Succession centres on Khamenei's son Mojtaba as Iran's next leader
MOJTABA Khamenei is one of the most influential figures in the Iranian religious establishment headed by his father, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and among the figures seen as a candidate to succeed him as leader of the Islamic republic.
A mid-ranking ulama who studied under religious conservatives in the seminaries of Qom, Mojtaba is a hardliner with close ties to the Revolutionary Guards, the force mandated to safeguard the Islamic republic led by Khamenei since 1989.
Carrying the rank of hojjatoleslam, Mojtaba, 55, has never held a formal position in the government, exercising his influence behind the scenes as the gatekeeper to his father, according to Iran watchers.
His role has long been a point of controversy in Iran, with critics rejecting any hint of dynastic politics in a country that overthrew a United States-backed monarch in 1979.
Khamenei has himself indicated opposition to the idea of dynastic succession.
The US Treasury Department imposed sanctions on Mojtaba in 2019, saying he represented the supreme leader in "an official capacity despite never being elected or appointed to a government position" aside from working his father's office.
Its website said Khamenei had delegated some of his responsibilities to Mojtaba, whom it said had worked closely with the commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps' Quds Force and the Basij, a religious militia affiliated with the Guards, "to advance his father's destabilising regional ambitions and oppressive domestic objectives".
Over the past 20 years, Mojtaba had built close ties with the Guards, giving him added leverage across Iran's political and security apparatus, said sources.
Mojtaba has been a target of protesters' anger in demonstrations since 2009, particularly during months of unrest that swept Iran over the death of a young woman in police custody in 2022, after she was arrested for allegedly breaching the country's strict dress codes.
He has appeared at loyalist rallies, but has rarely spoken in public. Last year, a video was widely shared in which he announced the suspension of Islamic jurisprudence classes he was teaching at Qom, fuelling speculation about the reasons.
He bares a strong resemblance to his father, and wears the black turban of a sayyed, indicating his family traces its lineage to Prophet Muhammad.
Critics say Mojtaba lacks the credentials to become supreme leader — hojjatoleslam is a notch below the rank of ayatollah — the position held by his father and Ruhollah Khomeini, who founded the Islamic Republic.
But he has remained in the frame, particularly after another leading candidate for the role — the former president Ebrahim Raisi — died in a helicopter crash last year.
A US diplomatic cable written in 2007 and published by WikiLeaks cited three Iranian sources describing Mojtaba as an avenue to reach Khamenei.
He has opposed Iran's reformist camp that has favoured engagement with the West and has been embodied by figures such as the former presidents Mohammad Khatami and Hassan Rouhani.
Mojtaba was widely believed to have been behind the sudden rise of hardliner Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in the 2005 presidential election.
Mehdi Karroubi, a reformist who ran in the 2005 election, wrote a letter to Khamenei at the time objecting to what he alleged was Mojtaba's role in supporting Ahmadinejad. Khamenei rejected the accusation.
Mojtaba also backed Ahmadinejad in 2009 when he ran again and won a second term in a disputed election that resulted in anti-government protests that were violently suppressed by the Basij and other security forces.
His wife is the daughter of a prominent hardliner, the former parliament speaker Gholamali Haddadadel.
Mojtaba was born in 1969 in the city of Mashhad, growing up as his father was helping to lead the opposition to the Shah, and as a young man served in the Iran-Iraq war. — REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
27 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Israel claims victory as US intel says Iran nuclear sites not destroyed
JERUSALEM: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared a "historic victory" against Iran, despite a US intelligence report concluding that American strikes set back Tehran's nuclear programme by just a few months. Iran and Israel agreed a ceasefire on Tuesday, ending 12 days of tit-for-tat strikes after US President Donald Trump joined the conflict with bunker-busting bombs at the weekend that he said destroyed key Iranian nuclear sites. A classified preliminary US intelligence report, however, concluded that American strikes on Iran set back its nuclear programme by just a few months. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed the authenticity of the assessment but said it was "flat-out wrong." In an address to the nation after the ceasefire announcement, Netanyahu said, "Iran will not have a nuclear weapon." "We have thwarted Iran's nuclear project," he said. "And if anyone in Iran tries to rebuild it, we will act with the same determination, with the same intensity, to foil any attempt." Israel had said its bombing campaign, which began on June 13, was aimed at preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, an ambition Tehran has consistently denied. Israel's military said that its strikes had set back Iran's nuclear programme "by years." After Trump angrily berated both sides for early violations of the truce on Tuesday, Tehran announced it would respect the terms of the deal if Israel did the same, while Israel said it had refrained from further strikes. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said his country was willing to return to negotiations over its nuclear programme, but that his country would continue to "assert its legitimate rights" to the peaceful use of atomic energy. US media on Tuesday cited people familiar with the Defense Intelligence Agency findings as saying the American strikes did not fully eliminate Iran's centrifuges or stockpile of enriched uranium. The strikes sealed off entrances to some facilities without destroying underground buildings, according to the report. White House Press Secretary Leavitt responded on social media: "The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean President Trump, and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran's nuclear program." While Iran and Israel have been locked in a shadow war for decades, their 12-day conflict was by far the most destructive confrontation between them. Israeli strikes hit nuclear and military targets – killing scientists and senior military figures – as well as residential areas, prompting waves of Iranian missile fire on Israel. The war culminated in US strikes on underground Iranian nuclear sites using bunker-busting bombs – which Israel lacks – followed by an Iranian reprisal targeting the largest US military facility in the Middle East. Trump shrugged off that response as "weak", thanking Tehran for giving advance notice and announcing the contours of the ceasefire just hours later. Some Israelis welcomed the prospect of a truce. "Everyone is tired. We just want to have some peace of mind," said Tel Aviv resident Tammy Shel. "For us, for the Iranian people, for the Palestinians, for everyone in the region." In Iran, people remained uncertain whether the peace would hold. Amir, 28, fled from Tehran to the Caspian Sea coast and told AFP by phone, "I really don't know... about the ceasefire but honestly, I don't think things will return to normal." Israeli strikes on Iran killed at least 610 civilians and wounded more than 4,700, according to the health ministry. The international community reacted with cautious optimism to the truce. Saudi Arabia and the European Union welcomed Trump's announcement, while Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Russia hoped "that this will be a sustainable ceasefire." But French President Emmanuel Macron warned there was an "increased" risk that Iran would attempt to enrich uranium secretly following the strikes on its nuclear sites. After the truce was announced, Israel's military chief Eyal Zamir said Israel's focus would now shift back to Gaza. The Israeli opposition, the Palestinian Authority and the main group representing the families of Israeli hostages all called for a Gaza truce to complement the Iran ceasefire.
New Straits Times
42 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
'Many thought Iran was evil — now they show support,' says Malaysian content creator
KUALA LUMPUR: A Malaysian woman with family ties in Tehran says the recent Israel-Iran conflict left her worried for her in-laws' safety and struggling to stay in contact during the height of the missile strikes. Norazryana Mat Dawi said the missile exchange between the two countries in April was a deeply stressful experience for her and her family. The 40-year-old Johorean,who is married to an Iranian and currently resides in the Czech Republic, considers Iran her second home. "I couldn't believe it was really happening. For 17 years I've been part of the Iranian community, and we always talked about the possibility of war. When it finally happened, it was heartbreaking." she told the NST. Her husband's family lives in Tehran, one of the areas affected during the 12-day conflict. Although the strikes did not directly hit their home, the situation left the family anxious and on edge. "They were terrified. The attacks happened while they were asleep. Although the missiles weren't near their area, the sound of the explosions woke them," she said. The first three days were the most worrying, as her in-laws could not leave Tehran due to heavy traffic and road congestion. They eventually managed to relocate to their second home in northern Iran on the fourth day. Norazryana said communication also became difficult when the Iranian government restricted internet access due to fears of cyberattacks. "From day six to nine, we lost contact for a few hours. Iran only allowed access to their local intranet. Incoming international calls were blocked, and we couldn't get updates from Iranian media or our family," she said. She and her husband resorted to using a locally developed Iranian messaging app, although the internet speed was poor. A landline call from her in-laws finally reassured them that everyone was safe. As a content creator who regularly shares updates about Iran, Norazryana said the conflict changed how Malaysians view the country. "Before this, many were sceptical and thought Iran was evil. But after the conflict, especially after Iran responded to Israel, I noticed more Malaysians showing sympathy and support," she said. She hopes more people will understand the hardship ordinary Iranians face under international sanctions. "There are over 90 million people in Iran who just want a normal life. "They are struggling with high inflation and a weak passport. This conflict has only made things harder," she said. International political observer Nasaie Ismail said the April missile strikes placed Malaysians in Iran at potential risk, as key cities like Tehran and Isfahan where most students, workers, and businesspeople live, were among the targeted areas. "This naturally raises concern for any Malaysian residing in or travelling to these high-risk zones," he said. He added that while a ceasefire was eventually declared, trust remains fragile. "Iran sees itself as the victim in this conflict. Even though the United States and Israel have signalled a desire to de-escalate, Iran is hesitant to accept any ceasefire without clear and fair conditions," Nasaie said. Nasaie noted that Iran's domestic unity has strengthened post-conflict, and he expects the country's internal situation to become more stable in the coming months.
The Sun
42 minutes ago
- The Sun
US strikes may delay Iran nuclear program by months, sources reveal
WASHINGTON: A preliminary U.S. intelligence assessment has determined that U.S. strikes over the weekend on Iranian nuclear facilities have set back Tehran's program by only a matter of months, three sources with knowledge of the matter told Reuters. The initial report was prepared by the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Pentagon's main intelligence arm and one of 18 U.S. intelligence agencies, said two of the sources, who requested anonymity to discuss classified matters. The classified assessment is at odds with the statements of President Donald Trump and high-ranking U.S. officials - including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. They have said the weekend strikes, which used a combination of bunker-busting bombs and more conventional weapons, essentially eliminated Iran's nuclear program. Trump's administration on Tuesday told the U.N Security Council that its weekend strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities had 'degraded' Iran's nuclear program, short of Trump's earlier assertion that the facilities had been 'obliterated.' Asked for comment, the White House pointed to a statement by White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt to CNN, which first reported the assessment, that the 'alleged' conclusion was 'flat-out wrong.' 'Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000 pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration,' she said. Trump has said the attacks were necessary to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. Iran denies it is seeking such a weapon and says its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes. Hegseth on Sunday said that the strikes had 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear ambitions, while Trump said Iran's crucial nuclear sites had been 'completely and fully obliterated.' Assessing the damage at the Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz nuclear sites is expected to be a difficult task, and the DIA is not the only agency tasked with the job. One source said the assessment was not universally accepted and had generated significant disagreement. A U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the U.S. did not know the extent of the damage yet. Still, the initial assessment indicated the strikes may not have been nearly as successful as the Trump administration has claimed. One of the sources said Iran's enriched uranium stocks had not been eliminated, and in fact the country's nuclear program may have been set back only a month or two. The Pentagon disputed the notion that the damage to Iran's nuclear program was minor, though it did not dispute that the DIA assessment exists. 'Based on everything we have seen — and I've seen it all — our bombing campaign obliterated Iran's ability to create nuclear weapons,' Hegseth said in a statement provided to Reuters. 'Our massive bombs hit exactly the right spot at each target—and worked perfectly. The impact of those bombs is buried under a mountain of rubble in Iran; so anyone who says the bombs were not devastating is just trying to undermine the President and the successful mission.' Initial military assessments can change as more information comes to light and it is not uncommon for opinions to vary across different U.S. intelligence agencies. Democrats have previously said Trump's claims that the weekend strikes eliminated or seriously set back Iran's nuclear program were not yet backed by evidence. 'There's zero evidence that I've seen that the nuclear program was completely and totally obliterated as Donald Trump has claimed,' House of Representatives Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said on Monday. Classified briefings on the matter for members of the House of Representatives and Senate were canceled on Tuesday.
