logo
Parliament aflame with unity, pride

Parliament aflame with unity, pride

Express Tribune08-05-2025

An air of pride and steely resolve swept through the National Assembly on Wednesday as lawmakers from both sides of the aisle closed ranks to denounce India's reckless midnight misadventure, calling it the act of a regime drunk on its own delusions.
In fiery speeches, they hailed Pakistan's armed forces for delivering a blow in the early hours of Wednesday that the enemy neither anticipated nor could withstand, turning a night of provocation into a morning of reckoning.
Addressing the NA session convened in the wake of the Indian air strikes, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif remarked that India, intoxicated by the pride of its Rafale jets - which Pakistan had downed in a spectacular display of valour — received a "resounding reply" from Pakistan's armed forces following the attempted air incursion.
"We exercised restraint, we could have downed ten aircraft," he said, adding that those who doubted Pakistan's conventional capabilities were now jolted into sense.
"The Pakistan Armed Forces delivered a crushing response," the prime minister said. "On that dark night when India launched a cowardly assault, our military turned it into a moonlit one."
Lawmakers across party lines, including National Assembly Speaker Ayaz Sadiq, PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, Zartaj Gul, Maulana Abdul Ghafoor Haideri, Khalid Maqbool Siddiqui, Senator Ishaq Dar and PTI's Barrister Gohar, delivered impassioned speeches lauding the armed forces and condemning Indian aggression.
"We stand shoulder to shoulder with our forces," the prime minister declared, who revealed that the Indian assault involved nearly 80 fighter jets. "Our eagles were fully prepared. As soon as India dropped its payload, our hawks struck and brought down five jets."
PM Shehbaz also recounted a pattern of provocation. He said that on April 22, a terrorist attack in India-held Pahalgam was swiftly blamed on Pakistan, within ten minutes of the incident, and used as pretext for military aggression.
"They accused us without evidence. Meanwhile, in the recent hijacking of the Jaffar Express, we possess undeniable proof of Indian links," he said.
The prime minister said Pakistan had offered international investigations into the Pahalgam incident but India rebuffed the gesture.
"Our air force was on alert around the clock. India may flaunt its Rafales, but wisdom and courage determine victory, not expensive machines. I salute Air Chief Zaheer Babar and our brave pilots."
The prime minister added that the operation's restraint was deliberate. "We brought down five jets, it could have been ten. But our falcons exercised prudence."
Calling for political reconciliation, he said, "I am ready to meet all colleagues, even in their chambers. This is the only way forward to make Pakistan a great nation."
'No longer 2001 or 2003'
PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari also addressed the house, reaffirming condolences over the loss of civilian lives in the Indian strikes. "The martyrs included women and children. These deaths did not occur in the course of battle but due to India's brutal aggression," he said.
"Only thieves and cowards attack under the cover of night," Bilawal said. "Had they any courage, they would have attacked in daylight and faced our soldiers. Instead, they targeted children."
He added: "It's no longer 2001 or 2003. The world won't accept terrorists being defined solely by religion. For two weeks we patiently tolerated false accusations. Islamabad knew it was innocent and demanded neutral investigations."
Calling Kashmir a just cause, Bilawal said: "We stand with truth and justice, backed by international law and UN resolutions. India stands with lies and deceit. We will unmask its true face to the world." He praised the Pakistan Air Force for shooting down Indian jets "like mosquitoes" and reiterated that Pakistan would continue responding in kind.
"India may be bigger in population and wealth, but as they say, 'the bigger they are, the harder they fall'."
"Pakistan hasn't fully responded yet. But when it does, it will be within the bounds of international law and the UN Charter. We reserve the right to respond at a time and place of our choosing," he warned.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Barbs fly during Sindh assembly budget session
Barbs fly during Sindh assembly budget session

Business Recorder

timean hour ago

  • Business Recorder

Barbs fly during Sindh assembly budget session

KARACHI: Opposition slammed the fiscal budget 2025-26 as discriminatory and dubbed it 'the darkest budget in Sindh's history', while the treasury hailed the financial plan as balanced and pro-people, during the Sindh Assembly session on Tuesday. Lawmakers from both the treasury and opposition benches also engaged in fiery exchanges during the budget debate that entered the second day as a tense atmosphere gripped the legislature The session was chaired by Deputy Speaker Anthony Naveed. Opening the floor, PPP MPA Yousuf Baloch praised Chief Minister Syed Murad Ali Shah and his team for crafting a people-centric budget in the face of stringent IMF conditions and limited funds. 'It was no easy task, but we relied on our own resources to ensure that the budget serves the people,' he remarked. He also defended Sindh's education performance, claiming it fared better than other provinces and would further improve through fresh teacher recruitment. PPP lawmaker Hina Dastagir affirmed the Chief Minister's capacity to deliver for the public, while Arooba Rabbani said health and education had received special attention, including Karachi's academic institutions. She noted that Shahrah-e-Bhutto would be completed this fiscal year. 'PPP's work is always visible on the ground,' she said. From the opposition benches, MQM's Faheem Patni lamented that no authority was responding to the severe public issues in his constituency. 'I've told my people that the PPP government will not provide them even drinking water,' he said. 'This budget won't change the lives of ordinary citizens— it will only benefit those who made it.' PPP MPA Sarfraz Shah extended congratulations to the leadership for a 'commendable budget' and requested that a branch of NICVD be established in Naushero Feroze. He also called for reconstruction of flood-damaged schools. MPA Khair-un-Nisa Mughal urged authorities to hand over vacant athlete hostels in Mirpurkhas to local universities and thanked Minister Sharjeel Inam Memon for launching the People's Bus Service there. MQM's Moid Anver highlighted sewage water entering a cemetery in PS-101 Essa Nagri and lamented 'Karachi's marginalization' despite contributing 60% of federal revenues. 'PPP has done nothing for the people in its 17-year rule,' he asserted. PPP MPA Pir Mujeeb ul Haq said all development in Sindh had happened under PPP's tenure, citing the 18th Amendment for increasing provincial budgets. He called for Sindh University's Dadu campus to be granted full university status and urged federal authorities to expedite the long-stalled Gaj Dam project. PPP's Seema Khurram said the Benazir Hari Card continued to benefit thousands of farmers and congratulated the CM and his team on a progressive budget. MPA Noor Muhammad Bhurgari noted incomplete roads in Badin and called for their completion. Opposition MPA Naseer Ahmad criticised the government's neglect of Manghopir, claiming the area was treated 'like a foreign territory,' and accused PPP of enabling land mafias. 'They should rename themselves 'Pet Palan Party',' he quipped. PPP's Agha Siraj Durrani cautioned against personal attacks and reminded members to focus on policy matters, not party names. Panel Chairperson Rehana Leghari expunged objectionable remarks made about PPP. PPP's Jam Shabbir Ali called for unity, emphasiwing that 'Karachi is the capital of Sindh and belongs to all of us.' Faqeer Sher Muhammad criticised low budget allocation for the Sukkur-Hyderabad Motorway and suggested converting diesel-run RO plants in Thar to solar due to fuel shortages. MQM's legislator Nasir Qureshi accused the government of under-funding Hyderabad's healthcare. He questioned why the President had to be flown to Karachi when the Gambat Institute exists and noted the ICU in Civil Hospital Hyderabad lacked beds. In her speech, PPP's Saadia Javed said that a budget was more than just numbers. She lauded the party's health sector achievements but stirred controversy by referencing MQM's past association with Farooq Dada. Her remarks triggered uproar from MQM lawmakers, though the Deputy Speaker maintained she had not used any inappropriate language. Saadia then remarked that MQM had yet to formally distance itself from its founder. She also referred to PTI's founding leader as a 'convicted former prime minister,' prompting protests from PTI members. PPP's Rehana Leghari called for an end to hate-based politics and highlighted her colleague Heer Soho's marriage to an Urdu-speaking man as a symbol of unity. She reminded the House that regions like Thatta and Sujawal had historically contributed taxes to Karachi. MQM lady lawmaker, Bilqees Mukhtar, said the budget crushed the poor and claimed that the 18th Amendment had turned the province into a centralised authority. 'Unless local governments are empowered, the public will see no real change,' she asserted. She demanded more powers for the mayor's office. PPP's Dr Sikandar Shoro recommended initiating a crop insurance scheme and extending the IBA testing time for teachers. MPA Ali Ahmed praised the CM for a 'balanced budget' and shared that funds had been allocated for the Qatar Hospital, including the establishment of a trauma centre and a new 100-bed hospital in Orangi Town. PTI's lawmaker, Sajid Hussain denounced the budget as unrealistic and anti-poor. 'Schools remain closed. People are dying of hunger and disease despite a hefty budget,' he said, citing encroachments on dispensaries in his constituency. MQM's Aneel Kumar questioned the transparency of temple fund allocations and decried the lack of development schemes for non-Muslim communities in Umerkot, Tharparkar, and Mirpurkhas, where he claimed 90% of the population is non-Muslim. PPP's Syed Ameer Ali Shah thanked the leadership for a 'people-centric budget,' citing completed road projects and calling for the full activation of the DHQ Hospital. MPA Shah Hussain Shah Shirazi emphasised the need to ensure resources reach the 'tail-end' areas. Sher Muhammad Mughairi praised Pakistan Army's role in past wars and defended Bilawal Bhutto Zardari's international trips, saying they were aimed at presenting Pakistan's true image. He also requested the construction of storm water drains in his constituency. During PPP MPA Ajaz Khan Swati's speech, PTI lawmakers created a commotion. Some PPP members were heard referring to the PTI founder as 'Prisoner No. 420,' prompting a rebuke from the Deputy Speaker, who asked members to refrain from such labels and address the Chair respectfully. JI's Muhammad Farooq reminded the House of an advisory committee agreement that applied equally to all. He criticized PPP ministers for indirectly mocking the PTI leader. After a rebuttal by Saeed Ghani, Sharjeel Memon rose to say, 'Their prisoner isn't just No. 420.' The debate continued with contributions from multiple MPs, including Heer Soho, who described the budget as a landmark for Sindh's development. The session was adjourned until 10 a.m. Wednesday. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

The missed century: can South Asia rise again?
The missed century: can South Asia rise again?

Business Recorder

timean hour ago

  • Business Recorder

The missed century: can South Asia rise again?

'Civilizations die from suicide, not by murder.' Arnold Toynbee's warning resounds powerfully across the contemporary South Asian landscape. Progress does not occur by accident, it demands conscious awareness, meticulous planning, and sustained reflection. For any nation, understanding its history and geography is not a luxury but a necessity. History serves as our collective memory, bearing witness to past struggles, triumphs, and failures. Geography, meanwhile, is a natural unifier; rivers, mountain ranges, ecosystems, and climate zones ignore political boundaries. Decisions made in one territory often affect neighbouring states, particularly in matters such as water, agriculture, energy, and environmental management. Without geographic consciousness and cooperative frameworks, regions risk falling into competition over scarce resources, repeating past mistakes, and descending into confusion, or worse, decline. History often unfolds in cycles, with major shifts recurring every 250 to 300 years. It would be short-sighted to draw long-term conclusions based solely on the geopolitical developments of the last eight decades. We bear the responsibility of course-correction for a region that along with South Asia, impacts neighboring countries including Afghanistan, Iran and Central Asian states; representing over 26 percent of the world's population. In the early 1700s, the Indian subcontinent accounted for nearly 30 percent of global GDP. That share fell to 16 percent in the 1800s and plummeted to 3 percent by the time of Partition in 1947. This prosperity was underpinned by sophisticated irrigation systems, expansive trade networks, and vibrant artisan economies that transcended linguistic and ethnic divides. The rapid economic deterioration was driven largely by colonial exploitation and the extraction of wealth by the British Raj. Today, despite India's recent economic rise, the combined GDP of India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh accounts for less than 4.5 percent of global output, whereas Iran, Afghanistan and Central Asian countries contribute a little under 1 percent to the global GDP. If our intelligentsia fails to understand this historical regression—and worse, to act upon it—then we risk being remembered as a generation of pawns that squandered its post-colonial potential. At the heart of every functioning nation lies a social contract; a mutual agreement in which the state pledges to protect its citizens, ensure public goods, and create pathways to upward mobility. In South Asia, this contract has been severely undermined by perpetual hostilities, divisive politics, inefficient governments and an obsession with external and internal 'enemies'. This is not just an economic failure, it is a moral failure, generational in its consequences. While Partition marked the realization of sovereign states and fulfilled the aspirations of many, however, its aftermath set the stage towards redirecting national energies towards prolonged military rivalries, elite capture, lack of reforms and rampant corruption, rather than social progress, focus on human development, and poverty alleviation. These problems have overshadowed the deep cultural, linguistic, and economic ties that bind the region. Pakistan and India, for example, continue to suffer from low per capita incomes, around USD1,824 and USD2,880, respectively, far below the middle-income cap of approximately USD14,000. The Human Development Index (HDI) that includes health, education, income and living conditions, ranks Pakistan at 168 and India at 130 out of 193 countries. Focusing on health, education, human development and social reforms has become imperative. Or else, we may not see a truly progressive state in our lifetime, or even our children's. Additionally, a fundamental shift in mindset is also needed, from adversarial nationalism to inclusive cooperation, decades of growth may yet be consumed by the very divisions that have long plagued us. In this regard, India offers a sobering case study. The current administration's embrace of radical nationalism has coincided with rising communal tensions and a gradual erosion of democratic institutions. This internal fraying not only damages India's own social cohesion but also diminishes its regional and global standing. India too suffers from an elitist economy along with inefficient institutions to cater to the needs of a large population still living below the poverty line. The recent four-day conflict, rather than asserting Indian strength, weakened its economic stability and geopolitical relevance, particularly as a counterweight to China. Pakistan, while faring relatively better in this instance, continues to grapple with structural weaknesses: a stagnant economy, lack of institutional reform, elite capture, and a fraying social fabric. Reaching middle-income status within a generation will require nothing short of transformation. This includes fiscal discipline, debt reduction, a reallocation of expenditures toward health and education, and a robust investment in innovation and human capital. Regional connectivity must be unlocked through initiatives like the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), Turkmenistan–Afghanistan–Pakistan–India (TAPI), and enhanced ties with our South Asian neighbors, Iran, Afghanistan, and Central Asia. Governance must be reformed; rendered inclusive, transparent, and responsive to local communities. South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC), once envisioned as the cornerstone of regional cooperation, remains largely paralysed. Political mistrust, hard borders, and minimal cross-border investment have eroded the potential for regional economies of scale. Nationalistic narratives continue to undermine collaborative efforts in science, health, and technology. In contrast, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) show that regional history need not be a barrier to future integration. South Asia, Central Asia, Afghanistan, and Iran sit at the crossroads of two emerging economic giants—China and Russia. This strategic geography makes sector-wise regional cooperation both logical and necessary for shared prosperity and resilience. Likewise, there is a huge potential in areas of information technology and digitalization. Moreover, the region's rich mineral resources—copper, lithium, and rare earths—can drive growth if harnessed through coordinated, responsible extraction and value-added processing frameworks. For context, mineral potential for South Asia, Central Asia, Iran and Afghanistan represents nearly 11 percent of world's copper reserves, nearly 14 percent of coal, 9 percent of iron ore, and 25 percent of uranium reserves. Such collaboration can activate new engines of sustainable regional development. China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) envisions regional growth grounded in stability and connectivity, an ethos that could encompass India as well. Forums such as the SCO and even the ASEAN offer viable pathways for cooperative engagement. China views South Asia through a strategic prism that balances regional integration with its rivalry with the United States. While India remains a key competitor—especially through the Quad—China has no vested interest in a full-scale conflict between nuclear-armed neighbours. For India, rethinking its posture toward China and Pakistan could open new economic frontiers that include Afghanistan, Iran, Central Asia and the Indian Ocean's evolving strategic architecture. There are many global examples in this regard. Post-WWII Germany and Japan rebounded by critically reassessing their pasts and rebuilding with purpose. Singapore, limited in both size and resources, transformed itself into a global trade and finance hub. Europe, once a theatre of endless conflict, forged the European Union to bind old rivals through economic interdependence. South Asia, with its shared cultures and histories, can emulate the spirit, if not the exact structures, of European reconciliation and integration. Terrorism continues to destabilize the region, feeding off political grievances, economic disparity, and extremist narratives. Each state must take uncompromising responsibility for curbing radicalization, and strengthening internal security. The cost of inaction is too high, i.e., undermining social cohesion, investor confidence, and long-term development. States must confront this threat not as a favour to neighbours, but as a duty to their own people. Or else, terrorism will remain a chronic obstacle to regional progress. South Asia is among the world's most climate-vulnerable regions, grappling with rising temperatures, erratic monsoons, and accelerating glacial melt. Deadly heat waves and worsening water stress threaten agriculture, while Himalayan glacier retreat endangers long-term water security and triggers floods. Urban flooding, rising humidity, and heat stress are compounding health risks, especially in cities with weak infrastructure. These pressures are driving internal migration, deepening poverty, and undermining regional stability. Preparing for climate change must be central to South Asia's agenda. Investing in green infrastructure, sustainable farming, and early warning systems is no longer optional — it is survival. South Asia and Central Asia now stand at a defining juncture. Pakistan, at the pivot of regions, holds the potential to spearhead a regional renaissance, if it chooses dialogue over discord, trade over tension, and vision over vendetta. Every resource diverted from elite-driven governance without institutional reforms and non-developmental expenditure into schools, skill development, hospitals, and infrastructure pays compounded dividends. Each functional trade route and open border sows trust and disperses prosperity. The stakes are too high for complacency. Across the region, young people are not demanding conflict; they are pleading for opportunity, equity, and a future worth investing in. While national security remains paramount, it must coexist with a broader strategic vision of sustainable, inclusive prosperity. The compass lies before us. Let us resist the urge to politicize our shared history and instead harness it to build a future of cooperation. In renewing our social contracts, domestically and regionally, South Asia can reclaim its place in the global order, not as a flashpoint, but as a beacon of stability and shared growth. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

PML-N senator rejects federal budget, slams powers proposed for FBR officers
PML-N senator rejects federal budget, slams powers proposed for FBR officers

Business Recorder

timean hour ago

  • Business Recorder

PML-N senator rejects federal budget, slams powers proposed for FBR officers

ISLAMABAD: A treasury senator from Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz (PML-N) has handed an outright rejection to the proposed federal budget while slamming as coercive, the powers proposed for the officers of Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) in the budget draft, which, according to her, would lead to more corruption. 'I reject this budget—the powers being proposed for the FBR commissioners, they are coercive, which will lead to more corruption, and violate the basic rights and the rule of law,' said Saadia Abbasi in the Upper House of the Parliament on Tuesday. She dismissed the budget as a 'non-starter— anti-business— anti-poor— anti-people,' urging Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif to review the policies announced in the proposed federal budget. Abbasi strongly criticised her party's federal government for taxing the solarisation. In addition, the senator also took on the policy of tax filers and non-filers, which she said, was followed 'nowhere in the world.' 'I am sitting on the treasury benches in this House, and I am expected to speak in favour of the government—In this paradox of trying to please the government, and speaking with some degree of intellectual honesty, I would go with my conscience,' she said, as the senator continued to lambast N-League's federal government over its economic policies. Apart from that, the Senate session was marked with apparent disinterest of the treasury side amidst the absence of most of the federal cabinet members, a scenario strongly criticised by the opposition senators. Law Minister Azam Tarar responded that the ministers could not attend the House proceedings due to their participation in the finance committees of Senate and National Assembly. Mohsin Aziz from Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) criticised the government for 'strangulating the registered taxpayers' in the country. Another PTI legislator Aon Abbas Buppi slammed the government for 'destroying the agriculture sector.' He demanded of Chairman Senate Yousaf Raza Gilani to exercise his powers and issue the production order of incarcerated PTI Senator Ejaz Chaudhary. Amir Chishti from Muttahida Qaumi Movement Pakistan (MQMP) also opposed the powers proposed to the FBR in the new federal budget, saying this step would adversely affect the business community. Waqar Mehdi from Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) invited Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb to 'spend a day with the labourers' to know their financial hardships. 'This budget is not public-friendly,' he said. Aimal Wali Khan from Awami National Party (ANP) said the government deprived 60 percent of Pakistanis of their 'right to live' in the proposed federal budget. The House was adjourned till today (Wednesday). Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store