
Serious pollution incidents from water firms up 60% last year, watchdog says
The watchdog revealed consistently poor performance from all nine water and sewerage firms in the country despite expectations for incidents to decrease.
The Environment Agency assesses all pollution incidents from water firms into categories, with category 1 (major) and category 2 (significant) being the most serious, which can have a highly negative impact on wildlife, ecosystems and swimmers.
Last year, 75 category 1 and 2 incidents were recorded, up from 47 serious incidents the previous year.
Three water firms – Thames Water, Southern Water and Yorkshire Water – were responsible for 81% of the serious incidents, according to its findings.
Thames Water was responsible for 33, Southern Water for 15 and Yorkshire Water for 13.
Meanwhile, just two companies – Northumbrian Water and Wessex Water – had no serious incidents last year, meeting the Environment Agencies expectations to see a trend to zero pollution incidents by 2025.
Overall, the watchdog said all pollution incidents increased by 29% with water companies recording 2,801, up from 2,174 in 2023.
The watchdog said it was clear some companies are failing to meet its targets.
It attributed the rise in incidents last year to persistent underinvestment in new infrastructure, poor asset maintenance, and reduced resilience because of the impacts of climate change.
But it is understood the agency is still investigating the pollution incidents and their causes more closely to understand the major increase and decide on any action, particularly at Thames, which saw serious incidents double from 14 to 33.
An increasing trend in pollution spills from pipes carrying wastewater uphill emerged last year, accounting for 20% of the serious incidents, the watchdog said, adding that these affected some protected waters for wildlife and swimming.
The Environment Agency also carried out more inspections of firms last financial year at more than 4,000, meaning it also discovered more non-compliance from firms, with 24% of sites breaching their permits.
Alan Lovell, chairman of the Environment Agency said: 'This report demonstrates continued systemic failure by some companies to meet their environmental targets.
'The water industry must act urgently to prevent pollution from occurring and to respond rapidly when it does.
'We have made significant changes to tighten our regulation of the water industry and ensure companies are held to account. With a dedicated larger workforce and increased funding, our officers are uncovering and acting on failures to comply with environmental law.'
Environment Secretary Steve Reed called the figures 'disgraceful' and a 'stark reminder' of how underinvestment and weak regulation have led to sewage polluting England's waterways.
'In just one year, this new Government has banned unfair bonuses for polluting water bosses, brought in jail sentences for pollution, and secured £104 billion to upgrade crumbling sewage pipes – one of the biggest infrastructure investments in history,' he said.
'Next week the Independent Water Commission will recommend changes to strengthen the rules so we can clean up our rivers, lakes and seas for good.'
James Wallace, chief executive of River Action, said the figures 'expose a brutal truth'.
'Serious pollution incidents are rising, sewage discharges remain rampant, and our rivers are spiralling toward ecological collapse,' he said.
'This is not just regulatory failure; it is a national disgrace.'
Under the Water (Special Measures) Act introduced by the Government last year, the watchdog will have greater powers to take swift action against polluting companies.
To boost funding for water regulation, the Environment Agency is also consulting on a new levy on the water sector to recover the cost of enforcement activities while the Environment Department (Defra) last week confirmed a 64% increase in its funding from 2023/2024.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
5 minutes ago
- The Independent
Government defends Online Safety Act after X claims it threatens free speech
The Government has defended the Online Safety Act after Elon Musk's X said the legislation was threatening free speech. In a post titled What Happens When Oversight Becomes Overreach, the platform, formerly known as Twitter, outlined criticism of the act and the 'heavy-handed' UK regulators. The Government countered that it is 'demonstrably false' that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech and said it is not designed to censor political debate. Under rules that came into effect on July 25, online platforms must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. This includes a new duty for online providers to reduce the risk that users encounter illegal content as well as age verification measures in the UK to access pornographic content. 'As a result, the act's laudable intentions are at risk of being overshadowed by the breadth of its regulatory reach. Without a more balanced, collaborative approach, free speech will suffer,' X said. It accused regulators of taking a 'heavy-handed approach' and said that 'many are now concerned that a plan ostensibly intended to keep children safe is at risk of seriously infringing on the public's right to free expression'. Ofcom said this week it had launched investigations into 34 pornography sites for new age-check requirements. The company said 'a balanced approach is the only way to protect individual liberties, encourage innovation and safeguard children'. A Government spokesperson said: 'It is demonstrably false that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech. 'As well as legal duties to keep children safe, the very same law places clear and unequivocal duties on platforms to protect freedom of expression. Failure to meet either obligation can lead to severe penalties, including fines of up to 10% of global revenue or £18 million, whichever is greater. 'The Act is not designed to censor political debate and does not require platforms to age gate any content other than those which present the most serious risks to children such as pornography or suicide and self-harm content. 'Platforms have had several months to prepare for this law. It is a disservice to their users to hide behind deadlines as an excuse for failing to properly implement it.' Technology Secretary Peter Kyle became embroiled in a row with Nigel Farage earlier this week over Reform UK's pledge that it would scrap the Act if the party came into power. He said the Reform UK leader of being on the side of 'extreme pornographers'.


Auto Express
5 minutes ago
- Auto Express
Volkswagen, Skoda and Cupra slash electric car prices
The Volkswagen Group has decided it doesn't want to wait around and see which of its EVs are eligible for the government's new Electric Car Grant scheme, and has cut £1,500 from the price of selected electric cars from Volkswagen, Skoda and Cupra. The government recently announced a grant scheme for fully electric cars costing under £37,000, but it's still unclear which models will be eligible for £1,500 or £3,750 off their respective price tag. It's dependent on complex sustainability criteria – which is why we don't know which models will meet the government's grant just yet. For Volkswagen, the electric cars that fall under the German firm's new £1,500 'Grant Guarantee' include the ID.3 in Pure, Pro and Pro trim levels, along with the ID.4 in Pure and Pro - essentially excluding the GTX from both. The £1,500 grant would bring the entry-level ID.3 Pure Essential's price down to £29,360 and the ID.4 Pure Match to £38,090. Advertisement - Article continues below If the new £1,500 grant from Volkswagen isn't enough to tempt you, then check out the big savings through the Auto Express marketplace, where you'll find great deals on loads of pure-electric cars. As for Skoda, its grant covers the Elroq and Enyaq, in SE, SE L, Edition and SportLine trim. With the grant the Elroq will cost from £30,010 and the Enyaq £38,190. Cupra's grant is on the Born hatchback on V1, V2 and V3 trim levels - lowering the base price to £34,190. All three brands will run their new £1,500 'Grant Guarantee' until 31 August. Volkswagen, Skoda and Cupra all say their grant 'will honour the £1,500 grant on the vehicles specified, even if the Government's grant is not awarded'. You won't be able to receive both the 'Grant Guarantee' and the Government Electric Car Grant on any of those models however. The latest moves follow similar offers or incentives from brands including Hyundai, Alfa Romeo, Kia and Leapmotor. Configure your perfect Skoda Elroq through our Find A Car service now. Alternatively, check out the best deals out there on a new Skoda Elroq from stock or top prices on used Skoda Elroq models...


BBC News
6 minutes ago
- BBC News
Oxfordshire council spent £6m on private SEND school company
A council has spent £6.64m of public funds with a private special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) provider over the past financial year, where owners made a £44m County Council has worked with Witherslack, which operates Chilworth House School and Chilworth House Upper School in Wheatley, where 79 students are Democrats research into the profits of SEND companies found it turned over £200m, with profits up 150% from Group declined to formally comment but argues that its schools are initially loss making so the increase in profits reflects its investment in recent years and enables more pupils to receive a good education. The Lib Dems have called for an 8% cap on profits for SEND companies to "stop shameless profiteering".The party's education spokesperson, Munira Wilson, argued profits were made "off the backs of disabled children" and at a time local councils face financial Glover, MP for Didcot and Wantage, said seeing local authorities spend £1.42bn nationally on some of providers was "a huge concern". "A lot of it is public money that they're getting and local authority budgets are facing more and more pressure all the time," he said."That's why I'm pleased that Oxford County Council is bringing forward plans to introduce new special schools for the area, which they hope would be run by multi-academy trusts."Mr Glover said the key was about "the balance between these companies and their right to make profits, but also looking at where they're getting them from"."More and more of my constituents are frustrated that they see council tax bills going up," he said."More and more of that is going on things like adult social care or special educational needs provision."And that sometimes comes at the cost of investment in things that they would like to see more locally, particularly on roads." A Department for Education spokesperson said the system the Labour government inherited "has been failing families of children with SEND for far too long"."...it's appalling that some companies are capitalising on this crisis," they added."We are already making progress to reform the SEND system, from more early intervention in mainstream schools across ADHD, autism and speech and language needs, through to £740 million investment to encourage councils to create more specialist places in mainstream schools." You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.