Top bosses have told police officers 'no DANCING' at Notting Hill Carnival as 7,000 are bracing for carnage
The Metropolitan police have said they believe grooving to the music could distract or slow down their officers from responding to outbreaks of crime.
The growing popularity of Europe's biggest street party which celebrates Caribbean heritage, arts and culture has become a big problem for Scotland Yard.
Last year, carnival arrests hit their highest level since 2019 as 349 people were detained including for violence, theft, sexual offences and assaults on police.
The Met confirmed the dancing ban to The Guardian and in a statement said: 'Carnival is an iconic and spectacular event which attracts hundreds of thousands of people every year to party and celebrate Caribbean culture.
'But it is also an event where there have been numerous concerns about crowd safety and crime. As a consequence, almost 7,000 officers will be deployed to this year's event. They are there to keep revellers safe, not to join in the revelling.
'We want officers to positively engage with the carnivalgoers while staying vigilant at all times and remaining able to respond and intervene swiftly as necessary. They can't do this if they are dancing.
'The standards of behaviour expected as part of the policing operation will be communicated clearly before the event, just as they have been in recent years.'
Amid escalating levels of violence Deputy Assistant Commissioner Matt Ward, police commander for this year's event, said the carnival's size creates 'unique challenges'.
The Met has faced increasing pressure to ensure the safety of revellers after Cher Maximen, 32, was stabbed to death by Shakeil Thibou, 20, in front of her three-year-old daughter last year; while chef Mussie Imnetu, 41, was murdered in the street.
The annual celebration has been running since 1966, and arrest totals have been on a rising curve since the start of the millennium when they stood at 158 in 2002. The total over the past 20 years between 2005 and 2024 is now well over the 5,000 mark.
This year, police want to identify 'violent gangs' planning to attend and urged anyone with information of individuals intending to engage in violence to come forward.
A series of 31 anti-terror concrete barriers were installed on Portobello Road last month by Kensington and Chelsea Council to help deter vehicle attacks in the popular market area of Notting Hill following counter-terrorism guidance issued by the Met.
But the council said these 'hostile vehicle mitigation measures' will be removed for two weeks from today to ensure 'people can move freely and safely during the event'.
Susan Hall, a Conservative member of the London Assembly, said in a bombshell report published earlier this month that the carnival in recent years had only narrowly 'avoided a mass crush on the scale of the Hillsborough disaster'.
London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan has warned of the risk of a 'crowd crush' at the carnival, saying at a meeting last month that he had 'seen images of some of the crowds at some parts' of the event and 'watching them made me frightened'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
a few seconds ago
- The Guardian
Met police's facial recognition plans fall foul of European law, says watchdog
Scotland Yard's plan to widen the use of controversial live facial recognition technology is unlawful because it is incompatible with European laws, the equalities regulator has claimed. As the UK's biggest force prepares to use instant face-matching cameras at this weekend's Notting Hill carnival, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) said its use was intrusive and could have a 'chilling effect' on individuals' rights. The development will be a blow to Mark Rowley, the Metropolitan police commissioner, who has backed the use of the technology at mass events such as this weekend's carnival, when 2 million people are expected to descend upon west London. The EHRC has been given permission to intervene in an upcoming judicial review launched last month by the anti-knife campaigner Shaun Thompson. Thompson, a Black British man, was wrongly identified by live facial recognition (LFR) as a criminal, held by police, then faced demands from officers for his fingerprints. Data seen by the EHRC shows that the number of black men triggering an 'alert' while using the technology is higher than would be expected proportionally, when compared with the population of London, it said. A letter last week from 11 anti-racist and civil liberty organisations, disclosed in the Guardian, urged the Met to scrap the use of the technology over concerns of racial bias and the impending legal challenge. LFR technology captures and analyses the faces of individuals passing in front of real-time CCTV cameras. It extracts unique biometric data from each face and compares it against a 'watchlist' of thousands of people sought by the police. There is at present no specific domestic legislation regulating police use of LFR, with police using common law powers instead. The Met insists that the Equality Act 2010 places legal obligations upon them to eliminate discrimination. The EHRC said that the claim brought forward by Thompson 'raises issues of significant public importance' and will provide submissions 'on the intrusive nature of LFR technology' which focus on the way in which the technology has been used by the police. The Met's policy on LFR technology is unlawful because it is incompatible with articles 8 (right to privacy), 10 (freedom of expression), and 11 (freedom of assembly and association) of the European convention on human rights, the watchdog says. Rebecca Vincent, the interim director of Big Brother Watch, said the EHRC's intervention was 'hugely welcome'. She added: 'The rapid proliferation of invasive live facial recognition technology without any legislation governing its use is one of the most pressing human rights concerns in the UK today. 'Live facial recognition surveillance turns our faces into barcodes and makes us a nation of suspects who, as we've seen in Shaun's case, can be falsely accused, grossly mistreated and forced to prove our innocence to authorities.' John Kirkpatrick, chief executive of the EHRC, said: 'There must be clear rules which guarantee that live facial recognition technology is used only where necessary, proportionate and constrained by appropriate safeguards. We believe that the Metropolitan police's current policy falls short of this standard.' The Met said last month it would deploy specially mounted cameras at entries and exits of the two-day event in west London. Rowley wrote on Tuesday that the technology would target the 'small minority' who commit serious crimes including violence and sexual offences. The Met has been approached for comment.
Telegraph
a few seconds ago
- Telegraph
Kneecap rapper gets Irish translator at terror hearing despite speaking English
A Kneecap rapper who can speak English used an Irish interpreter when he appeared in court for allegedly supporting a proscribed terror organisation. Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh, who performs under the stage name Mo Chara, is accused of displaying a flag in support of Hezbollah at a gig in November last year. Hundreds of Kneecap supporters waving flags and holding banners gathered outside Westminster magistrates' court as the rapper arrived on Wednesday. The Metropolitan Police has imposed conditions limiting where the demonstration outside the court can take place to 'prevent serious disruption'. In response, the rap group described this move as a 'calculated political decision' that was 'designed to try and portray support for Kneecap as somehow troublesome'. The group asked supporters to 'go out of your way to be compliant with all instructions issued, irrespective of how pitiful'. Ó hAnnaidh, who arrived at court alongside fellow bandmates Naoise Ó Cairealláin and JJ Ó Dochartaigh, was swamped by photographers outside. The rapper, who performs in both English and Irish, was granted the use of an Irish interpreter as previously requested. Ó hAnnaidh's defence team are seeking to have the case thrown out, citing a technical error in the way the charge against him was brought. Brenda Campbell KC told the court the case should be dismissed because the Attorney General's consent was not obtained by the CPS before charges were laid against Ó hAnnaidh. Michael Bisgrove, prosecuting, rejected this, arguing that the Terrorism Act allows charges to be laid against an individual before any approach is made to the Attorney General, if necessary, to obtain his consent. He further argued that such consent from the Attorney General was not required under the legislation. Hundreds of supporters greeted the Kneecap rapper with cheers as he made his way from a silver people-carrier to the building. Fans held signs that read 'Free Mo Chara', while others waved Palestinian and Irish flags before the rapper arrived at court. A chant of 'free, free, Mo Chara' could also be heard over a megaphone, which was repeated by the crowd. Susan Folan, Ó hAnnaidh's interpreter, said she provided him with both a verbatim translation and occasional clarification, as required. The singer left the court building to a hero's welcome from the large crowd. Speaking briefly from the impromptu stage, he thanked them for their support, adding: 'While we're here, genocide is taking place in Palestine. Free Palestine!' A man was detained by police outside the court because of a placard he was holding. Surrounded by officers, he told reporters his hand-made sign made no reference to any proscribed organisations. The court previously heard the 27-year-old defendant was 'well within his rights' to voice his opinions on the Israel-Palestine conflict, but the alleged incident at the O2 Forum in Kentish Town, north London, was a 'wholly different thing'. Ó hAnnaidh was released on unconditional bail to return to court on Sept 26, when Judge Paul Goldspring will hand down his ruling. He is yet to enter a plea to the charge.
The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
Kneecap rapper faces month-long wait over whether terror charge is thrown out
A member of rap trio Kneecap faces a month-long wait to find out whether his terrorism charge will be thrown out. Liam Og O hAnnaidh, who performs under the stage name Mo Chara, was once again greeted by hundreds of fans as he arrived at Westminster Magistrates' Court on Wednesday for a three-hour hearing. Prosecutors allege the 27-year-old displayed a flag in support of proscribed terror organisation Hezbollah at a gig at the O2 Forum in Kentish Town, north London, in November last year. During Wednesday's hearing, his defence team argued the case should be thrown out, citing a technical error in the way the charge against him was brought. Brenda Campbell KC told the court the Attorney General had not given permission for the case to be brought against the defendant when police informed him he was to face a terror charge on May 21. She said consent was given the following day, but that meant the charge falls outside of the six-month time frame in which criminal charges against a defendant can be brought. Prosecutor Michael Bisgrove said permission was not required until the defendant's first court appearance and that permission did not need to be sought in order to bring a criminal charge. Chief Magistrate Paul Goldspring adjourned the case until September 26, when he will rule on whether he has the jurisdiction to try the case. Hundreds of Kneecap supporters waving flags and holding banners greeted O hAnnaidh as he arrived at court alongside fellow bandmates Naoise O Caireallain and JJ O Dochartaigh. Demonstrations in support of the rapper were organised outside the court building in London, as well as in Dublin. The Metropolitan Police imposed conditions limiting where the demonstration outside the court could take place, saying they were needed to 'prevent serious disruption'. A man was detained by police outside the court building because of a placard he was holding following the hearing. Surrounded by officers, he told reporters his hand-made sign made no reference to any proscribed organisations. O hAnnaidh was swamped by photographers as he arrived, with security officers taking more than a minute to usher him into the court building. Supporters greeted the Kneecap rapper with cheers as he made his way from a silver people carrier to the building. Fans held signs which read 'Free Mo Chara' while others waved Palestine and Irish flags before the rapper's arrival at court. Chants of 'Free, free, Mo Chara' could also be heard over a megaphone, which was repeated by the crowd. Mr O Caireallain and Mr O Dochartaigh sat at the back of the courtroom with three others as O hAnnaidh confirmed his name, date of birth and address to the court at the start of the hearing. In response to the Met imposing conditions on the protest, Kneecap described the move as a 'calculated political decision' that was 'designed to try and portray support for Kneecap as somehow troublesome'. The court previously heard the 27-year-old defendant is 'well within his rights' to voice his opinions on the Israel-Palestine conflict, but the alleged incident at the O2 Forum was a 'wholly different thing'. O hAnnaidh, of Belfast, is yet to enter a plea to the charge and is on unconditional bail.
