Georgian court places opposition leader in pre-trial detention for contempt of parliament
TBILISI, May 22 (Reuters) - A Georgian court on Thursday placed Zurab Japaridze, one of the leaders of the country's largest opposition party, in pre-trial detention, as the government clamps down on dissent after major protests last year.
It was not clear for how long he had been put into custody, according to Georgia's Interpress news agency.
Japaridze, a prominent leader of the Coalition for Change, which came second in last year's parliamentary election, had refused to appear at a parliamentary inquiry into alleged crimes committed under jailed former President Mikheil Saakashvili, between 2004 and 2012.
Japaridze had been held in contempt by parliament, and refused to pay bail in order to avoid jail. He and other opposition figures say the inquiry is an illegitimate propaganda exercise by the ruling Georgian Dream party.
A baseball cap-wearing libertarian with a following among younger Georgians, Japaridze has been among the most prominent figures at street protests since last year. He has said he carried a gun until his license to do so was revoked by a court amid last year's protests.
The ruling came amid a large police presence outside the court building, alongside a protest of opposition supporters.
Georgian Dream's powerful founder, billionaire ex-prime minister Bidzina Ivanishvili, has in recent months repeatedly pledged to ban opposition parties for what he says are their links to Saakashvili, who remains deeply divisive among Georgians.
Previously one of the most pro-Western and democratic of the Soviet Union's successor states, critics of the Georgian government say the country has in recent years moved in an authoritarian and pro-Russian direction.
In November, shortly after a parliamentary election the opposition said was falsified, the ruling party said it would halt European Union accession talks until 2028, abruptly freezing a long-standing and popular national goal that is written into Georgia's constitution.
Georgian Dream says it still wants to eventually join the EU, but also wants balanced relations with Russia, which ruled Georgia for around 200 years until 1991. It says the October election, in which it gained a majority of seats in parliament, was free and fair.
Georgia and Russia have had no formal diplomatic relations since 2008, when Tbilisi was defeated in the latest in a series of wars with two Russian-backed breakaway provinces.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Chaos in Minneapolis as sweeping ICE raid descends into violence
Federal law enforcement officers raided a taco restaurant in Minneapolis on Tuesday morning, triggering chaos on the streets and frenzied protests. The search warrant being executed was for drugs and money laundering - but no arrests were ultimately made after local activists stormed the streets in protests. Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey said in a statement: 'I am aware of the operation federal agencies carried out earlier today near Lake and Bloomington. 'While we are still gathering details, this incident was related to a criminal search warrant for drugs and money laundering and was not related to immigration enforcement. No arrests were made.'
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Marjorie Taylor Greene criticized for not reading Trump's ‘big beautiful' bill
Republican firebrand Marjorie Taylor Greene has drawn widespread criticism from Democratic colleagues for admitting that not only did she not read Donald Trump's tax and spending bill before voting for it, but she would have voted against it had she read thoroughly. Greene revealed she was unaware of a provision in Trump's 'one big beautiful bill' (OBBB) that would prevent states from regulating artificial intelligence systems for a decade. The Georgia representative said she would have voted against the entire bill if she had known about the AI language buried on pages 278-279. 'Full transparency, I did not know about this section on pages 278-279 of the OBBB that strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years,' Greene wrote on X. 'I am adamantly OPPOSED to this and it is a violation of state rights and I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there.' Democratic lawmakers, who all voted against the bill, responded with incredulity of Greene's admission. 'You have one job. To. Read. The. Fucking. Bill,' Representative Eric Swalwell wrote in response. Representative Ted Lieu said he had read the AI provision beforehand and 'that's one reason I voted no on the GOP's big, ugly bill', he posted on X. 'PRO TIP: It's helpful to read stuff before voting on it.' Representative Mark Pocan was more forward: 'Read the f**king bill instead of clapping for it like a performing monkey. You should have done your job while it was written. You didn't. You own that vote.' The AI provision was added just two nights before the bill's markup. It would prohibit state and local governments from pursuing 'any law or regulation regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decision systems' for 10 years, unless the purpose is to facilitate deployment of such systems. The language applies broadly to facial recognition systems, generative AI and automated decision-making tools used in hiring, housing and public benefits. Several states have already passed laws creating safeguards around such systems, which could become unenforceable if the bill passes the Senate. It also raises questions about the curious case of Republicans not reading sprawling legislation about provisions in the bill. Representative Mike Flood of Nebraska was booed by voters at a heated town hall last week when he admitted that a provision restricting federal judges' ability to enforce contempt orders was 'unknown' to him when he voted for the same bill. 'I am not going to hide the truth: This provision was unknown to me when I voted for that bill,' Flood told the audience, prompting shouts from constituents who responded: 'You voted for all of it.' But Greene and Flood aren't the only unexpected sources to now disapprove of aspects of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill': the world's richest man and Trump ally Elon Musk called the legislation a 'disgusting abomination' on X Tuesday afternoon. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk wrote, adding that it would 'massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion'. Democrats have highlighted that the bill includes significant cuts to healthcare and social programs, with reductions to Medicaid affecting millions of Americans and cuts to food assistance programs. In response to Greene's admission, representative Yvette Clarke wrote: 'Reading is fundamental! Maybe if your colleagues weren't so hellbent on jamming a bill down our throats in the dead of night, and bending the knee to Trump, you would've caught this, Sis!' Representative Delia Ramirez noted that Greene appeared to have missed other provisions affecting her constituents: 'Oh, Marjorie! If you had read the bill, you would've also seen that 149,705 of your constituents could lose their Medicaid.' The House energy and commerce committee advanced the reconciliation package last Wednesday. Greene has called for the AI provision to be removed in the Senate, warning that 'we have no idea what AI will be capable of in the next 10 years'.
The Independent
6 hours ago
- The Independent
COVID-related agreement continues to shield some on Georgia's death row from execution
The fact that the COVID-19 vaccine is not available for newborn babies is shielding a group of prisoners on Georgia 's death row from execution. Executions in Georgia were halted during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the state attorney general's office entered into an agreement with lawyers for people on death row to set the terms under which they could resume for a specific group of prisoners. At least one of those conditions, having to do with the availability of the COVID-19 vaccine, has not been met, and seeking an execution date for a prisoner covered by the agreement would breach the agreement, Fulton County Superior Court Judge Shukura Ingram ruled. The agreement includes three conditions that had to be met before executions could be set for the affected prisoners: the expiration of the state's COVID-19 judicial emergency, the resumption of normal visitation at state prisons and the availability of a COVID-19 vaccine 'to all members of the public.' Once those conditions were met, the state agreed to give three months' notice before pursuing an execution warrant for one of the prisoners covered by the agreement and six months' notice for the rest. The state has argued that the agreement should no longer apply, contending the conditions have been met. But defense attorneys say it's still valid because the vaccine isn't yet available to infants under 6 months old, and visitation at state prisons has not returned to normal. Ingram's ruling, issued Friday, addressed only the vaccination question. She plans to handle the visitation issue separately. Ingram wrote that the state's arguments 'all boil down to an attempt to rewrite the Agreement.' The state is '(u)nhappy with the language it drafted' and wants to change it so that the condition would be satisfied once vaccines are available to 'most members of the public.' 'But courts cannot rewrite contracts to relieve a party of their regrets,' she wrote. She ruled that the agreement is 'binding and enforceable,' that the vaccination condition hasn't been met and that seeking an execution warrant before the requirements have been met would breach the agreement. The state attorney general's office plans to appeal, a spokesperson said Tuesday. Ingram noted that the Food and Drug Administration has approved clinical trials for infants under 6 months old, and newborns receive other vaccines. That shows it is possible for the COVID-19 vaccine to ultimately be available for that age group, and the state should have foreseen that that could take years, she wrote. Experts for both sides had testified that it was probable that the COVID-19 vaccine would eventually become available to babies under the age of 6 months, Ingram wrote. That was before Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was appointed U.S. health secretary. Kennedy last week announced that COVID-19 vaccines are no longer recommended for healthy children and pregnant women. A few days later, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 's website, which had said those groups should get the shots, was revised to say the vaccinations 'may' be given to those groups. The agreement covers fewer than 10 of the 34 people currently on Georgia's death row. While Georgia stopped carrying out executions during the pandemic, death penalty cases continued to wind their way through the court system, and as people exhausted their appeals, they became eligible for execution. A committee of a judicial task force on COVID-19 in early 2021 instructed lawyers for people on death row and the state attorney general's office to come up with terms under which executions could safely resume. The two sides reached the agreement in April 2021. The agreement only applied to people on death row whose requests to have their appeals reheard were denied by the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals while the judicial emergency was in place. The agreement was to remain in effect through Aug. 1, 2022, or one year from the date on which the conditions were met — whichever was later. The legal fight arose from a lawsuit filed when officials set a May 2022 execution date for Virgil Delano Presnell Jr. The Federal Defender Program, which represents Presnell, said the state had violated the agreement because the conditions hadn't all been met. Based on that argument, a Fulton County Superior Court judge halted the execution less than 24 hours before it was to take place, and the Georgia Supreme Court ruled in December 2022 that the agreement was a binding contract. People on death row who are not covered by the agreement have since become eligible for execution. One of them, Willie James Pye, was put to death in March 2024.
