 'racists', while on the very next she bemoans a failure of opponents to 'elevate the debate or illuminate the issues at the heart of it.' More glaring than her tendency to point the finger of blame at others is her propensity not to mention certain things at all. The scandal of her and her ministers' deleted WhatsApp messages during the Covid pandemic, for example. In the end, Frankly is a valiant, though failed, attempt to restore the reputation of an individual who promised so very much to party and country but who ultimately delivered very little. Had she been honest about her failings, perhaps Scotland could have forgiven her. But forgiveness demands repentance first, and there's precious little of that in this book.

The National
2 hours ago
- The National
An emphatic 2026 win for the SNP will mean no excuses for inaction
Given that support for independence is around 50% and support for establishing a Scottish parliament was around 75%, it does not take too much imagination to believe that a significant majority can be persuaded (with the help of some serious campaigning) to vote for that parliament to have the legal authority to conduct a referendum enabling the people of Scotland to determine their own future (within or outwith a now dysfunctional Union). READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon: Alex Salmond 'did not read' 2014 independence paper From Tommy's words, it appears that my personal interpretation of John Swinney's intentions regarding a constitutional convention – as being consistent with the creation of a widely-inclusive citizen's convention – was wrong. However, if we wish to gain broad public support for the next step on our journey to independence then, in addition to progressing an open citizens' convention, independence parties should have the commitment to establishing the legal authority of the Scottish Parliament to conduct a constitutional referendum clearly stated as a primary clause in their manifestos, backed up by stated actions to ensure that authority is granted to Holyrood. Otherwise, unless independence can be achieved in the meantime by alternative actions, the next Westminster General Election must be declared a de facto referendum. Offering another perspective to the dilemmas confronting 'Old John' and Jim Taylor (Letters, Aug 11), and no doubt many others, the more emphatic an SNP victory, the less excuse the SNP hierarchy will have for not taking substantive actions in support of a public mandate. This approach may be considered hypocritical by some if they do not support the route to independence advocated by the current First Minister, but to vote otherwise in the knowledge that it could bring about a Labour government in Holyrood would seem a betrayal to most who are absolutely committed to independence. Better to give neither the First Minister nor the Prime Minister any excuse for not delivering, or for further delaying, the means of exercising the right of Scotland's people to determine their own future. Stan Grodynski Longniddry, East Lothian TRUMP'S views on a deal with Putin over Ukraine seems like a deal between 18th-century aristocrats settling their gambling debts. Trump acts like an18th-century monarch. No consideration is given to the views of residents of the possible transfer areas, who are merely insignificant chequers in a high-stakes gambling deal. It seems reminiscent of the Act of Union, whereby the ruling elite in Scotland agreed to a union with England against the will of the general populace. READ MORE: David Pratt: Are Trump and Putin about to stitch up Ukraine? Trump will no doubt gain whatever happens, and Ukraine will suffer, being back under a modern Russian Czar. President Trump will parade as a peacemaker, and his sycophants (with usual brown envelopes pocketed) will propose him for a Nobel Peace Prize which he desires, hypocrite that he is. What's changed in politics since the 18th century? Modern democracy seems little more than a sham, with elites still in charge. Current political parties seem little more than a means for the current elites to maintain control under a pretext of democracy. Where is real limitation of elector funding? The exist many ways to get round and buy elections. If you're in the know, it seems funding is unrestricted. The current government in the UK, as well as the previous one, seem uninterested in altering the present set-up, as they both benefit from it. Drew Reid Falkirk YOUR article 'PM claims people feeling 'better off'' by Hamish Morrison (Aug 7) presents the reader with the classic case of 'the ventriloquist has died but the dummy keeps talking'! The 'dummy' tells us that his government is 'bearing down' on costs and 'putting more money into people's pockets'. Yes, the pockets of his sponsors, big businesses and fellow Labour parliamentarians, definitely NOT those of the people of the country! Since Labour came to power, the 'dummy' has increased the weekly shopping costs by as much as 40%. The facts reveal 'disposable income' is falling! It's not falling, it's PLUMMETING in an ever-increasing spiral into those same pockets that enabled Starmer to become PM. The answer is to tax the super-rich and get them to pay their fair share. Everyone knows 'Starmer the dummy' will never do that because HE is one of the super rich along with his cronies who sit beside him on the government benches. As for 'the focus will be on living standards', these are also PLUMMETING under his watch. Everybody and anybody in the 'vulnerable' category will be forced to pay more tax but not the wealthy pals, sponsors and big businesses who back this 'dummy'. I don't ever see 'Rachel from Accounts' do anything to help anyone other than herself and the 'dummy'. It's time the dummy was put back in the box and a real person with a spine and a conscience took over – or better still, let Scotland leave this Westminster pantomime. Jim Todd Cumbernauld


Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
Strange case of Nicola Sturgeon's recovery from amnesia over Alex Salmond sexual harassment claims
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Having been in the Scottish Parliament from the very start, I watched an introverted Nicola Sturgeon manoeuvre her way within the SNP to become the most powerful woman in the country. And what did she achieve with this untrammelled power – is Scotland a better place after 10 years of Sturgeon as First Minister? The answer is not to be found in her newly published memoirs – indeed there is little about her record of achievement. There is no explanation for why the educational attainment gap, which she pledged to eradicate, still persists. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad There is no excuse for the state of the NHS and the health service waiting lists that were growing long before the Covid pandemic. Never mind the stagnant economy and the lack of engagement with business. READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon says she still counts shamed Derek Mackay as a friend Nicola Sturgeon, seen with Val McDermid during Glasgow International Comedy Festival earlier this year, found her powers of recall had deserted her when she gave evidence to a Scottish Parliament committee investigating the government's handling of complaints against Alex Salmond (Picture: Jane Barlow) | PA Spoiler alert Instead we are told a story of a powerful woman approached by her older male mentor, Alex Salmond, who asks her to protect him, but she refuses. It's a dramatic turning point worthy of any author – which is no doubt why Sturgeon picked it to promote her book. The former First Minister may be more comfortable in a Waterstones' armchair these days than the debating chamber at Holyrood. But while I enjoy a good work of fiction as much as the next person, I was on the parliamentary committee investigating this very same episode. Spoiler alert – there's more to the story. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The committee was set up in 2021 after the Scottish Government's internal investigation into those same sexual harassment claims collapsed, costing taxpayers thousands of pounds and forcing the complainants into a spotlight they never sought. Our committee's job was to understand why this had happened and ensure that in future the Scottish Government's complaints procedures would not let women down. You would think that Sturgeon, who was famed for her attention to detail, would be focused on that task. Instead, we discovered the then First Minister's power of recall had deserted her. She could not remember. I am glad that her memory is returning. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Throughout our evidence-gathering sessions, the SNP government blocked us at every turn, at one point taking two years to deliver the documents we requested. And when they came, some were blank sheets of paper. READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon says Alex Salmond could have leaked probe against him and addresses conspiracy claim Swinney's role In this obstruction, Sturgeon had a key ally. Secret Scotland came into its own with our current First Minister, John Swinney. He was Sturgeon's political fixer and refused for many months to share information with the committee to the point that opposition parties forced a no-confidence vote. That culture of obfuscation and spin is Sturgeon's legacy, now carried forward by Swinney. On International Women's Day a few years ago, Sturgeon pledged 'to change for good the culture of misogyny'. With all the power she had, with a majority SNP parliament, she could have changed the country. That really would have been a legacy for Scotland's first female First Minister. In this case, actions speak louder than words.