Perplexity makes $34.5 billion offer for Google Chrome
Perplexity spokesperson Jesse Dwyer confirmed to CNN the details of the offer, which The Wall Street Journal first reported.
The bid comes as Google awaits a court's decision after a landmark ruling last year found that the internet giant had violated US antitrust law with its search business. The US Justice Department has proposed as a remedy that Google sell its Chrome browser.
Google has promised to appeal the ruling and called the idea of spinning off Chrome an 'unprecedented proposal' that it says would harm consumers and security. Google declined to provide a comment to CNN regarding Perplexity's bid.
Perplexity's offer — while likely a long shot, given Google's resistance to a forced sale of Chrome — marks the latest example of how new firms are taking on tech's biggest players to reshape the internet in the AI era.
Perplexity is a nearly three-year-old startup whose search tool uses AI models to parse web content and curate answers. Answers are usually posted as a summary, although Perplexity does provide links to its sources. It launched an AI search engine that competes with Google's dominant offering in December 2022.
Perplexity launched its own AI-powered web browser called Comet in July. The company is pitching it as a more personalized browser that connects the dots between a user's calendars, browsing tabs, social channels and more. OpenAI is also said to be developing a web browser, according to Reuters, in yet another signal that AI companies are looking to play a bigger role in how people use the web.
Perplexity said it would maintain users' current browsing preferences, including Google as the default search engine, if it were to buy Chrome, Dwyer told CNN.
It would also commit to 'continued available and support' for Chrome for 100 months and investing $3 billion in Chromium over the next 24 months, according to Dwyer. Chromium is Google's open-source underlying technology that other tech companies – including Microsoft and Perplexity – can use to build their own browsers.
Perplexity made the offer because it 'believes in the open web,' Dwyer said.
Perplexity was most recently valued at $18 billion following a $100 million funding round, Bloomberg said in a report last month, citing a person familiar with the matter. The company did not comment on the report.
That makes Perplexity's offer for Chrome worth nearly double its own valuation. Google, meanwhile, is worth nearly $2.5 trillion; shares of the company (GOOGL) rose around 1% on Tuesday. The Wall Street Journal reported that several investors have agreed to back the purchase, including large venture capital firms.
'This is a smart and opportunistic move by Perplexity given the case against Google and regulatory scrutiny,' Wedbush tech analyst Dan Ives told CNN, adding that he estimates Chrome is worth at least $50 billion. 'This is all a game of high stakes poker and Perplexity made a good move.'
Google Chrome isn't the only high profile acquisition target that Perplexity has pursued. The company said earlier this year it was making a bid to buy TikTok, after a law was passed last year requiring the social media app's parent company, ByteDance, to sell it to a non-China-based company or face a ban in the United States.
Perplexity has also reportedly been eyeballed by bigger tech players — both Meta and Apple have had discussions about buying the AI search firm, according to reports from Bloomberg and The Information, although it's not clear the talks will go anywhere.
Source: CNN
Image Credit: Google Chrome
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
The Trump-Putin summit shows why Europe needs to continue re-arming itself
Much store has been placed over the past eight months in how foreign leaders prepare to interact with US President Donald Trump. From a European point of view, there has been a carousel of winners and losers. Take, for example, a write-up in The Wall Street Journal of the golfing prowess of Finnish President Alexander Stubb and how that was key to the relationship between the two men. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer would have enjoyed the headline on Monday that said he was hoping to 'exploit his curious relationship' with the US leader to the benefit of Ukraine. Mr Trump appears to enjoy it all. Going back to his first term and the notorious handshaking with French President Emmanuel Macron, Mr Trump sees meeting European leaders as a kind of vaudeville performance. At the start of this week, he was boasting that Monday's White House gathering on Ukraine was a big day in history. 'Never had so many European Leaders at one time. My great honour to host them!!!' Step back from all the stage management, and the reality is that Mr Trump and the new American political establishment see the Europeans as all one, not the individual performers that the news reports highlight. The war in Ukraine appears to have reached the moment of truth. By abandoning demands for a ceasefire as a gateway to peace talks during his Alaska summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Mr Trump has established how the conflict can now end. For the Europeans, this means the transactional basis of US foreign policy going forward is a fundamental reality that cannot be wished away anymore. Nor even blunted by the kind of summit theatrics we have seen over recent months. The Europeans must now follow through on the generational change the continent's leaders have promised on its collective defence. This means all nations need to match the kind of uplift that Germany has promised. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz arrived at the White House on Monday having promised to raise defence spending to 3.5 per cent of national gross domestic product by 2029. It also means that leaders must be more ruthless in the dollars versus euros choices that the Europeans are making when buying defence equipment. Put simply, to defend itself Europe must now more aggressively buy European as a long-term strategic play. The third aspect of this is that the Europeans must show they are prepared to join in delivering what it takes to be robust in their own self-defence. That is why I describe this as a generational choice. It is surely true that the defence spending must go back to levels last seen during the Cold War. But it is also true that the population must be mobilised in civil defence and formal security roles in new and wider ways. The war in Ukraine has already changed the trajectory of the European story. A decade that started with the Covid-19 pandemic has seen its growth and prosperity derailed by the subsequent decoupling from Russia. This isn't just in terms of the cost of living, which was severely hit by the resources shock following the war. The wider outlook for the continent is also one of beleaguered choices between welfare and warfare with no real prospect of an economic revival. It is not just Ukraine that is a frontline state. The Baltics and Scandinavians have that mentality, too. Alliances have been formed such as the 10-nation Joint Expeditionary Force, which stretches from Iceland through the UK to those northern frontline states. Most European countries are on a trajectory to higher government spending, but the reforms in the security mentality are not yet as real as the scale of the challenge that the continent is facing. The retired British general Richard Barrons observed last week that no one was talking about a Russian invasion of the UK as a credible prospect, but he queried the readiness for a more wholistic threat landscape. This includes strengthening the digital sphere in the information age. A society mobilised to take on these challenges is clearly just as vital as strong defences in Finland or elsewhere. For now, the Europeans will seek to eke out as much of a security blanket from the US as they can feasibly obtain. That is why the cast at the White House on Monday was not just Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy but also included Mr Starmer, Mr Macron, Mr Merz, Mr Stubb, plus Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. It would be a fool's paradise, however, to not see the writing on the wall. When the Signal chat involving American leaders was leaked during Washington's confrontation with Yemen's Houthis, Vice President JD Vance was shown asking why the US was bailing out European security. The intervention across the Red Sea was quickly curtailed. France has long argued that at least two thirds of the coming European military build-up should be manufactured at home. Vulnerabilities of ordering from the US include long lead times and a de-prioritisation of the European inventory rebuild in areas such as ammunition. Other European countries openly push for the high-capability requirements on offer from the US. This pushes the longer-term restructuring of the continent's defence industries into the long grass. So while orders are flowing from a top-line increase in defence budgets, it is hard to shake the questions around adequacy. Not only is the spending rising as fast as pledged but also can Europe become strong enough, faster? The answer to that question won't be found in this week's trip to Washington.
Gulf Business
2 hours ago
- Gulf Business
How AI Is elevating aviation from operational efficiency to passenger experience
Image: Supplied Aviation is undergoing one of its most profound transformations, one that is not driven by new aircraft or routes, but by algorithms. Artificial intelligence (AI) is no longer a back-office tool or emerging experiment. It's fast becoming the engine room of the modern aviation experience, reshaping not only how airlines and airports operate, but how they connect with the people they serve. The commercial pressures facing the sector today are relentless: fuel prices, operational bottlenecks, pilot shortages, passenger expectations, sustainability mandates. And yet, within this pressure cooker, AI has emerged as a strategic release valve. Done right, it's helping aviation leaders build resilience, unlock profitability, and deliver the kind of personalised service travelers increasingly expect. One of the most effective applications we've seen is Lufthansa's flight operations optimisation platform. It digests data from a staggering number of sources , aircraft telemetry, crew availability, airspace restrictions, weather , and offers real-time routing and resource recommendations. Not hypotheticals. Real suggestions that operations managers are acting on 90% of the time. That's a sea change in how decisions are made, with measurable benefits in fuel savings and on-time performance. At ground level, the picture is just as compelling. Biometric boarding gates at Denver International. AI-powered debris detection systems at Then there's the passenger experience. In a market where loyalty is hard won, AI is helping airlines move beyond reactive service to proactive hospitality. American Airlines is using AI to tailor everything from seat upgrade offers to travel recommendations, all based on previous behavior and contextual data. For frequent travellers, that small touch of relevance often makes the difference between a one-time flyer and a lifetime customer. AI's value goes beyond the customer-facing sphere AI's value also extends well beyond the customer-facing sphere. British Airways is using RFID systems to reduce baggage mishandling. TAV Technologies is applying AI and computer vision to minimise aircraft turnaround times. Predictive maintenance tools are flagging equipment issues long before a delay becomes inevitable. And the deeper we embed AI into operations, the more we see its compound effect,not just cost savings, but smarter planning, smoother workflows, and happier passengers. Of course, integration doesn't come easy. Legacy systems are a challenge. So is data governance. Considering in addition to this facial recognition and biometric tracking, there are important conversations to be had around privacy and ethics. But these are solvable issues. What's harder to engineer is the cultural shift: getting aviation leaders to see AI not as a patch or pilot, but as core infrastructure. We now see a clear inflection point. The airlines and As someone who's been in the room with industry decision-makers, I'll say this. Those who embed AI deeply into their operations,across ground, air, and digital touchpoints,are the ones who will define the next decade of aviation. They won't just be more efficient. They'll be more adaptable, more trusted, and more competitive. Because in the skies, as in business, altitude is nothing without foresight. And AI is what's giving this industry its clearest view yet.
Khaleej Times
2 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Nearly 90% of videogame developers use AI agents, Google study shows
A Google Cloud survey showed that 87% of videogame developers are using artificial intelligence agents to streamline and automate tasks, as the industry focuses on optimizing costs following a wave of record layoffs. Most of the respondents in the report, published on Monday, said AI was helping automate cumbersome and repetitive tasks, freeing developers to focus on more creative concerns. Gaming publishers have turned to AI to deal with the industry-wide challenge of ballooning development costs and elongated creation cycles stemming from high fan expectations and intense competition. The study, conducted by Google and The Harris Poll, surveyed 615 game developers in the U.S., South Korea, Norway, Finland, and Sweden in late June and early July. Around 44% of developers use agents to optimiae content and process information such as text, voice, code, audio and video rapidly, enabling them to exercise autonomy and make decisions, the study showed. But the use of AI in videogames is a highly contentious topic, with many within the industry concerned over potential job losses, intellectual property disputes and lower pay. Last year, Hollywood's videogame performers went on strike over AI and pay issues, while studios shut down and more than 10,000 people lost their jobs. The industry is expected to gain momentum this year and the next, with the launch of premium titles and new consoles seen to boost spending. According to the survey, 94% of developers expect AI to reduce overall development costs in the long term. That, even as roughly one in four developers find it challenging to precisely measure the return on investment of their AI implementations, while costs associated with integrating the technology are also high. Around 63% of those surveyed expressed concerns over data ownership as the legality around licensing and who exactly owns AI-generated content remains unclear.
